Animals are exceptionally malleable. The russian fox experiment proved that.
Why don't we train an animal to become incredibly smart? The potential cost efficiency of a small large brained animal doing things like data entry is insane. Sure, it would take millions to get an animal to that point, maybe a few billions, but it'd make trillions. Sure, they don't have opposable thumbs, but we could make them tools. How much does a poor chinese villager cost to make shoes all day or work with dangerous chemicals? At least a bag of rice, probably more with chinas growing economy. What about a crow? Like five peanuts and a thimble of water. And we wouldn't have to give China money. It's likely to be doable from a practical standpoint, we know a shit ton of wats to bruteforce intelligence, as well as essential specific genes
>>3486917
Well that seems a pretty good idea. But I believe you got the wrong board, fellow Anon.
>>3486917
This is where the usefulness of crypto comes in. Use crypto to fund that kind of research.
>>3486917
>furry
kys
Well, maybe you should be breed to be smarter.
Is this Tsuyu cosplay
I WANT TO FUCK A FROG
>>3486950
what?
>>3487073
Dogs would be a really bad choice. I used crows as an example for good reason.
Either way, yeah, might have to give them rights if they get smart enough, but ultimately they'd still be absurdly cost effective. And we'd absolutely destroy them every time in an uprising. They'd likely be earthbound birds, crippled by oversized brains, with no military tech made for them