alright, serious question; how in the fuck have humans not figure

>>744166077
Tell us than alien with an ego bigger than my cock. Making fun of us lesser civilizations. Than humor me and tell me about this quantum resonance and also tell me how you learned English while your at it. Why not Chinese? That's the most spoken language isn't it?

>>744166077
Are you pretending to be an alien?

>>744166324
no u

>>744166077
So if you have figured out quantum resonance care to post a file explaining it

>>744166299
>>744166324

never said i was an alien. im just a human who figured it out

i know english because its my native language, and i never said i wad better than any of you. i like to think i got lucky and had an epiphany that lead me to resonance theory.

>>744166479
Me and 2 other civilizations
How did you manage to contact them?>>744166077

>>744166299
first thing aliens do is watch the Simpsons and learn English. Also Chinese is the most spoken but only in one country English s the most widely spoken making it more useful.

>>744166479
Oh sorry I guessed you were extra terrestrial. Now what about that resonance explanation?

>>744166456
thats where things get a bit iffy. i can only say so much without risking this planet being abandoned, but here the basic concept. if you can figure the rest out ill buy you a drink seriously i hope you can. i need a good buddy.
all things at the most basic level interact im a certain way, they exist in both a percieved and real temporal duality. but only negative singils can interact with true temporal opposites. it can all be charted with some simply graphs and some complex math.


that's as much as i can say without risking this civilisation being scattered. i like my homeworld a bit too much to let that happen, call me selfish but i love mcnuggets

>>744166534
i havent contacted them, or met them, i only inferred that they had because they where abandoned. and i found documents regarding resonance theory.

its fucking freaky man, litterally entire planets just became ghost towns

>>744166666
nigga you need to lay off the LSD. Also nice quads

>>744166666
>Complex math
Not my thing but what could humanity do with an understanding of the quantum resonance theory?
Also checked the satanic quints

>>744166666
ill give you massive hint though, a 2 4 3 quark interference patter creates a field of effective gluons, and via some prismatic polorized laser defragmenting. you can cause an effect of force negation. think of it like a car battery, and if you hook a cable up to ground, and touch the wires, all the electricity will empty into the ground and not you.


same thing here but with force, after all they are two sides of the same coin

Have you got any concrete proof of this

>>744166869
I'm a physicist and this is fucking hilarious

>>744166952
Is it like an "hacking the metadata mainframe" thing?

>>744166854
well, ill tell you what ive been able to do

>force negation via gluon defragmented primal structures. (become super man(kinda))

>negation of mass and acceleration of entropic value(effectively make your time go faster than others, achieving a "pausing time" effect)

>going close to the speed of light.

>creating black bodies

>wormholes

>litterally the ability to create a universe

it basically lets you make a field of any particle you want, even strange matter which you can make into some wicked bombs.

>>744166952
litterally the bait

>>744167076
prismal*

File: images.jpg (8KB, 299x168px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 299x168px

>>744167005
Yeah basically, this guy is cosplaying Rick Sanchez on the internet

>>744166077
>like the roman empire but a million times bigger
Thats still only a fraction of the size of the solar system. Try a trillion times bigger and maybe I'd consider it godlike.

>>744167076
Built any portal gun?

>>744167120
For me to be baited I'd have to be mad rather than amused.

Please OP go on, I'll be sure to share all of this with my colleagues

You are advancing the human race my friend

>>744167076
If I pay you can you provide me any tech Superior to the one we have now?

>>744166952

hey man, think what you like, but some advice: never accept any model of physics as correct. the point of being a scientist is to question everything. i wish you no ill will, and in fact, im kinda glad people are still skeptical of everything.

but just dont accept all of our ideas, progress is made by the acceptance of new ones.

>>744166077
Care to talk in private op?

>>744167196
nope, a portable device is bullshit. the power requirements are fucking wack. its possible on a macro scale, but a portable thing is just a dream

>>744167230
alright, tell you what. given the state of our planet. ill wait like 2 years. then, ill make another thread and we can get a drink or some shit. but right now, you would be suprised at how terrifying your government can be.

