Loli porn is basically Pedophilia. Anyone that disagrees

>>741072667
i agree its pretty f up who the hell gets turned on to that its a f kid mofos need some help

File: 1500330654323.jpg (786KB, 1000x1083px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 1000x1083px

>>741072667
>>741072868

File: G4FRMBe.png (192KB, 1366x728px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1366x728px

>>741072918

File: 1493762375754.jpg (232KB, 1400x939px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1400x939px

>>741073024

>>741072667
It's legal enough for me
Since I actually want to have sex with a preteen girl, I think just watching loli porn is a better outlet, don't you?

>>741072667
I disagree, and I dont even like loli.

>>741072667
Why the fuck should anyone care what someone faps to? Just as long as nobody is harmed by it who the fuck cares!

>>741073387
Because theyre fucking pedos
>>741073220
A better outlet would them not being fuckin denerates in the first place

File: 1448382948146.jpg (432KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1000x1000px

>>741074092

>>741074198
How does it feel to be a literal piece of shit?

>>741072667
It makes me laugh at how deluded people who fap to loli are when they say they aren't pedos. It's literally drawn child porn but they won't admit they're pedos because of the extreme stigma of being one.

You're not fooling anyone.

>>741074092
There is no law against being a pedo though. All there is is you butthurt faggots screaming every time you see a dirty drawing.

>>741074340
I don't deny it at all. Pedo and proud. Watchoo gonna do white boii?

>>741074092
anyone who posts/lurks on 4chan is a pedo. end of story.

>>741072667
Yeah and Chris Hansen's mom should have swallowed him. FACT

>no law against being a pedo
Alright go up to an officer and tell him your sick fantasies about fucking children sick fuck

File: 1473545455327.jpg (84KB, 632x892px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 632x892px

>>741074295
To be honest I don't fap to this. I have other fetishes, but not animated ones. I have these pics soley for butthurt fags like you. (It is pretty funny how upset you get over animated shit)

plot twist: chris hansen is an absolutely fucking massive pedo

hide in plain sight, chris, hide in plain sight

>>741074613
> i have these soley to trigger fags
Ironic, we all know you get off on little children faggot

>>741074603
Like anyone would do that. The difference is between being a pedo and acting on it. They don't call it child molestation/rape of a minor for nothing. But until you cross that line you have done nothing unlawful. Suck it up faggots. We are here to stay. We ain't going away.

>>741074762
Would you like to say that on record?

>>741074613
>i have these pics soley for butthurt fags
surely.

>>741074603
>Thinking thoughts are now a crime

Hang yourself pls

>>741074846
I just did. As I said. There is no law against being a pedo in most civilized countries. You crying about it won't change that fact.

>>741074373
the drawings are illegal in most countries though.

File: 1501821072919.png (844KB, 977x1000px) Image search: [Google]

844KB, 977x1000px

this is now a loli thread

File: 1450669533453.jpg (83KB, 1192x333px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1192x333px

>>741073132

>>741074846
On record as in get your fatass out of the house and tell the world you jerk it to kids faggot

>>741075092
Some laws are retarded but it is difficult to argue against thought crime when 'but think of the children' is used as a reason. Hitler knew this.

>>741072667
pedophilia is wrong because a child ends up hurt or mentally disturbed
the only people hurt by loli pics are fags shitting themselves because they are offended.
not even in the same ballpark.

File: IMG_5011.jpg (10KB, 266x190px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 266x190px

>>741075114

>>741074092
Well since I can't change who I'm sexually attracted to and by your definition I'm a degenerate, what do you suggest?
Do you want me to go out and look for a little girl to fuck or look at 2 dimensional pictures?

>>741074340
Everyone I know who's into loli admits they're basically a pedophile (or hebephile), including myself.

>>741075263
You could go kill yourself, just putting that out there

>>741072667
are you implying being a pedophile is a bad thing??

>Those filthy disgusting loli drawings offend me! Ban them this instant!

Child molestation increases overnight

>I don't understand. What could be the reason>???!!!

I am not saying that would happen but who knows.

I'm not a pedo and I don't fap to loli pics, I fap to pics of "nudist" girls aged 12-16. There's a difference, it's not porn it's "nudism".

>>741075249
But it's not a thought crime. It's an action of downloading, viewing, or making the lolicon. At that point you're committed and it's confirmed to be under your control.

