Fluffy Thread. The Birth of Squickbox?

wew lads

>>738666220
Squickbox. Yes.

>>738666220
off by two

Some fluffies have a bigger dick than I d :^)

What is Squickbox

>>738666474
*do

Just so we are clear, there is already a fluffy thread.
>>738638720
>saged because I'm not buying whatever you're selling

>>738666495
I second this.

File: 1.jpg (562KB, 1100x4156px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 1100x4156px

CC1 here. Dumping shit. Starting with the Mr Magoo so someone can tell if they're less clean than the others dumped.

>>738666827
and it reached the image limit, newfag

>>738666827
Image limit bro

File: 1496370290371.png (160KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 720x720px

>>738666827
It maxed out you dumb fucker.

>>738666495
New style. Part cringe, part uncomfortable, squickbox would explore fluffies and their complete lack of understanding when it comes to sexuality, their bodies, and social situations. Another name I'd propose for this is cringebox.

File: 1484006317203.jpg (225KB, 1162x1384px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1162x1384px

>>738666495
Sexual content that makes the viewer a tad uncomfortable. Like cringe because of the innocent fluffies are confronted with or engaged in sexual activity. It's aim is to recapture our fascinated disgust we had when first discovering fluffy.

captcha is killing me

>>738666902
Ugh. Not again.

>>738666827
Are you really this retarded? It's hit image limit, hence the new thread.

Is it a decent idea that fluffies are meant to represent common people and the actions done by them every day? Showing the disgust that we put upon these creatures should be the same disgust when humans (even ourselves) do the same activities? Do these comics push others to become more perfect in their day to day lives? Or am I reading too much into it?

>>738667062
thanks, I was worried I'd have to go 20 minutes without having this posted again, what a relief

>>738666928
So if fluffies were /b/tards.

>>738667461
Maybe. Kek

File: Fell for the bait.jpg (9KB, 224x225px)

9KB, 224x225px

>>738666910
>>738666912
>>738666915
>>738666975

File: Blue29.png (56KB, 1175x503px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1175x503px

>>738666220
>>738666220
>>738666220

I am still looking for the continuation of the Blue Story. Here is part 29 for the Anon in the last thread, more parts are welcome here.

>>738667564
Here's some sample squickbox prompts I came up with last thread:

>First, a fluffy stallion enfing the hell out a >cooing mare, all the while still sucking on a >pacifier.

>Second is two fluffies going at it, then, once >done, staggering sex drunk over into the corner >to suckle on a mare that was watching them. >She starts praising them and telling them >they're good fluffies, unaware that they're >siblings fucking one another.

>>738666928
>>738666956
Sooooo, this isn't new then. It is literally a part of lfuffy? Why are we just now pretending it needs a separate name?

I'm not acknowledging this stupid mentality. This has always been a defining story mechanic or artwork splurge. It isn't new at all.

Whoever is encouraging this is trying too hard at something they can't tell their parents about.

>>738667793
It doesn't fall into the classification of hugbox, abuse, or weirdbox. It's kind of its own thing. I've seen stories that introduce it as an element, but nothing that focuses on it as the main theme.

>>738667730
This has been around since the beginning of fluffy, though. Even the oldfags can't claim this is helgremlin shit. Stop giving a name to something that is simply "fluffy."

>>738667957
If it is introduced as an element, or main theme, it has always existed. Stop giving it a name because you think it is new. And this has always been under sexual, or sexual abuse. If you are going to call it something, then call it what it is, sexbox.

File: obligatory.png (984KB, 1248x3085px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 1248x3085px

>>738667184
It certainly has a potential to be social commentary because the fluffies are quite caricaturesque.

However for many fluffies are simply a grimdarker Happy Tree Friends. Or 4chans Watership down, or Plaque Dogs.

I personally like it as a kind of black soap opera with psychological themes.

Also read pic related. Feel free to ask follow up questions.

>>738668008
Helgremlin? Kind of a newfag, sorry

>>738667730
Not a new thing, but I like these prompts. Any drawfags around?

>>738668322
it's what some people call ferals going feral, though some people do take it too far when every domestic fluffy is a self absorbed, rapey, loud mouthed murderer

>>738668191
Not saying it is new, but as there are people looking for it specifically a label has merit.

Sexbox is a bit misleading because it suggest the aim to be straight up porn. But we can discuss what would be the best terminology.

>>738666928
Wow, I didn't know about that. Since when does this exist?

File: hentai.jpg (148KB, 1276x800px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1276x800px

>>738668728
It is a thing that has long since cropped up here and there but now we are attempting to put it together in a group to locate it easier and encourage this content.

