>store gpg encrypted private key w/ random password on an

>windows
You fucked up.

>>3206128
If you need that much security then they will kidnap your family to get to you. Or just beat you to death with a wrench for being such a pain in the ass.

>>3206149
sample image

>>3206166
>family
none left

>>3206128
>one punch to the head
>instant amnesia

ENjoy being a nocoiner you faggot

>>3206175
that's why I have a secondary backup held by lastpass (which I can authenticate with my fingerprint)

>>3206128
Pointless. Hardware can fail. Hardware can be stolen. You don't always have access to your hardware. Just go full paper.

If you're going to commit your password to memory just commit your private key to memory. Now you can fly naked half way across the globe and still have access to your coins when you arrive.

Keep a "human encrypted" paper backup in your safety deposit box. This should look like gibberish to normies but contain enough information to retrieve your private key if you get amnesia etc.

>>3206128
This is nuts... might as well just rememmber your private key.

Paper wallet in safety deposit box like the other anon said, or crypted usbs/ hard drives.

>>3206128
>using lastpass
single point of failure that requires you to trust a third-party provider. No, you don't trust your money to that kind of system.

It's not that difficult to come up with a passphrase that allows you to secure your wallets and is difficult to guess. Just make it sufficiently long to allow entropy to make it sufficiently difficult to guess, and bam. There's your passphrase.

t. InfoSec specialist

>>3206445
that's not a single point of failure since all they store is a password and my actual gpg encrypted file is on my hardware

>>3206475
congrats, a single point of failure where your PC dies is much more likely and much more harmful to you than a single point of failure where you die or are significantly incapacitated mentally.

You already said you have no family, so who gives a shit if you are a vegetable with no money?

Now, if you are a fully functioning human whose PC dies or your lastpass account is lost for any number of reasons, well then, how are you going to feel about that?

I'd choose to trust my memory, because if I lose that, well then, what use is money anyway?

>>3206475
>not a single point of failure
Yes it is. It doesn't matter where your file is/if it exists and is "there" if you can't access it. The failure point is not having explicit control/knowledge of the actual password/private key of your wallet.

>>3206128
Bitlocker would have sufficed for that. Only MS and the NSA have the keys so it would be enough to keep everyone else out.

>>3207468
>Bitlocker would have sufficed for that. Only MS and the NSA have the keys

kek