>/pol/'s average IQ according to themselves is 130 >/pol/

My logic has determined that the picture is nonsense.

>>2018138
>burger

Answer is E

>>2018137
E

EEEEEEEEE

The answer is E. Shapes have a weight. Use the following pictures to determine which answer is weighed correctly.

File: 1501182539092.png (811KB, 902x864px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 902x864px

>>2018137
Also don't forget the average age here is 18. Compared to /leftypol/ at 24. So imagine the typical /pol/yp chubby or skinnyfat, wearing a fedora, and a shirt with the snake meme, vaping while reading Ayn Rand. Fact of the matter, people move economically left as they get older.

circle = 1
square = 2
triangle = 4

so answer is E

File: stopandthink.png (290KB, 1156x2031px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1156x2031px

>>2018137

File: putin.jpg (99KB, 566x590px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 566x590px

>>2018139
>>2018140
>>2018141
>>2018144


Wrong you brainlets, the weight distribution would cause unequal torque.

insecurity bait

File: IMG_3732.gif (2MB, 400x359px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x359px

>>2018137
>I don't like people that go on /pol/
>I think that people that I don't like are stupid
>So I'm going to go on /pol/ and tell everyone that I don't like that they are stupid

>>2018146
well, right.

>>139888888

>>2018146
obviously not plebleaf, as they are hovering they illustrate an even and perfectly distributed weight.

The IQ metric is pseudoscientific. I don't have respect for anyone who treats social science as objective.

>>2018137
post your IQ

>>2018151
they are not hovering, they're enclosed in transparent gelly.

*jelly

>>2018146
>torque
>floating balls
okay

>>2018137
The answer is obviously E
However, this image really supports the argument that IQ tests have a cultural bias.
Your move, /pol/

>>2018137
IQ is a jewish meme

>>2018157
>cultural bias
how so? do other cultures not know what a beam balance is?

>>2018157
I suppose if your culture hasn't developed a balance for measuring weights that true. I guess that rules out abos and uncontacted tribes in the Amazon.

>>2018143
If average IQ is anywhere close to 130 almost everyone's going to college or will go, and stay long enough to graduate.

While there the college may well try to push you left, from all we read about college these days. So current gen may be more conservative by 24.

But usually one gets more conservative as one gets older, and this gen. is real conservative.

File: ManTheAutist.jpg (30KB, 368x516px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 368x516px

>>2018137
> fulcrum point is off-center in examples #2 and #3
someone post the other "math problem but the diagram is physically wrong" images

>>2018152
this

>>2018159
nigga I was tryin to do pattern recognition on that shit
you tell me

>>2018159
You clearly you don't know who you're importing.

>>2018163
I was doing the same desu

>>2018159
>>2018160
Thanks for proving my point and not actually providing any counter arguments. You are both literally just doubling down on the cultural bias and saying anyone who doesn't understand what the arbitrary symbols represent are just stupid. You could literally tilt all the images in OP random degrees and the answer would still be E, but you are relying on the cultural knowledge of balancing weights to answer the question. If those images were rotated or edited so it was something completely unknown you would have a far harder time answering the question ( for example instead of a balance beam it was just a bunch of spots on a cow )
In fact, that's a good idea. I'm going to make that image and laugh at all the retards who don't even know what is being asked.
I guess IQ tests really are racist.

>>2018137
rEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ;)

>>2018166
Nah if you tilted that shit even a bit they would all roll off.

>>2018166
this test is not about figuring out that it's a beam balance. you could just add explanatory text and it would solve the issue.

>>2018137
None of the answers are correct.

While E in theory could be correct pictographically it is not in practice, loading the four circles in such a manner will not balance with the triangle. The triangle needs to be centered 1/4 of the length of the balance from the left most side. Fucking cunts with their bullshit unanswerable shit questions.

>>2018137
E

>>2018169
>you could just add explanatory text and it would solve the issue.
And then you either add more cultural bias or turn it into a math problem instead of a pattern recognition problem.

File: 1504241522687.png (733KB, 1024x665px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 1024x665px

>>2018170

>>2018172
It is a math problem.

>>2018137
Because shills make most of the board traffic.

>>2018146
if you take torque into account then there is no correct answer

>>2018166
I would estimate 90% of the planet used a balance at some point in their history. Some developing countries probably use them everyday, like India and most of Africa. Some kid from the UK is probably only vaguely familiar with them.
Regardless, you can make the same problem without including the balance at all. This is just some facebook quiz, not a proper IQ test like raven progressive matrices which have no real world analogue.