>>741075263
maybe get therapy? sex addiction/porn addiction, and that could help. engaging in it can draw you in further. i'd rather have a pedo that thinks it but doesn't engage in it by any means, rather than a pedo/lolicon that's enticing it with the porn

us laws:
Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography

>>741075339
Good argument.
Holding a little girl down and forcefully penetrating her is exactly the same thing as drawing something.
Is that what you're saying?

File: IMG_1543.jpg (94KB, 634x800px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 634x800px

>>741075339
Careful anon

>>741075314
i like around 6-12, but don't get into loli (2d)

File: hansenlol.jpg (20KB, 600x364px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 600x364px

>>741073024
>internet explorer
>9gag in 1tab
>mlp
>male feminism

uhh

>>741075458
>Child molestation increases overnight
good evidence and argument. really activates my almonds.

>>741075520
You're enticing the idea of doing the real thing whenever you look at lolicon.

>>741072667
Would you rather have them fuck a real child?

>>741075520
I see no difference. You still get off on the idea of getting with children whether it be fantasy or reality. Off yourself

>>741075612
Come on, man
Lurk moar

>>741075612
Don't take this bait so hard, it's not a dick.

>>741075616
I disagree.
I look at the pictures, I cum, I'm done.

>>741075729
see: Thadeus and paulandamyrose.
and sure. i'll believe a person that could possibly be lying or in denial. facts please.

>>741074295
i dunno anon, lets all pray for the time when they end in the slammer and get anally annihilated and ground up glass put in their food when they are in solitary. they can say 'loli not peddo pron' aaall they want, if the authorities see it, they are fuuucked.

>>741075612
it's a meme you dip

>>741075505
Good job lolicon is not child pornography then.

Making illegal the sharing of my thoughts via the medium of pixels is thought crime. To access said pixels you would need to go looking for them (like on this shitty site called 4chins) and accept that by doing so you are acknowledging that any offense taken is not in the control of the person sharing their thoughts via the medium of pixels.

>>741072667
does that mean tentacle anime porn counts as rapist porn?

>>741075674
ah so the immorality of an act does not depend on how much harm it causes but on the amount of moral outrage you experience?

>>741075505
>indistinguishable from an actual minor
is the main point these kinds of people use to defend themselves.

Legally, they're clean.
Morally, not so much.

>>741073024
>/mlp/
>9gag
>male feminism

>>741075851
Its child porn. Just show the police your collection and see how fast you end up behind bars

>>741075926
By these faggots definition it is. They are hippocrites.

>>741075994
Kys newfag

>>741075851
>>741075975
>United States Code, defines child pornography as ANY VISUAL DEPICTION OF SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT INVOLVING A MINOR
>Visual depictions include... digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor.
lolicon, toddlercon, etc. uses actual children and bodies of them as references, and can go under law of this
if the creator of the underage character from a show, e.g. mabel, loud house, stuff of that caliber, then it can be classified as such

>>741075975
>Muh morals

kys

>>741076043
How daft can you be?! Are they real children? Answer that.

>>741076108
>hurr moralfag
fuck off.

>>741074613
>I have 2 gigabytes of child porn on my computer because I want to troll

File: shut-it-down-jew.jpg (617KB, 2040x3160px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 2040x3160px

>>741072667
I agree, they should be shut down !!

>>741076136
cunt. die in a fire.

I feel like an idiot for engaging in an internet argument.
I should have known better.
One last thing: all pedophiles are not bad people.
I hate being a pedo, but I can't change it.
I use loli because it's better than looking at real little girls violated.
Don't lump all pedos together as "bad people". We get it.
Go after the child molesters and rapists.
They're the ones actually causing physical harm to another human being.
Looking at loli isn't as bad as you're saying it is.
That's my 2 cents.
Thanks for listening.

>>741072667

Kill yourself.

>>741076110
Show the feds your collection degenerate.

>>741076081
Go check the supreme court ruling faggot. There is a reason lolicon is allowed on /b/. It's because it's not illegal. But you never read the rules did you.

>>741075263
I would just shoot myself.

People who are aroused by Loli, are pedos, but Loli itself isn't fully cp.

Finally a post with some sense

>>741076253
>Oh no someone doesnt like kiddie porn like me
Rot in hell faggot

i found a gf that's into 3d loli fantasy... we can share thoughts about us having our own to play with. She's mixed tho... should i keep her?

>>741076081
but really the only way it can be avoided is if it's shitty scribbles.

