What's the perfect IQ for a female? As a woman I find it

tits?

>>744111375
>intelligent
>women
choose one whore

I hate being intelligent.

"Ignorance is bliss"

When you're smart it's almost impossible talking to dumb people. If you want to socialize you have to "pretend" to be a lot more idiotic than you actually are unfortunately

>>744111375
iq was just made up by the jews to put us down, i hope you realize this

File: iq.png (18KB, 522x283px)

18KB, 522x283px

>>744111575
Come at me, ape.

>>744111375
>As a woman

Is that "woman" or woman?

>>744111375
If you are a truly intelligent female you are more rare than you know. Biologically females group around the median in almost all measurable traits. This is because they are the ones who choose who gets to mate and who doesn't.
This means that it benefits men and the species in general to have a much higher variability in the traits of males than females.
Statistically speaking women with IQs above 120 or below 80 are much rarer than men with IQs above 120 or below 80. This should also make you more desirable to men with IQs above 120.
Perhaps you are just slumming IQ wise. Stop hanging out at Walmart and start going to the symphony.

>>744111862
I even change the way I speak to fit in. They don't even speak the language properly

>>744112471
What this guy said

>>744111375

Intelligent men probably have the same problem as the intelligent woman, so i wouldnt look too much into gender specific issues.

Id also like to mention that it is unlikely that your intelligence differs much from the average (same goes for everyone, including me, on this secret club), perhaps your manner of speaking and interests are just "odd" and uncommon. I have the same "issue" so perhaps im just projecting, but ive noticed that i seem to hit it off with "odd" girls a lot better and i get attracted to them more so id advice to look into interests and personality more than something abstract such as intelligence.

Do you really care how sophisticated someones love is for you? If you dont, you dont trully care about intelligence and i believe that is a good thing.

I was just rambling and havent actually thought this through, so take it with a pinch of salt.

>>744112176
tits or it didnt happen

File: highIQ.jpg (532KB, 618x894px)

532KB, 618x894px

>>744112471
true, women tend to be average. there's a higher distribution of incredibly dumb guys and incredibly smart guys.

File: (Pacifica&Bill_Cypher)(Ryūko_Cosplay) Art by BigDad Inked and Colored by Xeaven.png (27KB, 611x1130px)

27KB, 611x1130px

>>744111375

Fucks IQs

If you wanna learn something... look that shit up... who cares if you're a quick learner

>>744112683
stop.
don't stop talking to dumb people of course, but let the way you speak and the things you talk about separate you. It will start attracting smart people to replace them.
or just realize that anyone can be smart and stop treating people with a lower test number as inhuman animals you piece of shit.

>>744111375
Here's some advice: Stop feeling the need to trade up.
>>744112176
Especially if you actually do have 147 IQ.

>>744111862
It's easy for me to talk to dumb people, because I just say shit that they like, but it's not really a conversation that I could enjoy at all.

>>744112901
>inhuman animals you piece of shit

You're not smart are you?

>>744113021
That's what I was getting at. Being smart and talking to a dumb person is like having already seen a movie but listening to someone's "blind reaction" to it

What's your MBTI type?

tits or gtfo

2 IQ, if she is in a vegetative state it's even better

>>744111375
IQ doesn't really prove intellect and people need to stop obsessing over it. And no I'm not saying this because I have a low IQ. I've taken multiple tests and gotten a range from 149-161 (more proof that it's bs) If you're actually a woman looking for an intelligent guy, go on a dating app and look for them.

>>744113300
Hey Brandon

>>744111375
when men talk about deep ideas or "intelligent" subjects now, it's considered mansplaining. So there you have the reason why men hide their thoughts and resort to "basic" activities and discussions.

>>744113449
Who?

>>744111375
>intelligent
>can't follow basic instructions
Tits or gtfo bitch

>>744111375
>What's the perfect IQ for a female?
What's the perfect IQ for any human? That.

>>744113241
A lot of people seem to enjoy that, seeing how popular all of the reaction videos on youtube are.
You could make a case and say that they are dumb though

I've unironically been told the perfect IQ for a woman is just enough to know their role and stay in the kitchen

>>744111375
>literature and culture

136 but I find these subjects to be bloody boring

OP let me judge you based on your favourite authors

>>744113670
Are you sure he wasn't just making a joke?

