Now that revenge porn is illegal in the UK, should people that

>>740734450
Fuck no.

Theres a wide gulf of difference between "raped a child" and "put nudes online without permission"

>>740734525

You could just do neither and be an upstanding citizen who contributes to a society that you no doubt benefit from.

>>740734450
I'm not saying revenge porn is fine.
But fuck you slut, next time think twice about who you share your nudes with

File: 1473048520212.gif (88KB, 51x52px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 51x52px

>>740734806
>>740734806
>But fuck you slut, next time think twice about who you share your nudes with

You'd fit well in Saudi Arabia, savage.

Nice b8 m8

>>740734694
Yeah yeah your fucking morals and all that shit but listen, one is CLEARLY worse than the other, they're not nearly the same so no, people who share nudes should not be treated like pedos

especially with the current problems with the SO registry

>>740735052

No room for nuance in an SJW's peabrain. If you don't agree with them you're just as bad as the worst thing they can muster up.

File: LibbyOP.jpg (445KB, 1023x1626px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1023x1626px

>>740734450
Post the nudes you mongoloid.

>>740735119
is that male or Female

File: 1425556835902.jpg (15KB, 258x195px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 258x195px

>>740735169
>2017
>using binary genders

File: 1460225261798.jpg (68KB, 927x497px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 927x497px

>>740735112

Peabrain yourself. You just did the thing you accused SJWs of being (which they are)

Let's see if you can figure out how you just fucked up, peabrain.

>>740735278
why are you so stupid

>>740735278

See >>740735336

>>740734525
Revenge porn is worse than being a pedo imo

Nice bot thread

>>740735422
Fucking kek

>>740735422

Only if you're a pathetic woman who can never take responsibility for her own actions and wants to feel no shame ever for their hedonistic/whorish/gluttonous behavior.

File: 1500851396724.gif (450KB, 500x338px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 500x338px

>>740735336
>>740735405

peabrain couldn't figure it out

cuz peabrain

>>740735422
Thats because you're either a pedo or a bitch. Either way you're wrong.
"boohoo they put my nudes on line, thats worse than raping a child and scarring them for life!"

>>740735511

>I know you are but what am I

I'm not going to try to decipher why your warped brain thinks I'm as bad as an SJW. Spit it out already you simpleton or stfu.

>>740735511
a) not even the same guy
b) why are you so stupid?

I've got a cousin who was 19 banged a 15 y/o in the UK, his life is now fucked.

>>740735589
thats kind of his own fault. Should have fucked a girl his own age.

>>740735657
He had just turned 19, she was turning 16 in a month, but yea I still don't disagree with you.

>>740734450
>>740734525
>>740734694
>>740735052
>>740735112
>>740735278
Samefag detected.

File: 1461811443677.gif (2MB, 325x244px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 325x244px

>>740735552

>No room for nuance in an SJW's peabrain

>If you don't agree with them you're just as bad as the worst thing they can muster up.

So basically

>You're an SJW if you find revenge porn as bad as pedophilia

>No room for nuance in an SJW's peabrain

>You're an SJW if you find revenge porn as bad as pedophilia

>No room for nuance in an SJW's peabrain

and

>If you don't agree with them you're just as bad as the worst thing they can muster up.

>You're an SJW if you find revenge porn as bad as pedophilia

>No room for nuance in an SJW's peabrain


No room for nuance, peabrain

>>740734450
>>740718626

File: 1477286055984.jpg (28KB, 467x568px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 467x568px

>>740734450
Are they Lesbyterians?

File: you sure nigger.png (6KB, 342x167px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 342x167px

>>740735711
you sure about that

File: also the game.jpg (20KB, 426x158px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 426x158px

>>740735855
>implying a web page can't be easily modified to hide your samefagging

>>740736069
> implying I'm retarded enough to try and pull that shit when literally everyone knows that trick
> implying you're not fucking retarded
> implying anything you dont like is samefagging

retard.

>>740736137
Seems that someone went on full damage control mode.
Relax anon, you're spilling a lot of spaghetti and making a mess.