>>738668728
It doesn't, really. Most of this thread has been arguing whether to make this its own category of fluffy or if it's just an element that exists in the majority of stories and doesn't need its own classification.

>>738668597
Sexbox would include all sex. Just like Wierdbox covers play on imaginary monster coming to life in odd ways, physics be distorted, mentality demonstrating odd situations, and overall puzzling situations, like that one where a fluffy is a smoke detector. We don't call it physicsbox as a way of discerning weirdbox physics stuff from weirdbox puzzling situations. It is all weirdbox.

Why are we claiming futa fluffies are anything less than a sexual category to be placed inside sexbox?

Another example is fluffy romance. We don't have a romancebox. It falls under hugbox. Unless it is romance between a person and a fluffy, than that could be abusebox or hugbox pending on the writing and connotations.

File: 1471396061783.png (701KB, 1113x1560px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 1113x1560px

https://aetasxblog.wordpress.com/
Fluffy threads are doing well today, huh?

What is this Squickbox, though? What is Squick?

File: 1467872277607.png (892KB, 933x3829px) Image search: [Google]

892KB, 933x3829px

Horrorbox fag reporting in.

>>738669293
See
>>738666928
>>738667730

File: fweud is nyu fwend.png (143KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 800x600px

>>738669293
Squick is slang for weirded out, mainly in sexual context. "This futa thing squicks me out."

Squickbox ergo focuses on scenes between fluffies a viewer or owner would look upon with this kind of discomfort. It is aimed to be a would be subgenre heavy with fluffy psychology.

>>738669293
Squick is a word people use to refer to discomfort relating to sexual situations (i.e. some dude wants to lick your feet - squick)

>>738669526
>>738669612
I've never heard of "squick" before nor do I understand how it has any real meaning. Where did this accumulation of letters originate?

I agree with >>738669102
Why not just call it sexbox? Does "Squick" itself have a definition? Is it latin or something? Google gave me 0 results on "squick."

File: 1461821511599.jpg (534KB, 688x1671px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 688x1671px

>>738669828
LOL, no it's not. This is completely fabricated. And you guys are acting way too cringy for even fluffy standards. Why are we making words up now? What the fuck is this, rap music?

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Squick

>>738669869
Oh, nevermind, I spelled it wrong. Definition is Cause to feel intense disgust.

>>738669102
It (Sexbox) puts two (or more) quite different aims into one category though.

>Fluffy porn, honestly aimed to turn on the perverts among us. Pinups.

>psychological stories involving sex

>straight up aimed for physical damaging abuse that happens to be rape.

Do you see how one might search for one but not the other, and how a nice term would be handy?

>>738669869
>>738669950
Ok, perhaps it is aged slang, but it is a thing. It happens that people not have heard every kind of lingo before.

>>738668956
That's cool

>>738670042
>>738670148
Hmmm... Not really. I mean they all fall under sexual behavior. So why not tag it "Sexbox, rape." ??? Or "Sexbox, Futa." I mean, if I'm searching for abuse, but specifically with mares, I type in "mare, abuse." That doesn't mean we give mares their own category... Like... Mammarybox or something, lol.

>>738667701
>nyu fwiend
>newfriend

fag deserves to be raped to death

>>738670367
That's too complicated, squickbox is more charismatic and original.

File: 1480444823174.png (177KB, 800x1600px)

177KB, 800x1600px

>>738666928
let's call it dieinfireyoufilthyfaggotbox

>>738670491
also: did a serb write this story?

>>738670538
Not at all, you are literally doing exactly what was just demonstrated. If we do this, then we have to give gay fluffies their own title, hillbilly abusing fluffies their own title, baby fluffies beating on sibling babies their own title, which would be different from baby fluffies beating on non-sibling babies their own title.

It makes no sense to do this to one thing but not everything, especially when it is already grouped under sexual acts.

>>738670538
That's why I chose it ion the OP, it is in line with the hugbox, sadbox, weirdbox scheme.

>>738670367
I am kind of aiming for a subgenre with a group of shared conventions, more than pure website tagging. Maybe you don't really see the boundaries because it doesn't particularly interest you and it will become more apparent once material has accumulated under the label.

>>738670862
I kinda think I get where this is going? Are there any examples of this shit already?

>>738670862
I've seen and think it is fine. I don't like it any more or less than any other sexual rendering or story. I just never thought it was hard to find nor miss classified. I think you guys are trying too hard to push something new. Or maybe I'm talking to a single person who is trying really hard to push their own idea, when it itself makes no sense, since you would have to literally develop a name for every other subgenre. It is silly. Plain and simple.

>>738670734
Why not ignore it and just let us fags who are interested gather acorns in our little specialty label?

