This man is after the Internet as we know it. His name is Ajit

>>739179277
why not just post pictures of him and his daughter and accuse him of raping her.

>>739179597
You are a fucking genus

File: 1499983488167.jpg (19KB, 438x344px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 438x344px

He looks trustworthy. Its gonna get great again.

>>739179597
THIS

File: IMG_0760.jpg (208KB, 1200x821px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1200x821px

>>739179597
Here are his children

File: 1110.jpg (230KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1280x853px

he's just another pawn to a larger problem, every year the internet is being targeted and unfortunately gents we are losing ground every year...we may win battles, but the war is being won slowly. i'm not sure what the answer is, but maybe you're right each battle must be engaged fully standing our ground because we have so little left.

>>739180433
Exactly

File: IMG_0761.jpg (41KB, 336x420px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 336x420px

>>739180365
And here is his wife

>>739179277

He's a fuck.
Some butt-ugly dothead fucker who sucks corporate dick with a smile.
Fuck you Ajit Pai.

Fuck the corporations who want to make the Internet into cable television.

>>739180636
BROWNED.

>>739180705
Clasic

>>739180636
>>739180705
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072303686.html
hot story

>>739179277
He's a good man, and Net Neutrality is just libspeak for "the internet needs more government oversight." So go fuck yourself.

>>739180822
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072303686.html
>hot story
Link is down

Someone jam his wifi. Put him in the slow lane

>>739180954

>>739180954
>>739181019
>being this new

>>739180987
Gay porn maybe

>>739179277

FUCK THE DOTHEAD FASCIST

>>739181132
>Trying this hard to fit in

>>739181207
says the emo who popped in to give a sheltered opinion on something he doesn't understand.

>>739181200
Yeah

Why the fuck would someone try to fuck up one of the few remaining things that are mostly neutral.

>>739181132
"The problem with the internet is that there aren't enough bureaucrats and politicians policing it." - 4chan

>>739181364
Leftists despise unregulated enterprises.

>>739180055
Homo is the genus that comprises the species Homo sapiens, which includes modern humans, as well as several extinct species classified as ancestral to or closely related to modern humans, most notably Homo (((erectus))).

File: 1485170269097.jpg (84KB, 800x603px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 800x603px

>>739181364
because they can make more money off of it, and they have a whole voting base who basically envies the super elite so much that they will let themselves get pissed on just to feel like they're hanging out with them.

>>739181434
hurr durr leftists are trying to destroy net neutrality.
you are a polarized retard.

>>739179277
We have to somehow frame him to sick the SJWs on him.

If anyone /pol/ would do something about this nowadays, not /b/ anymore

>>739181623
nope, just unlike you, I don't put my faith in politicians and bureaucracies.
>show me on the doll where freedom touched you, Sally

>>739180705
poo`d*

>>739181696
Yeah /b/ is not the internet vigilante it used to be

File: 1498683658354.jpg (386KB, 1155x852px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1155x852px

>>739180954
>>739181132
>>739181316
>>739181434
You fascists dont get anything right.

>>739181679
Like maybe prepolitics

>>739181795
Take her to the designated fucking street

>>739179277

Do these Google web searches:

AJIT PAI RAPED HIS OWN DAUGHTER
AJIT PAI CHILD ABUSE
AJIT PAI PEDOPHILIA
AJIT PAI CHILD RAPE
AJIT PAI DOTHEAD SEX CRIMINAL

>>739180636
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072303686.html
Janine Van Lancker

>>739181806
Demanding that the government do more to regulate the internet is the opposite of vigilantism

File: 10 dogs smiling 1.jpg (90KB, 500x469px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 500x469px

>>739181833
lol, it's fascist to want less government
okay, Bizarro Superman

File: 1482052824997.jpg (234KB, 850x850px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 850x850px

>>739181380
Bureaucrats and politicians don't police anything, and that's not what net neutrality even is, dummy.

When the railroads were built, the companies who built them would start to charge more for certain cargo, or charge less to certain companies who helped them or paid them. Look up how Rockefeller got his oil monopoly. It was ruled that railroad traffic should be given equal access in order to protect market competition. Not all government oversight is bad. That would be silly to assume.
This is the same thing happening with the internet. The ISPs have essentially become the only ones who control infrastructure, and are demanding the right to throttle bandwidth for websites they, or their best customers (hint: not you or me) don't like. And then, if you want your old internet back, they're going to charge you more for the shit you already had. You're basically giving away future money to them for no reason other than you're afraid of bureaucracy.

You guys are idiots. Lets dox a guy who is anti-net neutrality. That will make him support our cause. You are feeding his fears on the issue.