>>744167173
you dont get it. they arent great at all. they have no infrastructure or government because its all abandoned. my point was that its freaky seeing an entire planet just left as a ghost town

>>744167337
in private? depends on where

>>744167250
I actually agree with everything you said there bud.

Still doesn't lend any credence to what you say of course, but that doesn't matter, artistic works of fiction and all that.

I'd actually pay good money to see you deliver these findings to a board of professors, it'd be great

>>744167601
I don't know what do you prefer

Reveal it.
Start...whatever you are able to start by sharing this information, if you have it.
Be the most important person who has ever lived.
Make History.

>>744167666
Meet me in the toilet behind the arby's, there'll be a hole cut in the wall. You know what to do.

>>744167601
What do you suggest?

>>744167629
oh boy, trust me i will. ive been planning to go public fir a while. but with the implications i cant do that without a well thought out plan. give me a year, and ill make sure we get a drink and all.

my treat, personally i want more physicist friends

>>744166077
because everyone's afraid of the free market

What happens when we die then?

>>744167554
how did you 'see' these events?

>>744167673
in due time, but to be fair its alot sooner than you would think. im not looking for fame though, but if it comes ill enjoy the pussy.

when i do go public, i want you all to tske down this number


876342

if any of you ever tweet that to me or message me that in some way ill buy you all drinks and we can have a laugh

Remember to leave some backup of whatever proof you have, we need to know this even if you don't make it to next year.

>>744167709
Discord?

>>744167872
when yku fabricate certain heavy particles it creates a unique gravitational wave pattern. its extreeeemely faint, but out of curiosity i followed them

>>744167948
see
>>744167910

>>744167969
are you american?

>>744166666
oh shit. i forgot to clarify.


the perceived temporal duality is just charge, caused by supersymettry directly after the big bang, that symmetry let both positive and negative singils exist. existing in both expanding and compressing oscillations. this is what allows negative ones to interact with both temporal values. which is why leptons exist.

im sorry.i fucked it up, there is only one time duality. and the other is just a charge duality caused by supersymettry

>>744168241
nope

>>744168278
You're not Swedish or something, are you?

>>744168278
well, to be more specific, im not technically. but yes, i do live in the u.s

pls dont hunt me down anon

>>744167966
So?

>>744167779
i have as much of a clue as you do.

i never claimed i was perfect or omniscient. im just a person who happened to figure out how to make some cool tech. nothing more nothing less

>>744168369
youve been talking to not me this entire time. id rather not go public. just jot down the number i left in the thread and then send it to me later, ill buy you a drimk

>>744168467
I just wanted to talk about something that might interest you before going public

okay, i admit. first time i tried to explain it i fucked it up and botched it, im not a teacher. ive got a more thorough explanation, and i can post it. if you guys want a pretty fundamental idea as to what resonance is, ill post it.

i apoligize for the the first time, it was my bad

>>744168581
really? okay then send me a discord. im just sketched out that you might be government

File: 20170904_152111.png (9KB, 264x265px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 264x265px

>>744168667
I'm not from the government
Here's the link gg/bN3cX

>>744166666
Are you typing with your dick? Your spelling is fucking atrocious!

>>744169023
Rick is always drunk, forgive him.

>>744169023
i am pretty drunk actually. but i dont think of myself as rick. rick would never want to help people.

>>744167076
So you're saying using a reverse fragmentation of gluons from photons utilizing negative energy to create a temporal or physical rift which allows complete control over the determination of said event, effectively negating any physical effects there may be on us.

And how did you reach this conclusion?

File: knowing-is-half-the-battle-the-other-half-is-violence-gi-joe-shirt.gif (22KB, 508x408px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 508x408px

Dude. I'd stick around post desertion.

>>744169303
no no, its just making photons act like gluons, they dont actually become them

>>744168878
i dunno man, i have to create an account. got anything anonymous?

