There is actually any good books about investing/finance whose

Rich Dad poor Dad

>>2671238
I believed you shills and bought the book. Stopped reading when he said your house is you greatest liability.

>>2671238
>kike dad shill dad

https://johntreed.com/blogs/john-t-reed-s-real-estate-investment-blog/61651011-john-t-reeds-analysis-of-robert-t-kiyosakis-book-rich-dad-poor-dad-part-1

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-author-of-the-rich-dad-poor-dad-books-has-filed-for-chapter-7-bankruptcy-2012-10

https://www.forbes.com/sites/helaineolen/2012/10/10/rich-dad-poor-dad-bankrupt-dad/#3bbbf28c633a

>In an interview by SmartMoney magazine, published February 2003, Robert Kiyosaki gave an answer that is surprisingly vague, yet real: ""Is Harry Potter real? Why don’t you let Rich Dad be a myth, like Harry Potter?"

>>2671185
The 8020 Principle The Secret to Success by Achieving More With Less

The Richest Man In Babylon by George S. Clason

The Intelligent Investor - Benjamin Graham

The Millionaire Next Door

Think and Grow Rich

also I have some interpersonal relationship like How to win friends an influence people if thats what you want?

Market Wizards is an interesting one. Collection of interviews with top traders.

>>2671185
>>2671185
Honestly read Investopedia.

Books written by individulals have been read by thousands or millions. SO don't go reading books written by Peter Lynch about Ten-Baggers cause you and a billion other faggots read it too and there are no ten-baggers cause everyone knows what to look for and they're all looking for them.

Yeah, don't read books on investment. Intelligent Investor, ect, all slightly out of touch.

Sorry. Read about the 1999 Dot-Com bust and the 2006 recession.

> Pic related

Paulo Coelho is a retard. He thinks he is a mage.

the intelligent investor

Thats really all you need as a starter

>>2671816
I forgot one.

How I Made $2,000,000 In The Stock Market

the name may sound stupid, but give it a try. its about a small time actor?dancer? trying out investing. It will always remain in my book collection.

>"In December 1955 the stock rose from about 15 to 23 5/8 at the year end. After a five-week lull, its trading volume increased and its price resumed its advance. I decided to buy... It continued to rise and I held on, watching its movement intently.... When it reached 33, I sold it and took a profit of $2,866.62. I was happy and excited—not so much because of the money but simply because I had bought.... purely on the basis of its action in the market."

>>2671773
He's wrong about a lot of things. THAT is not one of them.

>>2671185
investing for dummies
srs