File: bobyfischerIQ.jpg (62KB, 638x359px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 638x359px

>blaming the jews is low IQ

File: EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.png (16KB, 607x272px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 607x272px

square is heavier than two balls. so it's:

balls = 1
square = 2.x
triangle = 4.y

y=2*x

>>2018137
took me 10 -15 seconds lol. Simple weight equivalency relationship between different objects. Kek
E

>>2018166
>You could literally tilt all the images in OP random degrees and the answer would still be E, but you are relying on the cultural knowledge of balancing weights to answer the question.
How stupid are you, retard? This can be a scale but it doesn't have to be. All the info shows is that one of x is equivalent to n of z. Jesus Christ you are dumb. Post your IQ scores dipshit.

>>2018137
Even more infuriating is the fact that the top picture second from the left shows an impossible condition where an offset fulcrum still produces a balancing effect between two equivalent loads at differing distances from the fulcrum. Like is this nigger land where rules and shit don't matter, oh no big deal fambam just shove your shit on the kike scale so we can rip you off in the quantity you get now move along goy.

>>2018166
Like the pattern recognition on Jared Taylor Swift gulaged video.

>>2018159
I didn't know it was supposed to be a balancing test

>>2018172
>culture that can't read and write.
>dumb because of bias

>>2018183
stop being autistic

>>2018187
the leaf started it.

>>2018179
>Being this autistic
It's E

>>2018137
My professer biotch dr nosenberg be sayin I be geneous n shit. I's be top of class n shit. Alls a gotta do is says white man fualt, muh dick, gibs me dat. shit imma be altered mater

>>2018187
No, this is what happens when low IQ proles are left to test the intelligence of their superiors. Draw the diagram correctly or gas yourself for being a drain on society. Useless fucks, pay them money to do a job only to fuck it up.

easiest way to answer this is to eliminate unnecessary information, namely the first two panels. all they show is 1 = 1 and 2 =2. if you use the latter two panels, you figure it out instantly.

>>2018186
Even within people who can read and write their knowledge of the language varies.
For example, you would probably get schooled at a spelling bee. What if a test that used spelling bee tier words to ask questions? Not understanding a question and being unable to answer =/= not knowing the answer.

>>2018179
Since there are only two dimensions shown, the filled circles cannot be assumed to be balls. They may be cylinders or cones, the same maybe said for the triangle being a cone.

>>2018137

E obviously.
fuck off faggot.

That shit took me like twenty - maybe thirty - seconds.
Fuck, I'm getting older. slower and dumber.

>>2018184
* Jared Taylor Swift
What did I mean by this.

>>2018179

Square does not need to be heavier than the balls because it hits the base first while one circle is still in the air.

Triangle does not need to be heavier than the circles for the same reason.

>>2018166

I bet a winner like you votes for Bernie Sanders.

fucking retard.

>>2018137
E for fucking easy

>>2018199
Why did you even bother responding when you still didn't refute any of my arguments?

>>2018179

You are the winner for a free ticket to the gas chambers.

>>2018137

The joke is that the iq test is replying to this slide thread seriously or not, since the puzzle is so simple it is not even a puzzle but an instruction almost.

Sage.

>>2018137
Any fool can see the answer is E.

>>2018201

> hurr durrr nigger don't balance beam
> racisss
> IQ is fake

eat a dick faggot.
btw, I'm a non-white who used to shit on hills in my grand mother's backyard in India, and I solved it.

i must be a self-loathing racist or something. I dunno.

>>2018194
I'll give you that.

>>2018198
let's just assume that all objects above the balance are enclosed in transparent jelly. otherwise it gets impossible.

>>2018202
thanks.

>>2018137
E is the only one that makes sense but I'm sure I'm somehow wrong. Probably magic or something.

>>2018137
The answer is E

Circle =0.75
Square = 1.5
Triangle = 3

It works for every other square

In reality, all answers are correct and also wrong!
Schrödinger you fools!

>>2018137
This is a trick test that they made us do in psychology class once. Basically no answer is actually right but only one determines sociopathic thinking while the others just note depression, or lack of motivation (assuming they're convinced of the answer).

If you guys answered E you played into OP's game.