>>744168878
Op did you join the server?

okay, to anyone in this thread still. do you guys want me to post an actually competant explanation to resonance theory?
i know what i first said probably made physicist laugh, but im drunk. ive got an actual explanation now

>>744169470
Ah got ya. That's the jist Though? There has to be an enormous energy requirement barrier for such a prismatic laser. Where did you work on this without anyone else's knowledge?

>>744169594
Do it dude.

>>744169520
http://www.chatzy.com/51287274246452

>>744169594
I'll read it.

>>744169594
I'm pretty sure you're describing force fields

>>744169594
You used a bunch of words in such a way that YOU clearly did not know what they meant.

Also, spelling mistakes ALL OVER the place. There's drunkenly hitting the wrong key, and then there's not knowing how to spell. Boy, you're in the second category.

all right. here it is


resonance theory:


at a fundamental level, all matter exists in wave "packets" i called singils. time split off into two roads in the beggining. and which one we are in is arbitrary. since the true charge duality is caused by the notion that if you where to pick and two identical particles from opposing time directions, they would have an opposite charge.

now, particles exist in two states, with a particles existing in both our time arrow. and its superpartner being in an opposing time arrow. now because they are waves, they oscillate, both in a sinusoidal way and like a spring. the sinusodial giving thw particle energy and the spring giving it observed charge. due to super symmetry during the planck era. some singils "bounced" off the edge of the universe. making half of them positive(expansion) singils and half negative(compressions) singils. these dont annihilate. and instead interact via interference and charge difference. particles become stable when they have configurations of singils that have all of the particles interact and still keep a charge. which happens because compression singils can interact with both temporal directions, since they compress. this allows for one temporal side of a particle to be neutral, and the other to be fully interacting with a kept charge.


these patterns can be scaled up to a macro levels, and with some clever engineering, and knowledge of the patterns you can make field of effective subatomic particles. now these arent actually subatomic particles. just a field with the same pattern as them, and since relativity is a thing, its impossible to tell a macro particle that behaves like a subatomic one from a subatomic one. and thats how resonance works.
i wish you all luck and i hope you all prosper

>>744169768
again, ive had a LOT of whiskey, im nust trying to have some conversation

>>744169909
fucking damnit. if any of you figure it out, please don't share it with anyone. i dont want our planet to be abandoned.

File: 4351.jpg (16KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x300px

Do you just drink or do cannabis?

>>744170334
i just drink, i smoked once but didnt like how it made me slow.

File: p-Chapelles-Show-Dave-Chapelle1.jpg (27KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x300px

>>744170245
I'll stay on the planet, anon. . . Just stay off my land.

File: Da_Moon_Rulez_Number_1.jpg (78KB, 600x504px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 600x504px

>>744169909
You are retarded
>all matter exists in wave "packets" i called singils.
Real quantum physics calls them wave functions but keep making up your own shit

>since the true charge duality is caused by the notion that if you where to pick and two identical particles from opposing time directions, they would have an opposite charge.
The description of charges on particles (i.e. positive, negative or neutral has to do with their magnetic properties when traveling through a magnetic field.

>now, particles exist in two states, with a particles existing in both our time arrow. and its superpartner being in an opposing time arrow
No

>due to super symmetry during the planck era. some singils "bounced" off the edge of the universe. making half of them positive(expansion) singils and half negative(compressions) singils. these dont annihilate.
Kek, no

>particles become stable when they have configurations of singils that have all of the particles interact and still keep a charge
what a about neutrons?

