I was tired of managing a dozen different browser tabs to ke

TaaS

>>1927925
I was going to, but they are only at ~2% of their cap in a week so I'm going to wait until the end of the ICO and then re-evaluate.

>>1927928
They are selling 101,000,000 tokens, thats why the cap is so high, but the developers expect around 6k btc (I asked them) which is good actually because the rest of the tokens is going to be burned, that alone shoul be enough to give a premium to the price

>>1927923
The minimalist approach to design is appreciated, OP.

>>1927938
Didn't realize the rest would be burned. Thanks anon. Assuming the fund itself has good returns, the tokens will probably fetch a high price.

Do you think they'll get picked up by an exchange even though it's a closed-end fund or will you have to find a buyer to sell your TaaS?

>>1927942
Cheers mate, glad you like it.

>>1927923
Nice site senpai.

Where do you get this info? Just lurk around and compile it for us? If so, thank you.

Also redpill me on cosmos

>>1927988
>>1927988
Yep, I just do a lot of lurking and compile it all. Takes a while but as the userbase scales the donations will hopefully scale too.

Here's the basic gestalt of Cosmos
>links together several different blockchains
>probably ETH, BTC, and lots of altcoins to start
>lets you exchange 1 crypto for another crypto, like shapeshift.io
>lets you write smart contracts in 1 language (tendermint) while allowing you to execute the contracts using multiple cryptos
>will presumably let you interface blockchain-to-blockchain in other ways

I'm not 100% sold on it yet, but if they raise a huge amount of their funding cap in the first day, I'll likely jump in. I wasn't sold on Matchpool either but it raised $4M+ in 3 hours so I jumped in towards the end.

>>1927938
What's the expected return for these tokens?

>>1928021

treefiddy x

>>1928021
The tokens act as your stake in the overall investment fund. The distribution is:
>50% profit in ETH to all token holders via smart contract
>25% profit invested back into fund
>25% profit as management fee

What's different about TaaS is that it's a closed-end fund, meaning that the only TaaS that will ever exist are the ones that are sold during this sale.

Add https

>>1927972
They already have agreements with two or three exchanges and and are it talks with the big boys... the tokens should be sold only though exchanges, but keeping them in cold wallets is needed to get your share of quarterly profits.

>>1928021
You can't really tell for certain, I'm hoping for 1.5x increase after the ico and initial trading in exchanges, but you never know, I'm just especulating here

>>1927923
thanks friend, i was just wondering if this existed

If I make money from an ICO I heard of through your site, I will send you some btc

>>1928080
Will do, going to add it today.

>>1929047
Cheers, thanks anon!

File: 16E00E83-389E-4096-B377-D5A5B955BDE2-1370-000001311D655B5B.png (10KB, 586x528px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 586x528px

Thanks for this anon, good stuff

Recommend using the phrase Initial Coin Offerings in your title and just under the logo to help out SEs.

>>1928080
Why do you care if it's just a site with some public info? Just curious because I have some non-https sites.

Where is MyBit?
They're re-launching an ICO soon

>>1927923
Amazing. You solved a problem for me and I'm sure it's the same for a lot of other peoples. Just try to not become a shill scammer when you'll decide to monetize your shit.

>>1927923
Nice site, the font isn't very easy to read though.

>>1929677
MyBit has been up there for a while. It's under the upcoming category for April 26.

>>1929665
Good idea anon, thanks. Just swapped out ICO for Initial Coin Offerings.

>>1929719
Don't worry, I won't. Someone donated 32 ETH to my donation address by mistake, and I sent it back when they asked, so you can be sure I won't be doing any scams.

>also HTTPS is now active, so rest easy security anons

Nice site!

>>1930122
Thanks anon, glad you like it!

can u add MADMAN pictures to it, for legitimacy?

(just kidding, obviously)