I've coded hundreds of trading algorithms over the past

>>1766946
Partner with someone who knows about high risk investment/business and make a small company and sell bonds based off of your algorithms success. Not that hard senpai.

>>1766946
make a portfolio where you demonstrate the trades using your algorithms.

show it to an employer, hedge or IB, and see what they have to say.

>>1766946
Bullshit, if they're really ''profitable'' how can you not have that much cash, or just use your own cash to make that much?

>>1767007
Maybe he only did back testing.

>>1766946

You know you can get a very decent job if you can code so well, right?

>>1766946
Can you teach me how to code trading algos? Where did you start? How do you test them? I'm a dev but I know nothing about algorithmic trading. Please help.

>>1767932
Bumping this. Whats a good resource to start learning trading algos?

>>1766946
don't kid yourself. your algorithms are shit and aren't worth anything.

get a job, save money, and you have faith in your shit, trade your own capital.

Sell them on biz (to me)

Keep this thread going and show what the algos pic for breakout. If it works ill buy it off you.
Im a wagie with lots of disposable income

>>1766946

You might have more fun roleplaying on /b/

Oh look, it's this role playing shitcunt again

If your garbage actually worked or even existed, you'd go to a payday loan and get money or do a 10x leverage

>>>>/qst/

>>1766946
how to sell

>>1766946
algorithmic trading is so 2010

>>1766946
honestly though, if you can prove to me it works i'll lend you 5k

>>1767043
in which case he probably doesn't have any profitable algos

>>1768044
he can't prove it works until he's got some money to actually trade it... at which point he'll then find out it likely doesn't work

>>1768051
demo account

>>1768055
that doesn't prove it will work

>>1767924
this

it amazes me that you're trying to say you have this ability yet don't know anything about

https://www.quantopian.com/

https://numer.ai/

https://algorithmia.com/

https://www.quantiacs.com/

and yes there you go i just gave you some fucking links

now kill yourself faggot

>t. actual algo master

(this was my monthly visit to this retarded underage board full of idiots)

get a fucking job, hippie.

>>1766946
Does numer.ai have any application to your needs?

>>1768189
those are all pretty gash in comparison to running your own money in a real account and building a track record however if the OP genuinely has no money then they are options for him to pursue and you're absolutely right to highlight that

main problem for the OP is that since he doesn't seem to have ever traded his system live it is highly likely he doesn't actually have a profitable system in the first place... he doesn't perhaps understand this yet but might well find out eventually

>>1770874
same thing happened to me, but i caught the algo trading bug.

after a few years i'm actually starting to get kinda good at it.

>the gains are very profitable
>I don't have any money
what?

>>1766946
I don't think anyone's buying trading algos from someone who can't fucking afford to have them patented.
Just go to quantopian.com , they protect your algorithms to an extent and they can hook you up with hedgies if you're good. Now kill yourself

>>1767043
There's always the risk of him over fitting his algos and he's lying to himself that they're actually profitable.

>>1771769
his imaginary gains (on a demo/test environment) are good - that can be from numerous things like overfitting through to bad simulation when you actually get filled and silly things like negating to include costs like commissions etc..

>>1771796
>I don't think anyone's buying trading algos from someone who can't fucking afford to have them patented.

people don't generally patent systematic trading algo's, I'm not sure it is even possible in most cases...

>>1768094

not that anon, but why would a demo/practice account not prove his algorithms work?

>>1767932
>>1767938
try /sci/.

>>1772302
/sci/ is for science. not only did these guys already say they know programming but /sci/ doesn't even consider that /sci/ material. trading isn't /sci/. now keep the shit on /biz/ please

>>1772295

for the reasons mentioned here for a start:

>>1771962

>>1774248
bottom line is any simulation is only an approximation of the actual live market you're trading - you don't know for sure you'll have got filled in reality at the prices you got filled at in your sim/demo environment - that is assuming he's conducting some forwards testing

if he's not even doing that then there are other issues such as overfitting your training set(historical prices)

if you want to be sure your system makes money then you need to trade it and if he'd traded it then he'd perhaps not have the issue he's claiming to have