>ou can make field of effective subatomic particles. now these arent actually subatomic particles. just a field with the same pattern as them
you are stupid


>its impossible to tell a macro particle that behaves like a subatomic one from a subatomic one
wat? everything smaller than a bucky ball behaves as quantum mechanics describes....e.i. electrons and orbitals are quantized. Molecule behave as classic physics describes because the orbital and electron energy levels smear together and become continous thus losing the quantized state

File: IMG_4300.jpg (72KB, 687x777px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 687x777px

>>744166666
>selfish but i love mcnuggets
Yeah I watch Rick n Morty but dont go larping as Rick on the internet, you sad fedora loser lmao

>>744167601
Bathroom stall, through glory hole

File: IMG_4310.jpg (321KB, 864x1536px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 864x1536px

>>744170813
Back to pol, faggot

>>744170684
think what you want.

heres some answers though if you want them

i called them singils because they made up quarks and i didn't know what to call these particles. i apoligize if i offended your physics brain

dont accept all info. the description of charges is just its description, not its explanation, all i claim was that charge exists because if you pick two identical particles with opposing time directions, their field lines are arranged in opposite ways.

i cant do much to convince you that particles exist in two states. its mire of just an oscillation on a vector. not to states, but a single state that you can choose opposing sides of


if you dont believe in super symmetry then you arent a scientist

i never said particles couldnt be neutral, in fact neutral particles are a requirement for the existence of charged ones

and when i said field of effective quantum particles, all i meant is that you can make macroscopic arrangements of matter portray the charactaristics that we thought only quantum scale particles could exhibit.


if you believe me or not, its up to you.

>>744171110
two states*

>>744170684
also, the wave function isnt the particle you dip, the wave function is all of the information pertaining to a packet or "quanta"

>>744171110
>think what you want
See you are thinking what you want, Im telling you how it is and the descriptions from actual physicists experiments.

>i called them singils because they made up quarks and i didn't know what to call these particles. i apoligize if i offended your physics brain
things made from quarks are just sub-atomic particles

>dont accept all info. the description of charges is just its description, not its explanation, all i claim was that charge exists because if you pick two identical particles with opposing time directions, their field lines are arranged in opposite ways.
Charge is just a way to describe how particles interact with magnetic fields

>i cant do much to convince you that particles exist in two states. its mire of just an oscillation on a vector. not to states, but a single state that you can choose opposing sides of
Nope jsut nope, Yes particles act as wave functions and then collapse into particles upon observation but that is only for things smaller than a bucky ball.

>if you dont believe in super symmetry then you arent a scientist
i dont think super symmetry is even fully accepted in the physics world and speaking of actually being a scientist, are you even a scientist? Hold any degrees in science or published in scientific jounrals? Protip: I have multiple degrees in chemistry and am published

>i never said particles couldnt be neutral, in fact neutral particles are a requirement for the existence of charged ones
you said all particles have a charge, have no charge is not having a charge

>and when i said field of effective quantum particles, all i meant is that you can make macroscopic arrangements of matter portray the charactaristics that we thought only quantum scale particles could exhibit.
sauce, becauser there is an upper mass limit to quantum mechanics and its the size of a bucky ball

>if you believe me or not, its up to you.
I dont, science is not a place for beliefs

>>744171782
they make up quarks. they are the components that make quarks.

>>744171564
its the probability of finding a particle like an electron in an orbital

>>744171782
sauce? im the sauce.


thinking that quantum phsyics jsut dissapears and the rules of the universe change according to size is why humanity hasnt proggressed, they cant accept that things do actually scale up. its why pursuit of a unified force theory is so adamantly sought after.
the reason things don't all exhibit quantum properties has to do with the prime quantum number.

super symmetry IS a thing, its why superpartners of subatomic particles exist.


all particles do have a charge. because all of them are made up of singils. the charge of two interacting particles will always add up to zero, but due to the time duality (which is an actual widely accepted theory) and properties of compressive oscillations. you can have one side of a particle act as if it has a charge, but in reality its total charge atill adds up to zero

>>744171865
>In particle physics, preons are point particles, conceived of as subcomponents of quarks and leptons.[1] The word was coined by Jogesh Pati and Abdus Salam in 1974. Interest in preon models peaked in the 1980s but has slowed as the Standard Model of particle physics continues to describe the physics mostly successfully, and no direct experimental evidence for lepton and quark compositeness has been found.

