hey /b/ros what do you think about Liev Schreiber's son

>>740414236
Show boi pussy

File: liev-schreiber-sons-dress-up-in-costume-at-comic-con-02.jpg (344KB, 1075x1222px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1075x1222px

>>740414236
I think it's hot and I can't wait to see him turn into a sexy little trap.

>>740414236
>son of Jew actor dresses as harley quinn
>Jew actor allows it
No surprises there. Would spank him like a little girl.

I think the child is too young to decide if he wants to be a trap or not. If he hits around 21 and still dresses up like a girl and likes dick then I think there would be validity to his feelings.

Its a fucking child at a costume party.

>>740414236
The same thing I thought about it a week ago when it was posted here and all the fucking dumbfuck teenagers weighed in with their worthless opinions amounting to nothing on it.

Every time you say the word cuck, insert a lit match in in your urethra.

>>740414780
>fucking a child at a costume party.
lewd

>>740414755
people who think this kind of thing are retarded

File: cringe.jpg (922KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 2048x1365px

>>740414780
costume party = fat and ugly fuck guys dressed like girls

>>740414236
He's preparing the boy to be farmed out to Jew producers the next time daddy wants a big role.

They don't call it Pedowood for nothing.

>caring about what other people do
>starting a thread about it
>not bettering your own life and being a total faggot

sounds about right. OP please do something for yourself and try to be productive and not some massive faggot that worries what others do with their lives. pathetic

>>740414918
l2read faggot

>>740415155

Product of white guilt.

>>740415122
Well that's just like your opinion fag.

>>740414828
>cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck
cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck
cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck
cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck
cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck

File: 1493058161922.png (403KB, 481x767px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 481x767px

why did he let him do that?

File: 1500773355920.png (725KB, 632x960px) Image search: [Google]

725KB, 632x960px

>>740415349
no, it's clinically supported

>>740414236
10/10 would molest.

File: 1496729466044.jpg (33KB, 250x345px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 250x345px

>>740414321
newfagg. when is a under age boy it's called boygina

>>740415458
I didn't know... I'm sorry.

>caring about what celebrities do outside of the their job.

If child labor was still a thing you fucks would at least be doing something useful.

>>740414236
If we're only talking about this singular case it doesn't mean anything. Little kids don't really care about things like gender or sex they see something cool they want to be like that. I wanted to be yoshimitsu but I'm not going around wearing a mask or mastering the glorious katana although I do like weird things and Japan so meh. Dressing like that won't make him a trap sucking negro dick for a dollar and begging for approval from society or anything.

But in the grand scheme of society we shouldn't act like this is a "good" thing. That character was obviously designed to be hot for men so it's weird to say "yes son, dress like a slut".

File: 1500918842024.jpg (134KB, 768x1152px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 768x1152px

>>740415664
no problem

Someone should tweet the shadman picture to him.
Maybe he will realize that he is sexualizing his son.

>>740414236
father >pedophile
son >queer

File: 1500525720054.gif (2MB, 500x459px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x459px

>>740415196
you hurt my felling anon know i have to go to jerking off whit cp until i cum blode. thanks for that

>>740415867
The problem is idiots are giving the trans threatment to childs now, so maybe that kid wants to dress as HQ just for fun, but his mom can turn him into a trap because that's popular now.

>>740415867
this

I hope he grows up to have inherited his mothers genes that way it will make fapping over him a lot easier.

>>740415458
what is?

>>740416011
Agree

At least he didn't go as Wonder Woman.

>>740414396
C U T E
U
T
E

>>740414236
>it's a boy
found the problem

>>740414236
It would be bad if he let a little girl dress like that too.

Besides all the pedos on here. Real woke Bros understand that his POS dad is going to pimp him out to all these sick producers and other elite faggots on the top of the food chain. Happens to a lot of child actors and celebrity kids. Fuck this backwards society. and you new fags glorify traps and Loli shit.

File: Harley trap.png (2MB, 1000x1482px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x1482px

shadmaster payed tribute aldready

>>740414236
Harley Quinn is WAY too sexualized to be a cosplay for anyone aged 18 or younger

Crazy how 4chan became like tumblr and Reddit glorifying faggotry and traps and Loli and pedo shit.

File: oh, my 2.jpg (27KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x300px

>>740414236

>>740414236
Wow, he failed as a father.

>>740415196
PEDO ALARM
STRANGER DANGER

ddude just cuz youre a pedo and you want to be considered normal doesn't mean you are gonna get OP to stop a thread like this

File: oh, my 3.jpg (72KB, 423x341px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 423x341px

>>740414236
>>740416573

File: oh, my 4.png (441KB, 300x900px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 300x900px

>>740416573
>>740416714
>>740414236

>>740414236
I.... I think I want to fuck it

>>740415948
He knows what he is doing. This is HOLLYWEIRD. Where pedophilia is the number one epidemic in Hollywood.

File: 1500773372102.gif (396KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1000x1000px

>>740415948
>>740416466
fuckin glorious

Who cares? And why?

