>implying stox isn't a fucking good name >implying

WE

Bancor begins it's moon mission August 1st.
You have been warned

>>2895199

What makes you say that?

>>2895219
People are going to want to get in on this ico. It's gonna be the first of many using BNT

File: IMG_5724.png (231KB, 458x384px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 458x384px

>>2895222

Nice trips.
But how does people going in on Stox help BNT?

File: bnt.jpg (365KB, 812x944px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 812x944px

>>2895228
It's just the beginning. More startups will turn to BNT over ETH to launch their tokens, and every partnership with Bancor is going to increase the token value. Pic related is the lead dev detailing the grand scheme to make Bancor the default for upcoming projects.

ETH has no regulations on who can start an ICO and Vitalik doesn't personally endorse any of them. The difference with Bancor is they will build on these partnerships and give investors a piece of mind.

Inb4 getting called a shill/Jew/kike. There's gonna be a lot of angry nobancs in the coming weeks.