So this pedo eceleb got caught out and is facing jailtime. E

>>735871846
the slutty females who messaged him first for attention deserve jail time for producing cp

>>735871846
The girls he was hitting on are of legal age of consent in my country so I can't really blame him too much.

Honestly there's stuff like this, ok he is a creep and deserves maybe 5 years in jail...

But then there is much worse, like prepubescent rape and production/distribution of child porn.

>>735872341
>>735871981
Why does a 24 year old man think it's perfectly reasonable to target underage girls for his sexual gratification though? He could've just went with older teens. It's clear he had pedo desires.

>>735872519
He's a youtuber, and like all youtubers, he's mentally stunted because he spends all day all on a toxic bullshit facade funded by Google. I say throw him in jail just for that. Hell, throw him in jail just for that faggot haircut. Fucking loser.

>>735872949
He's cancer for sure but I have no sympathy. He would an hero in normal circumstances if YouTube wasn't there. Hate seeing useless sacks of shit rely on YouTube for income.

>>735871846
Not really,Bitches do what they want to do so if they did it then people need to deal with it. At no point in time did he blackmail or force them to do it,persuasion yes but that's not a criminal act. What straight guys turns down some fresh and tight JB? It's in mans coding to want it.

>>735872519
>14 isn't pedo

>>735871846
um you are lying he did ask them to take their cloths off and asked to see their buttholes

He's sick. Put him in jail for N years where N = 30 / (his net worth in millions of dollars).

>>735872519
Sounds pretty normal to me.

>>735873812
30 is < 1 / 1000 of one million

he'll have what, 3 seconds in jail?

>>735871846
>Does he deserve jail?
Asking a 14 year old to behave like a slut over the internet isn't a crime. Abducting and raping a 14 year old against their will is a crime.

These laws are simply absurd for anyone who isn't a complete moron who just parrots propaganda.

>>735874103
If his net work is 2 million then his net worth in millions of dollars is 2, 30/2=15. 15 years in prison

>>735874372
>>net work
>>net
wat

>>735874336
lmao. the worst part is that what keeps happening is girls go after famous people messaging them then "expose" them like what happened to anthony weiner

they guys made mistakes but the girls are acting like predators getting them horny and stupid then acting like they were victimized from 2,000 miles away over a computer with contact they sought out

>>735871846
Cut him up into tiny pieces. Pedos deserve to die and go to hell.

File: 2017-06-15 00.51.06.png (53KB, 540x335px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 540x335px

Oh not to mention.

Those kids were victims.

>>735874792
Fuck off it's clear I meant to say "net worth"

>>735874743
>>735874636
>>735874592
>>735874486
I see absolutely NOTHING wrong with a guy asking someone else to show their ass over the internet.

Where is the fucking crime here?

The girl CLEARLY wants to do it for this guy, what the fuck is so wrong here?

>>735874858
How did he trick them? How had they had been harmed from choosing to show him some anus and ass shaking? You're an idiot and need to an hero.

File: 1492637314807.jpg (385KB, 619x1221px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 619x1221px

>>735871981
>females
do you giggle when you say penis, you fucking nerd?

>>735874592
that's pretty messed up. He deserves at least 2 years for that. Even if it's not violent, it's wrong for an adult to leverage their fame to manipulate a child for sexual purposes.

>>735875005
She can't legally consent.

>>735875074
How would you react if it was your daughter or sister?

File: 1460942027366.jpg (129KB, 1280x742px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1280x742px

>>735874336

>>735875112
Well, messaging someone you seem to be obsessing over and sending them a video of yourself showing your asshole sounds pretty much like she wasn't doing anything against her will there, mate.

How isn't that consensual? Who the fuck is forcing this girl to do anything?

She's a fucking fan showing her butthole to her idol, where exactly is the crime there?

>>735875219
Well I would raise my daughter better than that and if it was my sister why would I give a shit about what she does with her body?

>During an interview with Homeland Security, the Chicago-based vlogger "admitted to having used his Facebook account to have sexually explicit chats with minor females," records say

>admitting it to the police
Why would you do that?

>>735874486
>>735874592
>>735874636
>>735874743

I can't believe that level of discourse worked to convince a 14 year old to do anything.

