Whaddaya know, everyone's gay. https://broadly.vice.co

File: Quino Orejas.png (177KB, 499x639px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 499x639px

>>742888634
I am a mythical creature ahhahaha

the study they site shows that people react to hetero and homo sex, this doesn't mean that they're gay. people are only gay if they say that they're gay, you can't be gay and not know it. I knew I was gay by the time I was twelve I never thought "I'm gay, but maybe I don't know Im straight.

>>742888634
I'd say fuck them, but those mentally ill retards would want that, because they would fuck anything that moves.

My penis does nothing when I see two faggots going at it. In fact I find it quite humorous. Lol fucking homos

>>742888634
nah this article is complete bullshit

sexuality is a sliding scale, I would say the MAJORITY of people aren't 100% straight 100% of the time

Its basically the same as saying 100% gay people dont exist even tho i personally have never found a female attractive and have never pursued tried to be with a female

File: 1449114878889.jpg (364KB, 1500x1543px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1500x1543px

>>742888634
(((VICE)))

>>742888634
>study only tested sexual responses of women
>surpised when when get horny watchinh porn
>more surprised when confirmed lesbians get aroused more often by lesbian porn

This study is garbage and so is vice.

>>742888634
(((science)))

>>742888634

I identify as straight. Disagreeing with my identity is heterophobic. Checkmate, liberals.

Considering you niggers want to fuck traps this is an information I can believe.

>>742890189
facts.
why are humans like this?

>>742890320
I don't know.

"Yeah man I'm straight for sure and would never fuck a guy. I love fucking women with feminine penis"

>>742888634
I mean, anyone can fall in love with anyone. All you need are the correct triggers and precise conditions. Sure, some people are more straight, meaning it's incredibly unlikely they'll ever be interested even remotely in another guy, but the possibility always remains.

>>742890503
Unless you're not a faggot.

File: 123.jpg (36KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 480x640px

>>742890320
Simple.

Humans all get desensytized over time. Gore isn't as shocking after you've seen so many violent movies/images/clips on the internet for example. Same with porn, the regular stuff eventually stops cutting it for you (or it still does, like most people, but you want even more stimulation) so you start drifting into taboo territory, hence fetishes like BDSM, furry, vore, etc. Which can lead into non straight territory, like traps.

The feeling that this is taboo and/or unnatural is what gets people off.

>>742888634
that research was entirely about women and lesbians and had nothing to do with men.

File: 7887C75.jpg (104KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 640x960px

>>742890419
>saying no to this face

what are you a faggot or something

>>742888634
Applies only to women
Says lesbians don't exist

So get out there /b/ and bring some lezzies back to the D

>>742888634
especially you, OP

>>742888634
>article from 2015
Ok, OP?

>>742891135
That actually IS a really nice face, at least at that angle, which is REALLY rare for a dude. Doesn't mean I like what's below, however

>>742891991
I'm gonna need some sauce on that, Bill.

>>742889161
>you can't be gay and not know it
na, that is exactly how homophobia takes place in people

File: 1306822149192.jpg (173KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1280x853px

>>742892214

Bianca Freire

Lol cool

>>742892398
>he fell for the meme

>>742891135
if a guy can look that convincing to where you can't tell until you open their pants, why not just go for a real female? because you like cock faggot, its not a crime, just illogical and unnatural.

>>742892590
You're a good man

File: 7887D95.jpg (122KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 640x960px

>>742893327
>implying I would say no to a female

I am attracted to good looking, feminine people. Why would I say no to a good looking, feminine person just because of what's in her pants?

>>742892398
even liberals make fun of this myth.

>>742893764
because it's a detriment, no sex unless they haven't eaten in a week or do an enema several times a day, its a pain in the ass literally and figuratively, a woman can use a strapon if you like it up the ass and you won't get shit on your dick having spontaneous sex, a real woman has options. but you're mentally ill, so I'm sure you won't understand. enjoy leaving the literal cesspool of the human body your only option.

>>742894449
>turning down a blowjob from that face

How is that not mentally ill?

File: 1502426667508.jpg (89KB, 960x468px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 960x468px

>>742888634
Scientists determined that gays cannot exist, because magnets.
Therefore your opinion is null.

>>742889840
This.
Also there is no gay gene and homophobia is genetic, the same as being disgusted by shit, cannibalism, pedophilia.
Homosexuality is so damaging to human society we developed a evolutionary defense mechanism for it.

File: 1503411805840.gif (32KB, 350x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 350x400px

... Sexuality is fluid. Big news.

Bunch of tards xD

So sexual orientation is a social construct? Has the left has really come full circle...

>>742888634
Vice lol. American Pravda.

File: IMG_0887.jpg (67KB, 450x1247px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 450x1247px

>>742893764

>>742889620
2017

>>742889373
So true.

>>742888634
>you're either straight or gay
>what is bisexuality
>what is the sexuality spectrum

Well, you sure are gay, because as always OP is a massive faggot.