When I was a kid, I incidentally dressed up as a bunch of shit. It didn't make the news.

Why is this actually a big deal?

>>740415591
I prefer the term boipucci.
Also, nice pic. More?

>>740416466
NICE GET and want to fuck it even more now

is it gay I like this kid dressed up as Harley more then the one in the movie?

>>740415948
So wait. Some dude draws a picture and suddenly this person is sexualizing his son?

That's ridiculous. Maybe we could say that Harley Quinn is sexualized in some way, but if the kid wants to dress up as it, that doesn't mean the dad is sexualizing the kid.

File: DC6e-yZWsAAdhkP.jpg (76KB, 729x749px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 729x749px

>>740416969

>>740416969
the fuck
that other boy is all messed up. pick a costume ffs

>>740417087
that costume is completely sexual

fuck I want some of that boipucci.
I DONT WANT TO BE GAY
OR LIKE UNDERAGE BOYS
WTF

>>740417087
>fishnet pantyhose with holes in
>slut makeup

>>740414396
That's one hot little trap.

>>740417229
Sorry, what? Because of the tights? There's nothing sexual about that costume.

It's shorts and a shirt and a jacket and some make-up. What do you mean?

>>740417087
You got to be a pedo yourself trying to justify this faggotry

>>740416969
yeah that kid is so fucking queer

>>740417057
I'll surprise if don't

>>740417334
It's a fucking clown with some ripped tights. Holy shit. I'm sorry that turns you on, but that's not objectively sexual in any sense.

>>740417087
Dude bought his son fishnet stockings, pigtails, and whore class makeup and your saying he's not sexualizing his son?

>>740417397
nigga u best be baitin

>>740417485
LOOK ME IN THE EYE AND TELL ME YOU DONT WANT SOME BOIPUCCI

>>740417057
Yes.
And there's nothing wrong with that.

>>740417613
he's masterbaitin

>>740417621
I want HIS boipucci.

>>740417564
Forgot to mention the booty shorts.

>>740416466
>muh monochromatic aberration
fucking why shad

>>740417621
yeah bro, but like, nothing that's less than 16 y/o

>>740417564
Okay, if we don't get objective about this, we don't have anything to talk about. What is your definition of whore class make-up, and why are stockings and pigtails sexual?

>>740417621
That kid would make Chris Hanson take his own seat.

File: Finished-1_original[1].jpg (896KB, 1891x2213px) Image search: [Google]

896KB, 1891x2213px

>>740417485
Clowns are pretty hot yeah

File: Crazy_Laws_15_[1].jpg (481KB, 1939x1438px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1939x1438px

>>740417397
>There is nothing sexual about this costume. It's a t-shirt, a skirt, and shoes.

>>740414828
Someone is getting laid in his applied feminism class.

that's how you make your son a cuck

>>740417777
7777
fuck i should just kms thats quite the get

>>740417761
make-up is by it's nature sexual as it is meant to imitate the physical effects that sex has on faces such as redder lips etc.
fishnet stockings are sexual. especially with holes. no way around that.
short shorts are sexual for obvious reasons

>>740415353
ur penor is going to burn down

>>740417806
Congrats on providing a picture of what I assume to be a prostitute. A prostitute could wear anything she wants. How about answering the question?

>>740418066
Why would you assume she's a prostitute? She could be talking to her friend.

>>740417948
Is the joker sexy? You're writing off make-up as something that it is not necessarily.
What about having holes in fishnet stockings makes them sexual?
Short shorts are not sexual unless more leg is sexual. I would argue that more leg is not sexual.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG0Rv93Wtpc

>>740418171
oooo you btfo that guy

>>740417761
Whore class makeup is makeup that covers the entire face, with colors meant to accentuate the eyes, lips, and cheeks. Covering blemishes while highlighting smoldering bedroom eyes, puckered lips, and simulated blushing.
Fishnet stockings are sexual. I could show you literally millions of pics to prove it.
Pig tails by themselves may not be sexual, but these are bright colored artificial pigtails. Meant to catch the eyes of people.

>>740418219
>I would argue that more leg is not sexual.
you would be wrong. ask girls why they wear booty shorts. to look sexy.
>inb4 they are comfortable
they are not

>>740417805
>>740414236
which one would you rather?

for me it's liev's kid

File: 59b5f53a25f735372f1ef7393c3ded0c.jpg (33KB, 390x285px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 390x285px

>>740414755
>>740416192

>>740418171
Another congratulation is in order for you saying exactly what I expected you to say.

Still care to answer the question? Begging my intuition or exploiting contextual clues is not a means of answering my question. It's certainly not a way of justifying your conclusions.

>>740415184
Probably this

>>740415184

This.

File: 1500774413391.jpg (64KB, 612x496px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 612x496px

>>740417129
you're goddamned right

>>740414236
Asking that on a place full of traps.
Nice op.

>>740418456
The shota obviously.