>>2018210

awww...baby's first day shitposting on the internet

where do you think you are?

the question's not OK

implying that triangles circles and squares are different

what is it with you fucking Nazi's?

THEY'RE ALL THE SAME IT'S CALLED EQUALITY FUCKING GET OVER IT

>>2018208

I'm not sure why you wouldn't just say

Circle = 1
Square =2
Triangle =4

>>2018210
So, A, two squares equal a klansman stomping a nigger?

>>2018205
aaueciueaacieaau?e?

Can't solve that nonsense? You're retarded by your own standards. It only requires knowledge you don't have access to after all.

>>2018137
The answer is any of them. Because none are actually touching the god damn scale.

Im a faggot liberal. I believe in equality, so all of the answers are right :)))))
I WIN!

>>2018137
its E final answer

>>2018137
This problem requires top many assumptions to solve. You're a faggot OP.

>>2018163
same here. every other online IQ test is based on pattern sequences so I was looking for that here too. Didn't even consider that it was supposed to be a scale. guess I'm even dumber than I thought

>>2018193
Superfluous verbosity is not equal to simple instructions outlying the structure within a test. Most people can understand unfamiliar words in the context of a sentence. So to say that a culture that can't even develope the basics is some how being unfairly hindered in an IQ test is putting the cart before the horse.

>>2018137
>1 Post with this ID
Fucking Slide

>>2018221
>simple instructions
"simple instructions" is relative to the intelligence/knowledge of the person reading the instructions.
> Most people can understand unfamiliar words in the context of a sentence.
Only if the understand the rest of the sentence and have context clues from the previous/following sentences.
> So to say that a culture that can't even develope the basics is some how being unfairly hindered in an IQ test is putting the cart before the horse.
Why do you think
..o
_o____[]_
.......^........
Is a "basic" concept? You wouldn't even know what the fuck I'm referring to if I did that outside of the context of this conversation and thread.

>>2018137
1==1
1+1==2
2==2
2+2==4
4==1+1+1+1
Answer is E.

>>2018146
If that's your argument, all five choices are correct since none of the symbols appear to be resting directly on either side of the platform.

>>2018179
It's a symbolic representation, not a mechanical drawing.
The map is not the territory.
You fail at abstract thought, autist.

>>2018208
You're not wrong. You're an asshole.

>>2018179
look at picture 2
some squares weight more than others?

File: hint - diophantine.jpg (18KB, 367x255px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 367x255px

There IS a valid solution to this, it's just really fucking hard. Filename related.

>>2018137

The Answer is E

So hard

>>2018137
E

120 IQ here

File: thingken of genies.png (36KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 200x200px

>>2018229
And just for (You)s, here's the solving process:
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-find-the-positive-integer-solutions-to-frac-x-y+z-+-frac-y-z+x-+-frac-z-x+y-4/answer/Alon-Amit?srid=Qkoi

tl;dr the smallest valid solution is:
a=154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999,
b=36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579,
c=4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036

http://test.mensa.no

>>2018232
>the smallest valid solution is:
>a=154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999,
>b=36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579,
>c=4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036

damn, i was trying to do it.
i guess it was going to waste me a lot of time.

>>2018137
Could there be a puzzle board? Imagine how comfy it would be, /puz/ when?

>>2018137
>tfw officially tested with an average iq in the 99.9th percentile
>tfw in 99th percentile for height
>trfw in 99.99th percentile for dick size

What did I do to deserve to win so hard?

File: hurr.png (31KB, 846x600px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 846x600px

>>2018137
How does one get tested anyway, like who should I be asking for a test, a shrink? Most /pol/acks used an old iq test according to which I was also 130~, but >>2018233 seemed more legit.

>>2018237
I presume the local Mensa in Chile will offer supervised testing. A psychologist can also assess you.

>>2018238
Checked and thanks m8.

>>2018237
If you want you may be able to acquire a test online, there are lots of different tests that are generally regarded as 'good' IQ tests.

Oh and I guess I'll just throw this in here while I'm on the subject of IQ tests in general. Saying 'I have an IQ of 130' is kind of meaningless. The scores on most IQ tests have various standard deviations. What this means is a 125 on one test can be higher than a 130 on another test. If you're going to say a score then say what test you scored it on too. Even better, simply give the percentile of your score rather than the score itself.