>>740736196
Dude, you think one person made a whole thread. If anyone spaghetti'd here, its you, and we know you don't want to own up to being wrong, and thats okay, but go outside for a bit, your parents are worried.

>>740736247
on that note, thread is ded.

>>740735710
I'm not saying it's okay to do that because in most cases it's not, it depends on the maturity of both parties and what the guys intentions are though.

I dated a girl who was just shy of 16 when I had just turned 18 and her parents were fine with it because I wasn't a creep, wouldn't have fucked her though.

File: Jacky Chan is happy.gif (2MB, 369x271px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 369x271px

>>740736247
Yeah, of course, I'm totally owned by your superior rhetoric.
I'll leave you here, to cry over your failed troll attempt.
Have fun (or sadness, whatever).

>>740735119
a shitty photoshop of a fugly dude

>>740734450
Why spamming this crap bait everyday? Nobody gives a fuck about the UK.

Shouldn't of let the self be recording in the first place then. Dumb cunts.

>>740735536
I just think that being a pedo isnt that bad

>>740734450
Whats the story with these grils?

>>740736730
Its a pretty heart breaking story of how some cute posted pictures of her, after she dumped the cuck.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX6VyPWwwrM

Revenge posters are such beta males.

>>740734450
Any idiot that sends nudes to anyone should automatically assume that everyone that knows the person they sent them to will see them.
All that making this shit illegal will do is force a minor amount of discretion while keeping people from being accountable for their own stupidity. I know this is bait and all but really who's that stupid?

>>740736439
way to miss the point retard

kys

>>740736873
I cried from my penis

File: straight-outta-compton-album-cover-r.jpg (136KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 600x600px

>>740736873
post the nudes you fucking homosex

>>740734450
I'm for 5 to 20 years depending on the damage.
Non-negotiable sex offender registration by default.

>>740737166
The thing I don't get is why they make such a huge shitstorm about it, like I get it it's embarrassing to have your nudes out there, but just fucking own it and nobody can say anything. Especially if you're attractive who the fuck is going to hate on you for it?

It's nowhere near pedo, but I'm find with it being illegal.

>>740735489
So because you're emotionally unstable and want to take out your personal failures on women who aren't haram and have a healthy sex life, women should just allow someone like you to torpedo their career?

I've been as perplexed when I've had to deal with it because I'd get violent very quickly. But I'm a stacked male, I have no natural opposition and I'm used to it.
I've watched women get ground into dust by swarms of horny neckbeards issuing death threats and rape jokes, to the point where they were chased out of unis or had the online autism crew suffocate their social life.

It ruins lives. So why shouldn't yours be ruined? In a truly equal system you would be made to cover all damages. I.e. if their career flops because of it, any money they *might* have earned in their life if uninterrupted should be covered by you. In addition to criminal charges the public will file against you.

I'd suggest you go see a therapist before you have to see a parole officer.

>>740737367
Bingo, its kinda like Ryan Seacrest and his overwhelming gayness. Just own it and no one can touch you on it.
Besides, anyone willing to sends nudes to a person they aren't married to or intend to marry can't complain. People practically greet each other with nudes now a days, there's no real breach of fidelity. There's no exposure they weren't up for in the first place, more white people problems really.

>>740737367
That's not how it works.
You're being solipsistic. You can't empathize with a point of view you aren't personally familiar with.

You haven't had to deal with anything like that on an extended basis. It has a profound psychological effect to be stalked and harassed and powerless to stop it for a long time. It drives people to suicide.

tl;dr you have unrealistic expectations that shouldn't apply because it's being used to downplay a crime in the first place. The "healthy" response would be to literally knock their teeth out.

It's like with the chick Fritzl kept in his basement for 17 years. That daughter her kept raping and impregnating, after 17 years of it she would be faced with an open door and wouldn't leave. Because shes been conditioned in a totally different way. Someone who just walked in on their first day would just straight up stab him.

