[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Just wanted to get a general vibe from the biz community in regards

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 117
Thread images: 13

File: s&p 2 500.jpg (37KB, 651x493px) Image search: [Google]
s&p 2 500.jpg
37KB, 651x493px
Just wanted to get a general vibe from the biz community in regards to the markets. You guys as a whole probably have a better feel for the markets than the general public.

The S&P 500 and the global markets are going strong after 2008.

What is your view for the next few years:

1.The bull market will continue

2. Time for a correction

3. Sideways after the bull run

4. Other -(what is your view?)

Cheers...
>>
>>1804055
The market only crashes on major UNPREDICTED events. There's no point in looking at trends, the catalysts could be sparked at any time. If a reasonable person could see it coming obviously it would be mitigated before it ever got bad.
>>
>the global markets are going strong after 2008

MSCI Emerging Markets and Europe are still below their highest point from 2007/8 ago, only USA did really well.
>>
>>1804092
We're having a nice start to the year on the asx
>>
>>1804102

Australia is pretty much irrelevant when it comes to stock markets
>>
File: worldsnapshot.png (202KB, 1840x662px) Image search: [Google]
worldsnapshot.png
202KB, 1840x662px
1) There are several reasons for bull markets to end but the "height" of the market and the "length" of the bull market are not among them. From a psychology perspective - there is too much apprehension and skepticism about this particular bull run - and as such means there is room to go higher. Phrases like "It's a new economy!" and "traditional valuation metrics don't matter!"

>>1804080
Markets don't crash on "unpredicted" events. They RESET after the rest of the herd prices in what early participants have figured out (plenty of traders, fund managers, and speculators made money OR avoided losses during the market crash(es))

I can elaborate on that further if you would like.

>>1804092
This is true - we need to see the rest of the world catch up to the US markets level of enthusiasm!
>>
>>1804124
Unpredicted as in unpredicted by the general consensus obviously.
>>
>>1804055
Put 100% in S&P Kneecap, Jockstrap and Protective Gear Industry ETF
>>
We're in the bubble of all bubbles
>>
>>1804138
yeah, word. What do you think of the market here in the short term (1-4 weeks)
>>
File: 2BnTtqh.png (37KB, 338x215px)
2BnTtqh.png
37KB, 338x215px
hmmm
>>
>>1804080
Absolutely this. As you cannot predict the crash, so you cannot predict the steady growth. Best option is to determine when a crash might become likely, and either buy a villa in Scandinavia or liquidate your entire asset base into CHF

Here's my advice: A crash is now far more likely than it was after the market stabilized in 2008. You draw your own conclusions
Second advice: Cease investing in solitary stocks RIGHT NOW and migrate to a portfolio fully dominated of sector ETFs, Staples and Healthcare to be exact
>>
>>1804316
okay yeah man what your AUM?
>>
What happens next? Simple, the rally in bonds and stocks that has existed since the beginning of recorded history continues as they both go higher into perpetuity. Undoubtedly there will be corrections in the future, but that's temporary.
>>
>>1804316
Yup, ETFs are a great way to go. 80% of my equity investments are in sector and total market ETFs. Heavy in Financials and Healthcare for long term safety and a good amount in Energy for when Keystone starts and Trump guts the EPA.

About 30% of my non retirement portfolio is in P2P lending notes as well since they're less volatile than the stock market.

About 15% in BTC, ETH, Gold, and Gold ETF as further means to reduce exposure to equity market volatility.

YTD ROI is 4% on my non retirement portfolio so I'm a happy camper.

Out of morbid curiosity I sort of want to see a large market correction just so I can track how well my portfolio would fare during a crash. It's crazy diverse and I think I'd come out in the green. I think the total market could drop several hundred BPs when Trump BTFOS the H1B program. Way too many companies taking advantage.
>>
>>1804431
not my personal allocation, but a thought out portfolio definitely. Nice.
>>
True economic recessions are fairly predictable since historically there are canary in a coal mine type indicators that are reliable. Employment statistics are one. Also many major recessions get kicked off by energy shortages/ oil shocks.