>>742890677
Gross

>>742894950
I agree with this evolutionary moralist.
Though i think it is more to do with the moral law written in our hearts, we are disgusted by that which is immoral (murder, homosex, etc) unless you're a jaded misanthrope like myself.

>>742888634

scientific study
>journal of social science and psychology

science
>psychology

....sigh

>>742889620
ITS 2017

>>742888634
Actually reading the source, I conclude this article is bullshit. Title should have been "There are no straight women"

"Sexual arousal and masculinity-femininity of women."

This study literally says that there are no straight women. There was never any mention about men. Ripped out of context much.

>>742893327
>illogical and unnatural
So is using contraceptives, then. Sex in the modern day is all about what's pleasurable, so anything sex related that doesn't harm the unwilling is logical and natural. But if you want to talk evolution, then quit using condoms and birth control pills, faggot. Sex just for pleasure is illogical and unnatural; you're supposed to make babies with that batter!

>>742895482
Psychology is a science.
It's just not a hard science like Chemistry or Physics.

>>742888634
if this is the case then gay people dont exist either. i wonder how much faggots would chimp out at that notion.

>>742895758
Not at all, since non-retards have known sexuality is a fluid spectrum with no absolutes for decades. You're just not a non-retard.

>>742894576
Because sex is about procreation first and foremost, the reason it is tied to the pleasure center in humans is because humans are so fucking lazy they wouldn't bother reproducing if it didn't feel good. So people who think sex exists SOLELY for their own pleasure have a genetic defect.

I don't like dicks and guys in a sexual way.
Explain how i am not straight

>>742896040
Because you forgot about the six gorrilion

>>742896040
because this study is about women, read the source.

>>742895935
Who the fuck thinks sex exists "SOLELY" for their own pleasure? That's the worst strawman fallacy I think I've ever read. At most, it could be considered a "bio hack," where people benefit from having recreational sex that pleases them (shit tons of studies have shown it benefits brain function and mood). Far from useless or illogical, and utilizes the natural.

Go bait some other thread, retard.

>>742896040
Because you've never actually given them a fair chance, and likely never will since you automatically respond negatively to what society around you deems taboo. You're a braindead follower, a sheep, a lemming. Your bias, which isn't even really your own, keeps you, what we call, "in the closet," where you will always be unless you reach enlightenment.

Sexuality is a spectrum, and is fluid, for all people. This is indisputable.

It's okay to be bi. The second you actually and truly accept that in your heart, you'll start to like blow job porn just a little more, or traps won't seem quite as disgusting... that's how the awakening starts.

Homophobia is born of denial only.

File: 1464643652703.jpg (26KB, 400x462px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x462px

>>742888634
>When you deliberately misrepresent and twist a scientific study to fit your political agenda

This is the Abstract of the ACTUAL study, not the pseudoscientific article OP posted.

Abstract
Studies with volunteers in sexual arousal experiments suggest that women are, on average, physiologically sexually aroused to both male and female sexual stimuli. Lesbians are the exception because they tend to be more aroused to their preferred sex than the other sex, a pattern typically seen in men. A separate research line suggests that lesbians are, on average, more masculine than straight women in their nonsexual behaviors and characteristics. Hence, a common influence could affect the expression of male-typical sexual and nonsexual traits in some women. By integrating these research programs, we tested the hypothesis that male-typical sexual arousal of lesbians relates to their nonsexual masculinity. Moreover, the most masculine-behaving lesbians, in particular, could show the most male-typical sexual responses. Across combined data, Study 1 examined these patterns in women's genital arousal and self-reports of masculine and feminine behaviors. Study 2 examined these patterns with another measure of sexual arousal, pupil dilation to sexual stimuli, and with observer-rated masculinity-femininity in addition to self-reported masculinity-femininity. Although both studies confirmed that lesbians were more male-typical in their sexual arousal and nonsexual characteristics, on average, there were no indications that these 2 patterns were in any way connected. Thus, women's sexual responses and nonsexual traits might be masculinized by independent factors. (PsycINFO Database Record

I'm not even going to address any falsities in the study, granted there are any.

>>742891135
Wouldn't say no to the face, but to the body and dick.

>>742897166
Idk, seems like a pretty easy intuitive leap to make to me. Even in that abstract, they report "straight" women sexually reacting to females. "Straight people don't exist" makes sense.

>>742897720
What are you gay?

>>742889620
1933.

>>742888634
oh shit alex jones was right they are making the frogs gay

>>742897797
Adressing the body part only, unless you want to argue that liking dick isn't gay.

The shoulders are too broad, the hip waist ratio isn't all that great and I have a problem with obviously fake tits like those. It's mostly about the dick, though.

File: 1501536679576.gif (323KB, 220x165px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 220x165px

>>742898067
Alex Jones is a con man and there's something wrong with him. People have always been all bi. That's why all the Greek dudes were fucking each other.