>>738670734
It can be a subgroup alright, as long as someone searching for squickbox specifically isn't constantly told it has to be sexbox (which would be a larger group including more stuff.)

>>738670734
But maybe we can leave it as a subgenre, and not a full genre like hugbox or abuse. It's not necessary to categorize all.

File: Every_Day.jpg (233KB, 800x1795px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 800x1795px

>this thread

File: 1499373573560.png (255KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1080x1080px

Posting the word:

Anus.

In order to bump this thread.

>>738670734
But maybe we can leave it as a subgenre, and not a full genre like hugbox or abuse. It's not necessary to categorize all.

To bump or not to bump, that's not the question because by commenting you bumped anyway.

File: 1464714113753.png (813KB, 1000x2500px) Image search: [Google]

813KB, 1000x2500px

>>738671237
So do the same thing about the forests and the oceans and the land? No. How about we all come to our senses and stop labeling subgenres that are already labeled?

Squick also refers to disgust, per definition here >>738670076

Under that pretense, 95% of fluffy falls under this category. Can we all stop pretending now? I seriously feel like you guys are trying to make your own monument in your own honor.

>>738671343
Right, which was my point. Now you have to label all the other subgenres. So either go big, or go home :P

>bumping with image content because this thread can't just be people arguing semantics over genres and subgenres.

File: special-hugs.jpg (975KB, 1128x3545px) Image search: [Google]

975KB, 1128x3545px

>>738671200
If other want to make other subgenre distinctions they can. I see no value in keeping the status quo when it is just about one organizational label basically.

Sorry if it seems tryhard, I'm just in the habit of talking about fluffy in the fluffy thread.

>>738671152
The more recent part of Scootafluff
the enfpocalypse story
pic related story
a part of big mistahs fluffy foundation
there are parts in maroones story

File: the enfening.png (623KB, 1200x3738px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 1200x3738px

>>738671947
I am a guy who doesn't even choose a name for his drawfaggotry, not trying to erect my statue.

>>738671952
it was named enfening, not enfpocalypse my bad.

File: bestest splat by fluffyfoals.png (222KB, 500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 500x1000px

>>738671769

>>738667031
I don't get it. Why did he burn them?

>>738671952
Yea, I don't know. My point still remains. You can't do it for one "just because" and not do it to another. Plus, the word itself doesn't make sense. The definition is wrong to the topics of which you are labeling it with. At least choose a more reasonable label. I would think something like Raunchbox would fit more since it is specifically sexual vulgarity.

>>738672451
Didn't consider them a value.

>>738672451
I guess it's a form of punishment for the smarty because those fluffies where his herd

>>738671952
I hab weiwdest bonew nao...

>>738671952
>>738672242

These are....inspiring for the story I'm writing. Thanks again, Herr Freud Fluff.

>>738673116
The "Enf" panel would fall under squicky to me. It's kind of cute and adorable, and that's what kind of simultaneously makes it uncomfortable.

>>738673231
But, if we follow that rule, every sex scene would fall under squicky

>>738673363
Fair enough. There has to be more of a dynamic there, something beyond just the surface cringe to define it as squicky.

>>738673489
Yeah, I've read somewhere else on this thread that squicky also implies the innocence of the fluffy on the matter of sex. Kinda like >>738668956

>>738673784
Yeah, or
>>738672114

File: 1477077905192.jpg (142KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1024x768px

>>738672467
>You can't do it for one "just because" and not do it to another
Why not? People will order things for themselves when they feel the need. I feel like we can be laissez-faire here. Especially with the flexible headcanon situation, I don't see why we can't have the convenience. It is a sign of fluffy being alive that there can be new/old things having a resurgence. Maybe it won't even be a big thing and die in short order on its own, maybe a fad for a while. It is not a problem.

Raunchbox sounds like it is in the vain of lewding, but not too bad. Still like the other one better.

We also should take into accord that label can and do regularly intersect, so while there is "pure" material of each box there is the full spectrum of bleedover. The existence of mixtures shouldn't preclude identifying the components.

>>738673363
Yes I don't think this is too useful. I think ether an element of emotional fallout that is sexual in nature specifically or a tone of disapproval from the onlooker perspective is important. Sex<>innocence relationship is the conflict.

>>738673147
np

>>738667615
>hurr durr I'm retarded but I better paste a shoddy bait pic over it to make it all better

>>738673910
It's my headcanon for that category now, and maybe more people can consider this

File: anime sketties.jpg (225KB, 1362x862px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1362x862px

"The toy I bought for my children shouldn't be sexually active."
"It makes me uncomfortable when a childs voice says it wants to have sex with me."
"Fwuffy wan hump 'cuz feew gud, but daddeh say dat bad. Wan haf gud feew su much. Am bad fwuffy?"
"Daddeh why wong tu gif da specuw huggies tu sissy? Fwuffy am fow huggies an wuv!"

