Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: Coca-Cola-Exxon-Mobil-Colgate-Palmolive.jpg (189KB, 660x375px) Image search:
[Google]
189KB, 660x375px
>not buying stocks of well established companies that have been around for 50 - 100 years with reliable dividends
>falling for the tech startup and crypto memes
Its like you people are consciously making the decision to stay poor
>>
>>1733978
What are the returns like on companies like coco cola?
>>
>>1734001
Plug their numbers into capm and find out for yourself faggot
>>
>>1733978
If you're not an algo trader, this is literally the only safe way to invest long-term.
>>
>>1733978
I only buy those company's on large dips when I can get close to a 5% yield on cost. I like to look for bargains in the market, those types of stocks are rarely on sale.
>>
>>1733978
Growth stocks are better than divedend stocks for the most part. The divedend meme needs to die..
>>
>>
>>1733978
XOM is the one im going for.
They made money when oil was down, they will make alot more when oil is up.
>>
I have a bunch of oil and industrial blue chips sitting around all on drips. They just grow and grow so leave them alone.
>>
>>1734072
You're a retard, so maybe for you it is. Don't post anything so fuckin dumb in the future
>>1733978
I like companies that do good business and have been floating on the stock exchange for a number of years. I like a good PE and PEG, good cash flow, growing EPS, current assets far in excess of current liabilities, and there should be growing revenues (i.e increased receivables) and good return on capital.
>>
>>1733978
too busy reinvesting in my own company to buy someone else's
>>
>>1733978
Getting shit returns on watered down investments from the last century...
>>
>>1735902
I hope you're using forward PEs and not trailing.
>>
>>1734072
~98% of traders in any given year underperform the market. If you're any kind of trader at all, you're losing money.
>>1734130
Timing the market is impossible. You cannot "get close to a 5% yield on cost" except by luck, and the luck is stacked against you.
>>1734219
This is objectively true.
>>1734567
>picking stocks
A monkey throwing darts at a financial times page has an equal likelihood of success.
>>1735902
>picking stocks
>>1735908
Literally the only intelligent person here.
/biz/ was right, /biz/ is filled with fucking retards
>hey man you know humans can't fly
>FUCK YOU I'M MORE CAPABLE THAN ANY OTHER HUMAN, I'M GOING TO DO IT ANYWAY
/biz/ in a nutshell.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1