What's the point of buying this token? >devs said they

>>3034211
Idiot. When the vote is over they will pay for bittrex.

Sell for a quick 50% gain and look for other shittokens to put money into.

bittrex SOON good sirs, buy now!

>>3034211
>>devs said they won't make any effort to list them on exchanges
Next year that won't matter.

>>3034218
>>3034222

Different coin "idiot"

>>3034241
>Next year that won't matter.

Why would anyone want to buy 0x? It doesn't do anything for the average holder

I was initially planning to invest in this but I'm getting all sort of bad vibes from that CO lately. I think I'm gonna pass on this one.

>>3034311
>CO
?

>>3034278
it enables seamless interaction between different dApp tokens.
Example: you have OMG but want to do some shit at Bancor. 0x eliminetes the need to exchange OMG -> BNT. Fees are paid in 0x tokens.
After it is widely adopted the only coins you will need is ETH and 0x to acces the whole ERC20 space.

>>3034384
I read that fees aren't paid in 0x. They specified the uses are for governance and relaying. Not fees. Also the limit to erc20 only is concerning.

>>3034425
relaying is keeping order books running on a node. tx fees are paid to you in 0x tokens.

regarding erc20, it is considerably harder to facilitate that.

>>3034462
What do you mean by your second sentence

Did the big investors like Pantera invest in the tokens or the company itself. Anyone know? I think knowing that would be a good indicator of if the tokens have actual value or not.

Why would I use this over Bancor?

>>3034591
Well, you know. Bancor.

File: DG-xcVjWsAE9Bb5.jpg (43KB, 1080x590px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1080x590px

>>3034591
You will be able to choose whichever best serves your need.

Goodbye exchanges.

>>3034591
I have my doubts about the 0x ICO but I have no doubt it's still going to be ten times better than fucking Bancor lol.