It is easy to slip into lewd because of the subject matter but it isn't central.


Pic has the owner feeling the squick, while the picture itself is more weirdbox with a squick theme.

>>738675093
*Takes notes*

File: 1480645254922.jpg (218KB, 1359x1272px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1359x1272px

abuse + squick

Torment of fluffy is portrayed vocally, not just screaming from trauma applied to genitals among other areas.

>>738675473
In this case, the victim is the audience rather than the human. Which brings me to an element of squickbox: victims.

This is whomever feels the squick during the story. This could be the fluffy, the owner/other humans, or the audience. In most cases, audience needs to feel the squick to some degree, but the addition of a victim to feel the squick with them can lead comedy, disgust, or even fear.

So who made it to anthrocon?

>>738675930
Wrong thread, mate.

>>738675930
>>738676055
Topkek

File: IMG_0327.png (120KB, 772x732px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 772x732px

>>738667687

Oh shit Blue anon here. I've been in a slump of shit in real life, and I'm not in the right mindset to write Blue, but I can post what I have that came after 29

File: 19686 - artist fwuffee blush cunnilingus explicit hexalan_fluff inside_joke jack_daniel lesbian mares mutagen_fluff nsfw piss pussy.png (1MB, 800x652px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x652px

"Damn, I can't fap when my fluffy keeps walking in and watching me. Shit's weird..."

"Rover! What are you doing!"
"Am making gud feews to peepee-pwace like [teenage owner]"
"Son, we have to talk..."

Mild vanilla squick:
"Mummah, why bwue haf nono-stick an sissy nu haf?"
vanilla squick suddenly intensifies:
"Yus, wose wan haf nono-sticky too!"
Pic related we have the extreme edge of squick. Could be a squick situation, but execution implies it is just meant to be straight up fluffy porn.

>>738675093
pic reminds me that i'm more into manga than fluffy
maybe i should go to a

Not the anon you were discussing all this with, but I agree with them so I'd like to get into it all.

>>738673231
It would fall under abuse, or sexual abuse.

>>738673363
Exactly.

>>738673784
No, that is just the concept of fluffy over all. The innocents is a built in implication and world-rule. This isn't something to label.

>>738673916
>Why not?
Because on both a metaphorical and a logical stand-point, it doesn't work. Again, you'd have to do it for everything, or deal with a lot of people like you who want to make up their own words and apply it to their own "subgenre" that already has a label.

Raunchbox sounds like exactly what it is. And quite frankly, it would fit far better in describing since a few people in this thread had stated they had to look up the word "Squick" to try and figure out what is being claimed.

Bleedover takes place in pretty much every genre. I would assume that is implied in any case. I agree with that.

>>738674023
I agree with the Raunchbox. I think that has better meaning as to what those picture represent according the descriptions from those two posts above.

>>738668956
>>738666928


Sorry for the long post. I am just now getting through the whole debate.

>>738676222

Blue 30

>"What?! I... I can't! I don't know how to do this!"
>Doctor Connors slapped me in the face
>"Snap out of it! I'll walk you through this, if you follow my lead, Sky will be able to make it through this."
>"Okay... Thanks, I think I needed that."
>"Alright, first off, do you have any experience at helping animals or fluffies through injuries?"
>"One time I had a dog, and I was fishing, and the hook got stuck in his mouth, and I had to get it out. Does that count?"
>The good doctor facepalmed and sighed
>"That's good enough I suppose. Just do everything I say."
>He took Sky out of the topless carrier, and gently put him on the tiny operating table.
>"Alright, first off, restraints, just in case he wakes up. You take the right side, he's already missing a limb there, you'll have less work there."
>Little straps protruding from out of the table were meant to secure him for limb removal
>"Alright Aaron, I need you to be gentle with his leg, it's already broken so b-"
>CRACK!
>"FUCK!" I shouted in frustration after accidentally breaking his leg in another, more vile position
>Sky whimpered in his sleep, but he was still lost deep in la-la-land
>"I can't fucking do this... I might hurt him some more..."
>Doctor Connors shot me a steely glare of determination
>"You have to do this, its fine. His leg is coming off anyway, just try not to cause him too much pain."
>I took the now twice broken leg, and with sickening noises coming from it, and more whimpers from Sky, slipped it into the restraint, and tightened it
>"Mmmm!" Cried Sky, still asleep but obviously in a great deal of pain
>"Okay, that's the one of the hardest parts out of the way, now for the tricky bit." Said Doctor Connors
>He pulled out a tray of little tools, tiny versions of scalpels and scissors, along with a needle and thread for stitching
>"I think I'm gonna be sick." I whimpered
>"This your first time doing this on a fluffy?"
>"Yes..."
>"Then, yeah, you probably will be."