That mindfucking and control is what drives a lot of people to do it, too. So you don't get to be deliberately destructive because it gives you a spiteboner, and then roll over and show your belly when someone calls you on it.

>>740737489
Not even the person you replied to but
>worse than being a pedo
Children are defenseless grown women are not. Individuals in a modern age need to recognize the possibilities of reckless actions. Trying to entice people to engage in ephemeral(at best) encounters or relationships with nude pictures just shows a willingness to be exposed. If people just own up to their actions instead of hanging their head in a shame and denying it then there might be no problem.
->worse than a pedo
You really ought to kill yourself

>>740734450
post in sweden instead?

>>740736646
And at the same time revenge porn is an absolte disgusting filth.

>>740737727
>white people problems
Kill yourself faggot

>>740737963
Faggot

>>740737856
I'm not saying they're worse than a pedo, I'm not the OP. But I will definitely agree that they're in the same spectrum of sexual predator. There's the same kind of behavior, the same grooming, the same destruction and not infrequently the same violence involved. A tossup between "which is worse?" They're both shit and I'm not sure you can quantify it like that.

>>740737727
I would understand it would mentally fuck them up if they were caught doing something fucking disgusting and out there but most girls nudes are literally just a picture of their tits or at the worst them sucking on a dick.

>>740734450
People who watch revenge porn should goto prison.

Just like pedos

>>740738005
No, it's not about the exact type of content, it's the quantity of harassment that does most the damage.

It's not about making her embarrassed at work. It's about drowning her workplace' phonelines with horny aspies until there's such a drama going on that she's too much of a nervous wreck to work.
It's not about pitting her family against her, it's about making a public spectacle of her by splattering her social circles as publicly as possible with lots of harassment.

You put that shit on a decent website with contact info, I can promise you they'll need to change their address and phone number to stop constant harassment. You'll physically make them flee and ditch their contact info.

Pretty quickly they mentally end up in battered housewife mode.

>>740738020
How would that work? You probably see a lot of revenge porn and don't even realise it.

>>740738175
One I'm personally familiar with (theres been a bunch) was one of the few female IT students at a nearby uni.
She had some spiteful exes after her who would set up fake escort profiles with private pics, they hit her linkedin with it to spoil her professional rep, then eventually it got through to people at her uni too.
Eventually she couldn't cross the campus without people asking her for sexual favors or calling her a whore, she burnt out and dropped out. Now she freaks out if a guy just talks to her.

>>740738305
These people are sick, they should be locked.

>>740738305
That's the unfortunate problem with it.
Could at least go after distributors though. I mean it's marketed specifically as revenge porn, usually. So for the lulz, if one of these web admins is hosting say 80k pics, why not hit them with 80k counts of sexual extortion?
Hope the quick buck was worth it

>>740738305
Same way "I thought she was 18" works. Not well.

>>740734450
>Sharing a naked photo of some cunt who cheated on you us the same as taking a naked photo of an innocent child for grown adults to pleasure themselves to
Yeah nah fuck off.

>>740738482
I guess that makes sense, there's no way you can control who see's that kind of porn when it's not marketed as such though, half of the girls that get posted on image sites are probably posted without their consent.

It's not like people think before they find something to jack off to "hey did she approve of these pictures being posted?"

>>740738305
Go on tumblr and look at selfie nude blogs. 1000s of girls naked, none probably realise their nudes are out there. Hard to police. Then you have imagefap, motherless, 4chan, 8ch, the list goes on.

You have to stop people doing it in the first place.

>>740734806
/thread

Don't send nudes to anyone you date, you dumb cunt. Jesus Christ, think ahead a bit

>>740738305
Hows that fishhook taste?
You get some tasty bait too?

>>740738514
No the point i'm making is that whenever you see a nude picture of a girl posted anywhere it could be without her consent and you have no real way to know.

>>740734450
>country getting raped by sand people
>better make up internet laws

>>740738648

I mean, it's not wrong that it's typically illegal to view material that has been illegally distributed as well. It's just impossible to realistically regulate.

