Bought ltc for teh short term gains then when it hit 0.01 thought

Segwit support dropped to 62% last 24h

http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

File: 1489941142966.jpg (140KB, 700x939px)

140KB, 700x939px

You autists think of coinbase too highly

LTC is already on literally every other exchange, sure, coinbase is the EASIEST place to buy cryptos, but it has limits on sells and buys, and dumb high fees, no big players use it at all

i doubt it even will spike a dollar because of the coinbase adaption, it's only segwit that might do it, and that's never going to happen, the gooks will never allow it

>>1967675
>http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php
but it says 75% for me

>>1967660
sell now or cry later

Will probably pump again. Chinks playing with segwit signaling.

>>1967752
That's the percent of blocks mined so far signaling Segwit. For Segwit to activate 75% of blocks mined in a period must be mined by miners signaling Segwit. Meaning that if that percentage of miners signaling Segwit doesn't go up Segwit will not activate.

>>1967775
This. F2Pool started moved their ASICS toward LTC and started signaling for SegWit yesterday, sweet 85%... Now they're playing the dumb game and they mine against SegWit. It will be adopted sooner or later tho, they're just playing with the market

>>1967835
Of fucking course. Those F2pool chinks are a cancer and I hope Kim Jong Un sends a nuke their way.

>>1967775
except f2pool being forced to signal for segwit (to stop the DDOS attacks against them) has only splintered the community further

>>1967742
>You autists think of coinbase too highly

OP here, it's an extremely convenient way to buy coins. Nowhere else can you use a card.
It's insured same as a bank.

>muh fees
Coinbase serves a purpose and creates trust (warranted or not) that will be needed for normies to buy in.

File: IMG_9882.png (258KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1242x2208px

>>1967660
April 15, 2017 at 19:00 - 19:05 EST, Bitcoins were sold on GDAX/Coinbase for $0.06

The Time Traveler. All of this talk about April 14, 2017 at 20:30 that ETH would moon or something..

However, the exact same time that ETH was trading at $75, BTC was trading at $0.06

Why does nobody know about this?


Note: Sellers are being refunded..
>Buyers Keepers

>>1968794
My interest has been heavily peaked. Can any autists explain?

What information are we to gather? Is the flippening taking place?

File: IMG_9887.png (184KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1242x2208px

>>1968794
So, as it turns out, this "Time Traveler" insider was not bullshitting. The pullback of the curtain. A glitch in the matrix. It happened. I was checking it all day that day and missed it by 15 minutes. I should have been watching BTC. Maybe a distraction for the actual date/time. Maybe different time zone. Whatever. Fucking feels bad though.

>>1968794
Wait how come my screenshot (OP) doesn't have the $0.06 cent trade?

Anyway some insider shit 100% happened. For a full hour (?) bitcoin and eth were trading for the same price with no movement whatsoever. I thought for sure they were adding litecoin.

Just prior all the coinbase people were making all sorts of allusions to litecoin on twitter.
Put me off a bit actually that the founders of the exchange had stooped to rumor mill tier.

File: IMG_9899.png (293KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1242x2208px

>>1967660
Here's a better image of what I call the Black Hole Dip. It actually goes all the way down to $0.06, as visible in the at-the-time hour chart.

>>1968822
No one was able to buy for 6 cents faggot

File: IMG_9959.png (565KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 1242x2208px

>>1968832
Google search this: $0.06

Fucking cocksucker

>100BTC in volume

It was probably more than that. On my desktop, I've got a screenshot of GDAX to prove it. Volume was something like 834BTC

>>1968822
>>1968845
>>1968816

Did (((They))) heavily infiltrate the markets? It's a question that must be asked.