>>740418301

This is such a bizarre definition, but I appreciate you answering. It's just shy of making the joker a whore, of course. Smoldering bedroom eyes? Look up at the OP. Where are the smoldering bedroom eyes? lmao. The sexualization here is done post-hoc.

You could show me a billion pics of fishnets and it wouldn't prove a damn thing.

Thanks for budging on the pigtails, if only slightly.

>>740416192
Yes, I agree completely but on the flip side you got people like James woods acting like this kid is gonna be deranged for this.

>>740414236
Fuck that Jew and is faggot son.

>>740418456
The kid 100% I would pay good amount of cash to fuck that sweet boipucci.

>>740418669

But James Woods is an asshole who should be shot in the face. Why does his opinion matter?

>>740418456
Shota wins hands down.

File: basedjameswoods.png (528KB, 501x622px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 501x622px

>>740418854
Because he's hilariously accurate.

File: 1394090328016.jpg (85KB, 495x495px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 495x495px

>>740415196

>>740418857
Xmen Origins Wolverine was the start of this faggotry, I bet.

>>740418943
post more of the son

>>740418943

You haven't shown me anything to change my opinion, Anon...

>>740419041
this i need to cum

File: basedjameswoods_thesequel.png (14KB, 495x210px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 495x210px

>>740419049
Fucking libtard parents raising their kids without gender just to make a social justice statement are child abusers.

>>740419144
I'm genuinely curious where this becomes child abuse.

>>740418660
>Where are the smoldering bedroom eyes?

The ones highlighted by eyeliner, eye shadow, and colored highlights.

>You could show me an overwhelming sample size for how a certain thing is viewed by society and it wouldn't prove a thing.

So by that logic pornography isn't sexual, because no matter how much you show me it doesn't prove a thing.

>>740419041
We should spam the dads twitter demanding moar pics.
Get extra creepy about it too.

>>740419336
Except that I think we would agree that sex is sexual. I appreciate your attempt to reduce my argument, though.

>>740419144

I'm not familiar at all with those two people or their child. Would you like to enlighten me, or throw a shitfit some more?

>>740419445
I don't agree that sex is sexual.
Sex is reproductive. Nothing sexual about reproduction.

>>740419454
lrn2google faggot

>>740419544
So sex isn't sexual? Then is anything sexual? And if not, do you have an argument in the first place?

>>740419533
How to misrepresent facts 101.

File: 12751599_1720503618233493_813367164_n.jpg (141KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1080x1080px

I love this trend of trans young people

>>740419533
of course they do. they are mentally ill.

>>740419611
Faggots are annoying

>>740419454
No idea either honestly. Some Hollywood types and a sexy shota.
Honestly I couldn't care less about the Hollywood types.

>>740419431

Old /b/ would. New /b/ however will do fuckall but create an ongoing thread about it, containing every variation of every picture of the child ever taken, while making no effort to contact Mr. Schreiber and give him a headache for lulz (cuz meh effort and ZOMG HARASSMENT!!!! LEEEEGAL THREATS!!!!!1)

>>740419691
Exactly

>>740419567

Fuck a rake.

>>740415184
This

>>740419611
My argument is that I don't consider sex sexual. Just like how you don't consider what that kid is wearing sexual.

Your basing your stance solely off your opinion. Well, so am I.

>>740419691
>>740419761

What if their condition was biological in origin, and correlated to a lot of other problems like depression and anxiety?

What if these issues were exacerbated by environment?

>>740419533
it's a shame 100% don't succeed

>>740419544
>Nothing sexual about reproduction.
There's trolling and then there's this bullshit. You're not even being willfully stupid you're just an asshole.

>>740419680
damn that is a boy? i need more of that tight boygina

>>740419744
I miss old /b/...

>>740419885
what if?
it wasn't

>>740419877
Well, yeah, but we need agree somewhere. You're saying sex isn't sexual. I would say, based on any common definition, that you are wrong. If you aren't, we should define terms.

But that's me giving you too much credit. I think you're being a shitlord, and reducing our disagreement to "everything is subjective right?lmao" and you just shouldn't do that in the interest of intellectual honesty.

>>740416285
degeneracy

File: 2chansuccess2.jpg (469KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 960x1280px

>>740419533
This is actually great for the trap population. Nothing ruins the brand like an old ugly trap.

There should be a Logan's Run rule for trannies.

>>740420052
Then they would be mentally ill. And they would still deserve our sympathy.

>>740419999
Do you find trees pollinating to be sexual? That's reproduction.

>>740420240
Sweet semantics. I love how we don't get to discuss the issue because of conflation and immaturity.

>>740417564
YOu think they are crochless????

>>740419049
That's because you're a godless degenerate heathen, anon...

>>740420093
Your the one who was trying to say dressing your kid in an overtly sexualized fashion isn't sexual.

Or are you saying that Harley Quinn, as she appeared in Suicide Squad wasn't overtly sexualized.

