Tell me why don't you sell women's panties yet? Ever

>>1586344
But I do

Because I would end up thinking about it so much, I would buy them and jerk off into them myself...

>too much truth for /biz/realis to handle...

>>1586344
I did, but I got fired for jerking off on them in the changing room.
Fucking Bloomingdale's. They're nowhere near as "tolerant" as they claim.

>>1587699
Kek.
But on a serious note, I find it disturbing that women can work anywhere, including the men's department of a clothing store, yet women's departments or clothing stores can legally discriminate against men.
I don’t know if this is worldwide, I'm a britbong, but I'm assuming since it seems to be English Common Law now, it's international?

For the record, I am just as uncomfortable with some random cashier chick knowing whether I prefer briefs or boxers....

Looks like another case of feminists pushing the 'women are wonderful' phenomenon (there are no female perverts, silly!)

>>1587840
what's with MRA retards on /biz/. get on with reality. most women are harmless. and the ones that aren't, most guys would enjoy attention even from average looking women. even women enjoy other women.

guys however. most guys think with their dicks around women and can't be trusted.

> I am just as uncomfortable with some random cashier chick knowing whether I prefer briefs or boxers....

you're just being a faggot here.

>>1586344
Because it's against ebays TOS.

>>1587840
>women's departments
Except shoes, for some reason. There always seem to be men working there, which I never got.
Heels are in porn for a good reason, but at least there the girls are getting it on, not bitching at some dude about how their fucking corns hurt.

>>1587840
Shut up faggot