>>2018137
Circle=circle
2 Squares=2 squares, 1 square=1 square
2 circles=1 square
2 squares=1 triangle

So 1 triangle=2 squares, 1 square=2 circles, so 1 triangle=4 circles.
Hereafter, T (triangle), C (circle), S (square).
A: 2 S= 1 C, 1 T. We know 1 T=2 S, and 1 C=1/2 S, or 2 C= 1 S, so A is wrong.
B: T=/=1 S, 1 C, T=2 S. B is wrong.
C: 1 T=2 S, which 1 S=2 C, so 1 T= 4 C, not 3 C.
D: 1 T=2 S, so this is wrong right off the bat.
E: 1 T=2 S, and 1 S=2 C, so 2S (or 1 T)= 4 C. Correct, E is the answer.

>>2018241
Elaborately explains the obvious = retard.

>>2018242
A good logician never presumes the obviousness of something.

>>2018243
Don't you have assistants to molest or something, Layton?

File: 1503796865823.jpg (38KB, 720x700px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 720x700px

>>2018137
>ecelebs

>>2018244
No, but I'm working on it.

>>2018137
you dont need to be a rocket scientists to understand open borders + welfare state = disaster

>>2018137
The most successful people aren't smart they're sociopathic

>>2018245
>12 yo kid perpetuating the existance of the aryan race


kek

>>2018143
> people move economically left as they get older
only if they make terrible life decisions because they are low iq mongoloids and want the government to gift them the life they think they deserve
> average age is 18
our average age is probably around the average age of rs players mid 20s

>>2018237
This thing is bullshit. According to it I|m supposed to have an IQ of 138 (99.4 percentile) in this discipline.

Seems like a scam to get people to pay them to do the official test.

>>2018251
It is bullshit I got bored halfway through and just put random answers and got 130

>>2018137
>shown sequence picture
>doesnt give context on said sequence
thats not how logic works

>>2018248
just let them think that psychology is pseudoscience

>>2018253
You're supposed to eliminate the answers that don't belong, deus cult memer retard

>>2018137
Answer is D, fuck you if you disagree, every brainlet answering E didnt even use the quadratic equation

>>2018143
>Fact of the matter, people move economically left as they get older.

If you're going economically left as you get older, you're getting dumber with age, not wiser.

File: 1500337140505.jpg (368KB, 894x894px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 894x894px

>>2018159
>beam balance
that's obviously a seesaw

>>2018237
Link to old IQ test, I'm curious myself.

>>2018236
>http://test.mensa.no
Pics or gtfo.

>>2018163
Same, I didn't realize it was a scale.

>>2018146
OH THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE A SEE-SAW!!

I ... I didn't even notice that it was a balance ;-;.

>>2018255
fulcrum isnt even centered on some pictures, people just assumed its centered because they already know that the problem is a seesaw balancing problem

>>2018166
>anyone who doesn't understand what the arbitrary symbols represent are just stupid.
Huh......

I did a short (1-2 hour) test as part of an assessment process and scored as 98.6 percentile, although they wouldn't give out an iq score. Made me feel good for a fleeting moment until the meaninglessness of it all became obvious again.

File: 2017-09-01_22-13-13.png (23KB, 881x600px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 881x600px

huh, must have gotten smarter from the first time I took it, started eating oil fish capsules after all :)

>>2018260
It was iqtest.dk but the page seems to be down

>>2018267
>98.6 percentile
the irony is that if they tested the dumbest people they could find that means your at the top

but what if all the people they tested were literal geniuses? and you were just average?

File: giphy.gif (344KB, 500x348px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 500x348px

>>2018137
E
circle=1
square=2
triangle=4

>>2018166
>Balancing weights
>Cultural knowledge

Low-IQ brainlet detected

>>2018137
oooooooooh, i see
the shapes are balanced on the bullshit
so 1 triangle = 2 squares = 4 circles
making E the only balanced scale

>>>/sci/

>>2018309
annoucing you saged a post is against the rules

>>2018344
It's also a rule that you can't say racist stuff outside of /b/, or post GET threads, or complain about moderation.
Do you see anyone following those?

>>2018137
The second in the sequence shows two boxes on both sides with a fulcrum that is not in the center, this means that not all boxes are the same weight and the problem is therefore unsolvable.

>>2018309
>>2018399
this is a /bant/ and you're getting triggered