File: 14718503_1146059462146312_8170994080264749056_n.jpg (157KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1080x1080px

>>740419680
very pretty

Showing excessive skin is sexual. Fishnet stockings is made to be sexual. And this kid is wearing it.

>>740420400
Do you have pics to prove me wrong?

>>740420240
I identify as a tree and I masturbate to sweet pollen bukake.

>>740420453
He's saying she's a fucking tree, man.

>>740420561
Then I accept you finding reproduction sexual.

File: unknown.jpg (102KB, 750x536px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 750x536px

Yeah because he really has an issue with crossdressing.

>>740414236

I put myself in Liev's shoes and I think - my son wants to go as a female superhero. Ok. Can I think of a compelling reason to tell him no? "You can't, son. She's a girl and you're a boy." Well, we let girls dress up as Superman. I think it's different because Harley Quinn is a sex symbol. It's a bit much. The makeup? Eesh. I mean - the kid's gay. No doubt. What kind of boy wants to dress up as Harley Quinn? A gay boy - that's who.

>>740414396
that jawline tho

like, when youre liev schreiber's son i dont know what expectations you have for being a twink

>>740420554
>Wait you have proof those tights have a crotch in em??

Haha, I'm going to pollinate my old lady

>>740414236
He spawned the kid. Let him do whatever the fuck he want, because he'll be the one to suffer the consequences in the end.

File: 155443_full.jpg (105KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1000x664px

>>740420684
Yep, he is anti crossdressing.

>>740420453

You're the one who said that dressing your kid in an overtly sexualized fashion-- Stop right there. That's circular.

Even if I thought HQ was sexualized (in the movies), it wouldn't necessarily translate for a child wearing a costume.

And, for the record, I don't think she was. And I'm not being a fuck here. I genuinely don't see any sexualization in her character. That's why I'm curious what you think.

SEX ISN'T SEXUAL AND JET FUEL CAN'T MELT STEEL BEAMS

>>740420688
>What kind of boy wants to dress up as Harley Quinn? A gay boy - that's who.

Not necessarily. He may just be too young to realize that he wants to fuck her. He's confusing the thing he wants to fuck with the thing he wants to be. His parents shouldn't reinforce this confusion.

>>740420703
like bruce willis's daughters. couple of rock dennises

>>740420688
If my son insisted on being Harley Quinn, I'd have picked the red and black cat suit version from the animated series.

File: takeadeepbreath.png (312KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 500x375px

You know how you can tell sex isn't sexual? By looking into my asshole.

>>740421012
who killed a goat

>>740420967
i'd dress him as a Mr Harley Quin from the Agatha Christie book

>>740420967
I'd have just held my own party

>>740417805
Tabby made a good Harley.

>>740421074
if you fucked the goat that would not be sexual because sex isn't sexual kind of like a refrigerator isn't a refrigerator.

>>740414236
Don't act like this is something new. It's pretty awesome to dress totally like a girl when you're a boy. I really think it's a completely different mindset to being a trap or a cuck, as those that did dress like a girl on certain occasions seemed to turn into the more alpha men.

>>740420703
loads of american women have crazy jawlines
doesn't seem to stop them becoming celebs

>>740414755
>no children have arbitrary whims that may or may not stick
Anon, were you hatched as a 30 year old?

File: MaybeRegrets.jpg (300KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 800x1200px

It's weird (especially because it's a ditzy/sexy chick like harley quinn) and also as a celebrity he must have known that his son would be immediately singled out like this. I still think people are freaking out a bit more than necessary.

Also no regrets for pic

>>740421225
>Im not a muuuuuslim

If your college professor says sex isn't sexual you should blindly repeat it without thinking about what it means especially if your professor is fucking you up the ass (non-sexually of course)

>>740414236
TBH Its not as weird as seeing women cosplaying male characters which is common.

>>740420838
>And, for the record, I don't think she was.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-tZ1gJPiIY

>>740421370
with his feminine penis

So if you have sexual intercourse for the sole purpose of procreation then that isn't actually sex? Can we work this into legal rape somehow?

I'm the dude who claimed sex isn't sexual.
It's called playing devils advocate.

>>740421427
You're either uncharitable or equivocating her outfit with her role in the movie. No matter what you're doing, she's not even wearing the same fucking outfit! How can you seriously even link this video?!

>>740421407
I dunno, man. I've seen a chick do a pretty solid young Joseph Joestar.
Poses and everything.

sex is a social construct it isnt sexual

>>740421520
Goddamn it! It takes me 24 years to get laid and now it's not even sex! Fuck my life!

I think he takes after his father. A Faggot.

>>740421556
Playing the devil's advocate is sexual, man, don't say it isn't cause I see you jackin off.

>>740421600
>>740421427

And actually, I sent that preemptively. Actually appeal to my fucking reason why this costume is sexual without using intuitional dogma.

Actually answer any question I've posed without a stupid video or response.

Why is this outfit sexual? Provide some objectivity about this!

>>740420413

>believing in God

My sides and side-dishes.

