>any publicity is good publicity How true is this when it

>>1688190

Publicity is only good if it's making you money.

Being a sperg, losing the majority of your money, and possibly going to jail is bad publicity.

Just another thing, if you do something controversial or lets say you start a business and have a teenager as a poster child for the business, will news newtwork coverage help or do nothing for your business?

The controversy thing is weird because I don't really think it helped martin in any way, it just brought him twitter followers.

>>1688190
It's more false than true. It looks great in the short term because hey, everyone is talking about you! And then anyone with a brain will turn their nose on you as they'll just see you as a liability. Also see Trump: if Hillary's emails fuckups didn't flare up at full force right before the elections, it would have cost Trump the election. All the media attention on Hillary's emails was not good publicity either (for Hillary).

>>1688190
Trump won didn't he

he is a great person

File: 1469491571449.jpg (90KB, 734x960px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 734x960px

>>1688190
>any publicity is good publicity
Study the case of Donald Trump and you'll learn allot about this. In simple terms he said controversial things to get a rouse of the media. But pay attention the what he actually says: He picks stances which the media fervently opposes, "politically incorrect" stances which are unthinkable in a gated Hollywood community, but not necessarily stances which the everyday person finds repulsive.

Find the grey area where the media opposes you unequivocally but where the average joe doesn't. Unfortunately that grey area has grown pretty large with the sold-out corrupt media we have today, so it shouldn't be too hard.

Any and every spot of publicity is great for you as a business.
Your biggest (and only) problem is obscurity.