There are no crypto companies with fundamentals as solid as this

Because people prefer to gamble in cryptoland, like you are with ICN

No one tell him about blackmoon

File: _.jpg (57KB, 500x765px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x765px

>>3298359
This. I mean, shhhhh.....

>>3298323
This was one of the original ICOs, and the first DAAs are being set up as we speak.
I expect nothing but great things from this.

>Blackmoon

get ready for some -30%^Iconomi bagholders

>>3298359
>>3298397
>>3298967
The Blackmoon site is trying to spread fud about iconomi by referencing the iconomi dividend system, while Iconomi dropped the dividend system idea 6 fucking months ago.

They also don't have a working product yet, but the marketing is enormous and aggressive (incentives for posts on social media and forums), and the design concept of the whole thing is slick as glass. MAJOR red flags.

They're promising all kinds of shit that they'll do better than Iconomi, while they don't even have a first release yet.
They'll be playing catch-up while Iconomi simply implements everything they promised. They'll be a year behind Iconomi every step of the way.

This is obviously a smoke-and-mirrors pump&dump.

If anything, blackmoon only serves to validate Iconomi's concept.

>>3299395
The irony is that you're trying to spread fud by posting this on every single thread that mentions Blackmoon. We get it. You missed the pre-sale.

>>3299448
>every single thread that mentions Blackmoon
I posted it in another thread 10 minutes before I posted it here.

>>3298359
Oh you mean the project which is a year behind ICONOMI? Blackmoon is yesterdays news.

This shitcoin transcends news and press releases. In fact it's been proven that it'll remain the same price or go even lower upon news coming out on their end.

>>3298323
While we know how the coin will be used, there is still no projections on how much would be bought back and at what price. These will all clear up by the end of the year and their Blockchain.ONE will be listed in London stock exchange.

That should do the trick. Just hold.

>>3299514
>there is still no projections on how much would be bought back and at what price
I'm guessing the only way to really figure out the price is to wait for the first DAAs to become operational.
For the moment they're just keeping the price stable in anticipation.
But that's just my guess.

>>3298323
>fundamentals

Because fundamentals haven't mattered in crypto for the last 3 months. Its all driven by hype. Fundamentals mean BTC, ETH and XMR have all the marketcap and thousands of shitcoins have none. Do you see it happening?

also
>iconomi
kek

>>3299550
The early adopters look at the fundamentals, the pleb masses look at the early adopters.

That's how bitcoin and ETH even got to where they are now.

>>3299550
>fundamentals haven't mattered in crypto for the last 3 months
You might be right, but they will matter again in 6 months.