Damn, I was going to take my car for a drive but I can't if it's not a car. Why is sexuality so complicated?

>>740414236
I don't really give a fuck what other people do.

>>740421600
I think you're being willfully dense about the obvious sexual components of her character (she was literally offered up for sex like a whore). of course its subverted, but its still there. like what do you think fishnet leggings add to an outfit? sophistication?

nothing wrong with it though. children are beautiful and it's a good and morally justifiable thing to sexualize them.

>>740421650
the sky isn't the sky and this lsd isn't lsd

>>740421600
The fact that you don't think her costume was sexualized speaks more about you than anything. Your opinion is worth nothing. There are tons of articles talking about how the costume was sexualized.

>>740421600
How about the scene where she's flexing in her jail cell? Licking the bars?
Or Getting dressed? While EVERY male in the area stops to look.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiJ9Bmcc2cY

>>740421945
>children are beautiful and it's a good and morally justifiable thing to sexualize them.
finally anon makes sense
this is the kind of sexualization that's sexual, right? Have to check nowadays.

>>740421870
And look what not believing in God has rought. Good job, degenerate.

>>740421815
In contemporary culture hot pants and fishnet leggings are overtly sexual attire.

It doesn't work on a prepubescent boy ina coat thats a bit too big for him, but for harley the coat is there specifically to accentuate her waist by widening her upper body.

>>740422053
because she's a woman?

>>740418812
I hate to report you by law. Reported.

>>740422299
Because her character is "sexy" and her outfit is tailored for that purpose.

>>740421945
It doesn't matter what I fucking think about fishnet leggings, dude. I can be attracted to starfish. Unless you bring some objectivity to the discussion you should actually fuck off.

Like I said, you're equivocating her role in the movie with her outfit, and it's not even the same outfit.

Again you beg your own question. I'm not a fan of sexualizing children. I just don't think it exists in this example, and you've got nothing but appeals to emotion to convince anyone.

I'm not, honestly, being dense about this at all.

File: AHHHHHH.jpg (5KB, 256x170px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 256x170px

>>740422379

>>740421927
Well, we can all turn in now

>>740422049
Tons of articles is an appeal to authority.

>>740421815
>Provide some objectivity about this!

What is and is not sexual is a subjective matter you twit.
I'm going with the consensus of western culture. The culture the people, character, and movie involved all take place in.

Same way you can't objectively prove rape is wrong. It's a subjective matter that has reached consensus in our society.

>>740422053
Again, conflating her role in the movie with her outfit. If her outfit is on trial here, then her character is not.

>>740422625
so? that's not actually a legit fallacy

>>740422514
>who isnt attracted to starfish

>>740422642
If it's a subjective matter, entirely, then you have no argument.

How can you sit here and say it's sexualized if it's entirely subjective? I disagree. Owell, the whole thing is moot.

I could provide objective reasons for rape not being okay, but I don't know if that would constitute proof? There's arguments that rape is moral, dude, but they use objective statements to prove their points.

>>740422683
The kid is dressed as her, not simply wearing an identical outfit.

>>740414236
Is it the 8 or 10 yo if he is 10 then that boy is a tranny.

>>740422799
It literally is if it constitutes your argument (it did). If not, it's an appeal to popularity. Either way.

>>740414236
Comic con is for fags so it goes hand in hand

>>740422850
>I could provide objective reasons for rape not being okay

Do it then.

>>740422514
Can you "objectively" explain the components of her outfit? Are you just being a trolling shitposter?

Of course I know you're a shiteating weasel so I actually have to clearly explain how yes the sexual aspects of clothing are social constructs so there's very little objectivity to the concept to start with, but in our culture her outfit is absolutely meant to highlight the sexual nature of her character.

I realize drawing out meaningless internet arguments is the only way you can draw satisfaction from your miserable life, but dude, you aren't good at it.

>>740422886
What!?

>The kid is dressed as her not simply dressed as her.

Made my week, anon.

>>740422981
No. It's saying read the articles. I'm not going to repeat the reasons for its being sexual when so many article have been written. It would be like asking me to prove gravity. Look it up, it's been proven enough by scientists.

>>740422999
Even if I fail to do it right now, it wouldn't make your point.

Look. You are going to want some reasons to justify your beliefs, and if you can't provide them, then I have no rationale by which to be convinced.

>>740422979
After seeing >>740420490
And >>740418857 I guess it is the 8 year old.

If that kid likes dressing up as a girl regularly though he is definitely in to cross dressing and probably gay.

File: consider this.jpg (24KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x451px

If his father tried to put a stop to it, his wife would divorce him, he wouldn't get custody, his child support payments and alimony would be based upon his current income and then he wouldn't be able to pay it because he would never get another acting gig in Hollywood ever again. Also, his son would continue to dress like a girl.

Considering this, what would you have him do?

>>740423250
Not go out in public with him

File: pedobracelet.jpg (6KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 259x194px

>>740422999
1

nicole brown simpson the bitch

File: niggerhome.jpg (9KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 275x183px

>>740423331
2

>>740423065
I'm serious. lol.