>>744113527
It was worth a try

>>744111375
Why do people always assume they are smart?
Maybe you should actually listen and read what you typed. It sounds like you're going after boys not men
If you're so smart you wouldn't be with people that talk about sports and videogames you would go where smart people hang out which is hard to find because smart people tend to not go out and hang out like you might do. Smart people actually work on what they think isn't a waste of time, clubbing isn't one of those.
Also you're probably a guy that's lonely and wants attention. You probably edge while reading the responses

>>744113815
Camus, Hume, Aristotle are 3. I don't really" do" fiction.

>>744113584
Fuck. Bad analogy I suppose.

>>744114045
so you are reading pseudo-intelligent philosophy.
this thread makes much more sense now.

>>744113789
Agreed. Especially culture. Don't see how that's an intelligent topic.

>>744114172
what are some intelligent philosophers?

>>744114172
name some non pesudo-intellectual philosophers

>>744114281
Not same guy but Wittgenstein

File: YallN1ggazPostinInATrollThread.jpg (62KB, 600x623px)

62KB, 600x623px

>>744111375
sage

>>744111375
Bait.
>>744111862
>When you're smart it's almost impossible talking to dumb people
When you're really smart, you can talk to dumb people by knowing how to speak simply. It isn't impossible.

>>744114331
>Wittgenstein

The guy who slowly starved himself by eating nothing but oatmeal?

>>744114045
Monster.

>>744111375
It should be roughly equal to the man she's interested in.
But some men can only handle women who are not as smart as he is. You know, the kind who want their women to fawn over them and do nothing but warm their beds and fuck and suck their balls dry every night. The kind of guys who think women with an opinion is a direct threat to not just themselves, but to all manhood itself.

Try to avoid those kinds of guys, if you can.

I have an IQ of 125 - not internet testing. I actually prefer my women to be equally smart, if not slightly smarter. But then, I'm a bit biased in favor of smart people in general.
But yeah, pwning me *too often* might be a turn off eventually.

Unfortunately, even in college, guys obsession with vidya and sports over any real culture does not improve.

>>744114437
He died from prostate cancer from what I've heard

>>744114045
lol stupid dead people when I was 8 I was already thinking at their level lol they were close though I already transcended past everyone on earth that I can see my own future I'm close to Nostradamus maybe nuclear war happens in the near future it has been about a week since I have seen a crystal clear images of my future

>>744111375
> an intelligent women
hah.

anyway, the higher the better, i'm a sapiophile.

>>744114437
Also the guy who was first in his company to run towards the front lines to face death like a man every time.

Real intelligent men don't talk to anyone women or not. I have transcended the meaningless banter you plebians foolishly hold in such high regard. Good luck with your unfulfilled existence.

One thing that might help you understand, is that women generally care more about culture and other people-related things.

>>744114849
>dying alone

>>744114927
I think this is pretty true. Most intelligent guys I know prefer math, science etc.

>>744114849
technically speaking, social interaction is one of the human needs, so actually you are the one that will have to endure an unfulfilled existence

>>744114618
Yeah. I think I'm remembering a story about Frege.

>>744114849
lol
>I'm so smart I don't need to talk
>has very "intelligent" thought
>doesn't tell anyone
>days later thought is talked about in public
>I'm smart I thought of that
>is actually thinking like the mass population
Nigger

>>744114281
Schopenhauer
Nietzsche
Hitler
Ayn Rand
They're the only intelligent philosophers in the world. All the rest are just Jews and their slave shills.

>>744111862
Ignorance is bliss because YOU HAVE TO FUCKING CHECK YOUR CPU TEMPERATURE AND IF THERE IS A FUCKING MEMORY LEAK EVERY 5 MINUTES YOU FAGGOT.

>>744115249
Learn how to use greentext, newfag.

>>744115015
>You will die alone no matter what unless you have some kind of parasite living inside you.

>>744115018
The most intelligent guy I know is a music composer. Though to be fair, he did go first to MIT for mechanical engineering. He found it unfulfilling and switched over to music.

>>744113984
It really wasn't

File: 4thursdayy turd.jpg (278KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1200x1600px

this thread is fucking pathetic non tits from op and you fags keep replying

>>744115348
Only if you're an edgy teenager

>>744115348
>Ayn Rand
You just outed yourself, poser.

>>744115348
Hitler was the most intelligent being to ever lay a foot on this earth

>>744111375
tits with a timestamp or get the fuck out

>>744115249
Kek'd
U so smarrt anon wow

>>744115414
So, you know Ton Sholtz..
yeah, right. Sure you do

>>744115407
>unless you have some kind of parasite living inside of you
Before asking if gut flora counts, define "I".

