>Cryptocurrency >Speculating on individual stocks >Get

I do invest in those. Not 100% because I'm not 65. Only 10% of my portfolio goes to what you mentioned (minus the "get rich quick" schemes)

>>1708216
If you were 65 you'd have most of your money in bonds. If an 08 happened poof there goes your retirement. But now your old and there isn't time to recover.

>>1708224
At retirement, you want 50-100% stocks because long-term growth is still very important. Stocks accomplish this best.

>If an 08 happened poof there goes your retirement

It is true that sequence of return risk is very important over the first few years of retirement. In 2008, the S&P500 fell 37%. But let's look at the years following:

2009: +26.46%
2010: +15.06%
2011: +2.11%
2012: +16.00%
2013: +32.39%
2014: +13.69%
2015: +1.40%
2016: +11.24%

That said we are due for a recession in a year or two...

>>1708241
>begin investing 100% in low-fee index funds
>At retirement, you want 50-100% stocks
If you're ripping on people speculating on stocks, why 2 posts later are you telling them they should be 50-100% in them oh wait I forgot, this is just bait

stop spreading your self-doubt and and piss off somewhere else defeatist motherfucker

Legit over 500% gains this year trading memes
S&P 500 = Wagecuck

>>1708570
This. Making money in meme crypto is too easy