So right now there is no sign of a recession.

Stock market corrections and bear markets are not predictable and I suspect a correction in tech stocks, someday soon.

Stocks are going to stay strong for a while, since the bond market is such shit right now. There are fears of a bond market crash, even and so nobody has anywhere to put money besides stocks.
>>
>>1804466
You have a great point. Pension funds, money managers and the like have legal mandates to allocate funds...Remember a lot of open-end funds have to have a certain% of assets invested.

Bond market so garbage - yields going up puts pressure on bond prices definitely. Stocks could still go sideways to higher though - that correlation doesn't necessarily have to hold.
>>
>>1804055

The way I look at it, the doom mongers are only half right

If markets flatlined for two years and dropped 5% in the third year, people would be bummed out but not freak out

That would be about a 20% correction in real terms

I don't see a great hunger for cash given where rates are

There's less places for capital to flee to than in 2008
>>
>>1804055
EU collapse and recession.
>>
invest in bitcoin and Ethereum as a hedge. hyper inflation coming. then war.
>>
>>1804453
Thanks. What's your allocation?
>>
>>1804431
Are financials a relativly safe investment considering a crisis? Looking at the last crisis I assumed they weren't..
>>
>>1804055
Buy options
>>
>>1806088
I meant to say Consumer Staples, not Financials. Staples are a good long hold.

I am in financials, but not with safety in mind. I'm just betting on financials mooning when Trump kills the bank regulations.
>>
File: ok-logo.jpg (23KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
ok-logo.jpg
23KB, 300x300px
buy OK-cash
>>
>>1804566

You'll have your wish granted if Le Pen wins
>>
>>1804124
Add in dividends. Needs total returns.
>>
>>1804431
>Heavy in Financials and Healthcare for long term safety and a good amount in Energy for when Keystone starts and Trump guts the EPA

retard alert
>>
Perhaps this can help , http://www.gurufocus.com/shiller-PE.php. Looks like we are at 2008 levels for market valuations p/e adjusted to inflation. Just remember be greedy when others are fearful and be fearful when others are greedy.
>>
sorry folks there is gonna be a Trump related recession within the next few months.
>>
>>1807250
a single indicator means shit. How do you know that fundamentals behind PE ratios are the same as they were in 2008?
>>
More valuations for you http://www.gurufocus.com/stock-market-valuations.php
>>
>>1804431
>I think the total market could drop several hundred BPs when Trump BTFOS the H1B program.

I think Trump is after headlines rather than shaking things up.

If he can get some cheap, easy wins to assuage his supporters, that's enough. He'll announce a minor tweak to H1B which creates a lot of screeching in the media, it will look like a win, and business will continue as usual.
>>
>>1804316
Doesn't Benjamin Graham believe that record-high markets usually come with more risk, and with this, crashes are more likely to occur?

In the updated version, Graham and Buffett went over historical patterns where people have, time and time again, attempting to state that record-high markets will continue to trend to even higher record markets, but in actuality, these markets usually drifted back down due to a crash.

I'm sure this is just an overstated layman viewpoint, but I wanted people's opinion on it. Many people state that the gains made since the Trump presidency are just artificial and that the market shooting up to record highs make a crash more inevitable.
>>
>>1807851
>Doesn't Benjamin Graham believe that record-high markets usually come with more risk, and with this, crashes are more likely to occur?
This is retarded. Markets are at or near all-time highs on 20% of ALL trading days. If you freak out every time the market climbs you'll be dumping your entire portfolio every five days. Sound like a winning strategy?
>>
>>1807911
I'm not speaking of daily trends, but that of yearly trends. Aren't you just shooting yourself in the foot by attempting to uproot this viewpoint by giving me day-to-day trends? Of course markets fluctuate that much on a daily basis; why would a single investor base their information off of what happens day-to-day instead of looking at what happens on a quarterly and/or yearly basis instead?