>>739181890
I was actually talking about how /b/ used to be know for being a vigilante back when it was liberal

This is a bipartisan issue. Left and right should be united on this front, not be divided.
>inb4 some faggot blames the opposing party

>>739181971
Shill detected

File: 1497782847428.jpg (27KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 720x480px

>>739181936
Sadly, yes

>>739179277
Why don't you do something a little more.. permanent... than have his info online in which nothing will happen?

>>739181987
He has no fears on the issue. He's not even considering it. He was already bought and paid for by cable lobbyists. It's why he was appointed in the first place.

>>739182046
nope. just someone who actually understands net neutrality.

>>739182076
Maybe we need an unholy alliance

>>739181971
Ah, so unregulated, my internet speeds have gone for 58kps to 50mbps in 20 years, an increase of a thousandfold, but if we get the FCC involved, the internet will stop being to slow to increase speeds.
You're solving a problem that doesn't exist.
How about instead of adding layers of bureaucracy, you increase competition by banning local monopolies where people only have one choice of service providers?
I'm pretty sure if people had 10 choices for their ISP, the ones who pull shitty stuff would fail.
I don't know why i ask - anyone who wants more government doesn't even value competition.

>>739179277

But now that they've politicized freedom on the internet so that it's something supposedly only liberals want they have plenty of support for fucking us all over.

>>739181859
Have not found stuff on that yet but i did find russian bastard conspiracy

>>739179277
>FIND HIS PERSONAL INFORMATION AND POST IT HERE
yes! let's plaster his full name everywhere! that'll teach him!

>>739182203
Most of that is from reddit

>>739182305
Send it to all the news sources maybe even the president

>>739182085
Pai has been an advocate for less regulation during his tenure on the FCC. He is seen as a closer ally to broadcasters than other members of the FCC.[15] In testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology on July 10, 2012, he warned about the dangers of regulatory uncertainty and the need for the FCC to keep pace with the dynamic communications sector.[16

>>739182134
There's no such thing as holy or unholy my dear anon. There is only alive and dead.

>>739182452
Agreed

File: 1481868036997.jpg (30KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x480px

>>739182189
Oh yeah why not just have a bunch of startups go city to city and lay their own fucking fiber optics and cable lines. THEN, they can build a customer base and start getting revenue. Yeah, why don't 10 startups just go do that? What a great fucking idea that only you have ever thought of. You should go ask someone with any knowledge of business why they don't just go do that. Congratulations on your epiphany, Einstein.

>>739180954

'Net Neutrality' means that the government prevents companies for fettering access to the Internet. That means they cannot block content, they cannot throttle speeds, they cannot prefer certain content in searches, they can't charge extra if you play games or stream, they can't make different 'packages' like they do for cable TV....

All of these things are things that have happened or companies have tried to do in the past. Net Neutrality basically means that the Internet is protected as a communications utility. The oversight prevents companies from fucking you.

'If your ISP is fucking you choose a different one free market duh' except 40% of Americans only have one fucking ISP and an additional 30% only have TWO and the majority of those work together to fix rates and policies.

So keep thinking it's a liberal bullshit agenda.

>>739179277
All this outrage over not being able to access porn and free movies and videogames

>>739182395
Whatdoes that have to do with the fact that he is against net neutrality, dip shit? Do you just go around saying irrelevant shit in the middle of group discussions just to sound smart, or do you really not understand what people are talking about?

>>739182635
Dèjá vu

>>739179277

AJIT PAI CHILD RAPIST

>>739179277

>when you don't let Ajit shit in the street
>Sees memes on internet about indians shitting in streets
>Gets mad and runs for power position to get rid of memes about indians shitting in streets.

Almost feel like we created this monster over many years.

>>739179277

AJIT PAI RAPED HIS DAUGHTER AGED 9

>>739182762
Maybe that is the case

>>739182783
pics?

Fuck Ajit Pai. America really is being run like a business.

This is what you asked for, you faggots.

>>739182823
Requesting CP is a bannable offense and a felony

mfw I just screencapped the whole fake rape scheme and sent it to his office.
someone's getting v&d tonight.

>>739182012

>/b/
>liberal

Kek

>>739182958
Good job

>>739182189
>how about instead of this form of bureaucracy, we do this other form?
Both are saying companies aren't allowed to do a thing, you moron. However, both should be implemented.

File: IMG_3200.jpg (51KB, 640x483px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 640x483px

>>739182692
Yes lol I'm super high right now just randomly copied and pasted something from wiki that had nothing to do with this as a joke
You took the b8 though

>>739182994
Like I said used to around the bush years i think

>>739182556
Well no, his argument is that instead of applying regulations that already benefit us to something that needs it, we should write entirely new laws to solve the problem of "local monopolies" despite the fact that he has no idea what that law will even say, or how to enforce it in an effective way. He's the genius in the thread though, and probably in law school.