What do I need to objectively explain? The burden of proof is not on me to denigrate her outfit as sexual.

You should be able to, at this point, explain WHY her outfit is obviously sexual. If you can't do that, you should change your own mind.

I'm operating on agnosticism here. I have no compelling reason to find her outfit sexualizing. We can define terms, we can talk in terms of objective things that make things sexual. We can do a lot of things, but not until you stop being a faggot.

>>740423250
>>740423359

>>740423079
If the kid was wearing an identical outfit without knowing anything about Harley Quinn than he wouldn't be dressing up like Harley Quinn would he?

He specifically is wearing what he's wearing to ape someone. That's different than simply wearing the same clothes.

This is what I get for trying to bring nuance to /b/

File: jessica courtenay.jpg (61KB, 576x1024px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 576x1024px

>>740423434

>>740423188
Sounds like you realize you can't do it so your not even going to try.

>>740423250
We are so fucked.

>>740423441
>"If the kid was wearing a harley quinn outfit, he wouldn't be dressing up as harley quinn..."

What nuance have you brought? Are you saying intent matters in cosplay?... And are you serious?

Does my intent determine what I'm dressed as, or does my outfit?

>>740419248
if they're forcing social justice ideals on someone that doesn't understand them or doesn't care and "potentially" confusing them over time just to appease the parent then i would call that abuse for messing with their thoughts and emotions and not allowing them to grow into their own individual.

>>740423372
Any outfit designed to show off the body or certain parts of the body is sexual. That's just the way it is. That costume shows off the legs and butt.

>>740423331
Genghis Khan raped shitloads of women, that didn't stop him.
From a breeding standpoint he was the most successful man in recorded history.

>>740420037
Fuck it, i'm going to call him

>>740423250
Have a little self respect? A teeny tiny little bit of common sense? Some sort of love for his fucking son?

>>740423574
Holy shit. Okay.

So here's an objective reason to not rape someone: Rape causes suffering.

You can disagree with that 'till the cows come home, except it's not possible.

But even if it WASN'T possible, it would be a fallacy to assume it invalidated my point or bolstered yours.

Really, dude. You have to think in terms of more than emotion if you want to have an argument. Fishnets MAY be sexualized for a reason, but if you can't come up with that reason, you are not justified in your belief. Holy fucking shit I am being trolled.

>>740423250
This is a very good point actually. He really can't do shit about it.

>>740423649
intellectual property determines what you're dressed as. if you're in an outfit that's with a certain degree of legal similarity to, say, a star wars stormtrooper costume, then legally you're dressed up as a star wars storm trooper even if you try and deny it.

>>740414236
Your either faget pedophile or liberal cuck for liking this , im not sure what's worse

>>740422429
no, because they're men and she's a woman

>>740423754
In what way? How do you propose he stop his son from dressing like a girl that won't result in his life being destroyed?

>>740423696
Oh, well then rape is obviously okay, hope the old lady understands

>>740423434
suace

>>740423434
never before wanted to suck a dick so bad

>>740423558
This girl has a penis?

>>740423670
I'm actually inclined to agree with you about the butt showing, but I don't even see how this costume does it.

The legs, on the other hand, I disagree. You're describing shorts at that point.

>>740423799
How do objectively explain causing someone suffering as being something you shouldn't do?

>>740423649
Yes intent matters, that's what I'm saying.
Just because you wear a toga doesn't mean your dressing like Cesar.

>>740423799
>Rape causes suffering.
>You have to think in terms of more than emotion if you want to have an argument

OK

>Fishnets MAY be sexualized for a reason, but if you can't come up with that reason, you are not justified in your belief.

It's like with the Supreme Court justice on defining CP. He couldn't do it, but he knows it when he sees it.

>>740423886
He could start by buying the kid a pair of boys jeans you fucking faggot

>>740414236
Liev is retarded and Shadman capitalized

>>740423434
A completely nude passable trap. Now I've seen everything.

>>740423999
And when the boy refuses to wear them?

>>740423934
Certain shorts, short shorts, are sexual. The closer you get to the butt and groin, the more sexual it gets.

>>740423906
As a living organism, who's strongest drive is reproduction, yes rape is objectively okay.
It's the subjective stuff that makes it wrong.

>>740423952
I don't need to. And again, you're avoiding the issue.

I provided an objective reason. Do some of that. We can argue about the merit of your reasons after we get there. Do you not want to have a discussion?

For the Nth time, it doesn't matter what I can or cannot do. You are not right simply by virtue of my being wrong.

>>740414236
Terrible costume, Terrible Character, Terrible Father
Obviously the dads wants to get attention

>>740423713
post pic or somthin anon

record it

>>740423933
Yes. Her parents allowed her to take puberty blockers at the age of 12 with the supervision of a doctor. She has been on HRT since 15, which was 3 years ago. She's 18, a C-cup, and she has never had breast implants.

She grew her C-cups using HRT as fertilizer.