So you're stating that market values have never risen passed that of their actual underlying value? That bull and bear markets don't exist? Why should the future returns of stocks always be the same as their past returns? When every investor comes to believe that stocks are guaranteed to make money in the long run, won't the market end up being wildly overpriced? And given this, how can future returns possibly be high?

In this case, it doesn't matter what the price a certain stock is, because the markets are at or near all-time highs on 20% of ALL trading days.
>>
Markets are very volatile i can see old fags 401ks getting wrekt
>>
>>1807987

It's time for you too stop posting
>>
Bull market still strong. Said the same thing in 2016 january while everybody were waiting the armageddon of dow jones.

Every indicator is strong desu. Leveraged long positions sp500, nasdaq and dow still highly recommended. But over 10% dips with force.

Dow 40k is not out of question before a single over 20% correction moves.
>>
>>1808025
Why should I listen to a fag who doesn't know the difference between "too" and "to"?
>>
>>1808032

The fact that people like you think this, is exactly what suggests the opposite could be true.

People can't see crashes coming. That's what makes them happen when they do, instead of earlier.
>>
>>1804055

Look at the energy prices

Last time oil and natgas and coal and uranium rose high, the world economy tanked shortly after
>>
>>1808100
>The fact that people like you think this, is exactly what suggests the opposite could be true.

Wrong. The common "people" think it's crashing, have been for years now if you haven't noticed.

And it's called a gamblers fallacy, they just look at the oh it's ATH no way im going to buy that.
>>
>>1808090

>I almost had to admit I was retarded. Good thing his phone autocorrect made a typo or else I would been in trouble
>>
>>1808123
>Wrong. The common "people" think it's crashing, have been for years now if you haven't noticed.

Objectively false. If the "common" people thought the market was crashing, it wouldn't be going up, it would be crashing. By definition, the common people do not think it is crashing.
>>
>>1808138
Care to back up why you think this view is retarded instead of green-texting and shitposting? I have a feeling you're not even capable of discussing the merits of what I commented.
>>
>>1808150

You just jumped straight to baseless assumptions and strawmen with him , just like you're doing with me.

You're obviously an econ 101 student.
>>
>>1808168
You're the one that began with the ad hominem attacks. The stock market is riskier whenever it's trading at record highs, because the chances of the underlying assets to be over-priced becomes higher. Do you refute this?
>>
>>1808168
*takes a drag*

Econ 101... everything changed after that..
>>
>>1807987
>So you're stating that market values have never risen passed that of their actual underlying value?
Underlying value is irrelevant. The only legitimate purpose for book value is liquidations.

An enterprise's true value is based on its future earning potential, which depends on both its unknown future prospects and the unknown direction of the economy and markets in which it operates. We can make guesses about those future values, but at no point will we ever know if we're above or below the real current value.

As such, trying to guess -- and making stock picks based on those guesses -- is a losing play.

Better to bet on the long-term direction of the markets (p, in case you were wondering) because that's not dependant on the fortunes and fates of any individual unknowable outcome. Betting on the market (i.e., buy and hold index funds) simply means you're betting that the economy will continue to prosper and that the zombie apocalypse won't happen. Pretty good bet, and pays decently too.
>>
I'm seeing a lot of reverse iron eagle patterns in the energy sector plus some unprecedented bahamainian upticks in heavy industry.

This, combined with irregular hungarian accordion patterns in Baltic shipping indexes are causing concerns.

All in all, my prediction is that the market will continue to be uncertain.
>>
>>1807244
I misspoke. See:
>>1806383
>>
>>1804055
idk what tf to say...what comes up must go down.
>>
>>1809007
i loled
>>
>>1804055
Overvalued to hell on a fundamental basis. we are in a huge equity bubble(and lord knows what else). Trade the trend though (keep buying with the overall trend but keep a close eye on it). The bubble burst happens slowly at first, then all at once.
>>
>>1809013
Keystone pipeline isn't good for the US as we now compete with Canadian oil in our domestic market
>>
>>1809046
>what comes up must go down
Are you seriously suggesting that the financial markets are subject to the laws of physics? Do you honestly think the market trading level is a physical object that obeys the laws of gravity?