File: Not sure if trolling or just stupid.png (144KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 640x480px

>>738673954
Not the anon you replied to, but you are being autistic by biting the bait after the bait has been pointed out. Even if the Anon was mistaken, you are still biting bait no matter how you look at it. Just post fluffies.

File: 1455108169562.gif (2MB, 350x255px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x255px

>>738676222
do it

File: IMG_0502.png (1MB, 1168x1446px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1168x1446px

>>738676451

And that was all I wrote for Blue so far. Maybe I'll try to write some more later

File: IMG_0630.jpg (148KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 768x1024px

>>738676611

>He congratulates a trips
>He gets dubs

M A G I C

File: IMG_0631.jpg (158KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 768x1024px

>>738676796

File: bilbo.jpg (40KB, 420x325px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 420x325px

>>738676650
ok, then like we say in german: Abwarten und Tee trinken (wait and smoke pot)

File: 1478391421080.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>738676796
thanks for the (You), get one yourself

>>738676360
>"Damn, I can't fap when my fluffy keeps walking in and watching me. Shit's weird..."

Close the door tard.

>>738676427
>No, that is just the concept of fluffy over all. The innocents is a built in implication and world-rule. This isn't something to label.
I wish more fluffy in general had this focus on innocence and sexual context there off. But it is scarce and specific enough that I feel the need to search for it and promote it a bit.

It isn't labeling the character trait, it is labeling the material that strongly interacts with an aspect of this trait especially.

>It would fall under abuse, or sexual abuse.
But not all squick is abuse, when a benevolent owner is confronted with his pets sexual pursuit that isn't abuse.

>>738677424
This guy has great innocent fluffy stories.
>>738669293

Not so much focusing on innocence, but his writing clearly portrays it. Some of his stories are really good on fluffy perspective. I recommend a read.

>benevolent owner is confronted with his pets sexual pursuit that isn't abuse.
I always thought that was hugbox.

File: IMG_0557.jpg (132KB, 1000x801px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1000x801px

>Last thing you posted in a fluffy thread was how much you hated pumpkins art
>The thread you come back to is started with pumpkin art and filled with discussion about stuff that would be in pumpkins art

MFW

File: IMG_0511.png (382KB, 1280x750px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 1280x750px

Fluffies doing drugs needs to be explored more often

>>738678290
Fuck yes. LSD experiments plz

>>738677663
It is hugbox too, categories can overlap.
But if I want squick and search hugbox, I would get much of fluffies just hugging or playing.

If I search abuse, I get much of just cutting or rape as one way to do physical damage without portrayal of the emotional churning withing the fluffy, just pain screaming.

If I search sex stuff, I again get much smarty gore rape, or stuff meant to be just porn, without the psychological proceedings emphasized.

It is like a Ven-diagram.

>>738678445
Makes more sense when you explain it that way.

>>738678445
That doesn't seem like an overlap though. I think you are just trying hard to associate a label that already has one.

I'd say change the name. Nobody knows what Squickbox is. Name doesn't imply anything and doesn't make sense to what you say it is supposed to represent.

>>738678725
I'd vote cringebox, but I like squickbox as well.

>>738678445
>>738678662

I think that is more of an issue with people actually failing to tag their shit properly, mixed with fluffybooru's lack of proper search controls and refinement.

If there was a mandatory labeling system of "hugbox" subcategory "human rape" or "smarty rape" or "romance" than it would be easier.

Making up words is just silly.

>>738678974
But useful in this instance. Squickbox or whatever would be a quick, relatable tag.

>>738678835
cringebox doesn't describe anything though. Because what is cringe-worthy to you may not be to someone else. And since we are talking about sex and sexual innocence and sexual curiosity (with a situation), sex itself has varying levels of acceptance.

For example, I refuse to look at scat. People shitting on each other boasts mental illness in my book. But there are people who get super hard from watching shit like that.

I still like the Raunchbox description. Or, we just don't use a term, and call it like it is. Sexbox with a secondary tag of "foal rape" or "incest" or even "romance" as a secondary category to eliminate the possibility of rape in the results.

This really falls upon the booru and people tagging their posts properly, though.

File: 1499604212755.jpg (83KB, 684x515px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 684x515px

>>738666220

>>738678835
I had chosen squick because I talked about it in that term with others her before and it fits well with the other lingo stylistically.

Cringebox is the most discriptive of the alternatives in relation to a feeling, but all of fluffy is called cringe frequently, which will cause confusion.