File: e5da25e3bfb15ccb616022ffbe62e2b3c7459917_hq.gif (2MB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x304px

>>735874636
>I bet you had NO IDEA when you met me that just 1 day later you'd get to show me your butthole how special do you feel?!

holy fuck my sides

Yea he deserves jail just for that fucking ego

>>735875334
"Better than that". So you're saying she shouldn't be doing things like that, ideally? So you're opposed to it?

If you have "this pedo" and "does he deserve it" in the same paragraph youre probably autistic and possibly a pedo yourself

>>735875456
How would him being opposed to it change the fact that they weren't tricked and they aren't victims? They knew exactly what they were doing.

>>735875377
Don't forget she was obsessed with him. Just imagine this faggot is he's justin bieber or any other teen idol, and you'll see why that would easily work.

I just fail to understand how a willing 14 year old showing her butthole over the internet, somehow, makes that guy a fucking criminal.

>>735875456
I'm saying it wouldn't be a problem id have and if for some reason she did boo fucking who. It's a picture and a vid of some ass shaking and a money shot. She wasn't physically attacked or forced to do so.

>>735875360
>Why would you do that?
Because you are a dumb fuck and scared shitless.

>>735875596
I wanna know why he's opposed to it. He knows it's wrong.

>>735875642
because he talked her into it. If talking someone into suicide is a crime, so is this.

>>735875774
What exactly is wrong? HOW is asking someone to show their ass over the internet is wrong, for fuck's sake?

>>735875845
There's a small difference between having someone KILLED and having someone showing their asshole to you.

This bullshit is absolutely ridiculous.

>>735875896
post this on fb big boy

File: 1addff56-6f70-48c8-8fa8-3d9056d9c31d.jpg (35KB, 450x217px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 450x217px

gr@[email protected]

>>735875737
If it happened, you'd be opposed to it then? Because you know it's wrong. You're saying you'd deliberately raise her in such a way that this wouldn't happen. Why would you specifically train her to behave in a way that precluded this behavior? Because you know it's wrong.

OP is faggot,Turn this into a JB thread.

>>735872519
I don't know why but the alternative scene seems to be filled with pedos for some reason (Blood on the Dance Floor, Front Porch Step, etc.).
He could've gotten with older girls but specifically had a thing for underage ones. He kept telling the girls to mention their age in their videos.

>>735876005
>>735875896
Yeah, go ahead and try it. You'll see, you sick fuck.

>>735872519
cos (some) 14 year olds are fucking hot?

The guy is a scumbag but he's a hebephile not a pedophile.

File: 1494701565743.png (100KB, 515x800px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 515x800px

>>735875993
I bet you are pedo in question

It was illegal when Chris Hanson was around. You should have known better

>>735875896
They are minors and he is 24 years old. He took advantage of them by manipulating them knowing that this was wrong and illegal. To put this into a different perspective, how would you feel if some random ass sick fuck did the same thing to your 12 year old daughter? Honestly, would you be okay with this?

>>735876053
I'd raise her to have a higher value and opinion of herself, Not it being wrong because it's not. She would know she doesn't have to show shit for some nobody for any attention which any other low self esteemed whore could easily do besides her. Take your ill conceived moral faggotry elsewhere.

File: bisabunchofwinners.gif (2MB, 200x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x240px

>>735875896
Because as a society we've almost unanimously agreed on an age of consent based on developmental consequences and ick factor.

Who are you to argue with ick factor?

>>735871846
We just need to lower the age of consent to 12.
I mean, the attraction is completely natural and people are getting in trouble for it. It's stupid really.
Even homosexuality is much more unnatural than it is to be attracted to someone 12 and up.

>>735874743
>>735876180

ok actually that seems pretty fucked up :/

File: 1493487228023.jpg (169KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1600x900px

>>735876088

>>735872341
What country is this? Asking for a friend

>>735876180
What could you possibly talk about with them? If you're capable of carrying on a conversation with them, then that is an indication of your stunted mental development and how sick you are. Someone that sick shouldn't be around impressionable kids anyways, even in a nonsexual encounter. You seriously need help and you're not going to get it until you're arrested, scumbag.

>>735876494
This is more to do with the age limit of pornography. Any sexualised media of someone under 18 is considered CP regardless of AoC.

>>735876426
So you'd slut shame her?

>>735876400
Why would my 12 year old daughter be talking to a 24 year old over the internet showing her asshole to a fucking camera, UNLESS she really wanted to do it?