>>742898256
You sound gay-but-in-denial as fuck right now, my boi.

>>742896996
>Not liking guys means i am a braindead sheep
Guys for me are like kids for me not sexually attractive in anyway.
No i am not homophobic i can be homosexual without any consequences but i can't because males aren't attractive for me.
Good luck trying to make your homosexuality sound normal...

>>742898396
It sounds like you are projecting, mate.

>>742888634
>vice
U srs nigga

>>742898497
>can't think of a rebuttal
>quick! Revert to childhood comebacks!
"I know you are but what am I??"
>ha, got him

>>742898925
You asked me, if I was gay for not liking something you like.
I give you my reasoning for not liking it.
You claim, yet again, that I am gay.
I banter back.
Now you call me childish, while you did nothing but call me gay.

Are you sure you aren't simply projecting? It's okay to be into dicks.

>>742898401
>only speaking in terms of homosexuality
This shows just how uneducated on the subject you are, which shows how little you've been exposed to anything LGBT, which only strengthens my stance.

It's all about bisexuality, anon. All of it. Everyone is bi on some level. You just don't know how to know it or admit it yet. One day.

>>742888634
This is probably true and it gives credit to the idea no one can be "born" gay. It's technically all choices. That's one of the reasons the Christian church is against gay sex is because it's a degenerate choice to make. If you view sexual orientation as binary then you would have to assume the earth gives birth to people to simply not reproduce which we know in nature is rediculous and counter productive

Tldr; we pick our sexuality

>>742888634

Kurt said that a long time ago

>>742895865
whats with all the gay rights faggotry then?

>>742895718

well maybe its changed since my day.

in my time at university, all the pretty girls and pretty boys did psychology, and they mainly had empty heads.

i now edit scientific journals and the shit in the psych ones makes me laugh more than it makes me consider the point.

>i don't consider it a science, in any way, as it measures nothing and draws no verifiable conclusions. theories only, means its just imaginings, for want of a better word.

File: 6.jpg (31KB, 450x249px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 450x249px

>>742888634
eh my evidence is anecdotal but I've always believed this to be true cause of myself. I straight up had zero attraction whatsoever, neither sexually not romantically, in men until I was probably 21. But holy shit did I have a submissive side waiting to be let out- I'm in and out of sissy mode/trying to make as many guys cum as I can on kik like all the time now. I'd argue cock is even better, I get to watch daddy cum on my pics now c:

>>742899780
There's a LOT of non-non-retards. So much so that they overwhelmed the non-retards with sheer numbers and built a power structure on oppressing the non-retards. So we're attempting education this time.

>>742899780
They just don't want to be shamed for being degenerates with a high sex drive who can't emotionally or physically relate to someone of the opposite sex.

>>742899889
I do believe there is merit to the psych field but it has and will always be used as a political weapon

>>742899600
Nope, already proven to be a complex combination of both brain chemistry (born gay) and environmental stimuli growing up (boys locker rooms, etc). It's anything but a choice.

Technically you can choose celibacy, or you can choose to have sex with the opposite gender even if you're not attracted to them, or you can choose what label you'd like to use (based on what you feel most accurately suits you), or you can choose to force yourself into denial, but you can't choose what you're attracted to. That just sorta happens in the background, and your predisposed to certain directions.

>>742896996
oh for fuck's sake. do you hear yourself?

>>742899591
>shows how little you've been exposed to anything LGBT

thank christ I am little exposed to LGBT "anything".

i don't care for the ramblings of mentally ill attention seekers.

there is something seriously wrong with LGBT culture, comprised as it is by either weekend warrior fetishists (the most boring of the bores, who think they are *so* daring, avant-garde and shocking) and the ones who have actually committed to the lifestyle, which generally means they can afford to, which generally means they have income from mummy and daddy and like to rebel, which generally makes them wristers.

note I'm not speaking about people who are just actively gay, lesbian, or bisexual.

I know lots of those people and get on with them just fine.

but when people you've known for years or even most of your life start lisping, limp-wristing, when the piercings and wacky clothes come out, then its 360 time for me.

>>742896996
>Sexuality is a spectrum
your gender is not.

>>742888634
If your peepee gets hard when you see naked man, you're gay, if your peepee gets hard when you see naked woman, you're straight
It's that easy

>>742899959
>ad hominem
>purposely inflammatory language
But I mean yeah, you're right, kinda. At least about the part that no one wants to be shamed by other people for something that has nothing to do with other people.

>>742888634
You're either gay or in denial

File: really.png (114KB, 500x349px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 500x349px

>>742900450
>already proven

>>742896996
>this is indisputable

really

>>742900450
Yes but most of the research on sexuality says that it's overwhelming nature over nature. Sure there is more feminine men and masculine women, but I think the great of modern sexuality research and culture is that they tell boys who are feminine that they're gay snd masculine women that they're lesbians. I feel like that's a diservice to people who don't fit archetypal modes of male or female. I prefer masculine women as a straight male. I think it needs to be stated that just because you're a little to feminine or masculine doesn't make you gay

>>742900530
No, yeah, gender is too. A fluid spectrum. Only instead of straight to gay, it's male to female.