>>740414236
Fucking who? And bigger question who fucking cares? Why do we have this thread twice a day?

I fail to understand why a bunch of neckbeards on the internet give a shit about what some kid dresses up as.
Do you faggots ride around in your vans on Halloween reviewing all the kids' costumes?

>>740423809
Sure he can. Life has consequences and a real man faces them, he doesn't back down to his cock holster because she says so.

>>740424081
Then he could act like a fucking parent and punish him.
Just like if the kid refused to do his chores or school work.

>>740423999
you think they don't any jeans?

>>740420037
Why else are we still here?

>>740423957
No. You're equivocating.

What you're really saying is just because you're not MEANING to dress as Cesar doesn't mean you are, and that should be obviously false.

>>740424266
You don't?

>>740414236
>>740414236

its not trans gay or even bisexual.

take for example young girls who dress as batman. Is that supposed to mean they'll grow up gay?

In a few years that kid will likely hate his dad for letting him dress up like that. At least, most normal kids probably would. Knowing his dad though, he'll probably just make fun of him for it.

Thats what happens when you take your kids to see stupid movies.

>>740424147
>avoiding the issue
>meanwhile you've spent hundreds of thousands of posts avoiding the obvious sexual nature of an outfit for seemingly no gain or purpose

>>740424291
you see any in the fucking picture asshole?

>>740424248
you seem to know a lot tell me more.

>>740423973
Rape, by definition, causes suffering. I'll grant you that suffering is subjective, but the nature of the proposition that "Rape causes suffering," is not up for debate.

That's what makes it objective. You are really getting on my nerves here.

And again. Prove me wrong 'till the cows come home. It doesn't make you right. Why can you not just abandon this pointless endeavor and worry about how justified you are?

>>740414236
it's a little kid dressing up in a costume. What the fuck /b/

>>740424147
From the article on fishnets
>Generally considered to be a sexy garment,

For whatever reason, they are used to invoke sexuality, which is what makes them sexy. Why? Why are high heels sexy? Who knows, they just are.

>>740424386
tbh you're a pretty big faggot if you care about the way you dressed when you were a young child

>>740424324
So everyone who wears a simple robe is cosplaying as Jesus.
Everyone who wears a loincloth is cosplaying as Conan the Barbarian, even the tribes in the Amazon who have never heard of him.

>>740424392
No. I've spent all my time trying to get an actual reason why this is the case. I have yet to see one!

>>740422214

>cannot even spell "wrought" correctly

Go cum on a KJV bible fuckface.

>>740424451
Why does suffering objectively matter?

>>740424491
But they aren't necessarily. That's where the subjectivity runs rampant.

Nothing stops me from finding high heels sexy. I'll concede that even a majority of american men find them sexy, but that's still not a starting point.

It's not, who knows, but this child's outfit is just wrong. That's not how we assert things.

>>740424429
I've told you everything. She's one of those Beverly Hills high school traps. She's friends with this girl

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ

File: 1222345455.png (61KB, 377x434px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 377x434px

>>740419877
>"Sex isn't sexual"
>Facts aren't factual
>this is the world of relativism
>where degeneracy reigns
>this is the world of stupidity
>where the retarded are king
>God lives in a lamp
>You negated the lamb
>to consume this bullshit

Oh I hope you drown in shit, you foul creature
For centuries and so on
I want you to feel in life
The sensation of bugs
feeding with the content of your scrote

>>740424512
It give me a boner.

>>740424487
I was just here to fap to a shota. All this pseudo troll philosophy is killing my boner something fierce.

>>740424503
If we can say that there is a way to dress as Cesar, then we can say, objectively, whether or not someone is dressed as Cesar.

Otherwise, we can't say that. What is hard to understand about that?

Either it's possible or not, and if it's possible, then true it's independent of your opinion.

>>740424601
the child's costume is wrong but it is contains things which are typically meant to convey sexuality. fishnets are used to convey sexuality. that's just how they are used. ffs, the ancient egyptians even wrote about them being sexual. you are just being obtuse.

>>740424600
We're done. I'm sorry we wasted each other's time, and honestly, I think you got the best of me here. Good work.

Sex isn't sexual
glass isn't glass
It isn't shit you're sucking out of my ass

>>740424760
Me being obtuse does not demonstrate that fishnets are sexual. I understand that you have an intuition that they are, but that is not a fucking reason that they are.

>>740424451
oh my god, you're fucking 15
Just because you can put together a sentence with decent grammar doesn't make you intelligent.

Wait, you're probably a chick. Ones on the internet are usually stupid.

The argument the idiot your dumb ass is aruging with is over ethics you fucking clueless intestinal parasite.

Furthermore, ethics are not 'facts'
as well, 'rape causes suffering' isn't a 'fact' either, and does not 'by definition' cause suffering. Rape by definition does not 'cause' anything. It is a phyiscal act.

