>he's not adding mortgage based REITs in his portfolio

>>1748173
Pretty nice if you want low gains but im more of a high gains guy

>>1748226
Aren't u suppose to have a blog? Gib link pls

it means home prices will go down
total stock funds include reits afaik

>>1748449
regardless if home prices go down, mortgages will be more expensive.

>>1748173
This is a great way to turn $10,000 into $5000 in just a couple years.

already priced in by the big boys

>>1748173
any you would recommend in particar? i bought some of these awhile ago and they went down in value a bit, but pay a fat fuckin dividend:
MORT - this went up in stock price so i dumped it
MITT - bought in at $18.48, now $17.39, but pays a $10.93% dividend
IVR - bought in at at $17, now at $14, pays a 10.82% didvidend.

I don't know, are these even good ivestments, or am i going to get cucked?

>>1748718
>$10.93% dividend
damn son

>>1748759
yeah, but is there a catch?
https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/MITT:US

>>1748718
morl, csy, anh, there's a few others. fast food restaurants that are heavily domestically concentrated are good, like wendys. bank of ameirca, too.

>>1748226
This. fuck off with your grandpa baby gains

>>1748449
Total stock funds do not include REITs.

>>1748859
plus you're looking for reits based on mortgages, not just simply getting dat rent money

>>1748840
thank OP, i think i could get into some MORL, love the 2XLeverage and i don't wanna be a pleb. grandpa tier risk with stud tier returns here folks!

>>1748884
This thread isn't about taking on as much risk as you can possibly take on to justify the losing rate of whatever returns you hope to make. I trade options, but I also have a separate portfolio for non-trading. (ie: an IRA)

>>1748859
>Total stock funds do not include REITs.
You are 100% wrong.

https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Percentages_of_REITs_present_in_Vanguard_index_funds