>tfw finally lost all my 0.1BTC after 5000 dice rolls I thought

>>2496987

>I thought I had a system

The fact that you're too unintelligent to realize how many other fucking morons lost their shirt with this logic satisfies me in a schadenfreude type of way.

>>2496987
Describe you system

Now try again with 2 or 3 BTC

>>2496987
Wtf OP?
There is no system for a random dice roll

>>2496987
Where in my thread yesterday senpai?
No system works if you have finite wealth against an opponent with infinite wealth
Look up gambler's ruin

>>2497016
>>2497030
Roll with part of your stack, if lose put in double amount of previous roll, untill you win and get all losses back. If you win then you win. This works, but the amount needed for the roll grows exponentially, so you need a big stack.

>>2497036 Yes.
>>2497016 A tweaked martingale. It works on paper, don't think I won't.

>>2496987
Wtf, next time send it this way. Even if I send you only half back it's still a better investment.

>>2496987
>he thinks he can game online casinos

they mathematically guarantee that they will win you dumb fuck

File: 1497757726677.jpg (111KB, 416x620px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 416x620px

Can't say we didn't tell you

>>2496987
>a system to rolling the dice with a built-in house edge
I could understand this thinking with blackjack or poker or stocks or cryptocurrency trading but you're betting your money on a black box

REALLY NIGGA?

>>2497076
Previous losses do not influence the outcome of the next roll lmao

>>2497076
Retard

File: 8674647.jpg (127KB, 775x768px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 775x768px

>>2497076

>>2497153 >>2497165 No, he's right. You just have to know when to stop and cut your losses. Also, you can (and should) double after winning as well to make serious gains.

>>2497200
>martingale is a good strategy
no

>>2497133
If you roll with 1 BTC and lose then put in 2 and lose again, then you roll with 4 you get all previous losses back. -1 the first roll, -2 the second and +4 the third roll. After you win you start over with a 1 BTC roll.

>>2496987
>a system
it worked.

>>2497253
only works if you have infinite wealth, which you don't

this has to be a troll, nobody is this stupid and uninformed

>>2496987
>I thought I had a system

Learn to maths son. What is house edge?

>>2497301
0.25 chances, plus a fee for withdrawing your coins

>>2497320
*0.25%

File: 1427517679817.jpg (21KB, 559x556px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 559x556px

>He didn't learn not to dick with that thing after he lost his first .01 by misplacing a decimal

>>2497286
Of course this doesn't work, because in a digital system the odds of you winning are set to lower than 50% programmatically. I'm just explaining the system I think OP thought he had.

>>2497338
It doesn't even work mathematically if there was a 50/50 chance of OP winning, because eventually his "doubling" bet will grow so large he can't cover.

File: 1473907301437.jpg (34KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 640x480px

>>2497364
I wasn't doing exactly that or I wouldn't have needed 5000 rolls to go broke.
My system worked on paper no matter how many millions of rolls I ded. Something fucky is going on.

>>2497385

if there was any "system" that actually worked, casinos wouldn't exist.

even if you had a 50/50 odds (which you will never get), you'd still lose because the house will never go broke.

>>2497446
Casinos will kick you out if you try anything that smells of martingale.

>>2497200
You can't beat statistics

File: 1495265843453.jpg (40KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 625x626px

>>2497461