why is it that women from the 70's and 80's seem so

>>744659184
No feminism

Bush, son. They let their mad bushes grow.

>>744659627
I'm not sure if he's talking about 1870's

>>744659184
they ate different food, almost never looked at a screen

>>744659627
This
And not fat

File: 1503671695205.jpg (113KB, 1600x1035px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1600x1035px

>>744659703
the bush needs to be a thing again, I'm serious

>>744659777
nl?

You've only seen a few cherrypicked examples that were so hot people still post images of them today. There were just as many ugly chicks back then, there just aren't photos of them on the internet.
What has worsened, however, is obesity.

File: 1492048093075.jpg (586KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 1600x1066px

>>744660308
no, the problem is there's not a solid middleground anymore. today girls are either too fat or skinny as a skeleton. girls back then still had some thickness in just the right spots.

File: tatjana09.jpg (91KB, 719x978px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 719x978px

>>744660301
croatian

File: 186c00ac-d0b9-4558-85bd-0f13756ee398.jpg (52KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 720x960px

Add me for some sexting/camming with my 8 inches: kik & skype & oovoo = Godda2882

Ready for some sluts

>>744660744
>>744659184
post MORE

There was also the way they dressed. Mini-skirts and shirts with no bras if they could get away without them.

>>744660210

I've heard in pr0n, the bush is making a come back.

File: 100017330_dom019fxp_344324092.jpg (814KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

814KB, 3000x2000px

>>744661621
It's still somewhat of a niche thing and it's mostly restricted to a trimmed bush. I want the full-featured natural bush to be back.

>>744661621
I doubt that. It was porn killed it, trying for a close-up and mony shot where nothing was obscured by hair. Then the male fuckwits watching it before they got out of their base,ents to meet real women thought that's how girls should be, and started to demand it, so girls started shaving irl.

I know all about bikini trims and waxing for the beach; I'm talking about bald.

File: 100017335_dom019fxp_344324127.jpg (703KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 3000x2000px

>>744662034

>>744662034
I never liked the gynaecological shots that emerged once pubes became more "mainstream"

>>744662173
but pubes are not mainstream. In fact those are from a fetish site ATK Hairy.

File: piercing.jpg (20KB, 479x330px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 479x330px

>>744659184
face jewelry wasn't a thing then

>>744662294
Became. After the ban on showing pubes was lifted in the 60's. Then shaving came in and pubes went back "underground"

File: 09918_E60803_123_34lo.jpg (37KB, 474x676px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 474x676px

>>744659732
>almost never looked at a screen

Oh, please. We've had television since the 1950s. Its true though that staring at TVs, Computers and Phones is a big part of the obesity problem, but it started long before the Disco era. It takes decades of slow change to affect a society to a noticeable amount.

As a 70s kid, I really like these threads. More bush!

>>744659184
well...tan lines, bush, longer feathered hair

>>744660849
dafuq is wrong with your dick? looks like a snake's tongue

>>744659184
Film and printed magazines calendars etc was expensive, couldn't afford to publish genetically second tier women. No every shit tier slut can show herself to the world for almost zero cost.

>>744659184

You enjoy coked out retards with dead eyes.

File: 2ydZWQ5.jpg (181KB, 396x496px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 396x496px

>>744662919
we will

They all had the bush going on

>>744659703
>came here to post this
>mfw it's already the second reply

File: 1400074903380.png (43KB, 240x311px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 240x311px

>>744659184
They seriously don't. You are just a gerontophile. Average woman from the past looks like a 50 years old hag at best, and like an ugly hairy man at worst. Not just women, a hundred years ago if you look at the school photos, you will see that 14 year old guys look like they are 30. Shitty fashion and life conditions make everyone seem older.

>>744662632
this

>>744659184
because they remind you ofyour mom you sick fuck

>>744659184
50s were my favorite, I don't why though

>>744662919
My wife wasn't "coked out" when she did an amateur spread for a men's mag in the 70's. Nervous yes; coked out no

I disagree, I think women are hotter now

>>744663074
If so many guy here like the bush how come most women out there still seem to shave everything.

File: 98787989879879897879.png (226KB, 301x461px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 301x461px

>>744663257
> My wife
> amateur spread for a men's mag in the 70's

>>744663149
>gerontophile
Obviously I'm comparing younger woman from back then (as depicted in the OP pic) to the younger women of today you fucking idiot.

