tell me everything I need to know about batshit coin what

You will lose money if you didn't buy in the ICO. At least short term.

>NEETs thinking they can compete against Chrome and Mozilla

>>2341953
> former founder of Mozilla
> can’t compete against Mozilla

Wew

File: hahaha.jpg (107KB, 500x334px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x334px

>>2342027
it's a shit browser, that pays out nothing, why would people watch shit, get tracked and then give away BAT tokens

lel this shit overpriced ICO shitcoin needs to die, it's growth is so artificial it can't even stabilise even though less than 100 own 95% of it

File: 1549393_617545678313735_829386014_n.jpg (62KB, 588x888px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 588x888px

>>2342027
To add salt to the wound, he got kicked out of Mozilla because he donated $1000 to some group that supported banning gay marriage in California...
Mozilla has been filling itself with SJWs and affirmative action hires for years, which has slowed development to a grinding halt (newsflash, women and shitskins can't code for shit! Shocker!).

That, and the Brave browser is actually a fork of Chromium, which is Chrome,but opensourced and without the botnet.

Oh, and the Brave browser for mobile is the only one that has adblock, download Brave for your phone and start using it as your regular browser, enjoy faster page load times (normies love it) and more privacy
>protip: Smartphones have already surpassed desktops in internet access for a while, and it's only going up

>>2342272

Using Brave currently. It's pretty decent, feels like Firefox with a lot of the bloat stripped out. Good alternative to Chromium if you're running a lightweight system.

Staying away from BAT until ICOfags have dumped their bags however.

>>2341440

I think 0.0002 ETH or so

>>2342272
It’s actually a pretty nice browser, gaining huge traction in tech circles. Normies see techies and want in, EZ money.