Really this doesn't make any sense. The ONLY reason this guy is "guilty" of anything is because the girl in question "supposedly" was doing something against her will, which obviously wasn't the case for anyone without a carrot up his own ass.

>>735876615
Vatican City

>>735876426
What a bullshit answer.

>>735876606
Stale as fuck /b/ro, I've been here longer than that.

>>735876494
12 seems as arbitrary as 18. Care to explain your reasoning?

Women were put on this Earth for Mans pleasure

>>735876400
>wrong and illegal

Those are two different things. And it's not even illegal in some parts of the world to have sex with a 14 or 15 year old. It's not even illegal in most of the US to have sex with them if you're within 3 years of age.

>To put this into a different perspective, how would you feel if some random ass sick fuck did the same thing to your 12 year old daughter?

Taking exaggeration lessons from Trump?

>>735871846
Is this loli or a real girl? http://pridw.com

>>735876716
Under 18s can't make rational decisions.

>>735876757
Tell yourself what ever you need to keep that delusion going.

File: 1292755316926.jpg (4KB, 126x126px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 126x126px

>>735876835
Fuck off.

File: aa7.jpg (11KB, 213x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 213x250px

>>735876762
I doubt that, fuck boi.

reported

>>735876988
Get back in that kitchen bitch and make me something fresh.

>>735876716
A 12 year-old and a 24 year-old are on two completely different states of mind. If you read the transcripts you can also clearly see that he was the one with sexual motives. Its not hard to see that he was the one moving the situation that way.

File: the game.jpg (61KB, 460x587px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 460x587px

>>735876858
>justifying pedophilia

y-y-you t-too

>>735876792
Because he is sick and wants to have sex with them at that age. He thinks the law should obey his dick.

>>735877127
Bitch,I read the name.

>>735876792
It's just natural.
From personal experience, I've seen people at that age when I was in grade school talk a lot about sex.
THey really aren't innocent.
I was diddling myself by that age and so was many other else.

File: giphy.gif (958KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]

958KB, 500x250px

>>735877080
1/10 here's your reply, nerd.

>>735875360
After the Snowden leaks you can imagine Homeland Sec having access to all his computer shit.

They probably showed the guy tapes they took through his webcam of him fapping.

File: smoke rocks.jpg (65KB, 470x584px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 470x584px

>>735877205
>HA, GOT EEEM

>>735877111
If you read the transcripts you would know they weren't 12.

>>735877227
The ones who were talking about sex were abused. It isn't natural and is the result of abuse.

>>735877111
Yes, he wanted to see her asshole, and she showed it to him because she WANTED TO DO IT.

What the fuck is your point?

File: 1447314408232.gif (2MB, 435x246px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 435x246px

>"I have to see your butthole to know for you that you care 100%"

>"I bet you had no idea when you met me that just 1 day later you'd get me to show me your butthole how special do you feel?!"

>"Clap it super Loud. And say these lines: I'm only (age) yeah, only years old"

>>735877127
Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.


>>735874486

14 Nigger learn to read.

>>735877227
>appeal to nature fallacy
>anecdotal evidence
>personal bias

cool story, bro.

File: giphy.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>735872949
>Kids these days!!!!

>>735877456
Woops, my bad, anon, you want to fuck 14 year olds, not 12 year olds, that's some other shitstain in this thread.

File: 1432591602492.jpg (68KB, 897x670px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 897x670px

Is it still pedophilia if the girl weighs 400 pounds?

tbh he didnt do anything wrong it was consensual. people overreact to everything these days smh.

File: STAHHHHHHPdotjpeg.jpg (28KB, 180x460px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 180x460px

>>735877724
>>735877819
Thank you for killing this thread.

>>735872341
FOR THE FUCKING LAST TIME AGE OF CONSENT ONLY APPLIES TO KIDS.

A 13 year-old can consent to sex with a 14 or 15 year old. Once you pass a certain range, 2 or 3 years, you're in stat. rape. Above 18? Jail time for being a pedo...

>>735877676
Yeah,You don't fuck 12 year olds...You just let them suck you off. It's the patience that makes it so much more worth it.

age of consent should be 14

>>735875005
The problem is child pornography. Even if he didn't ask for the pictures, he would have still been sent to jail just for having it save on his phone.

>>735878204
I know you are but what am I?

>>735878160
This doesn't even make any fucking sense.