File: 1g.jpg (6KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x200px

>>744663269

>>744663426
Actually true, but I realise there's nothing I can say. Google something like "Knave amateur star for a day". It was quite common back then but you being in your 20's, you wouldn't know that

>>744663410
I wish I knew the answer to this, Im guessing its because to appear feminine the less hair you have the better or some bs like that. I dont know, I just like bush

>>744662919
beta male or modern feminazi detected.

>>744659184
Besides that hideous pussy hair, looking coy and a little more natural and less overtly sexual was in style which I think gives a more innocent look.

>>744663826
I actually think it's quite the opposite, a bush looks very feminine to me.

>>744659184
This one is easy. Back then the actually attractive women were given the Model jobs. Nowadays due to ignorant minorities being given more of a voice, fat and ugly bitched get attention. Examples: Nicky Minaj, the Kardashians, and that little cunt from the dr phil show. Fuck all this dumb shit op. You know what makes an attractive woman, go with your gut. What is the fascination with big fat asses? Fuck you sir mix-alot, no-one cares what you like. That nicky minaj sure is fucking ugly. What is the deal with all the mumble talk like the tongue is too big for the mouth. I think open season should be called. Thin the herd because it's fucking up the status quo.

>>744663918
>hideous pussy hair
virgin detected

>>744662456
motherfucker please,

looking at a 14 inch CRT from across the room is not the same as having a 22 inch screen 2 feet away from you for hours on end

or a small phone screen half a foot away basically all your life

>>744659627
>no feminism
Wat
Nigger, that was THE feminist decade.

Congress fucking passed the ERA in the 1970s (thank god that abomination never got adopted), for fuck's sake.

The big thing was that most of the women had been brought up when men were liked and respected. The colleges still didn't have feminazi professors yet, so they weren't being poisoned with man-hating rhetoric there either.

>>744663918
> more innocent look

Pervy MILFs who look like hookers with expired shelf life, mimicking 50's american dream housewives? It's as pervy and degenerate as anything you see in porno. Cheap, fake and plastic.

>>744663601
If you like when a 20 year old woman looks like she's 40+, you are clearly a gerontophile.

>>744659184
Because while the brain is just a group of cells floating in a calcium bowel. I believe a soul dictates how the brain behaves, a broken or damaged soul will lead to chemical imbalance, an old soul will lead to a person being great and kind, a new soul is learning. Everything with a brain has a soul. So single cell organisms don't have souls or things like trees. But bugs and spiders have souls. But not like larger animals. Souls have size limits you cannot go too small or too big but a soul can get stuck in another species (however rare)

What else do you want to know? Want me to explain anything better or in more details? I'm trying to give a broad answer here to just give a better idea on what I believe.

>>744660210
lovely

>>744659184

I honestly think women were shaped slightly different 20, 30, 40 years ago.

It's the way they exercise today. Or maybe the hormones in their foods.

>>744659184

hair makeup tats pierceing

>>744664642
and a lack of augmentation through cosmetic surgery

>>744662632
Wasn't that expensive, and no Internet meant the demand was there for print versions of EVERYTHING. Fucking, fetishes, cumshots, comics, celebs-you name it, there were magazines printed for it, either by major outlets like Playboy or fan-made 'zines. Even CP.
If you had the money and were willing to spend it, you could get anything you wanted.
And that's not even counting the polaroids that got passed around.

>>744664628
Yep, they were way more fat. Chubby was the norm for entire history, thanks to people being poor. After becoming rich, slim figures became a beauty standard.

>>744663257

You also know damn well that's the exception, not the rule.

File: 23.jpg (74KB, 686x686px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 686x686px

>>744664229
You know not of which you write. We sat two feet away from our 25" TV screens despite our mother's warnings. People have been addicted to screens from day one. As I wrote earlier it takes time for the effects to catch up. The advantage that we had in the past was that most of us had parents who would limit our screen time as best they could. I've had cell phones since they were analog. I had a 1st gen Commodore 64. We got our first color TV in 1971. I spend plenty of time on my PC, rarely use my phone as a computer, and haven't watched TV much for years. I get up and do stuff and I'm slender and healthy for it at 50+. You live the life you choose in spite of the allure of the idiot boxes.

>>744663930
Pubic hair is a secondary sexual characteristic, indicating readiness to breed. It would be odd not to find it attractive, even if only at a subliminal level.

Unfortunately, teens and millenials think it's somehow "dirty"', as though showers hadn't been invented.

>>744659184

The THICC fetish was a mistake

>>744665028
Citation for coked out models?

>>744664758
Yummm I'd flat iron her over the desk any day of the week

>>744663917

I just prefer my women to be capable of speaking in complete sentences.

