Is there a smart contract crypto that can't be changed like

NEO

>>3422150
BLUE BOARD

>>3422156
Technically this.

Its hard to change something that never actually existed in the first place.

This would probably be your best bet OP.

QTUM ?

modified bitcoin blockchain with smart contracts

>>3422150
wait for rsk. wait a long fucking time.

>>3422150
What do you mean by this?

>>3422156
Stakeholders can decide protocol changes. Or at least that's the plan. And since 100 NEO were 3.2$ at ICO, I assume some rich Chinamen essentially own NEO

>>3422216

heh heh bretty gud.

>>3422150
Stop Oldrow posting, Sweg.

>>3422216
NEO is legit I think. Don't believe Chinese FUDing

>>3422150
The only way something like that would be changed against your will is if so many people in the community disagreed with what you did that they decided to fork to an entirely new chain. This is actually a key feature of decentralization - If you don't like what someone is doing then you can fork the code and add your own changes. Then it's up to you to convince the community to use your fork instead.

>>3422150
These girls aren't asian.

>>3422247
It is legit and imho the only relevant SmartContract platform next to Lisk and of course Ethereum.
However, the protocol isn't done and as of now, the foundation host all the nodes. It's not like with Ethereum where you already have miners owning the network.

>>3422236
technically even bitcoin can be changed if all the node operators agree to it, bro.

>>3422301
My question was more a "Woud you not invest in Microsoft just because they release different versions of Windows every year?"

>>3422262
I'm not sure about the transition to POS. Especially when when people say its for "environmental reasons" which everyone should know is retarded