Raunchbox and sexbox imply the wrong idea.

>>738678974
I think it's fun, I mean the use of box in this context here is a similar slang thing. Enf, fluffyspeak in general. I think it suits the atmosphere.

ps. squick not a made up word.

>>738679520
What about enfbox?

>>738678290
seconded

File: 16977 - artist fwuffee condom domestic dumb filly questionable.png (256KB, 500x450px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 500x450px

>>738679693
That would be taken as the same as sexbox, only run through the fluffyspeak filter.

Perhaps raunch is the best, though it is not more clear as a term in my personal opinion and carries association with lewd, and all the anime and waifu perspective that drags with it.

>>738679967
Fluffy sex and sexuality is just human sexuality ran through a fluffy filter, too. Kinda seems perfect to me.

>>738679520
>The definition of "raunchy" literally describes what you said above

Squick isn't made up, but the use of it in this sense is. Squick means (according to Google) "cause (someone) to feel intense disgust." And that definition is admittedly a made-up word/slang (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Squick) formed to parent that given definition.

Raunchy explains it for what it really is.

File: Dis_Faggot.png (28KB, 443x592px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 443x592px

What if we think outside the box.

>>738680610
Squicko Bell?

>>738680136
Google calls raunchy
>energetically earthy and sexually explicit.

It seems like they both fit, but raunchy can be more positive in usage. "Oh, that's a raunchy novel." Like regarding forbidden sexual fruit.

And squick is a negative reaction "Gay porn just squicks me out."

How is the disgust felt not applicable? It is in a way the mission statement, and often felt by the human characters in the scene.


Another thought, why not both? And one term will crytalize with time.

>>738680610
Hm... is there a snappy term linked to innocence?

Garden Invasion of The Mutant Fluffies From Mars!

A 2-D Greentext Thriller Directed by Blue Anon

>Be me, Abe Ragemerican, about 45 years old, own my own house, have a lovely garden and two lovely fluffies
>Butterbean and Butterscotch
>Both kind of carmel colored with a manes and tails of dirty red
>Brother and sister from a shelter
>I raised them right, piss and shit out of the litterbox means sorrystick, any substantially good behavior is rewarded with spaghetti and lots of playing
>Life is good
>One night, shortly after dinner, we were all watching FluffTV
>I can't stand FluffTV, but the two goobers were really good that day, so I had to endure
>Some garbage called "Babies!"
>I occupy myself with a beer in one hand and the other hand petting my two little adorable fluffies
>When all of the sudden, all the power cuts out!
>"Nuuuuu! Nu wike dawkies! Su scawy!" Cried Butterbean
>"Ah damn it. Must be those teenage hoodlums who cut my power every Halloween." I groaned, having spilt beer all over myself
>"Nu wowwy bout dawk daddeh an sistah!" Declared Butterscotch "Buttahscotch wiww pwotect famiwy an gif big owwies tu teenagahs!"
>He and his sister were apparently part of a herd that was broken up when they got near a shelter
>Apparently he was a "toughie in training"
>That was where his misplaced courage came from
>I sighed and got up from the couch
>"Alright guys, stay put. I'll go fix this, you'll be fine."
>"Daddeh pwease nu weave" Whimpered Butterbean
>"Dun wowwy bout dawkies!" Butterscotch replied "Daddeh fix wights an gif teenagahs biggest owwies! Buttahscotch wiww pwotect yu sistah."
>That comforted Butterbean well enough, since she didn't realize the shakiness in Butterscotches voice, or have good enough sight to see him trembling in the dark

Ya know what I'd like to see? More FluffTV content.

>>738679519
copy'd and saved

File: blockies are hard.png (2MB, 1268x2336px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1268x2336px

>>738682238
Fluff TV and fluffy products are both underutilized.

>>738681921
>"Gay porn just squicks me out."
I think that's just how you are using it. The above examples from posts past I'm too lazy to find didn't have a negative connotation to me.

>why not both?
Like... Sqaunchbox? lol Actually sounds kinda good in a weird way.

>>738682757
Oxforddictionary.com
Examples

‘we get that bodily fluids can squick people out’
‘stop reading now if you're squicked by injury details’

wiktionary squick out

>To weird out or disgust; to make (someone) feel uneasy and squeamish

>>738682695
Is FluffTV more for fluffies' entertainment or education? I've seen one or the other, but never both.

>>738682695
Fact. In my headcanon, both are ran by Hasbio as a way to still turn a profit on fluffies, since they no longer have control on how many fluffies are produced after they PETA break-in.

>>738683274
It's a combination of both. Like Nick Jr.

>>738683274
Both, the colors and songs entertain, and while they are at it they can often try to get a lesson to stick.