>>741076181
Oh, i'm sorry that most morals are backed up by fucking factual evidence to why they're morally correct.

>>741076298
Supreme court ruling of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition? Where they state that for it to be used under these, it has to have artistic, cultural, or instrinsic value to be defended this way? Fuck, got btfo'd right there.

>>741076081
What I meant was, under US law, they're "safe" unless the image looks like an actual child. (looks realistic)

It's unfortunate, but that's the way the law is currently interpreted.

Doesn't make them any less of a pedo, but at least they're not molesting real kids, or watching actual pizza.

>>741076256
Answer the question, dipshit?

If seeing girls under 18 is illegal the why when I type nudism into google does it give me 1000's of pics of nude girls 10-15yo? Why isn't the CEO of google in prison?

>>741076063
Last time I saw a tip picture it had like 14 tabs of gay porn. It was pretty funny I asked if I could save that one XD

File: 1501283040499.jpg (2MB, 2000x1533px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1533px

>>741076337
Look at all the fucks I give

File: almost.jpg (17KB, 371x259px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 371x259px

>>741076171
>assumptions only make an arse out of you

>>741076405
/b/ allows it. deal with it faggot.

>>741076410
Ill let the feds answer it for me pedo faggot

File: 1501092035245.jpg (148KB, 862x1000px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 862x1000px

its pretty clear alot ppl want it banned

but what will banning it actually accomplish, will it help anyone or save anyone.
If anything i think banning it is just a way for humans to pretend they aren't vile animals so all the ugly parts of humanity are invisible to rich sheltered people even in the form of art. That's pretty much why ppl bitch about everything else offense in artwork, they don't actually wanna help people they just don't like being reminded humans are scary creatures. Pathetic.

>>741076498
I don't care I just think it's funny lol

>>741076409
>unfortunate
I'd say it's very fortunate actually. No actual child is harmed. Pedo's get their rocks off without harming anyone. It's a win win scenario. The only people who lose are butthurt moral faggots.

I don't disagree. I'm a pedo. You are wrong.

>>741076409
It's more of a grey area, depending on the subject matter and drawn content really. Then it's up to the defendant to actually defend what it is and the prosecutor and jury to judge that.

>>741076503
Oh shit, I can't state an opinion? /b/ allows that. deal with it faggot.

>>741076540
Because the answer is no, it's not real children; no matter how you try to spin it. Thus! It's not CP. Crazy huh?

>>741076612
Weak b8

>>741072667
the way I pick up milfs is by saying I wanna butter up their children and shove them back inside

It doesn't usually work because the milfs aren't actually mothers because I'm a senior in high school

>>741076592
Yeah, unfortunate that pedo's that are fine are dragged into that shit thinking it won't lead to possible addiction and wanting of the real shit.

>>741076668
See top.

>>741076668
If its not then you must have no problem showing the feds your collection right? If its not CP then nothing will happen to you surely...

>>741076185
This pedo has a brain. I'm with him.

I can add: Op wants us to rape his daughter, instead of watching drawings. Op is so weird.

>>741076755
That depends on the top reply of >>741076627

>>741076543
i mean if you are so determined to get rid of drawings, seems more like a selfish act so you don't have to see things that make u uncomfortable, rather than anything to do with morals.
Because bad things still happen in the world, you didn't fix anything just made yourself more comfy at the cost of anyone drawing something that looks too young even on accident being thrown in jail.

I tell ya what white knights. See that thing called a 4chan filter? Use it. Filter out all threads that contain the word 'loli'. Job done. You will no longer get offended by those filthy drawings anymore and you will no longer need to post shitty threads about it or shitpost in loli threads.

Everyone wins!

>>741076730
Sometimes I'll try to recreate the amniotic sac in my bathtub with a combination of gelatin and warm water and marinara sauce then I'll get a scuba thing and curl up in the fetal position and sit there until it gets cold

>>741076185
Of course they aren't. But lolicon can entice you further into the taboo subject of minors, underage, etc. something you obviously shouldn't go anywhere near if you already have this problem.

>>741074340
Proteome murder each other in video games, watch violent as movies, and cartoons. Does mean they really want to murder actual people? Is it better to blow someone's head off in a game or real life.

Ilike all kinds of porn including loli but i couldn't do that to a kid... who cares what i polish my pickle to as long as it's all fantasy.

Also Lolis can be over 18 if the artist says they are. Its a body type after all

>>741076732
>Citation. Your ass.

