For those Anon that feel that TA is an effective form of price

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2017-08-25 04:04:49 Post No. 3206050
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: PAYBTC 0.00079197 ▼−6.05 Unnamed TradingView.png (101KB, 1376x604px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:04:49 Post No. 3206050 [Report]

For those Anon that feel that TA is an effective form of price and movement prediction, how does Anon feel about this chart?

Looking at the first two waves, you can see their movement is near exactly the same. This could be due to bots, or some type of spooky golden number, etc. principle I'm not familiar with.

Knowing this, you could look at the time of the first wave, then look at the time of the recovery, then see what the percentage of the recovery is of the total, and apply that percent to the last wave.

When I do this, I get the launch date as shown by the above chart. The launch date is supported by the fact that it occurs at the same time the triangle is closing.

Does Anon this this is a valid form of analysis that could likely produce accurate results or no?

Love,

Lain

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:08:54 Post No.3206087
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:08:54 Post No.3206087 [Report]

Delet this

In all seriousness, I bought at 87 a day or two ago in anticipation of this. Didn't foresee BTC climbing and alts going down today, but no matter. 0.002 is our next stop in a week's time.

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:10:08 Post No.3206093
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:10:08 Post No.3206093 [Report]

Bag Holding PAY...

Fuck my lyf

I'm not Selling because I could be selling at the Low

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:15:16 Post No.3206139
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:15:16 Post No.3206139 [Report]

>>3206050
fuck off with these shit triangles

put the meme lines and shit triangles back up your cunt and fuck off to youtube

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:17:49 Post No.3206162
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:17:49 Post No.3206162 [Report]

>>3206050
This analysis assumes that 79k is the floor, clearly its not

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:21:56 Post No.3206190
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:21:56 Post No.3206190 [Report]

>>3206162
It's poorly drawn. Support is 76800.

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:23:22 Post No.3206207
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:23:22 Post No.3206207 [Report]

trend lines are fucking stupid.

reacting to price momentum is king.

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:23:54 Post No.3206212
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:23:54 Post No.3206212 [Report]

>>3206162
>>3206190

how bout we just say support is somwhere around 77k

support doesn't have to be exact, it's more of an area

and this one is being tested for the second time and was resistance previously, so it's probably pretty strong

if it holds, the chart will play out

bought in last time it dipped

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:41:42 Post No.3206354
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-25 04:41:42 Post No.3206354 [Report]

>>3206050
that would be too predictable

breaking down to the 40-50k region then up sounds to be a more likely scenario

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/