Fluffies Rock

>>738681974

Part II

>I made my way through the house, occasionally bumping my foot against stools and furniture
>Until I finally made it to the back door of the house and stepped outside
>That's when I noticed a strange green glow coming from my neighbors backyard
>A U-Fo? Nope, that's only in the movies, no way could that really happen
>"It's gotta be something stupid my neighbors doing to have fun with his kids or something." I thought
>How wrong I was
>I made my way to the fusebox, and that's when I realized something was wrong
>The thing was
>Nothing was wrong
>My fusebox was perfectly intact, no switches off or anything
>Then I noticed that seemingly every light was out in the neighborhood
>No street lights
>No house lights
>Nothing but the shine of the moon, and the eerie green glow coming from my neighbors backyard
>"What the hell is going on?" I asked myself, coming back inside
>"Daddeh back?" I heard Butterbean whisper
>"Maybe nu daddeh, stay cwose tu Buttahscotch fu safe."
>I chuckled and wiped my face
>"Come on little guys, it's me. Looks like the whole neighborhood lost power. It's fine. Come to the sound of my voice if ya can, and I'll put ya to bed."
>"Yay daddeh!" Both cried, scamperin towards me
>But that's when shit got really weird
>All the power came back up
>"Oh thank baby Jesus it's back."
>"Yay daddeh fixed wights! Nu am scawy nu mowe!"
>"Toww yu daddeh du it, sistah nee wisten tu bwudda mowe."
>Then the power went out again
>"Ah god damn it!"
>"Eeek! Dawkies back! Nu wan scawy dawkies!"
>"Dun wowwy! Daddeh an bwudda hewe!"
>Suddenly, a flash of green like ball lighting flickered through the house, illuminating the darkness in a sickly green glow, before impacting into the dormant TV
>Both of my fluffies gasped and fell silent after they saw the green flash, and then absentmindedly trotted back towards the TV, which was now playing static

File: 1498233941005.png (331KB, 795x704px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 795x704px

>>738683691

File: 45370 - animated artist ripoffMcgee editor fillialcacophony gif meatfoal meatloaf safe shit_edit.gif (889KB, 700x572px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 700x572px

>>738683759

File: IMG_0333.jpg (216KB, 576x617px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 576x617px

>>738683691

Holy shit is this about that coach who got arrested for child molesting

File: IMG_0332.png (128KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1000x1000px

>>738683807

I'll continue this later tonight

>smoking a blunt on my back porch
>see something in my backyard
>its a fat neon purple fluffy
>it notices me and woddles to the porch
>dummeh poopeh stoopie stinkeh hoomin!
>dis am smawty's yawd nao!
>gib bestes nummies, ow get FOWEBA SWEEPIES!!!!
>welp, time to get the baseball bat
>dummeh poo poo sniffen hoomin!!
>ge off smawtys yawd! Gib foweba sweepies!!!
>gib smawty nummies!!! GIB SMAWTY NUMM---
>FWACK!!!
>I hit it hard as fuck right on the top of the head
>gggggaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhggggggghhhhhhhhuuuuhuuuuuu!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>SCREEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!! Hewp smawtyheeheeeee
>nu wan...no wan huwtiez!!!!
>its left eyeball is bulging out of its head and its missing a lot of teeth
>hahahahahahaha!!!! You look like glenn from the walking dead! Lmfao
>cough gurgle hewp...smawty...
>fuck you!
>I go inside and watch TV. I hear a light scratching at the back door
>I open the door and its the smarty
>what the fuck? Its been 3 hours how are you not dead?
>pwweeeeeaaaassseee mistaahh...Hab wowstest head owies...
>nee hewp...nee huggies
>pwweeeeeeeheeeheeeesseee
>waaaaaaaaahaaahaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!
>I go get my gun. I cock it and point it at the smarty
>pweease..neber com on mistahs yawd eber gain...no wan foweba sweepiez...nee wuv...
>nuuuu nuu nuuu!!!!!! SCREEE SCREEEE!!!!!!!!!!
>AM MOMM----
>BRAKOW!!!
>I blow its head off and its body flails around violently
>brrrrrrrrrrrrrphhhhttttttttt!!!!!!!!
>it shits and pisses everywhere
>quueeeeeeef QUEEEEEEEEEEF!!!!!!!!
>SPLORRRRRTTTTTTT!!!!!!
>cheeep! Chirp! Chirp! Peep! Squeek!!!
>after I shot her she gave birth to 10 foals..

>>738666963
yes!

