Does BTC have a long-term future or is it just a redditor

BTC is going to replace all of fiat soon, brah.

>>3364615
THIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS
The best time to get in to crypto was in 1978 , the second best is NOW.

Any nation-state that makes crypto illegal misses out on potential crypto gains. A nation state is just no more prosperous than its citizens are wealthy.

The only way crypto can be stopped is with a one world government. That is very unlikely to happen.

>>3364606
Fuckin' baka, are you blind?

>>3364606

My main reservation with it replacing fiat is the way people on here/Reddit talk about it.

"I will ever sell, no matter how high the price goes"

This attitude to me seems retarded. Basically it seems there are a lot of whales that will never sell, so what's the point in them even holding the commodity in the first place? It's also why the price has been driven so high, not because more and more businesses are using it. Eventually one crypto has to dominate will it be BTC/ETH? I'm not so sure. I see BTC going above $10k as I still think there's a lot of speculators to step in. As for it's viability as a long term replacement for fiat? Absolutely not. It is a bubble, but the burst might be quite a long way away.

Bitcoin will keep chugging on, ethereum is actually the wediditreddit coin.

>>3364606
It is a redditor meme but most people think like redditors (e.g. >>3364615 >>3365651) and most people still don't have btc so add that up
If you couldn't add that up it basically means that it is an extremely shitty coin but will still reach pluto because investors are tribune of the plebs