How many bis/gays in here got that way because of sexual experiences as kids? I became bi the day my neighbor (my age) felt up my nutsack during a sleepover because he wanted to see if I also had only one testicle.

>>742900558
What if my peepee gets hard looking at both?

>>742900753
But you are actually here. Just like my proof. Your post is self-contradicting, I didn't even have to add anything, kek.

>>742900859
I completely agree, anon. People are so quick to apply labels, it's fucking retarded.

>>742900933
My classmate rubbed his dick on my buttcrack when we were like 9 years old and I was having a sleepover. This continued on each time we had a sleepover. Today...I'm not attracted to men, whoops.

>>742900979
Bisexual, maybe something stupid like omnisexual.

For the sake of argument, let's say this is true. What is stopping men from just doing their own thing without women?

>>742900933
>i was encouraged by a guy maybe 4-5 years older than me to experiment when about 8.
>both me and my younger brother, 6
>some touching, some pretending to have buttsex but nothing went in, we were prepubescent
>this extended to me thinking this was OK and playing these games with my cousins (female) and a friend (male)

>fast forward to sexual maturity and on into marriage and kids (am 40) and I have not a single gay thought, attraction to men, or wonder what its like to be bi.

no guilt, no conflict, I believe I was born normal and experimented in a normal way.

>>742901216
yup, just like this

>>742888634
A summary overview of the data shows that the conclusion does not follow from the data.

There are gigantic flaws in the study. Primarily how arousal was determined. They showed women porn clips of men and women and judged them to be "arousing" if their pupils dilated.

this is fundamentally flawed because it ignored the subjective nature of the experience. These are humans with memories, not robots reacting to a simple image. Many of these women, for example, indicated arousal seeing gay men. Well, to her brain, it's a sexual picture of a man. Her being aroused doesn't mean she's gay or not straight. Similarly, a sexual picture of two women might trigger arousal based on a memory of a man doing the same thing to her, or any number of things.

Frankly, the way they are collecting the data is fundamentally flawed. It's like making a study where you assess if someone is oriental by judging if they respond to pictures of rice.

>>742900654
It might be my own personal bias and experience showing but I really have a hard time believing there is such a categorical thing as "gay". If we want to suddenly exclude the phenomenon of lesbians suddenly wanting dick when they're older then we fall into the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. As a Catholic Libertarian, I have no real issue with gays but I do have a problem with the movement saying the earth just gave birth to us naturally. I do believe saying you didn't pick your sexuality means taking away agency, free will, reason, and logic by turning people into just an aggregate of chemicals

>>742900906
what a boring spectrum

>>742900933
I realized I was bi when my friends showed me meatspin and made a joke about "how gay are you in number of spins?" and I blurted out "143," the highest number I remembered. The runner up was 17 spins. They all laughed at me. Later I went back to the site and fapped.

>>742888634
If you believe that you're retarded.

Also, looking at the study itself, it's a load of literally bullshit by some really incompetent people.

File: pinknews results.png (400KB, 635x725px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 635x725px

>>742888634
WRONG

>>742901220
So it wasn't that simple after all? I feel lied to.

>everyone always forgets bisexuality even tho 99% of people are actually bi

>>742893162
>>742894155
>closet homos
i've got some bad news for you...Or good news, depending on how you look at it.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v10n01_01

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-97197-010

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-00463-014

>>742889620
2016

>everyone's gay
no but even 99% straight and 1% gay means you're bi

>>742901080
not that guy, but I don't see a single piece of proof quoted in this thread.

I agree with >>742901367

the data such as it is, is a rehash of a non-scientific study into a non-scientific matter.

>>742901484
or you can put it this way.

your contention is that:

nobody is 100% gay, or 100% straight. sexuality is a spectrum.

BUT

sexuality is 100% determined by nature and upbringing. it is 100% NOT A CHOICE. and everybody is 100% bi-sexual. they are just repressing it if they say different.

re-read that a couple of times. can you do the math? it doesn't fucking add up.

>>742901412
That's why some people have tried to spice it up, and now tumblr exists.

>>742889620
1

>>742901600
What is 1% gay like?

>>742901685
Anal fetish.

>>742901600
>too stupid for word. what the fuck is 1% gay. how could somebody 1% gay be in any way defined by the word bisexual.

some basic mathematics, aptitude and ability lacking seriously from the gays in this thread.

must be all the semen they ingest.

>>742901685
its like when you can't grow a full beard, but kinda idolize men that can

Wonder how much people had to pay to get that "study" published.

>>742901685
for example you liked somebodys beard
or admired masculine muscles at some point

>>742901794
>liking to see women defiled is not really the same as liking a cock in your throat and enjoying wearing a red indian costume.