http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm
>>
>>1809076
It'll start with Walmart.
>>
File: 307_55.gif (151KB, 535x539px) Image search: [Google]
307_55.gif
151KB, 535x539px
1 the bull market will continue. The US is entering a period of stimulus. The apprehension is good to slow down growth. If you think we've gone too far, open short positions or puts.
>>
>>1809262
https://www.amazon.com/Dow-40-000-Strategies-Profiting/dp/0071351280

Go read this book. It's for people like yourself.
>>
>>1804055
>You guys as a whole probably have a better feel for the markets than the general public.
Pfffft ahahahahahahahaha. Yeah like /g/ does with technology or /sci/ and /lit/ with philosophy and education.
>>
>>1809296
Exactly. Never take advice from these people.
>>
>>1809256
>It'll start with Walmart.
Walmart's earnings will be stellar on Tuesday.
>>
>>1809228
Physics doesn't say that, there's a little thing called escape velocity
>>
>>1809558
>he thinks escape velocity isn't a law of physics
>he thinks markets are subject to the laws of physics
Dude, I even gave you a link. You're the definition of irredeemable moron.
>>
>>1809577
> has no reading comprehension
> doesn't understand I'm not the guy he was talking to, just a random physicist
Dude...
>>
>>1804080
Shit.

>>1804124
Shit.

>>1804466
So close, then bails

Bull markets do not die of "events" - ever. Not one ever has. They die of only ever two things - the macro economy and the Fed. Those are the only two things that have ever killed a bull market. Ever. The macro economy is cyclical. We are at the top of the cycle. Stocks trail the cycle. Since it's been about 7 years since the last bottom, you've got about seven years till the next one.
>>
>>1809738

Thanks, Dalio.
>>
>>1804055
I thought the cap before a correction would be 20.2k for the DJIA, but we're past that and almost at 21 now. I still think that the markets are overvalued, but investors are enthralled by all of Trump's stuff about cutting taxes and bringing in business. Good shit to hear if you're an investor.
If he carries out all of this stuff he's saying, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw some back-to-back thousand-point months for the Dow. I definitely see the NASDAQ breaking 6k soon, though probably after 21k for the Dow. 2.5k for the S&P not long after the NASDAQ.
In a few years down the line, though, I definitely see a correction coming. It might even be a precursor to a recession, though definitely not a 2007/08 level one. Right now my best guess is that the market is overvalued by about 10-15%. If this kind of enthusiastic growth continues, then a correction could even lead to the markets hitting the magical 20% mark of a bear market.
>>
>>1808286
>Underlying value is irrelevant.
>Betting on the market simply means that you're betting the economy will continue to prosper

Jesus christ get off this board right fucking now, you're clearly too stupid to be posting.
>>
>>1809124
That's literally not what Keystone is for you fucking nimrod.
>>
File: 1394201448071.png (176KB, 638x317px) Image search: [Google]
1394201448071.png
176KB, 638x317px
>>1809277
>greatest bull market in history
pffffftt
>>
>>1809876
Learn to consolidate your posts, you worthless attention-whoring ignorant NEET tripfag. And if you think I'm wrong, use word to explain why. This isn't /r9k/ you fucking retard.
>>
>>1808181

>stock market is riskier when it's trading at record

Source: Your ass

>hurr 14,000 DOW is too risky guise
>>
>>1809124
Keystone is for transporting oil from North Dakota and the Midwest to Gulf refineries.
>>
>>1804055

I'm the guy that gets to fuck my wife in the ass at least two times a week.

While I can't predict 2017, please pay attention to valuations:
wwwdot starcapital.de/research/stockmarketvaluation

CAPE as the year closed in the US was 26.4 (even higher now). Please understand price/earnings of 26.4 implies < 4% earnings per share. Better yet..have a look at this which describes relationship between CAPE and subsequent 10 year returns:
seekingalpha.com/article/3987114-predicting-stock-market-returns-using-shiller-cape-pb.

