Why isn't anyone going into substratum ICO? This shit

>>3479952
Bump

>>3479952
Bump

>>3479952
Bump

>>3479952
Bump

nice shit ICO, if you want a really good one check out ICON. First Korean ICO that will kill ETH and Neo. Already partnered with second biggest Korean bank.

File: 1489298590729.png (445KB, 551x548px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 551x548px

ha what a piece of shit.

>CTO went to Ohio State
>No Asians on the team.

You should totally invest

>>3480152
>>3480129
>have worked with Apple, Disney, Kodak and Facebook
>will be on both major western and Chinese exchanges, Bittrex and Yunbi
>Idea is solid with a good dev team. Every member has at least 20 years experience.
Why wouldn't you honestly?

>>3480236
listen shill.

I've "worked with" similar companies, does not mean I would drop their logo's on an ICO page to try and con people into thinking that there may be some type of partnership.

Serious question, have they received VC funding?

File: 1505034583149.png (554KB, 967x954px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 967x954px

>>3479952
DOES IT LOOK LIKE I HAVE ANY CRYPTO TO SPEND RIGHT NOW ?????

>>3480250
They received 5mil in funding. I've forgotten who funded them, but it's on their YouTube account or their twitter recently

>>3480250
https://substratum.net/substratum-receives-5mil-usd-investment-render-payment-systems/

>>3480268

>doesn't mention the BRAVE browser in their video.

they are not with the times.

Also This: 3480253

File: 1486849744863.jpg (52KB, 610x480px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 610x480px

>>3480271
>render payment systems
>VC funding

choose.

>>3480287
>a company invests in a another company great amounts of money because they see high growth potential
>no a VC funding
???

>>3480308
not the SAME.

VC Partners have a strict due diligence process and also have a track record of picking viable technology.

WHO
THE
FUCK
IS
Render Payment Systems?

Try picking a coin that was funded by Founders Fund. Heard of them? Prob not kook. They were early round investors in Airbnb, Facebook, Uber, Palentir, Twitter. They also funded BAT. They don't pick losers unlike you.

>>3479952
All jokes aside. Which one of them are you?

Tell me more about the scam ICO game?

I checked the team members on LinkedIn. The team members all work for different, completely unrelated companies and have no connections with each other.
The whitepaper has ZERO technical details.
The addresses to send money to are the same for everyone, even for non-Ethereum cryptocurrencies (which would make it impossible for them to distribute Substratum coins to participants if they would not be a scam).

>>3480372
>nice copypasta

>>3479952
Bump

>>3479952
Bump

>>3480372
I got my substratum tokens, and they look pretty legit. Check their YouTube, that's what convinced me basically. The only thing I'm worried about now is whether those tokens are worth anything

>>3480742
Unironically this. But this applies for every crypto anyways.

>>3480742
Not right now but I'm predicting over 100USD.

They will be up and running and have practical use before next year. We'll be able to host websites with them before next year. This shit is going to fucking blow up.

>>3479952
Just make your own decision anon. With regards to ICOs, there will always be FUDders and Larpers. If you believe that this shit will moon, then invest in it, if you don't then don't. I personally think this has good growth potential and has a solid dev team so that's why I invested in it.

>>3480850
No way will it be worth $100 a token, they're gonna have an absolutely massive supply by the time this ICO is over

>>3481003
>massive supply
Not when I already seen verge's supply. I'll buy it when I see it.

>>3481003
not right away. i mean in the next year or so