>>744664460
except she doesn't, she looks like she's in her early to mid 20's

File: hairy 1a (13)_2.jpg (300KB, 1163x1023px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 1163x1023px

>>744665051
Oh, and yeah there were plenty of fatasses in the 70s too. Pic unrelated.

File: IMG_6847.jpg (236KB, 1011x1040px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1011x1040px

More retro

File: picz.jpg (128KB, 800x1092px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 800x1092px

>>744659184

chubby, fat, less lean...whatever...it obviously means nicer curves, nicer body.

another thing is tit shape.
...and that had to do with Bra design.
Bras were more functional and less attractive.
Now bras are designed to look good and don't support as well.

File: 1497801427730.jpg (271KB, 1066x1600px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1066x1600px

>>744664628
Women definitely had puffier tits back then. When was the last time you saw a pair of torpedo/banana tits that seem to defy the laws of gravity? They're very rare to come across these days.

It's not only their looks (bush, more thicness, long, wavy hair and stuff) that make them more atractive. I think women back then were more feminine and acted like real woman. They knew how to cook, knew how to do other chores around the house - in other words they knew how to please men not only using their bodies. And I guess most of them werent materialistic, dumb sluts who would suck a dick for a pack of cigarets.

File: IMG_7159.jpg (87KB, 419x640px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 419x640px

Retro 2 more

File: IMG_3827.jpg (125KB, 500x529px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 500x529px

Retro3

>>744659184
>hy is it that women from the 70's and 80's seem so much more attractive?

Babes from the 50's and 80's are by far superior.

>>744666614
i would go as far as to say anything pre-90's is better than the women we have today

File: 1501348119447.jpg (284KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1600x1067px

post moar bush

>>744667513
That's Darina Nikitina, not really retro.

>>744660210
this anon knows whats up. told gf if you shave it im done eating and fucking it. dont care for pedo looking pussy

>>744664628
It's also increased calorie intake too.
The 1970s were before the Cola Wars, when big companies spending billions on advertising got Americans to drink MUCH more soda than they had previously.
Just one 20oz soda per day on top of a normal diet is 2 extra pounds gained per year. Think about that.
Now think about al the alcohol products that have been developed with women in mind since the 1980s too. All the hard lemonades, wine coolers, pre-mixed drinks, and so on. Each of those has all the calories of a soda as well, and they sell millions of cases a year.
Take those easy calories away, and people's weights go back down to where they were in the 1970s.

I'll go with the bush. It's lest cute but a lot more fun. It's just more fun to dive in a hairy pussy then a bald one.

File: MetArt_Bijele_Victoriya-A_high_0047.jpg (2MB, 4000x6000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x6000px

>>744669657
>bush
>less cute
anon please

>>744665855
Oh yes they would. The women of that generation smoked like fucking chimneys. They would just do other things like cook, clean and stay on a diet for a man, too, and those were more important. Especially when that man way paying her bills, and she knew it.
When she could get her own money, she "didn't need no man" to get along anymore, and that's when you saw the domestic practices start to die out and the bad habits really start to creep in.

File: IMG_7181.jpg (1MB, 3000x4500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x4500px

>>744669888
Trips of truth.

File: IMG_7182.jpg (2MB, 4500x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4500x3000px

>>744670254

File: IMG_7183.jpg (2MB, 3000x4500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x4500px

>>744670330

File: IMG_7184.jpg (1MB, 4500x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4500x3000px

>>744670401

File: IMG_7185.jpg (2MB, 4500x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4500x3000px

>>744670451

File: vps10.jpg (185KB, 805x1185px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 805x1185px

>>744659184

More natural beauty. Most models now wear more make up that Tammy Fae Baker (google her). No Photoshop jobs back then. Now days Playboy just take any girl off the street and loads her up with make up and photoshops the shit out of the photos. They can take a 4-5 and make her a 10 in the photos.

No stupid tattoos or piercings to 'express' themselves. Not many dyed their hair back then.

Diet and work. More people consume many more calories than they did back then. Consumption of soda/beer/hard liquor has more than doubled.

People are working longer at their jobs and commuting much longer to get to them. How many cup holders did you see in cars in the 70s and early 80s. All this leads to less time to eat healthier as most people want a quick meal.

File: IMG_7187.jpg (2MB, 4500x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4500x3000px

>>744670562

>>744670287
Would run my wet tounge all across her body, fom her lovely bush to perfect tits

Girls are also starting puberty earlier and earlier.

