Bcash is an altcoin. Bcash never attempted to gather consensus,

>>3207714
the 2x hard fork has a better chance of /being/ bitcoin. If it even happens

Bcash implemented real replay protection a couple of days before the fork.

Avant garde devs right there.

>>3207714
Bumping for discussion.
Why isn't Bitcoin Cash not more "Bitcoin" than SegWit2x?
2x only exists because almost everyone acknowledges the solution is increasing the block size.
SegWit is basically a blocksize increase too. It just enables other shit that wouldn't be a problem if they allowed the Bitcoin chain to scale.
>Bitcoin is a voluntary currency.
Hardforks are inherently voluntary nobody is forced to pick a side. They can continue holding both chains if they like

>>3207714
Since it's an altcoin, you Corecucks can stop crying about, right? Riiiiight?

Also
> Voluntary currency where a temporary anti DDoS measure is decided to be kept by a small group of neckbeards against the wish of the majority (two years ago, a clear majority supported the increase)
> Being so weak you are scared of competition in the free market
> Being so weak that you demand extra effort from your competitor so that you survive

>>3207973
>Why isn't Bitcoin Cash not more "Bitcoin" than SegWit2x?
Because Corecucks control the narrative via bitcoin.org, the primary mailing lists, and reddit

No other reason.

If Michael Marquardt supported big blocks then that's what we'd have by now