>>744171960
okay, your just baiting at this point. i bit the bait, i admit.

>>744171960
thata just the prime quantum number btw, which is only part of the wave function

This is true /b.. no traps..no sissys..no dick rate. Thank you, anon.

>>744172297
>immedietly believing that because we decided something else was immedietly better that no other option is correct.

just because no evidence has been found doesnt mean it doesnt exist, saying that is just a fallacy.

its like when we chose a uranium reactor over a thorium one. we only ever kept the standard model because nobody saw importance in components of subatomic particles.


though thank you for the name, preons roll off the tongue better than singils.

>>744172550
besides, finding evidence if something smaller than an electron is very tough, im sure thay they just didnt have the tech back in the 80s. only recently have we even been able to detect neutrinos. and those can be massive at times.

>>744172210
So you have no degrees in science, fuck off

>thinking that quantum phsyics jsut dissapears and the rules of the universe change according to size is why humanity hasnt proggressed
right because science and man havent progressed since the 40s when the power of the atom was unleashed.

>the reason things don't all exhibit quantum properties has to do with the prime quantum number
Funny how experiments with bucky balls show that quantum effects do has an upper mass limit. If you took one semester of quantum anything, they would have taught that to you that. It has nothing to do with prime numbers retard, and about how molecular orbital energy levels smear together when combined

>all particles do have a charge
neutrons have no charge

> the charge of two interacting particles will always add up to zero
so two electrons add to zero charge? and not -2? Or how about two electrons and a proton aka hydrogen with an extra electron? Total charges do not add up to zero, charged states drive chemistry and especially biochemsitry

>>744172336
no, just no

>>744172733
What is fermi lab

File: Cornholio[1].jpg (22KB, 320x456px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 320x456px

>>744166077
>lemme just throw some big science-y sounding words together
>uhh.. quantum.. resonance. something
>that'll work

[Post]

>>744172550
so god and santa and the tooth fairy exist too?

>>744172747
you litterally just proved my point. the prime number becomes greater as you get farther away from the nucleus, and that smear is the reason that they dont exhibit it. what im saying it that in certain situations, using leptons like streams of photons ans the flow of electrons, you can reproduce a field of virtual particles.


school is dumb. the way you put so much faith into just proves how brainwashed you are. science is the product of curiosity, its to question everything. to know that we dont even know how much we dont know.


bucky balls are an upper limit, but photons cant make bucky balls.


neutrons are made up of quarks, which havw charge. and those interact to form a neutral charge, im trying to tell you the same concept here.


two electrons cant interact. only opposing charges can. and i meant it on the most basic level possible, on the most fundamental level, they will always add up to 0

>>744172849
>thinking that fermi lab was designed to detect particles smaller than subatomic ones.

im talking below subatomic. much much smaller

>>744173230
and i already said why they can exhibit charge, but their "real" charge will always equal zero

yknow, i never thought there would be so many scientists on /b/ brings a tear to my eye

just remember that number i jotted down. itll be worth it

>>744173112
sure buddy

>>744173230
Man you are naive anon.
> prime number becomes greater as you get farther away from the nucleus, and that smear is the reason that they dont exhibit it. what im saying it that in certain situations, using leptons like streams of photons ans the flow of electrons, you can reproduce a field of virtual particles.
Serious no, it has nothing to do with prime numbers, eigenvalues are what you are looking for when working with wavefunctions
>school is dumb
yes to a person who hasnt gone

>the way you put so much faith into just proves how brainwashed you are
so when I did the experiments to prove the theories taught, I was brainwashed? So when the theories I was taught are applied to my research, doing experiments no one has done before, and they work as predicted. It was the product of lies and brainwashing?

>science is the product of curiosity, its to question everything. to know that we dont even know how much we dont know.
this is said all the time in upper level courses. Clearly you never made it past general chem or physics

>neutrons are made up of quarks, which havw charge. and those interact to form a neutral charge, im trying to tell you the same concept here.
two electrons cant interact. only opposing charges can. and i meant it on the most basic level possible, on the most fundamental level, they will always add up to 0
Ok then what about electrons and protons who's quarks obviously add up to a charged state?

