So how is Bancor going to ensure that their ICO won't be

I don't have much hope.

The whales will find a way to keep the poor from getting a piece of the pie. It's always been like that and it'll stay that way.

>>2252650
They can't. There is no solution for this.

>project has a woman at the helm

Dropped

They could limit the maximum number of tokens per address/wallet

Whales would probably get around that by having multiple wallets but at least they would be making it harder for hoarders

ico's are a failed investment for people willing to dump hundreds of thousands or millions into them if they can't ensure they get almost entire control over the token afterwards, and theres no way to prevent it. without that its just not lucrative and they'll get next to no investment.

the people (scammers) running the icos dont give a shit about how "fair" the distribution is, its anonymous unregulated funding and they dont have to do shit after they get their money. but of course to get their money they have to start dumping all their ether first.

File: Joover.png (52KB, 596x643px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 596x643px

>>2252711
Mate it's an Israeli woman, do you really think they're not going to make a fucktonne of money?

>>2252712
this, but announced only a few hours before the release.

>>2252798
Or don't announce it at all so wh*les can't transfer money to multiple addresses
>>2252711
Delet this, Galia best gril

>>2252813
the first occurrence of this will just have large holders move funds out over a few hundred addresses, and they'll only have to do it once.

the only thing that would work would be to partner with an exchange and allow one sale per account, but they would never do this because they have no reason to care about being nice to the suckers buying into this shit. once they have their money thats it.

>>2252851
>the first occurrence of this will just have large holders move funds out over a few hundred addresses, and they'll only have to do it once.
who cares I just want to get in on Bancor