Neo daily chart. Notice anything?
Astute /biz/raelis may use correction #1 to predict when to buy and sell during correction #2.
>>3028156
If I buy it, it'll go down, if i don't it'll go up
I don't own any nor will I buy any, so expect it to go up. otherwise it'd retrace to somewhere between the 1st and 2nd peak.
all I see is ETH 2.0 rising to greater heights than ETH 1.0 could ever hope to achieve. stay mad, no neos.
>>3028176
>all I see is ETH 2.0 rising to greater heights than ETH 1.0 could ever hope to achieve. stay mad, no neos.
You surely are a brainlet. I'm not FUDDING. I intend to buy Neo. Corrections like this are normal, this isn't the first and it won't be the last.
>>3028156
your extrapolation and basing your prediction on past behaviors in an irrational market.
using your logic, NEO will only temporarily correct for a day or two and then continue going up
when will it stop going up then?
>>3028169
you should tripfag as a permanent investment loser and be our mascot and a gauge to know when to do the opposite of you all the time
>>3028169
You have to buy and forget about it, it's called "having a strong hand". Then after a couple of months you can order your lambo
>that perfect flagpole, meme triangle and continuation
TA is just a mame they said
>>3028206
>using your logic,
It's not 'my logic'. I'm using the data available to try to predict what it's going to happen. I know of no better way to make predictions. Unfortunately, there isn't a lot of data for Neo, so we have to look at correction 1 to predict correction 2. There are only 2 corrections to analyze.
>>3028206
>NEO will only temporarily correct for a day or two and then continue going up
It might take more than a day or two to moon again, but it will moon way higher than $35 USD. That's for sure. This is just the beginning.
>>3028243
This is not TA. I'm just looking at the chart and noticing a potential pattern.
>>3028253
>data available
You're looking at the graph from a month ago and saying the exact same thing will happen in the same fashion
>>3028268
>saying the exact same thing will happen in the same fashion
I'm not saying that. But what else can we do to predict what's going to happen? Look at a crystal ball?
June's spike looks similar to August's spike, so I expect that they are going to result in a similar correction.
>>3028302
>Mays's spike looks similar to June's spike, so I expect that they are going to result in a similar correction.
>>3028156
it is not called neo fuckwit
>>3028592
The fuck are you talking about? It is called Neo you brainlet.