Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: 1471124530718.png (102KB, 2000x1250px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 2000x1250px
If I want to just live my life and do what I want, why not work a $60,000 job a year on the road doing manual/semi-manual labor, saving as much as I can, and then retiring when I hit around 800,000 in my stock portfolio? If I only need to live off of 30k a year, why would that be problematic?
>>
File: 1455622021918.jpg (45KB, 600x448px) Image search:
[Google]
45KB, 600x448px
>>1481081
I dunno, why would it?
>>
>>1481083
The pic is clearly unrelated.
>>
File: 1456198987247.jpg (114KB, 540x960px) Image search:
[Google]
114KB, 540x960px
>>1481093
But you did not answer my question.
>>
>>1481081
There is nothing wrong with that plan, save for working a manual job, maybe.
>>
>>1481130
So why do more people not do it?
>>
>>1481218
People are irrational and stupid
>>
>>1481218
I'll also mention there is risk in putting everything into the stock market. How would you cope with a depression with a slow recovery?
You'll have to sell more shares to pay for potentially more expensive goods and services.
Things can go pear shaped.
>>
>>1481222
What other accounts can you use as completely passive cash-generation?
>>
>>1481237
I think buying property and renting it out is the pretty much safest option and has a pretty good track record for millenia
>>
>>1481241
What's the return on it, though?
It's also the scummiest thing to do.
>>
>>1481302
how is renting a house out scummy?
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3