You either CAN consent, or you can't.

What a fucking shitty bait, holy fuck.

>>735878223
This is an even more retarded argument.

How are you a criminal for looking at fucking pictures?

Just fuck off with this broken logic. These laws make absolutely NO sense.

>>735878160
Wot?

>>735877459
you think I'm intimidated by the pointing out of fallacies?

Really, it isn't fallacies because it is backed by fact.
Look to your past, I mean, you weren't innocent about sex either now.

It would be a fallacy if it doesn't really add up like: put a cucumber in your butt, it's natural.

Also, there is no way of avoiding personal bias or anecdotal stuff unless you could be someone other than yourself. We're limited by who we are, we can't know what we don't experience.

Also, science is a study of nature.
So, don't try to invalidate science either

>>735875296
>santa cuck porn

>>735875296
those tabs though

You're saying child pornography is legal? Lmao

>>735871846
its funny because Canada changed there laws not too long ago where the age of consent was 14years old, and now they raised it to 16.

Is Canada full of pedos and run by pedos according to americans?

is that why my 8th grade teacher made a move on me and it never made the news ?

>>735878412
Are you saying having child pornography save in your phone is legal?

>>735878535
>fact

Please cite your sources.

The rest is gibberish and not worth you trying to explain it.

>>735878160
Come on, 12+ can be attracted to 20+ people and also the other way around.


Age of consent should be 12 I think.

>>735878693
their

>>735876652

Are 24 year old women even smart enough to carry a decent conversation most the time? What about middle aged?

No. Womens only role is for sex / pleasing men. Expecting anything more from 95% of them is childish in and of its self.

>>735878724
cite? haha.
You're in the REAL world.
You can cite yourself by just remembering what it was like with your other classmates at 12 years old and throughout highschool.
We don't need a team of scientists to check the libido of 12 year olds and write out the study.

>>735878767
this over 9,000

who is this dude? looks like a gayer justin baber. LOL he really likes buttholes, gonna be funny when Jomo from cell block C busts his raw

>>735878693
no, canada isnt full of pedos; they move to thailand/cambodia/etc
thailand/etc is full of canadian pedos
canada is just full of racist left wing sjw's

>>735878945
>we don't need scientists to...


HAHAHAHA shut up.

>>735878767

12 and under = actual pedophillia
13~15 = hebephillia (moderately fucked up if you're not within that age range)
16 + who gives a flying fuck you fucking retards

16 isn't a child, 6 is.
14 isn't an adult yet, but isn't a little kid.
16 is a young adult and the law / society should treat them as such
14 is still childish but females are sexually mature / ripe half the time by this point.

>>735875642
Because she was clearly uncomfortable with it, but being an impressionable 14 year old girl, she was easily manipulated by an older man who knew quite well that what he was doing was wrong.

If you think she was not uncomfortable or being manipulated you are autistic, or know nothing about how teenagers act.

>>735879189
>ripe half the time by this age

>>735879172
citation needed

File: 1385015908576.jpg (38KB, 240x200px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 240x200px

I seriously bet OP is this faggot

Enjoy jail, bitch. Tell Chris Hanson i said hi

>>735871846
>published on June 29, 2015

So what happened since then?

im 21 and my gfs 18

i met her when she was 16

am I a priest?

fuck u all

>>735876180
>>735876652
not the dude who replied, but I'm a senior in high school and the freshman here are pretty fucking developed. There is literally countless of C cups bouncing around, and they're all aware of sex and shit. I have a mixed class in which the majority of the class are freshman, and none seem too immature, and actually have a brain to know what they are speaking of, and what they're doing. I'm not sure why people think fourteen year olds are brainless idiots who can't tell the difference between an asshole and a vagina, but I can very much assure you the fourteen year olds of today's age aren't as innocent as you assume them to be.

>>735880574
>none seem too immature
From your pov I'm sure they dont

>>735880574
It's always been that way.
It's not just today.

>>735878716
I'm saying having child pornography saved in your phone is not a fucking crime.

If there is no victim then there's no fucking crime. Retard.

File: 1494701720345.png (82KB, 418x823px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 418x823px

>>735881335
The fact you are serious is hilarious as fuck

>>735881335
Pls tell me you're trolling

>>735876835
Neither can you.

>>735881560
>>735881749
Where is the crime in looking at a picture of someone spreading their ass on your phone?

