I'm a big fan of decred. It's a good coin and undervalued

>>2743631
Well if it's actually a good coin no use shilling it on here

why is it undervalued

>>2743636
Exactly.

I think people are getting desperate to shill this dead coin nowadays for some reason.

>>2743631
PREMINED
R
E
M
I
N
E
D

You know how in science fiction in the future people purchase things with credits?

This is literally that thing.

but seriously it's the closest thing to a decentralized organization, it has features already implemented that 200 mil ICOs are still developing. The devs are super secretive about what they're developing and don't announce a feature until it's mostly been developed. They have giveaways that are hidden under cryptographic puzzles. Any major changes are voted on by people who own the coin. This is a top 10 coin but it's currently 32.

>>2743631
Don't like the developer subsidy. Good open source projects are built by communities of volunteers, elevating a select few to paid status changes the dynamic substantially. Plus it's inflating away your holdings.

>>2743891
They're working on a voting system for people to determine how the Holdings are spent.

But basically if you submit proposals you can get paid for developing too.

https://forum.decred.org/forums/requests-for-proposals/

>>2743926
It'll still end up being an insular cabal.

>>2743953
That may be true, I do know the devs communicate using a zero-knowledge chat they developed themselves, but they also have been hitting their roadmap milestones and this coin has one of the best documentation I've seen on any crypto

Regardless, any major changes have to be voted on by everyone with at least 75% of the holders voting.