>>742901878
Good thing this is about being 1% gay not 100 fucking percent.

>>742901868
Wait. Am I gay if I like the way I look, say, in a mirror?

>>742901794
Don't like to put it in the pooper, don't like anything being put in mine.

>>742901823
What if I can grow a beard, but admire anyway?

>>742901868
1% gay, I guess. Is appreciating aesthetics automatically sexual?

>>742901878
>being this scared of 1% gay
see
>>742901578

>>742901868
I honestly don't think its straw-manning to say thats like saying if you like tanks, guns, knifes, subs, helicopters, like most little boys and men do, you therefore have murderous tendencies.

>come to think of it thats exactly the kind of statement these lunatics make

>>742901600
>>742901685
>What is 1% gay like?

Considering it's all a figment of imagination, it's whatever the fuck you say it is. I call it mental illness.

What is it where you're completely turned off by dudes' bodies and faces, but penises are A-okay?

>>742901977
that's yourself and called good self esteem
>>742901988
to some degree yes

>>742902068
Faggot

>>742902068
Queer

>>742902068
Gay

>>742900450

You're talking out of your ass.

None of this is scientific consensus yet. There's research that vaguely points in that general direction but we're years away from "proven" or "indisputable"

I actually agree with you in the sense that sexuality is fluid. But you're a disgrace to those that actually take this seriously. You misrepresent research to prove a point, often making people slip further away from it.

>>742902068
gloryhole material

>>742902068
Homosexual

>>742902068
You are a trans fetishist?

>>742901963
>>742902027

>humour bypass detected
>taking being gay this seriously

Go on then, define 1% gay....

Because in our (normal, non-deviant, rational) minds, being gay means you find the same sex attractive and enjoy sexual relations with them.

If you do not enjoy that, you are not 90% gay, or 80%, or 50%, or 1% gay.

You are just.....wait for it.

>NOT GAY

Now

Fuck

Off

and allow those of us who don't want to be, to be NOT GAY, AT ALL.

(not gay).

or are you THAT heterophobic?

>>742902195
Calm down, 1% faggot, it's okay to admire someone's beard.

>>742902248
You faggots rationalize your deviant degenerate shit anyway you can, don't you? If you're into guys, you're not anything but 100% gay, fag.

>>742902248

>not gay

>>742902195
>[autistic screeching]

File: Screenshot 2017-08-22 21.23.31.png (882KB, 1118x626px) Image search: [Google]

882KB, 1118x626px

>>742902248
just saying
>i'm not gay

File: hygienist.gif (58KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x500px

>>742888634
Ha ha haaa! I knew you were all faggots

>>742888634
(((((((((((VICE))))))))))

Do this Jews in media ever get tired of their fake news?

>>742901377
see: >>742900450
and: >>742900859

There are gay animals, anon. All throughout every animal kingdom. Some of them are gay by incident, some of them are gay their whole lives with a single partner, and sometimes my male dogs mount each other cause there's no other dogs around. You're saying proven science conflicts with the philosophy you want to be true, so you're choosing to believe in your philosophy over evidence.

Sure we have agency, sure we have free will, sure we have reason and logic, but not in all things. You have much less capacity for logic and reasoning when you're drunk or otherwise drugged up, like all the post-wisdom-teeth-operation videos across youtube (because we're an aggregate of chemicals). Some people have much greater capacity for reasoning and logic than others. Some people lose their agency by an outside force (prison sentences, rape, robbery, human trafficking, etc). I can believe in choice because I have a basic understanding of quantum physics, but otherwise I'd have to admit we were likely basically just pre programmed robots.

Sometimes there are just very few choices in front of us when it comes to free will. Not sure which part of that is hard for you to understand.

>>742902447
>[slurping noises from below the table]

>>742902248
>>742902248
>1% faggot
from now on i will call everbody 1% faggot

>>742901519
Arrows wobble a shit ton mid-flight, anon. Kinsey was going in the right direction, but his word is not law.

>>742889620
2017

>>742902530
>my dogs mount each other cause there are no female dogs around

right, so in what way is that example proving they are born that way, and its not due to circumstance?

>>742902195
This logic is too rational for degenerates and queers. They'd rather imagine everyone is just as much of a fuckup as they are, but nice try, m8. Hold the flag high.

>>742902530
>most illogical, rambling, nonsensical post of 2017 detected

>>742888634
>Vice
The same people that wrote an article about dog-fucking and said it's okay when women do it.

>>742901620
Fucking kek. Do you realize where you are, kiddo? Speaking in ultimatums, hyperbole, and absolutes is kinda the thing here. I'll just tell you that instead of continuing to string you along with more fake argument, because I'm feeling nice today.

Tho I do think most people are bi but in denial, ofc it's not everyone.