File: 3177645376_16087ab598_b.jpg (60KB, 670x474px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 670x474px

>>740734450
The UK should slip beneath the waves and become a marine reserve, do the world a favour.

>>740738617
I think a better method would be to teach people that taking/sending such pictures can ruin their life, in addition to it being illegal to distribute them.

Some sjw's might complain that's victim blaming but fuck them, surprise surprise your pictures aren't safe with the random guy you've been dating for a month.

>>740738667

>there can only ever be one problem dealt with at one single time
>adding a law to stop something on the internet literally removes police from our streets

>>740736196
I was one of those you called a samefag. I'm clearly different

Fuck you

>>740738766
Or teach them not to leave the house in case they get robbed.

>>740738615
Yeah. I get this is a new problem we're dealing with that you get with internet + people, but this escalated quickly
We don't even have to sift over nuances there for a while, there's some very basic stuff we need to tackle like people actively marketing revenge porn AS revenge porn. They're just taking advantage of a novelty that hasn't been legislated yet. But you can assign a (substantial) dollar value to the damage they cause.

Frankly criminalizing that wouldn't even address the people that've already done it, it'd just be a fix for the future. Unfortunately a lot of people are still getting away with it.

>>740738766
EVERYone with a sex life has pics. Hell I had pics before I had sex. Thank god the internet was just coming out when I was 14.

Also in a lot of these cases the pics were taking without getting their consent (it happens, sometimes you gotta capture the moment) or without them knowing (when some creep tunnels into her webcam or something)

File: 1499991918311.gif (891KB, 325x252px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 325x252px

>>740738869
You know that's not what i'm saying at all, just don't send out nudes with your face/identifying marks on you to just any random idiot that wants them.

>>740738656
I also cant tell her age.

>>740738972
How about you just don't commit the plain criminal acts like extortion or defamation?

Should you also be excused from larceny because "they should've locked up their money better apparently?"

>>740738756
Hey man, Ireland is great and Scotland has that dude who kicked a flaming terrorist so hard in the balls he broke his foot.

So let's just say England sinks

>>740739040
No I agree, people shouldn't do it, I personally wouldn't do it. You don't leave your doors unlocked just because it's illegal to break into somebodies home, you protect yourself as much as possible and these days people just give out pictures of themselves with their faces in to random people they don't know like it's going out of style.

Yep. Is totally the same sexually brutalizing an innocent, defenseless child and distributing some bitch nudes that she would have sent a lot of guys anyways.
Totally rational. I mean, what's the worse it could happen? Like, we don't have examples of that kind of policies going wrong?

>>740739040
i'm mainly arguing the fact that you can't tell if a picture of a girl you're jacking off to gave her consent for this picture to be on the internet, what are people expected to do research on every picture before they have a quick tug?

>>740738869
That's retarded and you know it

It's more akin to saying "don't leave your wallet on the car seat as you pump your gas"
Or
"Don't drink and drive"

Unless you wanna argue telling people not to drink and drive is blaming the victim?

>>740739226
Well no I never expected that. I think there's no practical way and no merit to go after end users really.

>>740739152
It happens man. I don't know how often I've taken a shot in the heat of the moment for later faps. Especially when you've got a long term thing going on, I mean, you're not gonna find a single married couple that has way more damaging shit than just pictures. 50% of those end in divorce to, and then some of them turn out to have pretty shitty character and go scorched earth too.

Yeah guys remember in 2014 when the UK banned/regulating some forms of Porn on the internet?

It wants online Porn to conform to the same law as offline/UK made Porn.
No BDSM. No Spanking
No face sitting (that could KILL YOU, I wish I was joking LMAO
No Female Ejaculation.

http://nypost.com/2014/12/10/mass-face-sitting-planned-to-protest-uk-porn-laws/

So of course this was ridiculous back then, and sit is now.

Morality and Legality are not the same.
Clearly the UK has to get its priorities straightened up a good bit.

>>740739324
>that has
*doesn't have

>>740739333
Literally nothing has changed in the uk aside from isp's blocking "harmful content" by default and you have to ring up and ask them to unblock it.

