Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1469791300466.jpg (133KB, 1366x768px) Image search:
[Google]
133KB, 1366x768px
Are we headed towards economic ruin? With automation and shipping jobs overseas, the capitalist machine becomes more efficient. That means money flowing upwards to the top, and very little of it flowing back lower. Poor people spend almost all their money, while rich people only spend a fraction of it.
No one has any solution to this. Higher taxes on the rich, and redistributing it back to the rest is one idea. In a perfect society this would work. But the rich are really good at both hiding their money and controlling the political system. Which means it may not work.
So we'd be right back at square 1: the circular flow of money broken and a good chunk of society unable to get jobs.
>>
>>1431579
yes there is a solution.
stop spending your money.
hoard it like the rich do. soon they will wonder where all the money has gone, and ease up interest rates.
>>
>>1431609
Spending is good, saving is bad. That also stops the circular flow of money.
Circular Flow is life.
Circular Flow is love.
>>
>>1431619
/me pets the proletariat , then pumps a glob of germ-x.
>>
>>1431579
how much monies do you guys think it would cost
me to let her let me lick her feet?
>>
>>1431579
Remember. Money=debt.
>>
>>1432327
money = symbol of value created .
>>
>>1431579
Ultimately it boils down to poor people need to stop procreating. They're on the lowest rung of the financial ladder for a reason and you can't say it was all rigged/oppression. I know this sounds "edgy" but honestly this seems like a logical conclusion to me.
>>
>>1432410
Wouldn't someone else just replace the poor that died off? It's like getting rid the left side of the Gauss curve, some other group just take their place anyway.
>>
>>1431619
Sounds like something a jew would say
>>
>>1432410
>only thinks of the immediate effect of pruning the poor
>logical conclusion
You sound like a poor person yourself.
>>
>>1431619
It would work if the rich would spend the money instead of hoarding it. Even though it should be noted that most of the actual money is stored in liquid assets instead of cash proper.
>>
fuck you socialist get out of my helicopter
>>
>>1431579
most millionaires today are self made.
>>
>>1432666
The rich might not spend it, but they hold the money in a bank and the bank invests it into bonds equities and gives loans. Plus on top of this if you're super rich more than half of your income is taxed to pay for welfare whores and government workers.
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1