Who is the victim exactly? Your phone or your eyes?

>>735882098
You're arguing with four decades of brainwashing, anon. At best, the answer you're going to get is going to be equivalent to "a fucking WHITE MALE".

>>735881560

There are serious arguments to be made, although I'm not sure that anon is the one to make them.

Nude photos of a 12 or 14 year old isn't always a crime, even in the US. There are naked pictures of a 12 year old Brooke Shields all over the internet taken from a movie, which is legal and played on TV, where she played a child prostitute complete with simulated sex scenes. And there are other Hollywood movies out there with underage nudity. There are 16 and 17 year olds in old issues of Playboy. But they'll lock up the guy in the OPs article.

The difference between being legal and illegal in these cases only appears to be that Brooke Shield's and the others parents said it was OK. And it just seems bizarre that someone could authorize nude photos to be taken of a girl, but not the girl herself.

>>735882233
This hysteria is absolutely ridiculous. How is this even a thing?

The girl literally SHOWED HER FUCKING ASSHOLE to the guy, and he's in fucking jail???

WTF???? How is shit like this supposed to happen in a fucking first world country?

>>735871846
Yeah he deserves it lol who is he anyways and why should be care about him in any way?

>>735882325
it depends on what year the movie was release otherwise it would be banned and for the playboy one I have no comment if true

>>735876652
As a gun married to a woman half his age, who met her when she was 18, there are plenty of things to talk to someone younger than yourself.

The biggest"complaint" against it was "she can't go to the bar, what do you talk about"

My response is still the same,

If going to the bar is a requirement to live someone, maybe you should reevaluate the relationships you are in.

I'm bringing this up because 14 is Dan close to 18.

My wife was a slut at 14. And most attractive woman are sluts at 14.

>>735872341
5 years. Fuck man, for an asshole picture. He's a fucking creep but I think he should get probation, as long as he didn't fuck anyone I don't think he should have his life ruined more than it already has (millions of fucking people know that he's a creep now)

A $5000 fine and 5 years probation is the max he should get tbh

>>735876835
Woman period can't make rational decisions

>>735883312
I think age of consent should be 15 across the board. Up until like 80 years ago, 15 year olds were getting married, fighting wars, drinking booze and treated as full on adults

Now 15 year olds are infantalized and treated like toddlers. Does a 15 year old showing her pussy destroy her mentally? I don't think so

>>735882921

Brooke Shields played the 12 year old prostitute in Pretty Baby. It came out in 1978. Two years later she had more nude scenes in Blue Lagoon. They play both of those movies on TV regularly. And there are other movies that came out after that, although I can't remember what they were off the top of my head.

The confirmed under 18 playboys came out in the 50's and 60's. There may have been a few up until the early 80s. There were some between 1970 and 1983 that were 18 and less than 2 months on the day the playboy hit the stands, but it isn't known exactly when the photos were taken. Could they have taken the pictures and had the magazines printed and distributed in less than 2 months? Yeah, maybe. But lead time was often 6 months or more. Hugh Heffner used to make the under 18 girls get their parent's permission first.

>>735882325
A film is made for artistic purposes though. This was solely to get our eceleb off.
Fun fact, the girl who played Juliet in the old Romeo and Juliet adaptation was 15, and went topless for the movie. Because of her age, she wasn't allowed to watch the movies premiere because it had her own breasts in it.

>>735881335
>I don't know what a crime is
If it's legally classified as a crime then it's a crime you retard. You can argue the law should be changed, but that's the law

>>735883620
>A film is made for artistic purposes though. This was solely to get our eceleb off.

Aren't strip clubs protected under artistic expression?

And there is at least 1 confirmed 16 year old playmate and at least 10 17 year old playmates. There may be up to a dozen more 17 year old playmates. It is not illegal to own those magazines.

>>735874486
>>735874592
>>735874636
>>735874743
tricking anyone to send nudes is wrong, but does the guy really deserve to go to jail for some stupid butthole pics?

>>735882325
That's not true,

What makes them legal is...get this "artistic value"

I shit you not.

>>735883924
That's because playboy was the shining start of porn.

"Artistic value"

>>735883966

Could this guy in the OP claim he was requesting artistic photos and get off the hook? I don't think that's going to work. Has to be something else.