>>744173376
um fermilab discovered some quarks and neutrinos among other things. Nice try tho

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/science/particle-physics/key-discoveries.html

>>744173468
>their "real" charge will always equal zero
So protons and electrons are charges are not +1 and -1?

>>744173870
i never said charges cant exist. i said all particles do. but at the most basic level the charge adds up to zero.

and, my theory for how the smear happens is a bit different than the standard. its too long to explain here, but ill give you that one. quantum has an upper limit due to matrix's and that whole stability calculating stuff. i apoligize that i couldnt portray my point effectively, i am drunk.

ive taken theo physics and im currently studying electronic engineering so i can make gadgets, ive got no degree but i love to learn. the brainwashing im speaking of is what plagues science. the inability to try and even attempt to percieve anything other than the standard model. thats what sets you apart from people like steven hawking, they question everything, you simply learn and know.


im not talking about charges at quark level, i never was. in saying that a sub-subatomic level, charges will always add up to zero, but observed charge is still a thing because of the time duality and the oscillation states of these wave functions.

>>744174060
quarks and neutrinos are still subatomic.
im talking about detecting preon level things

>>744174157
their observed charge is -1 and 1. but if you look at both temporal sides of the interaction, they will add up to zero. its why if you add a particle and its ant particle. they anhiliate and add up to zero charge.

>>744174750
>at the most basic level the charge adds up to zero
Quarks are thought to be the most fundamental particles which are charged and when they are put together to make electrons, protons and neutrons. Obviously they have a mixed of charges (+1 or -1) or no charge at all.

> my theory for how the smear happens is a bit different than the standard. its too long to explain here, but ill give you that one. quantum has an upper limit due to matrix's and that whole stability calculating stuff.
Aka you are wrong and you know it

>he brainwashing im speaking of is what plagues science. the inability to try and even attempt to percieve anything other than the standard model. thats what sets you apart from people like steven hawking, they question everything, you simply learn and know.
My job title is Research Biochemist, so I push and explore beyond "the standard models" and I have published my research. So dont spout off about what you dont know

>in saying that a sub-subatomic level, charges will always add up to zero
Electron -1
Proton +1
Neutron 0

>but observed charge is still a thing because of the time duality and the oscillation states of these wave functions.
Nope, charge is a thing because of what quarks make them up and the number of the charge is just a basic description from when a scientist shot electrons, then protons and then neutrons through a magnetic field

>>744174885
but anti particles and particles co-exist, spontaneously sometimes which due to conservation of energy then when combine they must completely anhiliate each other

>>744175329
>>in saying that a sub-subatomic level, charges will always add up to zero
>Electron -1
>Proton +1
>Neutron 0
ingore this, i just noticed the "sub-sub" part in the previous post

>>744174818
>subatomic particles are particles much smaller than atoms.[1] There are two types of subatomic particles: elementary particles, which according to current theories are not made of other particles; and composite particles.

>>744175329

okay, ive tried to reason, i like some good discussion but youve insulted me and put me down, classic scientific elitist mindset. youve been toxic, im leaving after this last thing


>sub-subatomic
>neturon
>proton
>electron


litterally just look at that, thats your logic

>its thought if thag quarks are the most fundamental particles

ive been trying to get you to unserstand that im talking about things smaller than quarks, but somehow in your head, things that arent quarks are quarks.

>>744175592
and as to you, why do you think that one of the big questions in physics is why, if 50% of matter in the beggining was anti matter and 50% was matter, why didnt it all just annihilate and there is no universe? the model of physics you preach is flawed but you cant accept those flaws.

if you thought about what ive said a bit more, you could join me. but you cant.
all of you have focused on sub atomic thing, somehow me saying that im talking about things smaller than that just doesnt even register. i apologize that a wacky crazy science man came on here spouting nonsense. ill leave you all to your lives,


and when i do go public, even if you where toxic, message me the number i posted here, i love science and all that it is. i can see that you all love it too. and i dont blame you for skepticism, so ill just let my actions speak for me.


when this all pans out, ill buy you all drinks, and we can have a laugh at this. because humanity will progress and that is the best for everyone. and thats all i seek, progress.

