Lisk thread, Sdk nearing V1.0, nano wallet 1.0 out
Fundamental analysis of lisk: https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@crypto-ta/lisk-fundamental-analysis-long-term-investment-future-top-10-coin
Repost faggot
They moved even rebranding to the end of the year :\
Just read the article, looked at the dev team, website etc. Looks good, could someone please anti-shill me
>>2689459
I like the fundamentals of Lisk but the name is just bad, call me petty but I can't get past the bad name. Lisk? the fuck? Sold all my LSK for BNT.
>>2689716
>missing out on millions because of a fucking name
wew
lad
>>2689716
huh? lisk sounds fine to me
if anything you avoid shit like digibyte
the fuck is a digibyte? lmao
lisk should be short for basilisk instead of obelisk. also their logo should be a basilisk and not a big blue buttplug