Not a single one of you can defend the rent-seeking and economically

>>2767109
>but muh free markets
>muh greed is good

>>2767109
Trump said it was alright so that means I support it. He also knows that net neutrality is bad so I'm against that

Sorry libcuck, MAGA!

>>2767109
fuck you cuck


>me:99999
>libtard:0

>>2767156
Even in a free market, wealth should only move between consensual parties who both benefit from the transaction. A transparent attempt to make money off of customers by going through the government rather than offering additional value to the other party is destructive and a net negative for the economy, since less money is being spent by them to remain competitive through developing new technologies or improving the infrastructure of the company, and instead being spent on lobbyists and propaganda.

>>2767165
>>2767162
On the contrary, opposition to rent-seeking and irresponsible regulatory behavior is the backbone of a fiscal conservative. This behavior is just plainly economically negative for the entire market, and leads to the crumbling of a nation's innovation as companies spend more on lobbying than developing new technologies, which causes a reduction in efficiency and economic stagnation.

>>2767213
>opposition to rent-seeking and irresponsible regulatory behavior is the backbone of a fiscal conservative.

tell that to pol

>>2767213
I think you misunderstood that I was satirizing those who disagree with you