File: yourmovecreep.jpg (157KB, 453x604px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 453x604px

>>741075549

>>741076879
Ever wanna shrink down and go inside a woman's uterus?

>>741076879
No. You fucking moron. Lolicon help me to know the difference between fantasy and reality.

That same difference that a rapist lack.

>>741076755
Not a burger, mate! Not illegal here. Even so, don't you have a mind of your own? If the feds told you to suck cock all day, would you?

>>741072667
Technically it is in my country. The law is worded as such that any depiction of children involved in pornographic situations, real or drawn, can get you prosecuted. Heck, to put it to the extreme, you could draw two stickmen having sex, point to one and say it's a minor and that would constitute child pornography, lol.

>>741076868
Wheres the fun in that? Ruining loli threads is great. Keeps the fags away

>>741076755
Why would I intentionally show the feds anything? Do you show them your collection of homosexual pornography whereby hairy men are sticking their cocks up another mans shithole? I am sure they would enjoy that equally (well some might).

>>741075489
Sauce on said nudist young girls?

>>741076986
If you have nothing to fear then go out and put it out on display faggot. Timestamp that the feds dont care, hell even take a selfie with you holding up a pic of your precious loli and post it. Bet you wont

>>741075204
Do you go out and announce what you jerk it to to the world? Tell you mom toy pound it to traps? Midget porn? Straight up missionary sex only porn? Fuck no you don't

>>741076950
It's only really a theory..? On the mindset in general.
And I've surely been seeing a lot of lolifags with good evidence here too.

>>741076986
If it travels overseas or has been transferred within the US before, and you view it, you are immediately under affect of US law. If you view it view it on eufag only sites dumbfuck.

>>741077142
Have you thought about a career in politics, mate? You'll do fine the way you're trying to dodge questions.

>>741072667

Goddamn, OP, John Cena was a lot skinnier when he was younger.

File: The+Room+relief.jpg (55KB, 697x394px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 697x394px

Most loli is actually traced CP. I don't really know if it should be banned or not but denying you are a pedo is bullshit and you should realize you have a problem

>>741077210
Ok? Totally unrelated to the point, but good shit bud!

>>741077270
A career in politics might help me do something against degenerates like you.

File: __d_va_and_officer_d_va_overwatch_drawn_by_takotsu__sample-e36db62c2bcf25ae5ee8f7a7b63cafb0.jpg (210KB, 850x1275px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 850x1275px

>>741077143
i fap to imaginary loli versions of the cops.

I can't hear you, I'm fapping to >>741077116

>>741072667
>Ignoring Loli is a body type
>Ignoring that Loli is usually above the age of 13
>Ignoring that Chris Hansen is actually a pedo himself and hates himself for it so he humiliates other men that chases underage girls

File: 1468439599051.gif (542KB, 560x420px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 560x420px

>>741077541

File: f1a00261ccc36799593cfc72207e1cb82259b7b43246db27df04397003f273ef.jpg (73KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x500px

>>741077541
Go for it! Then you won't have time to come shitposting here anymore (Hopefully).

Now fuck off because frankly. We don't fucking care!

>>741077126
Go to google, type in nudism (not nudist)
Enjoy!

>>741072667
"I didn't have to be Muslim to find the images beautiful, or its poetry moving."

Gordon Deitrich, V for Vendetta.

Same goes for loli. It is a form of art. I don't find the images arousing and don't jerk it to them. I simply find them beautifully drawn, at least some of them.

>>741077701
Degenerate. Go off yourself

>>741077210
it also just isn't US laws, but other countries that don't allow it, e.g. >>741076994


>>741076947
>Also lolis can be over 18 if the artist says they are. Its a body type after all
>>741075505
>Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

>>741077701
If you didn't care, why are you still posting, or even started to?

>>741077736
If it's strictly loli, as in a nude girl, then yes, that point can be argued. If it's lolicon, a nude girl having intercourse with an adult male, then it isn't.

File: 1422217870083.png (2MB, 2817x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2817x4000px

>>741077769
NO U!

File: 2 nekopara loli.jpg (220KB, 720x1018px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 720x1018px

>>741076543
preach it, brother. Agree completely

File: 1501875584331.jpg (28KB, 352x707px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 352x707px

>>741077736

File: IMG_0445.jpg (144KB, 1092x819px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1092x819px

>>741077769
Already did, got some xp for it too.