>>742888634
(((research)))

Heavily flawed.
They do not seem to be determining a divide between the impulse of "I wanna do that person now" and "I wanna be doing that same action now".
Not to mention the various levels of "nudity taboo" and the instant reaction to seeing any kind of naked flesh before recognition sets in and goes "oh that's not what I want".
>WE GONNA PROVES YOU ALL IS GAY
Biased agenda propaganda.

>>742899591
>This shows just how uneducated on the subject you are, which shows how little you've been exposed to anything LGBT

Why should i be educated about human justifications for their abnormal activities (in behavior what isn't majority isn't the norm) instead of learning about science or other stuff that can actually benefit the humanity?
Also in psychology if you believe in thing it will turn real for you which means believing that you are gay, bi or that everyone is bi will make you bi, gay and the opposite is Right(theirs an article on psychologytoday about this topic)

File: Screenshot 2017-08-22 21.31.20.png (318KB, 445x474px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 445x474px

>>742902867
>kiddo
>i'm feeling nice today

sorry, oldfag. cheers for taking mercy on me.

>you fucking trumpet

Quick gay test:

Do you cum (sex or fap)?
>No
You're not gay, you're asexual
>Yes...

Do you exclusively cum (sex or fap) to people of the opposite sex?
>Yes
You're not gay, you're straight.
>No...

Do you exclusively cum (sex or fap) to people of the same sex?
>No
You're not gay, you're bisexual
>Yes
Yeah you're gay, congrats gaylord

There are literally no other sexual preferences since there are only four combinations of two sexes cumming to each other.

>>742888634
What research? The study they reference isn't research, it's a load of shit that reads like it was performed by high school kids trying to prove a preconceived theory by bullshitting their paper.

>>742895128
I've not seen this one before, pretty funny

>>742888634
whats with faggots assuming people that don't want to be around them are secretly gay themselves
fucking degenerates

>>742903085
Thank god it's not people I cum to

>>742902166
>you're a disgrace to people who actually take this seriously
>on 4chan

My sides fucking hurt so bad. I can't stop laughing. Please send help.

You're so new you don't even know what this site is.

>>742903276
>only sane being in the thread

>>742903276
does that make you a...xenosexual?

>>742903427
xeno implies alien, there are things that aren't people on this planet you know.

File: dat_nigga_shoes_is_tight.jpg (8KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x236px

>>742903427
>tfw I just now realized L Ron Hubbard got "Xenu" from "xeno"

>>742903473
It was about people he came to, though.

File: internet warrior.png (134KB, 388x294px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 388x294px

>>742903366
i bet you're this guy: >>742902867

and this guy, on the left

>>742888634

"Straight people don't exist, new jewish research says"

>>742889161
>you can't be gay and not know it
What is repression?

>>742903590
he said it's not people he cums to.

maybe he cums to floor tiles?

>>742903473
xeno
1.indicating something strange, different, or foreign

It works, anon. Xenophobic doesn't mean "afraid of aliens" when talking about prejudice.

>>742902530
This was my post; >>742901377
Let me make this very clear and distinct, animals can have sex for pleasure including us (since we are animal and metaphysical being). I do agree that you can lose agency with coercion but that doesn't excuse the Maghrib society with its culture of "women are breeding, boys/passives are for pleasure". Culture has a lot of influence on our sexuality. I find it hard, if not impossible to dismiss especially "gay" women who have sex with men on their own free will, with no coercion. I'm speaking about people who live in a free society and have no coercion against them about what they do sexually. I'm going by my own experiences and first hand knowledge of this subject with the "gay" community. I do believe people like to fit into nice and neat boxes but when it comes to sexuality it's all a gray area. If it makes us all sleep better at night that there is subsets of people who are "born gay" then fine but from experience it seems like people are more praxeological in their sexuality

>>742903609
That is knowing it but not admitting it.

>>742903609
its knowing something and holding it back.

to repress something, you have to be aware its there.

File: 1374691015272.png (610KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 683x1024px

ITT 1% faggots

>>742902689
see the other posts linked in the post you just replied to

>>742891135
God those tits are horrible.
What a shame.

>>742903671
Not quite, because if you're the non extraterrestrial definition then you'd just be implying that you fap to foreigners. It's colloquial, kind of like how "fetish" is only used for weird shit and not regular stuff like say, "breast fetish", which even has a name, masophilia.

>>742903689
This. Neighbor Dad from that Kevin Spacey movie where Thora Birch shows her tits knew how badly he wanted to suck cock. That's why he didn't want his son to become a big ole queermo. Meanwhile his son is getting titcow sex on the reg. What a loser.

>>742902828
Rambling, maybe. But which part was illogical or nonsensical? He made sense to me.

File: 161107120239-01-trump-parry-super-169.jpg (90KB, 1100x619px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1100x619px

He's here bacause all this faggotry, and you know it.

>>742903827
That's gay

>>742903827
ew gay.

>>742890001
>I identify as straight. Disagreeing with my identity is heterophobic. Checkmate, liberals.
Do you actually know anybody that disagrees with your self identity as heterosexual?