From wiki:The average age at which the onset of puberty occurs has dropped significantly since the 1840s.[69][70][71] In every decade from 1840 to 1950 there was a drop of four months in the average age of menarche among Western European females. In Norway, girls born in 1840 had their menarche at an average age of 17 years. In France, the average in 1840 was 15.3 years. In England, the average in 1840 was 16.5 years. In Japan the decline happened later and was then more rapid: from 1945 to 1975 in Japan there was a drop of 11 months per decade.

A 2006 study in Denmark found that puberty, as evidenced by breast development, started at an average age of 9 years and 10 months, a year earlier than when a similar study was done in 1991. Scientists believe the phenomenon could be linked to obesity or exposure to chemicals in the food chain, and is putting girls at greater long-term risk of breast cancer.[72]

So girls are developing their bodies, while still being so young. They develop this weird combo of childish and adult features that wasn't around a few generations ago

>>744662085
Jesus, are we all just going to ignore the dead chafed skin on her gooch?

File: 1495948196186.jpg (500KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 1280x960px

>>744670562
>>744670629
I want to live in a world where this is the most common look for a woman.

>>744670964
it's just dried up pussy juice

>>744659184
>why is it that women from the 70's and 80's seem so much more attractive? pic related

only the good pics survived from that time area

>>744662456
Staring at TV's, etc. can't make you obese. Only eating to much food can make you fat.

File: Cyndi.jpg (394KB, 680x1024px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 680x1024px

>>744659184

>>744670572
>Not many dyed their hair back then.
Bullshit.
It was estimated in the 1970s that over 40% of women dyed or colored their hair. By the 1980s it was up over 50%.

>>744659184
>why is it that women from the 70's and 80's seem so much more attractive? pic related

Professional models
Professional photographers
Film cameras
Expensive lenses
Attention paid to lighting
Makeup artists

File: 0wYnspl.jpg (1MB, 1529x2210px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1529x2210px

>>744665817

>>744670878
Amazingly enough, starvation has the well-known effect of postponing and even eliminating menstruation. As we've conquered starvation, women's periods can start at a more biologically natural time. That's not a problem, rather a sign that our population is fed well enough that our women can safely start having children. That they do not want to have children that early is their problem, not Nature's. More kids=more chance of survival in the eyes of our DNA.

>>744672060
>>744672045
I love tits like that
I wonder how they feel probably firm as fuck like a semi erect dick

File: IMG_7188.jpg (2MB, 4500x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4500x3000px

>>744670629

File: IMG_7189.jpg (1MB, 4500x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4500x3000px

>>744672383

File: 1412124191298.jpg (88KB, 486x603px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 486x603px

>>744670572
his balls are awfully high

>>744660849
faggot looking for cock

>>744672639
holy shit, that is t h i c c

>>744659184
looks shit
i hate their "fashion", the tan and the stereotypical hair are hideous, now body hair i dont care but less would be better

>>744659184
they're not
their hair was awful

>>744665817
I've noticed this too, wonder why.

>>744659184
because you can't see their ugly AF vagina

File: Vintage-BW-nude-with-shaved-pussy.jpg (95KB, 511x748px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 511x748px

I'm 57 and I agree something is missing...something has changed.
Tits of yore are so much better.
Babes of yore are so much sexier.
But I've always had an aversion to body hair...
I can handle a trimmed bush, but I prefer a shaved vag and underarms.

>>744669994
men are the other part of this. they don't marry anymore

>>744672084
I don't have the sources, but there's research that points to chemical treatment of plastics as causing fluctuation in sex hormones, especially increased estrogen. While low body fat does delay puberty, it seems to me there's some other component. Male sperm count has decreased significantly across the last few generations also, which makes me think there's something fucking with human estrogen levels.

>>744659627
fpbp

>>744673589
edgy

>>744673886
it's in the plastic bottles you should look that up. the elite is trying to sterilize us to decrease birth rates and control overpopulation.

>>744664231
He meant batshit insane feminists and sjws.

>>744659627
This
>>744664231
There was the feminist movement, but most women were raised to be a good wife and mother. Occupations were secondary. Girls are not raised to be good wives and mothers now. Hell, now women are shit mothers.

>>744670451
I wanna finger her stink star

>>744673582
Bras can shape out women tits, back then they were all awkward, pointy and uncomfortable, now women have these round soft padded bras and it shapes them into the round ball shape we know today.

>>744676246
I highly doubt it's the bras

File: mMGe01G.png (734KB, 1200x774px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 1200x774px

>>744659703
dunno man. you're kinda right. women should only grow a bush to hide their disgusting roastie cunt. like men grow beards to hide their weak jawline and acne. but if they have a nice simps like pic related they should def show it off imo.