File: 18e.jpg (45KB, 623x457px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 623x457px

>>741077849

>>741077126
>Google images

>>741077846
haven't thought of it, but yes, in retrospect, all the images I saved contain only the girl(s), no actual intercourse. Maybe you have a point.

>>741077846
Go do something about it if you are so butthurt about it. You are wasting your breath here.

captcha = stop Brianna

File: hmm.png (100KB, 252x323px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 252x323px

So basically.... if I photoshop Spiderman getting buttraped by bill clinton. spiderman could sue bill?

File: 1356964335901.jpg (47KB, 453x576px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 453x576px

>>741077968

>>741077804
Love you spider man

>>741078097
Lost me on that one anon

>>741076543
If it's not suggestive, and not porn, LOLI is fine. Lolicon isn't. It entices something dangerous, such as actual pedophilia. It isn't much of saying "shit i don't like this ART, banned xD" it's not even art. it's pornography and has no value past that.

>>741078001
nice.

>>741078004
I'm not the one still staying behind after they say they're done and keeping it going. And I have worked in CSS, CPS, and as an EMS worker. I've seen actual fucked up shit.

File: 1471793244946.jpg (523KB, 2204x2417px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 2204x2417px

Well I enjoyed our little conversation but now it is time for all you moralfags to go kill yourselves.

File: IMG_0936.gif (2MB, 350x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x300px

Kek whole thread disappeared, everyone is googling nudism.

>>741077126
www.ifyougooglethisyou'regoingtobeputonawatchlist.com

>>741078391
The point of this thread was to prove that loli is pedophilia and none of you degenerates proved me wrong. I Win. You are pedophiles and you'll go to hell :)

File: ficshunaw creecher.png (563KB, 848x2495px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 848x2495px

>>741076081
Found this in a fluffy thread.
Explains why fluffy abuse images don't violate animal abuse laws.

Replace the fluffy with a loli, and you're good to go.

>>741078485
How is it legal for google to have those images?

>>741076185
anon if you're still here, please, tell me, why are you attracted to children? I know it's hard to explain, I mean, I can't explain why I'm attracted to women or why I find some of them beautiful (unlike men, kids, apache helicopters, etc). What I'm after is if you had some kind of unusual things happen to you as a child/teen that might have sparked such an attraction (perhaps a relationship, family issues, some outer stimuli), or if it is just something you were born with. When did you find out you were a pedo?

Any other true pedophile lurking in this thread is welcome to answer too.

>>741078374
>Drawings hurt people
>We must protect the public from 'potential' child rapists!

I think you've seen so much bad stuff it's addled your mind. Maybe you need to setup a new precognition bureau to make sure nobody is having naughty thoughts on the interbutt,

>>741078502
>hell

Oh I'm laffin' alright

>>741075612
Anybody know when Summer ends?

Anyone else hear the story about the guy who had loli on his phone? His co worker saw the images, called police. He got charged and sent to prison

>>741078717
Better to ask why faggots like mens hair assholes

>>741072667
>gives his opinion
>calls it fact

Oh gee anon... you posted it on 4chan so it must be true.

>>741078550
Different laws. Why are you comparing them?
And law still states that
>ANY VISUAL DEPICTION
there.

>>741078615
Because by Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, it has cultural value. Nudism is a culture and way of life for some.

>>741078742
>oh shit quotemining me
>quotemining again
I think maybe you're a bit delusional. I stated that it can be a danger to the pedophiles themselves, as in it could make them spiral out of control. Never said anything of the caliber of "Think of the children."

>>741075263
The is that your brain releases dopamine. You are addicted to. You need mental help dude. Liking a child is sick and you're fucked in the head.

You are an evolutionary menace. The female body changes as to attract males for procreation. Hence why women have large tits and big asses.

A child isn't physically or mentally ready for that. It's rape. Its deviant. Get help.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-04-15-34-46.png (78KB, 480x854px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 480x854px

>>741078790
Not for awhile /b/ro

File: smallbanana.jpg (45KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 512x512px

>>741078919

>>741078834
Good.

File: 1501620587351.png (140KB, 600x454px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 600x454px

>>741079017
>>741078941

File: trump-tweet-on-death-penalty-for-pedophiles.png (54KB, 682x347px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 682x347px

>>741072667
agree 100%

>>741078834
Was he American or Europeon

>>741078717
I'm not attracted to children. I'm attracted to features that make a woman look younger and more "innocent"

If I am aware that that girl is under 18, however...
>insta-bonerkill

>>741072667
What if I agree but still like it?