>>739179277

AJIT PAI RAPES BABIES

America is an oligarchy. Trumpfags and liberals are just contributing to it. Down with the federal government! Down with the CEO's!

>>739179277
he looks like he can smell his own teeth, and it is unpleasent.

>>739183139
Can't find anything

>>739179277
God what a punchable face

Once everyone gets cucked by their ISPs, there will be tard rage riots.

>>739183250
Yes he has a very big nose

File: 397.jpg (1MB, 680x1671px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 680x1671px

>>739183111

>>739180979
no it's not

>>739183340
>IT WAS ALL OBUMMERS FAULT WHAT MY INTERNET GOT FUCKED

>>739183427
On a mobile device wont work

They will just find another puppet if something happens to him. We need to kill innocent civilians and say we won't stop until are demands are reached.

>>739183463
>implying Pai isn't Trump's fault
>implying the liberals won't go full retard

File: IMG_3314.jpg (80KB, 640x636px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 640x636px

>>739183393
Kek.
>but muh trips

>>739183250
>>739183305
>>739183366
His default smile is the satirized guffaw/smugness of British nobility.

>>739183623
Youre so smart you should be working at middle east

>>739183569
Well then maybe you stop browsing 4chan on a phone you fucking blight.

>>739182783
Bob saget raped and killed a girl in 1990.

>>739183624
what are you arguing? did you not get that the person you replied to was being sarcastic?

>>739182504
You're pretty retarded, anon.
Look at how the home energy sector does it. You can buy electricity from different companies using the same infrastructure.

File: netnigtrality1.png (1MB, 1200x821px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x821px

>>739180365
no, HERE are his children.

>>739183787
I know

Man, circlejerk itt

>>739183798
>implying the sarcasm wasn't poorly executed
>implying you're not a faggot

>>739183817

ARE THOSE THE KIDS HE RAPED?

>>739179277
Shit skin street shitter.

>>739182556
You're really stupid, as you accept monopolies as natural and reject the idea of competition outright while supporting more government.
If your ISP blocks or chokes Netflix, switch ISPs. If you CAN'T switch, that's because your local bureaucrats have created a monopoly, probably to a donor company. You fear unfettered capitalism, so you embrace crony capitalism, which is always worse.

>>739183061
banning monopolies isn't a form of bureaucracy, you twat.

>>739183800
Correct. You can not do the same with the internet because the infrastructure isn't standardized, and it's mostly owned by the companies who built it. I agree that we should do it more like the energy sector, but we aren't and without net neutrality we're going to get fucked even worse if we don't start treating the internet as a public utility.

>>739180183
SHILLS GTFO

>>739184194
Wasn't this the reason 4chan was created

>>739184098
And how do you avoid monopolies on things that require expensive infrastructure, like internet cables? It's not like you're going to have a lot of companies rushing to lay cable in every fucking town.

>>739182189

we're going to get screwed either way, either by corporations or by the government. Or, in my case, being in Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission will screw us first.

Here in my little town, we have Suddenlink cable for our Internet provider. Because of the OK corporation commission, they have been able to sit back and let Oklahoma networks stagnate because Oklahoma has no incentives or mandates to better the network infrastructure, and in my town's case, hinders it by over-regulation of network interconnectivity; i.e. our network's backhaul over microwave. We get a whopping 3mb down, 512k up.

20 miles away, across the border into Texas, the small town there (on Suddenlink) has 100mb service for a cheaper package than we pay.

In writing to our illustrious government, I was told that Oklahoma is being cautious in allowing companies to connect willy-nilly, and that it actually helps Oklahomans because the more regulated networks hamper computer crimes.

We've had the same corporation commissioner for 30+ years. He was 40 or so when he was first elected back in the late 80s. He has no clue about networks, yet he is allowed to hamper progress. I can't wait for the boomers to go away.

>>739184098
>you accept monopolies as natural and reject the idea of competition outright while supporting more government.

You're going to have to show where you got that idea because right now it looks like you're back to posting irrelevant shit just to steer the argument to a place where you can make your own irrelevant point.

>>739183800
In that system you are paying for the production and capacity of the electricity transmitted over the shared infrastructure. In communications, you are paying for the path of the transmissions that comprises the infrastructure, the routers and cabling owned by the ISPs. You are suggesting a false equivalence.

>>739179277
>white people invent internet
>brown people fucking ruing it
Par for the course.

>>739184280
...no? It was created to give people an anonymous voice instead of one tied to an avatar, which was the norm for every other board at the time.

