>blockchain getting distributed via satellite
>3.6k is the new bottom
>segwit activates tomorrow
>blocksize will nearly double
>backlog going to disappear
>lightning is practically ready
>tfw nocoiners, fudders, gook and pajeet shills alike about to get collectively btfo once again
feels so confy bros this is amazing
never change, btc
high five!
>tfw you bought the dip
Feels good, man.
Sell you focking moron. Everything is falling apart. The boomers were right all along
>>3166210
BTC 15K by december as predicted by masterluc
>>3166210
Feels good doesn't it?
Would the general market follow your prediction? Highly unlikely.
How do you het btc in your ln chanel with no hashpower?
>>3166210
>>3166210
>SegWit about to tank price of BTC when it doesn't help the backlog whatsoever
>Stupid neckbeards still falling for the LN bullshit despite it still being in "alpha" with no testing underway
>Sold all my BTC for BCH sub $400
>MFW these are the brain-dead autists I'm betting against
>>3166210
Lmao really? Yesterday the fucking sky was falling.
Nowadays I barely keep up with news, just comfy holding my free money.
>>3166625
>segwit increases block size to nearly double
>doesn't help the backlog whatsoever so I'll switch to the fork with bigger blocksize
Why can't Jihan hire shills that aren't fucking dumb as shit? Does he only outsource to pajeets?
>>3166723
SegWit increases blocksize when SegWit addresses are sent by SegWit transactions to other SegWit addresses.
Maximum functional increase is .7MB
Core shills keep grasping at straws because average blocksize increase is likely to be .3MB after weeks of use
Meanwhile BTC is bleeding market cap, bleeding hashpower, and bleeding users
Nice try shitstain, go back to shilling on r/bitcoin
>>3166569
$6,000,000 by 2020.
>>3166723
Do you have segwit transactions on backlog? Otherwise it doesn't change a thing.
Also how many wallets currently support segwit?
>>3166827
>nodes won't do segwit even though the software is ready and the incentives are there
>because I say so
Great argument, I'm beat. Now gtfo with your plebbit wars pajeet. Nobody likes you.
>>3166979
You do realize that SegWit tx aren't the same as the tx currently in backlog right?
Nothing wrong with suggesting that it will ease the backlog moving forward (if enough users switch to SegWit addresses/wallets) but that's not really a guarantee.
>>3166979
Wtf are you even talking about? Did you have a stroke? Sorry about your brain damage.
>>3166976
>>3167030
Most relevant wallets and services are ready, I can only spot 2 relevant ones (coinbase and mycellium) that aren't explicitly ready but are 'wip'.
There are a number of ways through which unconfirmed tx get evicted from the mempool. Backlogged non-segwit tx are a non-issue and should go away within days.
>>3167033
Go play in the street.