File: 1d9.png (41KB, 200x145px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 200x145px

>>741079081

>>741079098
Then why not look at legal teen shit? Most lolicon is underage. That would relatively be the same thing.

>>741079080
Hamburgerland, They charged him for c p

File: Jkloveyoubaby_72e20225106a90908ee9597317925ee4.jpg (47KB, 477x345px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 477x345px

>>741079183

>>741072667
100% agree with you, but Im a pedophile too, what now?

>>741078895
>Lolicon is a victimless crime.

The only thing you moralfags have is the 'it's icky' factor. Basically you don't like it so nobody else can like it. So ban it.

I always found it funny when I read some shit obscenity law. One of the qualifiers was for something to be obscene it had to have the power to 'corrupt or deprave'. The thing is that lolicon is created by someone and most likely viewed by someone who is already 'corrupt and depraved' and it is very unlikely that someone is going to just wander upon it accidentally. You have to go looking for it on sites like here.

Women actively strive to remove body hair which is a symbol of puberty. Bare(ish) legs and arms are a childlike trait. What does this mean for men?

>>741075616
You should be tried for murder then because you sound like you play alot of call of duty.

>>741079328
That they are grown fucking women

>>741079234
Fuck, either his Lawyer sucked dick or he had more incriminating Loli

>>741075263
You could with extensive help. Being pedo is unnatural, as is being tranny or gay. So something happened to your brain during adolescence. Their are fags and trannies who get help and become normal. It's possible with a great psychiatric team.
Did your mother or father emasculate you or abuse you in any way? Did something traumatic happen in your life. This is a nature vs nurture thing. And pedo is nurture.

>>741079098
in that case I wouldn't actually call you pedo, just a guy with a different taste. I have a friend who is only 18 but prefers women that are 30+ over girls his own age. Same thing but different direction. I myself love all beautiful females, but not more than 5 years my senior (I'm 20) and of course not below 18, although I do agree that cute, innocent girls exert a greater attraction on me.

>>741079098
>Under 18

Ah! That magilcal get out of jail free card again. Now if you lived in say...the UK where it is legal to fuck a 16 year old I am sure oyu would saying the same thing but this time it would be under 16.

I have to laugh at this stupidity.

>>741075994
summer fag

>>741079376
Without hair on their bodies, which makes them more childlike.

>>741079393
Pics were described as pretty brutal, but all drawings. not sure how his co worker saw them

>>741076313
no you wouldnt, no one with this attraction thinks its a problem, and even if they did their self preservation instinct wouldnt let them, got any real non retarded solutions?

>>741079288
>hurr moralfag
Nice. I stated it's because of possible sex addiction and porn addiction, and with the combination of being a pedophile is dangerous in it's own right. And it kinda is already banned, anon.

>>741079343
oh, the shitty blanket statement of comparing lolicon to video games. Video games are for damn stats, competition. Masturbation is a far more intimate thing than that and isn't for competition or stats.

>>741079406
We a re human, nothing is unnatural. Which is why you lock your doors at night, not to keep out the pedos, but to save your ass from the likes of me.

>>741079098
It's a metal thing, a control thing. Your not a pedophile if you like girls who have gone though puberty. You just like underage girls. There's a name for what yo have, don't remember. R Kelly is referenced as one.

Pedos like prepubescent kids.

>>741075263
>>741079273
anons please answer this >>741078717 if you haven't already

>>741079465
MILFs rule. I'll fuck them up into their late 40's in some cases.

Also their cunts have to be hairy, no exceptions.

>>741079590
Pedophilia or attraction to any form of children is unnatural because they can't fucking handle child birth.

>>741079590
Of course it is. You cant procreate with a prepubescent child. Hence it's unnatural. Meaning against nature. Just like homosexuals and trans. Homos can procreate and trannies are biologically male.

>>741079677
Beef curtains

>>741079519
I cant find anything news related on the subject

I don't care, it's legal enough for me

Baby fuck! Baby fuck! It's alriiiiight!

Now arrest me for putting a string of English typographical characters together in such a manner as to form a sentence that many would find offensive.

>>741079471
I live in Sweden where the legal age is 15. I would, however, in no case (presuming I'm sober, since I'm very easy to persuade when I'm drunk or on speed) have sex with a 15 year old. Then again, I don't consider myself a pedophile.