>>742903933
my dog.

he keeps humping my leg.

>>742888634
I guess this means everyone can prey the gay away and live a normal life

>>742903600
I thought about just linking that guy's post, but he was too spergy for me, so I opted for the
>muh sides
meme.

>>742903812
Get out of your little box, kid. Xeno as a prefix for banging non-humans is perfectly acceptable in English.

>>742903827
damn.

Are bug chasers viralsexuals?

>>742888747

aguante quino

>>742903812
Isn't fetish a actual condition? Like you need whatever your fetish is to reach sexual satisfaction?

File: 1502449345816.jpg (12KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 320x320px

>>742903012
>justifications for abnormal behavior
It's not abnormal so they don't need justifications, tho.

>>742903827
who is this?

>>742903827
lost

>>742903827
Real women do not look like this you fucking sperglords.

Masturbating to anorexics is only going to make it impossible for you to be happy when you finally settle down, get married and have kids.
You're not going to be sexually attracted to the mother of your children if you keep conditioning yourself to be attracted to this unrealistic portrayal of the female form. Idiots.

>>742903684
I mean, just Google "what makes people gay" and you'll see all the leading research that shows it's overwhelmingly nature and then some nurture which does it, but by and large it's mostly out of our hands.

>>742903827
Jesus Christ.

>742904530
you won't get a (you) from me.

>>742903827
sauce?

>>742904530
Are you body and kink shaming right now, faggot?

>>742903827
Moar!!!

>>742904530
tits or get the fuck out

>>742904530
>because fantasies should be realistic

>>742903689
This isn't correct. Repressing it is not being consciously aware of it. You subconsciously are aware of it, but you aren't self aware of it enough to come to terms with it consciously.
That's why homophobia causes so much irrational anger.

>>742903827
is that a skeleton

>>742904569
Actually no, if you look at the DSM (which I would assume is a pretty reputable source even if it's disputed) that sexuality is overwhelmingly nuture. You can have femnine men or masculine women but that doesn't make them gay. I will channel my inner Scipio Africanus when he was asking about Hannibal Barca, "Did the earth suddenly give birth to a new breed of Carthaginian?". In asking that question, did the earth give birth to a new breed of people whose sole purpose is to have non-reproductive sex? Or is it more complicated that people do choose their sexuality? We should be highly skeptical of people who say certain people were just pre-destined to have sex with people of the same kind. I believe you're stripping away a lot of what it means to be human and make choices in our lives even when it comes to sexuality

>>742903827
This image causes me to feel funny down there

>>742903827
Someone give that poor thing a hamburger before it starves.

>>742889605
Your explanation is complete bullshit too.
Sexuality is not a scale. It's just a matter of attraction. If you like women - you're straight, if you like men - you're homo and if you like both it's bi for you.
The scale makes no sense. Only stuff like "I like dick from time to time, but I main pussy kind of bullshit".
There might actually be a lot of bi people, but I think social stigma makes a lot of them repress their homosexuality or even develop stupid sexuality based indetities, as if partner choice makes them special.

>>742905089
>This isn't correct
False, repressing something can only be done if you know about it. That includes repressing traumatic events.
>That's why homophobia causes so much irrational anger.
This shit again?

>>742904530
>>742905161
>>742905280

samefag

>>742904569
i think the question should not be:

>what makes people gay

the question should be

>what makes people such attention-seeking idiots?

and why do they have to force their silly agendas down others throats.

>>742905089
no, thats just one definition. call your version extreme or psychological repression. you can't say that people can be gay and not know it, because of extreme examples of repression. you can't take the most extreme example of something and generalise it.

>>742905302
>as if partner choice makes them special

thats what most of this is IMHO.

boring, uninteresting, wastes of skin who have allied themselves to an agenda and like to shout loudly about it because umuh spechuh snowflurk.

just get on with your shit and stop boring the rest of us, you are like the guys standing at the edge of a group of people having a fun conversation about an enjoyable topic, continually trying to interject and turn the conversation to star trek.

>really, its not that everybody is a little bit bisexual.

its that 99% of people are a little bit stupid and boring. and they don't half want to disengage themselves from that aspect of their personality, so they try very wery hard to be different, special interesting and just that fascinating 1% gay.

>>742905579
>fatty boombatty detected

>>742905575
You're an idiot and you're speaking out of your asshole.
You're just making up what you want to believe.

>>742905575
>the subconscious doesn't exist

>>742905575
suppression = conscious
repression = subconscious

How about open an introduction to psychology book and read a few pages before you go around acting like an expert on psychology you poser.
Not doing so is only causing you to look foolish.

>>742905815
i am not the guy you are replying to.

>how the fuck can you repress something you are unaware of?

you suggest that repressed homosexuality means that the person is SO REPRESSED that they are attracted to the same sex.

