>SNAP INC Will it become FB or TWTR? Why cant TWTR make

>>1834325
The thing is these young people will age overtime. Some into moronic college who fall for shit IN ads and spend their college loan money on consumerism instead of something useful.

Twitter failed because nobody even sees the adverts. They also peaked at launch, their entire service was complete from the start and had no growth potential

Snapchat is a good investment. I'm convinced of that. It allows people to get close to celebrities in ways that facebook and twitter can't manage. It's also fun to use and people feel encouraged to post stories for their fans, unlike facebook.

If you want to map the progress, it'll fall for the next few months and explode before the 2018 election. that election will kill new media/social media and the recession will start off the back of data/ad bubble finally popping. I'd buy now and sell in 2019..

>>1834325
Advertisers pay for specific audiences to see their ads.
Facebook can guarantee that, say, industrial cleaner ads will be shown to people who list their job as a place that would use them.
Twitter can only guarantee that the same ad will be shown to people who talk about cleansing a lot, even if it's of the ethnic variety.

>>1834325

I think SNAP will be more like Facebook.

It's a buy to me.