>>744115399
Apparently you don't know either don't call him a new face if you're one

>>744115414
ever heard of the term anecdotal evidence?

>>744115535
Hitler teaches you how to deal with people outside your circle of associates. Ayn Rand teaches you how to work with the people within your circle of associates.

>>744111375
>"Men only talk about vidya or sports"
>"I want to talk about literature or culture"
Learn video games and sports then. I don't like sports but I still know a little bit about it or try to learn some history about it. If you're truly an "intellect", you wouldn't mind learning about vidya and sports

>>744115778
That doesnt even make sense

>>744115839
Brainlet spotted.

>>744115555
double double quads of truth

>>744113056
there are human animals. they're called humans.

ur not smurt r u?

>>744111862

You're clearly not smart in the sense you think you are, or you are reasonably intelligent by some sort of academic marker but yet have very little real word experience, i.e. you're quite young.

Life is full of experiences, places and social interactions, to instantly label an entire subset of people as dumb, by your estimation, as you so eloquently put it, is stereotypical and arrogant.

Everyone on this planet has something valuable that you could learn, if you look hard enough. I'm guessing you will learn understanding with age, but for now try to understand this, we are all equal, whether you have a greater capacity for learning or not and humbling yourself slightly might help you to find the joy of interacting with your fellow human beings, regardless of your pre-conceived thoughts on how fostering a relationship with them might go.

By the way, I'm not that intelligent, I'm just clearly a lot more reasonable and level headed than you.

>>744113472
People really use that word?

>>744115630
Exactly. You are starting too see what I mean. Our existence may not be how it seems to many. After many years of living with debilitating mental disorders and trying to fit in with different groups of people and never being understood in the slightest and constantly feeling like an outcast I have finally embraced it. I have realized that human interaction actually only brings upon pain and unnecessary suffering.

>>744111375
I'll talk to you about anything you want. Pick a topic.

>>744116108
Another anon here. Just a small detail I take issue with in your post.

Everyone is equal?

Everyone is most certainly not equal. Some people can not and will never see. Some were born without limbs. Some are more predisposed to developing cancers. Some have brains that pruned connections in specific ways that makes them more predisposed to acts of memorization, on top of being exposed to more frequent avenues and opportunities to further develop and make concrete that emergent ability. Some are born with extra chromosomes. Some suffer from mental illness.

It's well to think of everyone as equal, but everyone is most certainly not equal. I have good reason for pointing this out.

>>744116210
> All that typing and I fucking put too instead of to
> Kill me please

>>744116002
The brainles was the dumbass who suggested she take an interest in dumbass subjects.
By that logic, you should be taking an interest in WWF and NASCAR because your dumbass friends are... instead of just getting some less dumbass friends.

>>744116108
>I'm just clearly a lot more reasonable and level headed than you.
Not OP, but no... you're not.

>>744115653
Yes. What of it?

>>744116398
I think he meant that everyone should be given an equal opportunity with you..

That humans, by default, deserve an equal amount of respect, be it that is none or a lot is your choice, but that you shouldn't judge someone before they've done anything for you to judge.

"think everyone as equal" is difficult for me, because it sort of sounds like you are denying that the limbless is unequal. Sorry if I sound pretentious, though.

>>744116398

Yeah, umm, I was being empathetic in that we are all roughly created equal.

You are being quite literal and I have no idea why or what purpose that serves in this specific thread, but carry on, you seem to have a point you want to make . . .

>>744116210
Or, in a nutshell, you do not belong amongst the average and also do not represent the average man, or even the "best" man. Disorders do not make you better, remember. Dis-order.

Not a good thing.

Human interaction can actually bring upon you great pleasure and satisfaction. For example, physical contact: a hug.

File: iu-24.jpg (139KB, 2362x2686px)

139KB, 2362x2686px

>>744116431
I agree, but what is your problem with WWF?
Do you hate animals or something?

>>744115614
I don't know who the fuck that is. I know a Richard Kahn, of whom I'm typing about, Stop assuming, faggot.

>>744116625
I think literal is the right direction. Being equal in respect and being equal in abilities are important distictions, imo. Not OP, just an onlooker.
the one who said > >>744116623.

>>744116623
but what if the person Is black?