You all seem to be forgetting about the mental aspect. Never had I seen someone have sex and just exchange a word or two. What about the psychological development of the chick you're fucking? Just knowing she has the mindset and experience of a 15 year old is an instant turn-off. Anons?

>>741079902
Because he pulled it out of his ass that's why

>>741079986
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography

isn't.

>>741080000
check em. and that's not really the full action, anon. you'd have to draw it or view it (if ausfag then have to view it from somewhere outside of aus)

>>741080041
I'm sure there is a social stigma attached to that age of consent in your country. Without the stigma it would just be normal.

>>741080041
I think it does the opposite for them. Rather it's a turn on for control.

>>741079704
haha I wish he could be as open about it as you. I am his closest friend and he still denies that he has a milf fetish, yet all his actions and words point to the opposite.

I don't give a fuck. Keep crying white knights.

>>741079570
But violent video games surely produce some of the hardest criminals, its not like many scienific studies have shown that violence in a virtual setting is actually a great outlet for people, youre right how could you possibly compare the two. The reason YOU enjoy video games is subjective, i know people that just like to play games like GTA or Hatred just to blow off steam, they dont even own real guns and will most likely never become violent in the real world. Sorta like fags that fap to loli and never seriously consider touching a child. Anyway i hope your orwellian thought police wetdream comes true my dude.

>>741080041
15 isn't pedo.

There are categories
Pedophile 0-11
Hebephile 11-14
Ephebopholia 11-19

>Pedobear has left the building

/thread

>>741079570
>Nice. I stated it's because of possible sex addiction and porn addiction, and with the combination of being a pedophile is dangerous in it's own right.
Prove that with actual evidence. You know what the word evidence means right?

>And it kinda is already banned, anon.
Post one person that was convicted solely for lolicon in the US.

Honestly, who cares if loli porn is pedophile material? It gives them something to sastify their needs and urges to ultimately prevent actual crime. Point is, I'd rather a pedophile jerk off to loli porn than actually make a sexual contact with a little girl.

>>741080477
Or they can take hormones to not engage in deviant behavior and get therapy. That's an option.

File: bcaebe2a01c01dbcfd6c73212bfaacc2.jpg (42KB, 444x640px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 444x640px

There is an evident lack of lolis, here !

I personally don't find children attractive, just have a fetish for hentai. Some loli boards have some nice pics of teen and above teen characters, but the child pics - disgusting. Also in my country the age of consent is 16, so I guess it's kinda okay to be attracted to teenage girls.

>>741080159
Perhaps. However I believe that my determination not to have sex with a 15 year old (note we are talking about one with well-developed features, not the kind that looks like 9) comes from the mental aspect of the relationship, since I do not find myself to be a suitable sexual partner for a 15 year old, nor do I want to have sex with someone who has a similar world view to mine when I was 15. Granted, some people mature early, but a 15 year old with the mentality of a 20 year old is a turn off for me in itself. I might, of course, be deluding myself and trying to find an explanation so as not to seem a victim of the social stigma, however, regarding this, I am the last person who should be allowed determine if it is so.

>>741079739
Says the biased faggot. I call bullshit on it all. I've seen people fuck thier sisters, cousins, animals, loaves of bread, thier cars, etc. As far as I can tell, the ones that are the assholes of them all are the ones pointing the finger. So fuck you.

>>741072667
Meh. In the end of the day, bitching won't do anything. Whatever helps you moralfags sleep at night.

File: 1491783216217.jpg (118KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1024x1024px

>>741080727

>>741080169
damn. there are some ugly people in this world.

>>741079739
>Homos can procreate

Kill yourself.

>>741080727
That would be killing the rest of us. hth.

>>741080787
FAGGGGG SPOTTTEDDDDDD

>>741073220
A better outlet is sticking your dick into an electric one.

>>741080722
Fucking family and animals is also unnatural. You cant procreate with animals and marrying close family members results in greater likelyhood of deformities, high infant mortality and mental retardation. Which is natures way of making people not do or not further the blood line that engages in incest.

File: 136557797116.jpg (106KB, 864x875px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 864x875px

>>741080912

>When 4chan becomes filled with so many white knight and SJW, that anti pedo becomes a thing.
Wow...
I miss my 2007.

>>741080257
interesting, I didn't know of this classification. Is there a similar one for the older person? I would say an 18 year old being attracted to a 13 year old isn't the same as a 40 year old being attracted to a 13 year old. Or would you say there is no difference in their hebephilia?

>>741080841
Can't fucker it was a typo.