>>739184166
>You are not allowed to do this thing
>You are not allowed to do this thing

>>739184425
Ok Maybe i might be confusing history again

When did 4chan become supportive of the government, corporate America and Trump when in the Obama and Bush days, we used to hate on them?

>>739184516
4chan is a counterculture
During the bush years it was like that because it was normal to be conservative but now it is cool to be a liberal

>>739184194
But consider. Where I live, the phone company has fibre optic internet service in several suburbs, but not in mine, not because it's too costly for them to lay the line, but because our town authority won't allow it - so we have a choice between cable internet through what used to be Time Warner and DirecTV. In some local areas, you have one choice only. And again, not because the companies don't want access - it is very cheap for them to put down fibre optic, for example, relative to what they would make, and the phone company is hardly some start-up out of someone's garage. But they aren't even allowed to do it.
Does it not seem even a little naive to believe that if we put the internet in the hands of the politicians owned by donors that they won't shape policy to favor their donors?

>>739184098
In summary.

Accept unfettered capitalism so that you can petition and lobby for change against your local bureaucrats. Forfeit your access to several Internet Service Providers who are required by law to abstain from, say, choking access to Netflix, in exchange for one large monopoly that has been given the freedoms to do as it pleases with not only your access to content, but the freedoms to use your personal information as their leisure. In addition, prevent smaller entities from accessing or providing service to you, the consumer, as they would be muscled out by the larger Internet Service Providers who already, for lack of better words, own local internet infrastructure, like cable.

Goodness me, I cannot see what is wrong with that picture. It's as if freedom of choice and holding companies to a standard is, well, wrong.

>>739184293
So you think the phone company doesn't want a piece of the internet pie?

>>739184335
>You're going to have to show where you got that idea
>choose a different one free market duh' except 40% of Americans only have one fucking ISP and an additional 30% only have TWO and the majority of those work together to fix rates and policies.
That's you accepting monopolies as somehow unfixable.

>>739184724
Maybe they want the old days of the internet back who knows

>>739184724
You think they don't already have it? AT&T? Verizon? They have it where they want it already.

>>739184413
I wonder how Kahn feels

>>739184410
If National Grid lays the lines to my house and I buy the energy from Blue Rock, how is that different from the cable company laying the lines and some other company being able to buy their use wholesale and selling the use to a consumer at a different, better rate?

>>739184413
>white people invent internet and everything is awesome because unregulated and free
>negro party advocates larding it with bureaucracy and regulation

>>739184486
The monopolies are created by the government, not by the companies, when bureaucrats give certain companies exclusive access.

>>739184947
>I don't like 4chan

>>739184721
You're attacking a straw man. I'm so surprised.
>>739184821
>They have it where they want it already.
False. They have it where local bureaucrats have allowed it. As I noted earlier, AT&T said they couldn't come into my neighborhood because my local bureaucrats had locked them out.

Thread feels dead

>>739185041
>I am on 4chan applauding CNN for breaking internet anonymity and advocating for a government takeover of the internet, because I have total faith in politicians.

>>739185112
>locked them out
How exactly?

>>739185112
But that's entirely what you said, just in more direct wording. Unless you're only saying it's a strawman to dismiss my concerns, and refuse to explain why my concerns are trivial when faced with them.

>>739185294
>I don't like 4chan
>take it away from me

No seriously guys the thread actually feels dead

>>739185732
>guys the thread is dead like leave it
>no seriously

>>739184098

My sweet summer child.

It's almost like companies need some oversight in situations like you describe so they can't fuck people over. I agree that competition would alleviate the problem, except that competition is not happening and will not happen in over 2/3 of the entire country. So oversight is needed to allow full access to the internet.

You don't know me. My only fear is ignorance, and my only ideology is reason. So you can just shut the fuck up. From a fully objective standpoint it is far better to continue to operate the Internet as it is now, rather than allow it to degenerate into a rampant cash grab.

And as far as local corruption, you are correct, but net neutrality isn't a local policy, it's a federal policy, and it doesn't deal with which companies are where but rather to the extent the internet can be controlled by providers. Even if you got rid of net neutrality protections the same localized bullshit would still occur.

>>739180822
It's from 2010 you dumb fuck

>>739180433
This is exactly how gun owners have felt for the past 50 years.

>>739184789

They are not unfixable and I didn't say they were. But to rid ourselves of content protections BEFORE fixing that issue is ludicrous. Right now the protections are required.

>>739184881
because of what is being transmitted. When I purchase electricity I am purchasing the potential energy to be delivered to my house. With internet, i'm purchasing the ability to transfer between and communicate with servers around the world