>but they don't know it

>they have seen no evidence of it

its buried SO DEEP that they are completely unaware of it. it affects their lives in ways only you can detect, their admiration for a nice beard, their enjoyment of the odd hetero anal video.

>but they are 1% gay. we all are! the science proves it!

>direct quote of your post
>you are just making up what you want to believe

except I think you have a very negative reason for doing so. those of us opting for the "simple explanation is usually the correct one" hypothesis are simply allowing people to live and let live

>not trying to force them to admit that they are at least 1% homosexual, and exist on a sliding scale which also includes you

i tell you for certain I exist on no scale you exist on, and you certainly don't exist on any bell curve that includes me.

>>742903827
This girl is gorgeous.

>>742906072
this

also see
>>742901578

>>742906140
I think you replied to the wrong person.

>>742906072
hey

>hey

how about you open a dictionary. a widely accepted way of ensuring a word means what you think it means.

>in said dictionary you will find:

repression
rJˈprɛʃən/Submit
noun
the action of subduing someone or something by force.
"students sparked off events that ended in brutal repression"
synonyms: suppression, quelling, quashing, subduing, crushing, squashing, stamping out; More
the restraint, prevention, or inhibition of a feeling, quality, etc.
"the repression of anger can be positively harmful"
synonyms: restraint, restraining, holding back, keeping back, biting back, suppression, keeping in check, control, keeping under control, stifling, smothering, bottling up; More
the action or process of suppressing a thought or desire in oneself so that it remains unconscious.
"children and adults pay a heavy price for their deep repression of thoughts about death"

you repress thoughts you find uncomfortable. thus, you are aware of those thoughts. otherwise, there is nothing to repress.

>repression

>>742906247
you are correct. disregard my citation of you, I suck cocks. i meant >>742905089

>>742906270
obvious bait.

>>742904265
Then why is the LGBT community trying so hard to normalize themselves by studies that aren't based of biological or scientifical evidence?

>>742906363
yeah, i'm over here baiting you with a dictionary.

>how disingenuous of me

File: Repression.jpg (83KB, 955x588px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 955x588px

>>742906532
"the action or process of suppressing a thought or desire in oneself so that it remains unconscious."

>>742906506
exactly.

I suspect they would argue that they feel their community marginalised, deprived of rights.

>where the traditional community feels that they have mental health issues as a prevalence, deviant and paedophilic natures as a disproportionate make-up of their rank, and overall as part of a society, do not embody a positive influence.

as a *community* LGBT generally is disruptive, subversive, a danger to children, and their constant demands to alter systems based on biological gender and the health issues their deviance causes, are now a drain on our democracy and financial system.

thats why they are trying to play the card: "you're the same as us, medically, scientifically, genetically". and perversely (ahaha) they are correct.

we ARE the same medically, scientifically and genetically.

forget 1% gay though, they are 70-80% mentally deficient. whether its simple attention-seeking or full-blown kidnapping and rape of young boys and girls, they are not fit to be given human rights and demanding more of the rights they already have is downright disgusting.

>>742895128
This is fucking good

Sexuality as an ontological category is nonsense.

>>742888634
There are NO genders in English.
Regards, The Grammar Nazi

>>742906814
#rekt

>>742906814

yes. thank you for quoting my quote.

that phrase is in the description I posted. 4th to last line, as your reading comprehension seems lacking.

to suppress a thought or desire in oneself so it remains unconscious, it must be known by the conscious mind.

or is there a complete disconnect in your interpretation of things, between the conscious mind and the subconscious?

if thats the case, then I can tell you that you are all....wait for the good news.....

>at least 1% STRAIGHT! You are ALL STRAIGHT to a degree!

Thats right, GayLords, you've just been repressing it! Its buried unconsciously, so deeply that you are not aware of it.

But we've conducted a scientific study that you did not even realize you were part of!

It shows clearly that your desire to justify yourselves to us straight-pegs, means you yourselves are, subconsciously and unconsciously, totally, STRAIGHT without realizing it!

Good news! You just need to pay for therapy to rectify this.

We can cure you of gayness!

>Wait, I remember. You don't like to hear that. It smacks of 50s scientific and religious wacko zealotism.

Now go swap the words straight for gay in the above and tell me thats not what you are doing.

>>742907331
rekt by quoting the very thing I quoted to him.

>#rekt alright.

>samefag

>>742907466
>it must be known by the conscious mind.

This is where you become an idiot. You don't know anything about psychology.

File: 1489262215844.webm (2MB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 852x480px

>>742907466

>>742907466
The lady doth protest too much, methinks

>>742907642
>oof yeah, I forget, its a fucking science.

you're trying to say, correct me if I am wrong, that everybody is partially gay, but they are repressing it.

they don't even know about it.

but you guys do. the guys in the fucking red indian costumes.

>the psychologists
>the social scientists
>the women's rights activists

Show me a study by a fucking biologist and we'll talk.

>but but muh gay dolphins and monkeys

And how do you know monkeys are gay?

>exactly