The only thing I believe changed was in regards to the type of porn that could be made in the uk, you can still view it.

That being said I think those "rules" are hilarious.

>>740734450
don't want revenge porn to be a thing?
easy! don't be a cheating whore or do cunting things that will cause your partner to take revenge on you.
dumb whore.

File: tumblr_m0n6ttklOp1qzbz8uo1_400.gif (548KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 320x180px

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37278264

200 arrests a year after the law came in, and the number was rapidly growing. Only a matter of time before some of you get caught. Gif related, you make me sick some of you.

>>740739476
I don't think half the time it's even "revenge", a lot of the time it's just guys sharing pics with their friends because that's what some guys do.

>>740734450
post her nudes newfag

>>740739476
So you can control what other people do?

You're the only one, congratulations

>>740739552
I get that but I watch my archive like a hawk and don't let it out of my control either exactly for this reason.
Even if we've split up we're usually on good terms and I don't want it coming back to me and her when it leaks onto /b/ and she ends up taking neckbeards in wave tactics
They gotta be able to trust me with it if I want to keep this going. So I don't share.

>>740739550
Good. At that rate they can arrest my great great grandkids

>>740739476
There's lots of guys who have no integrity and lots of issues, who will blow up over nothing or just act spitefully, and will be willing to cross every line in doing so just because they're emotional and they have no sense of boundaries.
You sound like one of those people.

>>740739680
She was taking wave after wave of neckbeards anyways

>>740739715
It's not just guys that do this though, plenty of women leak nudes of guys but they just don't care because what guy would unless you look like a bag of shit?

>>740739774
I'd go into that but you're tossing that up to spin the subject, not because it's a genuine concern of yours.

>>740734450
No one will ever compare pedos to human beings. They're treated like shit even in prison. They're scrum and need to die.

Revenge porn is shitty, but not in the same universe as pedo shit.

>>740739443
Cool, some actual insight in this thread.

And yeah, pretty much what I expected, they can't enforce bans on certain types and certain keywords for Porn online.
Their bans will never work or have limited effect like you just described.

Also, as a brit, are you scared about Theresa May banning encryption?

I know its "impossible", and basically means starting the internet from scratch.
Is it still a topic of discussion/debate there?

>Hey hon, you know what would be hot? If you posted those pics I sent you! You know I'm an exhibitionist, it will really get me going.

2 days later

>OMG how could you, this is like rape, I'm gonna sue you for everything after the state puts you in prison.

Really doesn't even require the guy to be involved, she can just post from his place while he's in the bathroom or asleep. She probably doesn't even need to bother doing that, she could post them anyplace with free wifi.

>>740739715
The best advice for women who don't want revenge porn is to not pose nude for shit or keep porn in her possession.

>>740739664
not exactly, but you know, actions have consequences.

>>740739715
i'm way too jealous to share anything, but nice try

>>740739828
>I know its "impossible", and basically means starting the internet from scratch.
No it's not. That's the problem
Large firms will have complete divisions devoted to making sure mechanical details of their systems comply with local laws. Their networks are already separated into national jurisdictions for this purpose, with database content matched geographically.

With limits on block sizes for example, they WILL spend about two years pouring over everything and downscaling it in all relevant applications.
There will also be inspections and fines if they fail to comply.

Small businesses aren't on this radar, private citizens don't know shit about it, criminals and terrorists will utterly disregard the policy and continue to use heavier encryption.

This is mostly a general security weakening of broad scale infrastructure - medical record networks, payment service providers and financial transaction networks, admin for power grids and so on.

>>740739814
i find it really unfortunate that a guy with a slightly too young girlfriend will be treated pretty much the same as one who legit rapes a girl with a single-digit age...

The great firewall of china couldnt stop shit. You cannot control the interwebz

im here for the nudes

>>740739828
She can't ban encryption. All of these things our government throw out there are so unrealistic it really is laughable, they don't understand how things work.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/07/17/porn-websites-uk-ordered-introduce-age-checks-next-year/

All of this shit under the guide of "protect the children" when really they just want to control the internet. How realistic is it to expect people to enter credit card details online and in the same breath want to get rid of encryption, they're so out of the loop it's laughable.