>>744166077
normalfag here, jotted down the number, and if i dont become superman in the next 3 years ill admit i took the bait and wasted about 30 minutes of my life

>>744175808
>not realising theories change over time

peace, im out, its been good /b/, screencap this so i can print it out later in my life. i wish you all the best.


you terrific sons of bitches

>>744176001
>if 50% of matter in the beggining was anti matter and 50% was matter, why didnt it all just annihilate and there is no universe?
Our universe is not special, situations where anti-matter and matter were equal probably did happen or will happen. Same with antimatter being more the matter. In that situation youd just think antimatter was matter and matter was antimatter and thus having a universe with more "matter" than "antimatter" is 66% and them being equal is 33%. Thus it was 2x more likely for a universe with "matter"

>>744176087
Theories do change but until they do or you have scientific evidence then it is good as hear say

>>744167076
>creating black bodies

I heard negroes do a lot of that in the hood

>ayy lmao

>OP
>OP
>OP

Let's say for a second that we believe you.

We have written down the number you posted.

What can we expect in a year/two years?

A news story? An article? A documentary?

How can we know what you are talking about is real? How can we know it's effective?

Please respond.

bumping thread

>>744178008
im planning being incredibly controversial, youll know who i am.
ill buy you a drink, and if ive got the company i want to start set up by then, ill give each of you one cool gadget for free. your choice. be it a space ship, hover boots (those are fucking DOPE)plasma gun ect. one of your choice.

>>744166077
Hey my dude, is this like quantum resonance spectrometry? If so, we already have it.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2015/01/03/what-is-quantum-resonance/#.Wa159u5MHqA
Plus, the original research paper is in Chinese. Whoa!

>>744169594
Sure, brohan. I'm interested.

>>744179401
if you had read the thread, its like completely polar opposite.

>>744179872
Give me a chance, I'm reading it right now. It's a long thread.
Also, damn, no immediate Chinese tech for us

Who would ever have thought there would be a physicist fight on /b/?

Props to OP for an interesting thread and a respite from the 10 repetitive topics that seem to flood /b/ these days.

>>744166800
Nigger thats a quint

>>744169594

>just copying and pasting info from google

Time to stop posting now

This was an awesome thread. Thank you meta-physics /b/ro. I look forward to you blowing the minds of the scientific community

>>744166077
1. You have no idea what you're saying
2. Strings isn't a thing nublet, explain string theory oh wait you will copy n paste wiki,
GTFO

I don't know if OP is kill or if he's still here.
I've just started to read about chaos magick - does any of this sound like it's related?

File: 1504272819983.png (91KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1200x1200px

>>744166077
>>744166479
>>744166666

AHHHHH WOOO PICKLE RIIIIIIIICKKKKKKKK HAAAAAHAHAHAHA WOOOOOO WUBALUBABAUBUBUBUBADAUBUDUDDUDBAAAA DOO DOO POO POO HEE HAA REDDIT YAY

>>744181507
magic isnt science.

>>744181491
string theory is just a generalization. i apoligize, but stating off all the unified force and quantum theories just wasnt in me

>>744182128
I know, but this kind of science is pretty close to magic(k). A lot of the same terms, too, which is why I asked.

if OP's still here, I'm having a little trouble visualizing the two time arrows - do opposite "time arrows" start at the "death" of the particle and work backwards to its creation?

>>744169638
nope, just some clever geometry. its not maddening bullshit. its just a neat exploit to how our universe functions, relativity happens to be at the very deepest core of that. and this is just relativity exploited

>>744182359
explain? im curious

>>744182689
i am, im too drunk to leave.


just think of it like this, the big bang was a point, and time is a vector going in bith directions for infinity. the time "arrows" are just which side of the point you are on.

