how do you make "lower than 0%" inflation? he wants

>>2687297
You reduce the supply over time. Are you stupid?

>>2687302
yeah, but how do you reduce the supply? you make every address lose ether at an equal rate?

>>2687302
you realize that sub-0% inflation means currently existing ether has to disappear forever

link
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6jzc22/vitalik_buterin_barrysilbert_once_casper_comes/

oh it means 1 unit of ether will increase in value even faster than the market cap of ether increases

and yeah, it'll be part of the transaction fee that gets eliminated from the system, the amount stored at your addresses can't be touched by anyone without access to your private key

>>2687317

you destroy a % of the transaction fees

it says right there in the first tweet you mong

>>2687669
but then 'partial tx fee burning' can be applied while still having over 0% inflation? that doesn't seem to make a lot of sense, bit it's what the tweet implies
how would that be useful?

Lol at thinking ethereum can even do a hard fork to get to PoS.

>>2687890
What are you even saying? A hard fork is effortless, how could they not be able to do it?

>>2687890
Too many fucking retards don't understand the built in iceage and how much more gnarly it is then the bitcoin halving