I think Bitcoin Cash is actually the best step to improving cryptocurrency

not really, segwit removes unnecessary data from the blockchain by adding some more code, which makes it more complicated but it's already done and the users don't care. it's something good because gives an instant scalability boost. In opens the door in case the community wants lightning networks, and block size can be increased at any point in time, even implement adaptable block sizes, it's just not absolutely necessary to do it right away so it wasn't done.

wahwah wah
why dont u like jihan wus china coin
wahhhh

>>2904910
Do you think BCC deserves the hate it's getting?

>>2904920
Prime example of someone who has no opinions of his own.

>>2904853
If that was its only purpose then it would not have value since gold and silver already exit.

>>2904927
no. The community has the right to choose what it wants, and I feel like the transactions will be faster with BCC, among other improvements they provide. If they truly take bitcoin in a good direction, they will just be superior over time. I prefer the stability of core because I feel they try to get feedback from the community and think carefully before making a change.
I like the idea behind BCC but I feel removing the segwit code was totally unnecessary, which makes me wonder what kind of decisions they will make in the future. In the end, I will hold both for sure and see how it plays out

>>2904983
I just found out some blog posts on why one of the developers dislikes segwit, will see what he has to say about it

>>2904853
>>2904964
>>2905037
>"Your total comes out to point zero zero zero zero zero five six two four nine eight one six three Bitcoin. Is your QR code ready for scanning?"
BTC will crash because it wasn't built with humans in mind.

>>2905077
Do you even know what a Satoshi is?

>>2905037
he raises some good points but I feel like completely deleting segwit is just too harsh

File: download.jpg (8KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 259x194px

>>2904853
Wouldn't BCC be largely controlled by Bitmain and Bitpay? Also they could technically premine BCC after the fork. Any truth to this?

https://youtu.be/GiXAaa_cvbk

>>2905157
100% true. BCC is basically china paypal or some gay crap like that. it's not crypto. it's just garbage.

File: 4546879804.jpg (7KB, 240x200px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 240x200px

>>2905128
Waiter:
Sir, this makes 7.000 Satoshi.

Me:
Okay, let me take out my mobile.

Waiter:
Sir, the amount increased by 500 to 7.700, bitcoin is crashing.

Me:
Thats fine, I....

Waiter:
Sorry to interrupt you, it is actually 7.200 now, it recovered a bit.

Me:
Well okay, let me...

Waiter:
I need to tell you again that it crashed again. This makes 8.000 Satoshi now.

Me:
But I just want to...

Waiter:
Sir, I must inform you that it crashed yet again. It is 9.000 Satoshi now, not including taxes.

Me:
Just take these $10 and go fuck yourself.

Waiter:
Thank you, Sir. We hope that you enjoyed your stay.

>>2905180
show me one instance where this actually happened in a matter of minutes in whole bitcoin history

>>2905180
Your point being? Bitcoin in 2017 is still volatile? No way duuuuuuuuuuude let me watch those charts again.

>>2905180
While this made me laugh, it's completely incorrect.

I hope you posted this for the lulz, and not because you actually believe it.

>>2904853
do you know how much of the bitcoin hash rate is going to be directed at it?

Because if you did, you would realize that not even jihan ver are pointing their hashrate at it

nobody believes in bcc

>>2905180
ZIMBABWE
also, kys

>>2905283
No one believes in BCC = buy BCC. There's no sound justification against owning BCC other than people don't like that it will exist.

>>2905857
It's a contentious fork, actively harming the Bitcoin network.