>>735884156

There was porn long before playboy. Heffner made it mainstream by putting celebrities in his magazines, and he helped break down some of the laws, but he didn't start it.

>>735871846
why would anyone ask minors to send non sexual twerking videos?
they don't have any ass and twerking is sexual in nature.

overall this faggot seems pretty retarded.

>>735884181
Well there's a difference between pornography and "art" this dude in the op has claimed he fap to it, so it wouldn't be art

File: 1443126464094.jpg (52KB, 460x522px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 460x522px

>>735884798
The video is from 2015. He was asking for twerking videos then, but he went full on TCaP in since then

People in this thread trying so hard to defend him is the funniest shit all day

>>735875074
He manipulated impressionable young girls by saying that if they didn't do what he wanted, then they weren't his biggest fan

>>735871846
Yes. He's 10 years older than those girls. Did you see the manipulative shit he's been sending them?
>you've got to prove you're my #1 fan by taking off your panties
It's just predatory and abusive. Absolutely not justifiable in any way

>>735885045

What if he fapped to Brooke Shields in Pretty Baby?

>>735871846
What a faggot.

>>735885489
The producer didn't mean for it to be something for people to fap so its still art. Context matters and he can't control on what people want to fap to

>>735886018

Did Heffner mean for people to fap to Playboy?

>>735885489
There's articles that can help you clear up this confusing and such, that's just the easy explanation

>>735886088
if heffner did it today, he'd be in jail too

nice try pedo

>>735876180
Maybe you should go to prison with him

I'm kind of split.
On the one hand, who the fuck rocks a Beiber cut in 2017? The fashion police alone would sent this fuck to the big house for 3 dimes.
On the other, I mean, if the girls sent it to him, then it was kinda consensual, and as long as it wasn't videos of them being dicked by some hairy fatass, then who cares.
Fucking people and pedo hysteria garbage.

Damn, maxmoefoe fucked up.

>>735886088
I believe playboy isnt considered pornography and i dont think they have had any underage model recently

>>735875296
>How to unrape sister

It's just a prank bro

many youtubers / internet people are pedophiles. many. not shocked about this dude

>>735886278
yeah fuuuuuuck you

File: pepe horny.png (84KB, 706x680px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 706x680px

>>735874486
>>735874592
>>735874636
>>735874743
That's some straight up hentai dialogue right there. Pretty hot to be quite honest. I would do it too if I had access to willing ripe 14y olds.

>>735886921
>no arguement
>just childish womanly emotional outburst
>not even a good one at that

Here kid, let me show you the ropes.
I hope you get raped several times over and then shoved into a wood chipper feet first.
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck you
queer.

>>735886922
congratulations, you're scum.

Austin "Not Allowed in School Zones" Jones

Being a pedo is a-ok

File: jared-fogle.jpg (116KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1600x900px

>>735887192

>>735886515

It's not illegal to own (or fap to) the old magazines, though.

And if playboy isn't considered porn because it only has nudity, then how is the guy in the OP in trouble? All he did was look at nudity.

lol fucking loser can't even retort
anti-pedos are a meme
just like antifa faggots

>>735887432
>It's not illegal to own (or fap to) the old magazines, though.
like hell it isnt

and you keep on comparing old shit under different laws to today. What part of that do you not comprehend

>>735886922
MOOOODS!

>>735883219
women majority mature sexually at 16, but there are some girls that sexually mature at age 14. I read an entire journal from NCBI (US GOV Science studies) and I think consent laws should be 16-18. Leniency at 16 17 based on age gap, full legallity at 18. Degenerates will be degernates.

>>735887773
Nop. 12 is the number. That's we get sexually aware. That's all it is really. We get woke at 12.

>>735887773
>Faggot on /b/ calling any degenerate

Go back to posing in your mother's underwear faggot.

>>735887605
>like hell it isnt

Show me one story about person being arrested for owning or selling the old magazines.

>and you keep on comparing old shit under different laws to today.

I began by including some more recent movies, but those were dismissed because they were "artistic" and supposedly the artist couldn't help what people fapped to. So I have only been discussing the Playboy's in recent posts because those pictures were purposefully taken for people to fap to.

