from b-b-b-bizness perspective how likely would you be paying EU €2.4billion fine for something almost unknown as Google Shopping price search results manipulation?
I mean, wouldn't it just make a lot more sense to give EU a middle finger and see how long they last without Google services? Pretty sure eu people would kill the bitch who fined Google with that stupid high fine?
No we wouldn't. Only Americunts would cuck themselves like that.
> Let me be a slave, dear mr. guggles
> Please let me suck your bull's cock
You use a search engine made by Google and named Google, you try to find products by typing it in on Google search engine. Google shows you the products via Google shopping, in my point of view there is nothing wrong with this.
OP could you explaine why this is "illegal" because i don't really get it.
>>2635300
>Manipulation
Dumb boomers dont understand that google is just a search engine like any other and is a private company that can choose to promote what they want.
If you dont like it use Yahoo, Bing Duckduckgo, ixquick or fucking make your own crawler.
Dumb fucking shits piss me off so much this is like saying Amazon shouldnt promote their kindle while selling books on amazon. Or saying Yahoo cant promote their own news and reporting on their search engine.
>>2635370
If they do this to google
What is stopping them from saying apple cant only have an App store and safari on the OS or promote their own iTunes service. Or say Google has to stop including chrome or voice or search on Android.
>>2635300
It's the equivalent of what USA did to germany with volkswagen. It's just a blatant money grab or power play.
>>2635585
i think power play