File: anonstory.png (1MB, 1255x7384px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1255x7384px

>>738684452
This greentext is from another anon a couple days ago, he requested someone draw his story. I took it up on a whim because I like the story, even though I'm well aware my artwork is shit, I still had fun drawing it. Got a little lazy towards the end with the blood, but hopefully someone enjoys it.
Also I don't plan on uploading it anywhere, if someone wants to themselves to, feel free.

>>738684340
Jerry Sandusky?

File: IMG_0496.png (122KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 600x600px

>>738684809

I think that might be who it's about.

>>738683272
This has been pointed out. It doesn't fit the description of the genre trying to be labeled. Not everyone is "squicked" by sexual curiosity drawings/writings. That is why "Squick" is a bad term used for this. It doesn't make sense.

>>738685537
kek

>>738667243
is that the end of this one?

>>738686924
yep

File: IMG_0596.png (382KB, 1187x6483px)

382KB, 1187x6483px

>>738686924

Oh no. There is a lot more to his story. And it is a wild ride.

>>738686924
see >>738667480

>>738687099
you're getting your stories mixed up

>>738688594
WTF is that monstrosity

>>738688802
a jellenheimer.

File: aj.png (170KB, 788x1014px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 788x1014px

Howdy partners!

>>738666986
>>738667007
I don't understand he says the foals were worth a lot but then he incinerates most of them?

>>738689418
his foals were worth a lot, he filtered out the valuable fluffies from the smarties herd and burned the rest

File: 1494127915010.jpg (85KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 900x900px

>>738687116
Oh, the art style just changes so much I didn't expect it. Thanks!

>>738689418
The foals that were raped, yes. He sorts his foals from the ferals.

File: rarity.png (170KB, 805x720px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 805x720px

Hello darlings!

>>738667226
damn, i'm actually learning new words from this shit

I really enjoyed Gerald.

>>738690287
God why

>>738690800
"Because it pleases me"

-God

cump

>>738692447
Would be better if fluffies made squeaky toy sounds when they hit one another.

>>738692814
They could peep as a sound of effort.

"Take dis! Hnnn-jeeeepp!" *ineffectual hoove swing*

>>738693487
That would make all of these fights fucking adorable. Or they just devolve into cheeps and peeps when enraged.

>>738693569
Guuuuud feeeews.....

>>738694115
Kek

File: ts.png (190KB, 418x422px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 418x422px

Hello everyone!

File: IMG_0328.jpg (93KB, 750x446px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 750x446px

I think Chocofag and Ponyfag are the same person.

File: what's a boner.png (964KB, 521x1462px) Image search: [Google]

964KB, 521x1462px

>>738694771
It doesn't really matter.

File: 44663 - accidental_abuse artist-renaissance author-renaissance blood comic foweva_sweepies herd rockys_herd sadbox safe wild.jpg (2MB, 1275x1650px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1275x1650px

>>738695412

File: fs.png (238KB, 1280x1020px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1280x1020px

h-hi everrypony

File: 44739 - accidental_abuse artist-renaissance author-renaissance blood comic foal-death foweva_sweepies heawt_huwties herd huggies_can't_fix_everything rockys_herd sadbox safe wild.jpg (2MB, 1275x1650px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1275x1650px

>>738695448

>>738695229
you could also just put up fences, like a normal garden planter

come to think of it if a fluffy herd is ruining your garden then a bunch of rabbits should have no problem tearing your shit up either

>>738696385
....how?

>>738696666
Possibly just stood up.

>>738696904
Imaginative little fucks.

>>738696666
holy quads

>>738697792
This is adorably meta

>>738698550
xD

File: indulge in my liquids, children.png (94KB, 468x720px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 468x720px

>>738696287
>>738696385

>>738699439
wouldnt weed worsen their rectal control even worse than normal?

File: calming TV.png (190KB, 1121x2056px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1121x2056px

>>738699409
Ok, I laughed. Well done!

>>738699409
kek

File: educational.jpg (103KB, 816x604px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 816x604px

>>738699636
Depends on their biochemistry. Either way, we can tone down the ultrashit 24/7 portrayal once in a while.

>>738699949
i like this. very heartwarming!

>>738699949
fuck you, i come to this thread specifically for the shitting fluffies. If it's not at least 30% shitting content, this thread is garbage

>>738699409
op of dolan here, i love it.

>>738700338
is it flying, or stationary on the ground?

>>738700423
It is slowly crawling.

>>738700461
new thread?

>>738700627
Don't know, nobody else has been posting fluffy in the last hour.

>>738700910
i got high and forgot about the thread for a bit

>>738701603
good trip?

>>738701784
you know it man, all that stress from work just melted away

>>738701983
I need to get to that point with you, man. It was an all right night but I'm going batshit crazy anyway.

Fuck my brain...

>>738702300
nice dubs man, go for the gold bro