With the argument you've made, you could say that the rapist 'suffers' as a result of raping because rape causes suffering. The point is you didnt even say who is suffering.

get the fuck out of gradeschool and stop looking at porn

>>740424715
Well I'll tell the tribes in the Amazon to stop stealing their fashion from a movie then. Clearly their intent doesn't matter.

So when your naked, are you cosplaying as Adam from the garden of Eden?

>>740424881
IT'S WHAT THEY ARE USED FOR!!! Women only wear them when the want to convey sexuality. Why is this so hard to understand? They are not worn as normal clothing. They are only worn to convey sexuality.

>>740424386
i don't, but fucking hell if their were pictures of me dressed as cinder-fucking-ella when i was 8 years old all over the fucking internet, i'm sorry, but I'd rather that not be the case, as i think the majority of most 12-14 year olds would.

>>740424784
Yeah the whole objective subjective thing is kind of bullshit when it comes to this sort of stuff.
Still, the back and forth was amusing.
No hard feeling eh?
Well, except for the shota. I have a hard feeling there.

>>740423434
What is this gay shit

>>740423626
/thread

>>740424784
You wasted our time, your time is clearly worthless.

>>740425120
If you aren't attracted to her, you're definitely homosexual.

>>740424405
you think they're wearing their entire wardrobe?

Roses are red
violets are blue
sex isn't sexual
if there is poo

>>740424940
Well, we could disagree on the definition of rape I suppose, but there's not much room to debate whether or not it causes suffering.

I mean, that's like arguing that killing doesn't cause death. There are propositions that are true by virtue of having to be. I'm sorry you think that I'm being a pseudo-intellectual. I'm not trying to be.

I could say that rape causes suffering to the rapist as well as the victim, I suppose, but I don't see how it would except on some sort of greater moral grounds (like his soul is corrupt or some shit). I don't need to do that, though.

Either rape causes suffering by definition or it doesn't. If that's something we have to argue (then holy shit), then we can do that, but you should surely see my point:

There are objective reasons to give for beliefs.

2+2=4

This sentence is true.

Come the fuck on and be reasonable.

File: edge.jpg (671KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 1280x960px

>>740424940
>pretending to be smart on /b/

File: Rage_face.png (8KB, 409x258px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 409x258px

>>740424621
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ
Wait, this is legal?? A fucking DOCTOR is doing this to this child? And that doctor isn't losing her license?

WHAT THE FLYING FUCK!

File: fuckofffaggot.jpg (10KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 320x240px

>>740425314

>>740419877
And Earth isn't a world

>>740425105
No. Hard feelings abound, dude. You never once attempted to have a conversation with me. I could see how my concession could peg me as a troll admitting to a draw, but I'm earnest in my beliefs.

Either way. Have a great night.

>>740423250

and that, my friend amrifags, is why you need Trump

>>740425293
>her

>>740424270
>implying it's just her saying so.

>>740425429
this is an obvious concession

>>740425326
Not the dude who you were replying to, but for the sake of over complicating things I can imagine a scenario where rape causes no suffering.
Ever see Kill Bill part 1?
She was comatose and a doctor was selling time with her to rapists without her knowledge. Had she not woken up when she did she might never have known, thus not suffered from, the rape.

>>740425578
sex=/=gender

Gender is a social construct.

My college professor says sex isn't sexual and I was like no way jose and he was like ya baby so I was like okay does that mean like I'm going to get an A even though I like totally shined you on when you wanted to touch my pussy and he was like yehaw! bitch suck that buckin bronco and the fact that he was balls deep in my ass just made me think that it was just a little bit more sexual than he said it was but I got an A anyway lol XXD

>>740425459
Well fucking fine then, I wont let up.

>Hard feelings abound, dude.
>Have a great night.

Contradicting yourself to the very end, you pansy.

File: shook.jpg (19KB, 521x521px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 521x521px

>>740419680
I love the future

>>740425614
looks like an asshole to me

>>740425660
Your point is that what a person doesn't know doesn't hurt him, and I take it. Touche.

I should have, in retrospect, used a different example.

File: Lots-O-Implying.gif (2MB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x168px

>>740423754

>>740425662
>My college professor says gender is a social construct and I was like no way jose and he was like ya baby so I was like okay does that mean like I'm going to get an A even though I like totally shined you on when you wanted to touch my pussy and he was like yehaw! bitch suck that buckin bronco and the fact that he was balls deep in my ass just made me think that it was just a little bit more sexual than he said it was but I got an A anyway lol XXD

>>740425788
Being upset with you does not preclude wishing you well. I love you as a fellow human being, even when you're being a faggot.

>>740421945
>children are beautiful and it's a good and morally justifiable thing to sexualize them.
Oh look another pedo trying to justify their urges. I hope you get hit by a bus.

>>740426085
L2Context

>>740425662
you shouldn't embrace everything that falls out of your ass

>>740425967
Yeah, my point was super nit-picky.
This shit show of a thread just seemed like the right place for it.

>>740426053
HA! Even had to get the last word in, I love it!
You sir, I wish you a great night as well.