Unless there is something dramatic to happen in the next decade (such as cure to energy woes), don't expect returns better than 4% annual that time period. That said, I still recommend at least having 50% of your portfolio long stocks, but I'd roughly half that 50% in International/Emerging Markets where valuations are better.
>>
>>1804233
bet you don't even have money to invest...do ya kiddo?
>>
>>1804055
Bull run will continue for the next 2-3 years imo. Rising tide lifts all boats...you know which boats get lifted out of the water most violently by these rising tides? Small caps like GIGL OWCP NMUS and other OTC stocks. ALSO CONSUMER STAPLES. Also i think if there is a correction it will be slow...like 3 year slight downslope instead of a 15% haircut. But honestly 1/3 of my portfolio is in the OTC right now. Have to pay a bit more attention, but the possibility of getting in on the ground floor is enticing to trade. There are quite a few jems in the OTC this year. Old money follows new money..2017 year of the OTC
>>
File: indiana_moretz.jpg (340KB, 1502x1502px) Image search: [Google]
indiana_moretz.jpg
340KB, 1502x1502px
>>1808146
You just seem very clueless about the markets overall, like most common people.

The current bull has nothing to do with small private investors buying it up lol
>>
>>1804350
>rally in bonds
my sides
>>
>>1804431
Financials are especially risky compared to the "normal" equity market in that they are far too individual. Sure, you can spread out your losses through note diversification, but when the shit hits the fan, you're stuck with the loss, and it's permanent. There is nothing you can do about a defaulted note. An equity market has a far better chance of sucking up individual losses and recovering, and you'll get almost the same returns at the same time. I have investment into P2P and it is very profitable at the moment, but there's no way I'm going to risk their credit models vs a company that has been around for decades. My mutual funds have beat out returns of platform averages last year. How sad is that?
>>
>>1810061
I'm asking nicely, not trying to be confrontational, just a question... You think Snapchat's IPO is properly valued? How many of these new startups do people have to invest in before we realize that we're in the tech boom 2.0? It's like an entrepreneur meme to come up with some idea, go through your rounds of funding, and then do whatever after that. It's all happened very quickly, and early investors are going to soon realize that they've wasted every penny on an unsustainable service. This can only go so far, and it may be the next crash after they're realized how much money they've wasted in this nonsense.
>>
>>1810123
>2017 year of the OTC
Agreed

especially, cannabis stocks. Check out SGBY and ERBB both in loading zones.
>>
>>1810158
Snap is just Twitter 2.0: shit financials, massively overvalued, and it will be a shit stock when they go public.
>>
>>1810158
Valuing an enterprise like Snapchat involves at least three major variables: (1) amount future earnings, (2) time period until earnings materialize (discount rate), and (3) probability of success (contingency). You also have to value the metrics beyond the core business, like the value of the user base, the platform, the intellectual property, the server infrastructure, the branding, etc.

Anyone who thinks they're smarter than the market at predicting value with these kinds of factors is deluding themselves.

And besides, who said an IPO is supposed to be offered at fair value? Its offered at the price designed to make the underwriters the most amount of money. Two completely different things.

>>1810259
Case in point: here's another Pup of Wall Street who thinks he knows the future direction of a stock. Of course, if he had this ability, he'd be wealthy and in demand. But he's just a poser, NEET, poorfag.

Thanks "River" for proving that you're as dumb as your earlier posts suggested. Take note folks, and feel free to filter this jackhole.
>>
File: Selection_002.png (26KB, 519x244px) Image search: [Google]
Selection_002.png
26KB, 519x244px
>>1810074
Source:
The Intelligent Investor
>>
>>1810143
You make an excellent point. I'm mostly getting into P2P as part of my passive income portfolio. Can you recommend any other passive income investments that don't fluctuate in concert with the broad equity market?

I'm looking at select preferred stock ETFs (established large caps), REIT ETFs, and floating rate (since we're due for inflation) bond funds.