>>735887432
How long are you going to go on with this. Why dont you search the laws and what's considered pornography and not nowadays. Also I have stated context matter when deciding what's pornography or not and that the dude in the op have already admitted it was for fap and has fapped to it

>>735887432 Also you're forget child pornography is also involved

File: 0mKXcg1.gif (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

>>735871846
what a hero

>>735871846

he deserves jail, plus more jail, then add extra jail time, possibly between a bunch of horny gay niggers.

if you forgive a single pedo, you've forgiven and approved them all.

btw, being a celeb (omg, a "youtuber", wtf, "celeb") should mean getting triple the punishment.

if you want to fight pedos, you need drastic measures, especially against celebpedos.

>>735888195

>How long are you going to go on with this.

This is my last post because I'm going to sleep.

>I have stated context matter when deciding what's pornography or not and that the dude in the op have already admitted it was for fap and has fapped to it

The OP wanted to fap to those pictures. People want to fap to playboy pictures. There's no difference. Either they're both porn or neither of them is.

>>735888130
The dude in the op is one story of it lmao

>>735888284
>Also you're forget child pornography is also involved

In which case?

>>735873470
Have you ever hear of the term 'intent' my dear spergy pedo?

>>735888130
Using playboy as an example is bullshit anyways. Show me an example of him having underage girls. I doubt even Penthouse has. Foreign magazines from netherlands and france used to in the 60s. And yes. Your ass will be arrested if you try to import them.

You want a real example? Use Traci Lords. She lied about her age to do porn. Now all but 1 of her videos is illegal to have.

>>735888499
none of the fucking dadless homofuck niggerloving queers on this board know what playboy is.
/b/ is lost.

>>735888499
>Show me an example of him having underage girls.

He had at least 11 of them and possibly twice as many. The youngest was Elizabeth Ann Roberts, who was 16.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Ann_Roberts

And now I'm really going to sleep.

>>735888429 If it was just a nude it wouldn't be illegal but since she was underage it was illegal

He should serve jail time and be publicly shamed but those little whores should not be allowed to use for anything even if they are underage..he didn't force them and they know right from wrong..

File: 1475397763257.gif (551KB, 245x220px) Image search: [Google]

551KB, 245x220px

>>735888671

Elizabeth's pictorial was a significant one in the history of Playboy because she was only 16 at the time her photos were taken. She had arrived at the Playboy studio with her mother, who provided a written statement that she was 18. After it came out that Roberts was underage, Hefner was brought before a domestic relations court on a charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor.[1][2] The charges were ultimately dropped on the grounds that Hefner in all likelihood did not know the girl's true age

>>735888730
next time in english, shitskin

>>735888882
Kys you pedo sympathizer

>>735875334
I would raise my daughter better than that

These little sluts have the internet in their pocket and i guarantee you there is a man out there thirsty for her little ass who is smarter than both u and her

This shit he pulled was fucked up, and women will not go near u without a hefty bill attached, even the pigs would overcharge u

>>735889019
>kys

Throw yourself off of a bridge twitter shitsmear
>mmmhmm

>>735889019
Put a carrot in your ass and light your pubes on fire, feminist.

Did I offend you by calling thoes whores whores? It's what they are.they chose to be whores and now probably want to use him

In London in 1850 the age of consent was 10, and certain parts of town were thronged with starving, slender ten year old streetwalkers eager to do anything for a few pence. In those no-growth-hormones-in-their-scarce-food days puberty might start by 14, so these were flat and bald pros. Women couldn't keep their husbands home, and started shaving their legs and smelly pits to try to compete. Half the 14 year olds today have been spreading it around the middle school for several years.

File: George_Clooney_laughing.jpg (12KB, 356x496px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 356x496px

Look at all the moralfags!

Where did my /b/ go

Hope he gets raped in prison and I hope thoes whores kill themselves..its the only fair thing

>moralfags posting on /b/ and anons actually replying to it

What the fuck has happenned?

Ever since Gamergate went viral this shithole has been more and more filled with moralfags.

ITT:
Sane people dropping base on a pedo

Pedos sticking up for a pedo

YTers HRdepartment running damage control on overtime

YTers Lawyers asshole , "ggfam, I'll b back to see u next month with little suzie. Prepare to lose those yt shekels BOi!"

Yes, this is the extent of a lawyers lexicon.. atleast my lawyers.. well my times up, back to my cell, bye /b/

>>735889258
fuck you

File: 1497268600673.png (187KB, 467x360px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 467x360px

>>735873655
>cloths off
>asked to see their buttholes