>>744116623

Yeah he took a light hearted comment about all of us being roughly on an equal plain to make a specific point to the author and ran with it to very specific and literal ends that don't really hold up to the spirit of the conversation.

With that said, he clearly has a point to make, so lets see where it goes.

File: 635975552032407361-1386711875_be-nice.jpg (19KB, 560x263px)

19KB, 560x263px

So how's your day going?

>>744116431
>dumbass
>dumbass subjects
Can you further elaborate and demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that those subjects are dumbass subjects? What is a dumbass, objectively?

And, yes, a truly smart person would bother to familiarize themselves with a foreign subject so they can better relate with, and understand, their peers. Because doing so allows them greater social mobility and greater control over any social situation with said friends, especially when it could absolutely be the case there there exists no feasible way to find any less "dumbass" friends. Arguing what I think you're arguing is like trying to say that you won't learn another language because learning it is hard or boring. This is like arguing that you won't eat solid food because smoothies go down easier. I mean, have fun with that, but your digestive tract probably won't thank you.

>>744116776
Oh. I guess there ARE exceptions to the rule after all.
>/s

>>744112176
At 147 you're the smartest person you usually meet. It's not just dating men you're going to have problems with, it's friends, coworkers, casual convos on the bus, etc.

And those 0.5% men to match you? Even fewer are hot. And those guys can land hotter women than you.

Kill yourself. Or settle for a 120 who cares about you, dingus.

>>744111375
Have a talk with my bf. Sometimeshe'll just talk my ear off....but I haven't left him. Good quality in men to keep your interest up, just let them chime in, trust me women feel the same. You're not a lone nut.

>>744116732

Agreed but it's not really in the spirit of the conversation and for the most part, the direction he was going in made him sound like someone I'd rather not have a full on debate with.

I don't really think that looking into what makes some of us better than others due to constraints outside our control is a great way to get alone with people or not come across as an arrogant jackass.

But maybe that's just me?

>>744116942
>at 147 you're the smartest person you usually meet
I don't know why so many people instantly trust IQ. I think it just makes people who get a low score humble, and those who get a high score narcissistic.
The kinds of test barely measure intelligence. In fact, when designing it they had to make changes so that women could also get similar scores. It wasn't because women, on average, were dumber, rather, that they're brains were often better calibrated for different kinds of activities.
Anyones brain could be better calibrated for different kinds of activities. The things on IQ tests are largely not-very-useful activities anyways.

>>744116642
So if I don't belong amongst the "average" or "best" men, then through social interaction with them I will not find the same satisfaction that you experience? In this case we could both be equally correct in our conclusions that we have come to based on our own perspectives. But then tell me, how should I go about feeling satisfied in life if one of the key pillars to feeling accomplished is being valued by one's peers?

>>744116623
Right, I was just making the argument of the literal case of equality, because I have, many times, heard the case for literal equality being made. I'd never try to force someone to walk up flights of stairs if they have Rickets. It's much better if they take the elevator.

>>744116625
There's no need to carry on, the point was made.
>>744116398
>It's well to think of everyone as equal
Please read this sentence if you still believe that there was a misunderstanding beforehand.

>>744114520
>*too often*
>*fedora tipping intensifies*

>>744117201
which test are you even talking about
please post some kind of source that is more detailed because what you just said doesnt really make sense as far as I can see

I guess being a guy on the opposite side I've taken a more nurturing and mentoring role in my relationships. I enjoy teaching my girls about new things and getting them to explore.

>>744117073
I can see what you mean, I guess..
I think looking into it has no inherent problems, but the way you act in relation to it might, and that's why it's important to think about how to act in relation to it.
This probably isn't really anything new, though. It's practically an abstraction of "dont be racist", heh.

Again, I don't mean to be pretentious or arrogant in any of this, i'm just not very good at speaking a lot of the time i guess..

>>744117314
sounds like you would make a great kindergardener

>>744117222
>Trips of despair

>>744117470
I would. Kids love me.

>>744111375
Your fucking retarded if you think men are intimidated by intellegent women that makes them stupid guys stop looking at pussy ass strong men and find actual husband material like a smart and caring guy

>>744117309
I'm fraid' I don't have clear sources to cite, but obviously I should get some.
I've taken a couple IQ tests before and none of the things on it seemed to have many IRL translations other than maybe the occasional 'noticing a pattern other people might not have noticed in something'..