Got any other ideas?
>>
The market is going to crash and burn once Trump start fucking around with China in the summer
>>
>>1810096
>Unless there is something dramatic to happen in the next decade (such as cure to energy woes), don't expect returns better than 4% annual that time period.

before or after inflation?
>>
>>1804055
>1.The bull market will continue

Well if the cucks keep paying why not?

>3. Sideways after the bull run

I don't see how cucks getting sloppy seconds will help the market.
>>
>>1809124

(>-_-)> Says the third grader.
>>
File: Capture.jpg (24KB, 957x98px)
Capture.jpg
24KB, 957x98px
>>1810170
Nah, OWCP bucko
>>
>>1810123
Oh, finally someone else on the OWCP bandwagon. I'm retiring off that bitch.
>>
>>1810170
i am in ERBB.. you are better off putting money in PURA right now, easy profits coming
>>
>>1811957
thank you for buying and paying towards my P/L tomorrow
>>
>>1811968
>paying towards my P/L tomorrow
Nah, I've been in since .60 or so. I got stop loses in slowly down to 1.30 just in case. I'll be fine.
>>
>>1811960
ERBB has a O/S in the billions. It will never move significantly.
>>
>>1804055
The market is up due to possible changes to Doff-Frank and that the market doesn't believe the Fed will raise rates the 4 times it claims it will. I missed out on some gains last year and likely will under perform this year but if the market starts to believe in the trend that interest rates will rise, holy fuck we're going to see some serious shit. Let's hope we don't all forget Jan-Feb 2016. Given Trump's policies are pro-inflationary, the main metric the Fed claims to be lagging in terms of necessitating rate hikes and the lack of political pressure with Yellen's appointer (Obama) out of office, I view rate hikes as more than likely than last year.

Though I've been wrong for a whole year and mor than interest rates affect and economy, basic finance dictates that if the risk free rate increases, the prices of riskier assets will decrease. If not, lucky me, I will be able to buy up risk free 30 year bonds and live comfy as fuck.
>>
>>1809262
Just because one thinks that the market will drop, doesn't mean they have to be in short positions. A short position may be inherently too risky for the individual as timing is a factor.

>the US is entering a period of stimulus

Unless Trump succeeds in rolling back some of Dodd-Frank, there's fuck all for stimulus left.
>>
>>1810126
Where is the money coming from then? Oh that's right, institutions which mostly hold commoners' money, which is in equities, ergo the common person thinks the market will go up.
>>
>>1807851

>considerthefollowing.jpg

we arent even close to where we were mentally in 99 or 08

however, theres still plenty of room for correction. people havent forgot.
>>
>>1808123

this. market is still wary.
>>
what about bubbles? we know about the student/autoloans thingy.
>>
>>1811953
fucking saw that. damn i wish i got in at .69 a couple weeks ago.
>>
>>1811960
thanks ill probably buy some in the AM

>>1811979
buy .0014 sell some at .0015 hold the rest high. it's a big float but could still move and it doesn't need to move much
>>
>>1804431
I'm 50/50 in cyptocurrencies and uranium etf
>>
>>1808107
energy is cheap af...
>>
>>1811994
central bankers and not just the FED, they've been purchasing a lot of stocks with their supernatural budgets
>>
>>1810292
he isn't wrong about twitter though, and Snap does appear to have similar financials.
>>
>>1812083
What uranium ETF?

Also what brokerage are you using? I can't use Robinhood due to compliance restrictions. Currently with Fidelity.
>>
>>1811983
>15 trillion debt economy is riskfree
>>
Crash imminent, Buy TZA, JNUG, NUGT.
>>
>>1809007
Look at the greeks! They just had a party, but the hangover is about to start
>>
>>1811960
Me too... wait... Dad?
>>
>>1812589
ccj is the uranium stock to own... but uranium is abundant and there is plenty to meet demand. Prices won't rise any time soon. It's dead money.
>>
>>1811983
The higher they go the harder they fall.
Thread posts: 117
Thread images: 13


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.