Don't date these kind of "woman" just pump and dump.
Any and I mean any woman who spreads nudes around and then complains is just annoyed her nudes got out.

File: 1501119881128.jpg (137KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 960x960px

>>740739443
>ring then up to unblock it
>tfw you thought that was a joke for going on 8 years

Got pics of Hanna? shes a hottie

This thread is a fucking first. People actually discussing shit for a change.

>>740740213
Once upon a time Exporting PGP to the UK was considered arms trafficking. You can in fact attempt to ban encryption

File: 1500952127364.jpg (22KB, 480x876px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x876px

>>740739550
>tfw living in 3rd world shithole and hosting revenge porn server

Get fucked

>>740740393
I mean they can but they seem to think it's just something simple and that it would be worth it just to "protect the children" from the porn they're going to be able to access anyway.

>>740740368
This happens often, the problem lies in that the threads don't match

Last week I had a delightful discussion about the future of gun control in a thread about the tv show fraiser

>>740740213
On top of this you can still access porn on sites like reddit/tumblr/imgur/4chan whatever other sites that aren't strictly for porn, are they going to block all those too?

>>740740605
And thats why this thread nerds moar ponies

>>740740793
You can McFucking™ end your life, my dude

File: ohlook.jpg (45KB, 600x570px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x570px

>>740734450
This fucking roastie has been posting this shit everyday.
No they shouldn't be treated the same way as someone who rapes children.

>>740741066
you throw this word "roastie" around all the time... I do not think it means what you think it means.

File: 28bcf73eeccd66732198888e70351464977d6598cfc07afa38a210167e19d713.jpg (67KB, 625x416px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 625x416px

>>740741066

>>740741198
I know exactly what it means.
And how do you know I post it all the time? I rarely use this word. I only use it on roasties.

>>740741246
the meme is valid so go fk yourself

>>740741198
Means she's smuggling Arby's in her panties

Means she got a couple a curtains long enough for bay windows

It means she can play peekaboo with your dick without you every penetrating her

Means when she spreads her legs it looks like a couple of bats wings

Means she a Fookin sloot m8

>>740741253
But if you were using it correctly...
You don't know that they are a "roastie" any better than I know that you shit post all the time.

>>740735274
binary genders? you mean genders right?

>>740741427
>But if you were using it correctly...

It's an insult is that so hard for you to comprehend?
You can keep up with your mental gymnastics.
It's funny

>>740741427
Roasties, and by extension any stereotypical human, has character traits that dictate if they do one such action they will more than likely do similar actions in their stereotype.

If a nigger owns a pit bull, it's fair to assume hes also got an illegal gun.

If a spic plays loud music til 3 in the morning, it's safe to assume he's got 10 people living in the studio apartment.

Etc

>>740735274

Only two genders, but there is a spectrum of mental illness

File: IMG_0343.jpg (206KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 600x600px

>>740737489
He's here...

>>740735119
Why does this fag look like Colin Meanly

>>740741711
> wrong
genetic mosaics, lack of identifiable genitalia and hermaphrodism.
cool story, though.

>>740734887
Thats non western countries in general ypu think russia brazil or japan would care

>>740742043
Sounds like a disease

why are the slut's pics not being posted here??

>>740742303
Fear of being jailed.

>>740742408
What if I live in a state that doesn't care about revenge porn since freedom of speech

File: 57645675463.jpg (10KB, 410x411px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 410x411px

>>740742408
The rest of the millions of pics on the internet are ok though because they're not high profile cases?

File: cute.png (224KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 450x300px

cute

File: john-sonmez-awkward-book.jpg (165KB, 926x1172px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 926x1172px

>>740734525
Also wild gulf between watched cp, had cp on HDD, created cp, touched children, raped children, raped and killed.

Please don't throw us in one basket