>>744183054
which side relative to the point you are on *

my bad

>>744182903
I just started looking into it, but chaos magick uses terms like 'quantum resonance" and "sigils" (which seemed similar to the term OP used for smaller than quark particles. Even though sigils are symbols the chaos guys use for altering realty, I'm pretty sure).

I thought maybe OP was into some high level chaos magick instead of science.

ok so what do you think will happen once you go public with the information? also what number? do you mean 2 4 3

>>744183054
You're back!
Serious question: Why is time only in two vectors / directions? Wouldn't there be an infinite amount of "directions" time could go in?

>>744183054
so there's like a "shadow" universe where electrical charges down to subatomic particles are flipped?

And if you don't mind, how does this knowledge translate to being able to "fake" exotic particles with light? You mentioned the 2 4 3 quark interference pattern, but where does the opposite universe come into play?

>>744183346
i got corrected, what i was calling singils where preons, i didnt know the term had been coined.

and resonance is just a word i assigned to because it sounded neat.
interference or interaction would be equally correct.


and ive actually got equations for this stuff. im not just a bullshit crazy guy. ive got a thesis im making, and its at around 150 pages right now. with detailed descriptions of the math and a simple graph inspired by feynman diagrams to help with the recognition of patterns.

ive sorted out these patterns, how much mass they have, and their charge, ive got about 180 of the little bitch configurations and they do match up with the values we have for actual and theorized particles. from hadrons to baryons and bosons.

the charge, spin, and mass ratios are the same as the ones in our traditional model. it fits pretty snugly.

ive got alot of cred to it. thats why im waiting to go public, because ive gotta finish a thesis.

>>744182903
>>744183054
I just read a short interview with one of the forefathers of chaos magick:

"Over the years Carroll's interest shifted to the concept of three-dimensional time. His research culminated in the development of the "Hyperwarp 6D model"—something he hopes will advance things like starship design and parapsychology"

>>744183475
time is a single vector. its just the big bang is a point on that vector line, and our "direction" of time is simply the observation of the which "side" we are on the vector line relative to the point.

youll notice that this means which side we pick is arbitrary, and thats true. so in definition, yes, time has no true direction, but since its a single vector. it can be grossly over generalized to two directions

>>744184030
OH, so the "shadow" universe I (wrongly) mentioned in >>744183497 is just time as seen from the other direction

>>744183787
Sorry dude, I didn't mean to imply you were a nut job. I don't think you are. I just saw some parallels between what I've just started to study & some of your concepts.

I don't actually know anything about physics, although I am a scientist by training.

I think your stuff is really interesting. I'm just incapable of debating it with you due to lack of knowledge in the physics field. Very nice change from all the trap threads, though

>>744166666
Checked
Also >my homeworld
You said you weren't an alien

>>744184359
not OP but when one has a massive perspective change, one starts to see oneself as a piece of a much, much bigger picture.

I consider myself an earthican as well.

also, since it must be done
>checked

>>744183497
the opposite universe is just us flipped. if you lived in it there would be no way to tell it apart from ours.

2 4 3 is just the numbers assigned to the pattern, each number corresponds with a particle. i won't reveal which. i havent patented my work yet


the "fake"ing of particles is an exploit of relativity at a fundamental level. i just set up a matrix if lasers with a specific frequency, and use magnetic fields, other lasers, electric currents, and different materials to start a sort of chain reaction that leads something like a photon, through the steps it needs to go through in order to sort of behave like another particle. this is only visible in the area of immediate interaction, and its pretty power costly. but, it makes a photon say, kind of act as if it has some of the properties of a gluon. it doesnt become one, but while its interfering, its exhibits some of its properties

>>744184030
Cool, thanks for the explanation. Does this have implications for time travel, or is going "back in time" still impossible?