The female thing is something I heard from a book outlining the differences in the brain between males and females. It was written by a feminist so it has a lot of biases, but the biases are more in /how/ she outlines the differences than what they are (She'll say "men have tunnel vision and women can multitask" rather than "Men are very prone to focusing on one thing while women are more likely to get distracted" when they both outline the same, subtle difference).

>>744117566
kek. You would tend to the child garden consistently cause the crops would love you.

>>744117451

I think you're doing just fine! Coming across quite eloquently. No problems there.

In a nutshell, the OP is quite young, real world experiences across travel, culture and socialising will teach her that all people have something to offer her, she just needs to be a little less arrogant about her place in the world and the rest will come naturally.

>>744117639
Way of keeping it classy. You seriously sound like a newfag, this isn't helping.

File: 800px-WAIS-IV_FSIQ_Scores_by_Race_and_Ethnicity.png (91KB, 800x480px)

91KB, 800x480px

Not everyone is equal. Just take a look at this. Niggers are dumb as fuck
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

>>744117893
And what's wrong with that? Some of the most insightful things can come from the mouths of children. You don't have to be pretentious to be smart.

>>744117979
That's very kosher.

>>744117222
>So if I don't belong amongst the "average" or "best" men
Don't belong isn't can't, mind you. And can is not does. I don't belong in a race for people with muscular degeneration. But there is nothing stopping me from running onto the track and breaking the ribbon.

I simply shouldn't be there. You can absolutely be amongst the average or best man. Do you want to be? Should you be?

>But then tell me, how should I go about feeling satisfied in life if one of the key pillars to feeling accomplished is being valued by one's peers
I don't know if one of they key pillar to feeling accomplished is being valued by one's peers. Perhaps you shouldn't go about this way if you are seeking the feeling of being satisfied in life. All I know through experience is that I enjoy physical contact, sometimes. This is a gross simplification of what might actually cause this, or what this implies, and what it enables or precludes. However, you might enjoy being alone due to a number of factors. If you insist that because of disorders you can not reasonably seek pleasure in contact with other human beings, then this is so, and you are exactly right in saying that you do not derive pleasure from being in social situations, therefore: you don't necessarily belong with most people as most people enjoy what you do not, and will attempt to give you what you do not want. You do not want this. This is not a form of success for someone like you.

But I've already met individuals who do like you do, and find that there is at least one person whom they seek being valued by. This might not be you. Therein lies the question. I cannot prove or disprove this. And, driving the disorder line is implying that it is a matter of health, too. So you can't suggest it is because you are better than them, or that such behavior is indicative of a superior person who can claim higher ground. Hence the "best" man. Not that you necessarily did, but I'm mentioning this now just in case.

>>744111375
i had this problem before (i'm a guy btw) , now i live alone with my 2 dogs waiting for someone to invent robotic waifu's with artificial wombs .

>>744118892
You can already have a non mechanical version. Just ask the doll guy. He can even give you 50$ off

>>744112176
147 is bad
Dont brag with it dumb ape

File: fdp.png (557KB, 575x537px)

557KB, 575x537px

>>744117639
niceguy

>>744118892
>>744119038
It's pretty bad if our best and brightest have to defile themselves with hunks of silicone rubber.

>>744111375
I've got an IQ of 142. I'm not intimidated by intelligent women's intelligence nor anything else about them that is inherent to them as a group. I do however want my wife to stay at home and have our children as her first priority. Most intelligent women have bought into the "you can have it all" meme where they believe that a career, children, friends, and a high number of sexual partners can still lead to a good marriage. That's just not true for any but the most successful and energized individuals in the world.

So yeah, if you're intelligent then you should realize that other intelligent men aren't turned off by your intelligence; it is either the men you are looking at or there is something else about you that is off putting as a competitor for their attention.

IQ tests aren't actually a good way to measure intelligence you dumb fucks. Do some research before you ask stupid questions fag

Protip: You're hanging out with the wrong dudes.

Also THIS: As you get older, it gets worse. People have less and less time for other people.

>>744119513
or ya bref stank

>>744119604
>IQ tests aren't actually a good way to measure intelligence you dumb fucks. Do some research before you ask stupid questions fag

>>Makes statement without offering alternative...

>>744115249
I laughed my ass off

>>744119699
>Dups of truth

>>744111375
>What's the perfect IQ for a female?

as high as possible? kind of a dumb question tbh.

>>744111375
i got a score of 125, do i count as sub-human?

>>744116920
You just shat on his face