Can you explain me, why sex with children is illegal and wrong?

>>735607890

Do you know how chemical burns work?

No? Not a chemist?

but your fine with drinking any chemicals you find right? Bleach. Lye. Antifreeze.

You don't understand how they harm people, so why shouldn't you?

>>735608137
I didn't asked how, I asked why? It's easy to proof that chemicals are dangerous, but there is not proof that consensual sex is dangerous.

>>735608361

You are asking for biological and psychological proof.

Are you a biologist or a psychologist. No?

Then why do you not TRUST people who ARE telling you it causes harm?

Hence, you shouldn't trust chemists and drink bleach because you don't understand WHY it harms you.

go ahead. but don't at us like we're crazy when we don't join you in a swig.

>>735608746
If you put candy in child's mouth it did not harm him. If you put something different that is covered with something sweet, it did harm him, even if taste is completely same. Why I has to believe idiots who clam there is difference when there is no?

>>735607890
doesn't need explaining, you're just a pedo acting dumb. we've all seen how they act when they get Chris Hansen'd into prison hell.
>hell yeah gonna rape this kid
>"Hi i'm Chris Hansen, why don't you take a seat
>oh shit just play cool
>"Why don't you tell me what you were doing here?"
>fuckfuckfuck
>"We weren't going to do anything i swear."
>saved.jpeg
>"I see you have a bag full of beer and condoms. What's that all about?"
>fuckfuckfuck
>"You're free to get up and leave whenever you'd like."
>kek what a retard he actually bought it
>walk out the door
>get on the floor
>gets raped in prison 6 months later

>>735609148

"A razor blade covered in sugar will not harm a child's mouth, because it's taste is the dame as candy... and candy doesn't hurt children."

>>735607890
your chode would tear that little boy's anus

Because you could hurt the child.

>>735609307
Can you have a polite debate with me?

>>735609330
Blade is sharp and by this reason is dangerous.

>>735609658

So? It tastes the same as candy, it will not hurt, TASTE is the same. Yes?

>>735609405
You could hurt the child doing anything with him.

>>735609658
cock tastes and feels good so it must be dangerous

>>735609751
Are you stupid or pretending?

>>735607890
Becoming sexually active means a lot of responsibility; pregnancy, STDs, etc.
The basic idea is that children are dumb little shits who aren't ready to accept that responsibility; we as a society are worried about them being vulnerable and abused. To be fair; they are. By pedophiles. The basic point is children can't accept the full responsibility of becoming sexually active and that they might get abused by older individuals, so as a safety measure, we've banned even consensual sex with children. Loli, though, is okay, because no actual children are hurt, abused, or taken advantage of.

>>735608361
Children cannot consent.

>>735609829

That's your argument.

Do you understand now?

>>735608746
What kind of bullshit rethoric is that? What does biology has to do non-reproductive sex? What does having sex have to do with criminalizing and victimizing a consensual relationship?

You shouldn't trust anybody, period. You use your own knowledge and reason to determine why bleach is bad for drinking.

Does that makes me a monster? Does it makes me less of a human? If I can determine with science that drinking bleach is harmful for myself WITHOUT drinking it, why all of a suddenly this topic puts you into de KILL YOURSELF attitude?

>>735607890
because children are incapable of deciding what's good for them that's why

> hey, can uncle fuck you? will be fun
> sure
> ...
> cries about everything and has nightmares for next two months

>>735609912
>Consensual

A child is unable to make the decision to have sex. Most don't understand sex. They are easily manipulated and it causes years of psychological harm

>>735609585
Its not to be debated retard. you can't have sex with children.

>>735609405
This doesn't stop bad parent from beating the living shit outta their kids.

Also, children are sorta frail and pleasing them sexually without penetration you gotta understand this.

>>735609863
It means responsibility because you mean it. With this logic you can clam that eating dinner can mean the same responsibility because it can be poisoned.

>>735607890
Having sex with children is wrong. Having sex with teens is ok.

Pedophilia = Wrong

Hebephilia = Ok

Look it up.

>>735609911
That's not an argument, you are both being stupid for the sake of it.

Back on topic
>>735609878
Agreed, off course some might have a very good cognitive reasoning but this doesn't qualify every child for consenting.

>>735610068
Just because beatings happen to children doesn't mean sex with them is right. Both are wrong. Children cannot consent to sex. Wouldn't have sex with someone in a coma?

>>735609912

Ok then. How will you prove it doesn't hurt children then. Yourself.

Since you refuse the proof of experts that it does.

How will your science prove it? hmm? Human testing? How are you going to do that? hmm?

>>735607890
this sexual disorder is actually divided into three by psychology (there's pedophilia for below 10, hebephilia for 10-13 and one more philip for 14+), while law in most countries just has one age of consent, period.

This is wrong, especially in the US because there's clearly a difference between fucking 7yo and 17yo. The latter shouldn't be that much of a deal, if you don't have brains at 16-17 then you are lost forever anyway.

>>735610131
...wat.
I'm not saying it's bad because there's a nonzero chance of abuse, I'm saying it's bad because there's a *high* chance of abuse. There isn't a high chance of your dinner being poisoned, just a nonzero one.

>>735607890
because children make poor decisions and are easily influenced. young teen girls like 20 something y/o guys and 20 something y/o guys would be talking teen girls into sex all the time, impregnating them and leaving them. It isn't like the old days when a guy would find a young wife to have lots of kids with and support his family. the niggers and jews have ruined traditional american values

File: mra-virgin-no-hymen.jpg (166KB, 1024x672px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1024x672px

>>735607890
Dont do something when you are incapable to fathom the consequences. A child cant, thus is unable to consent

>>735610036
> A child is unable to make the decision to have sex.
This is wrong. A child is able to make decision, but it will most likely be bad one, because it will be made without understanding what is it they are asked for

>>735609911
I already answered that blade is dangerous because it's sharp. You did not answered how is dangerous what we're talking about.

>>735610036
Now, using rethorics, are you psychologist to know they get psychological harm from oral sex for example? How many years had you studied children with sexual relationships with adults or between other children?

>>735610047
Half agreed, a grown adult can penetrate but everything else MIGHT be good for sexual release.

>>735610298
Many states allow 16 or 17 year olds to consent with each other. A 16 year old fucking a 40 year old or even a 30 year old is fucked up in the head.

>>735610356
agreed

>>735609878
This.
Consensual sex is good sex.
Thereby, since children can't consent and be responsible for their own actions, they cannot give legal consent. Therefore, illegal. Like rape.

>>735609913
Who must to decide that?

>>735610433
If you are unable to weigh the pros and cons you are unable to consent.

>>735610438

You didn't ask how.

You asked, why.

>>735608361
>>735608361
>>735608361

File: 1486501814853.jpg (95KB, 364x499px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 364x499px

>>735607890
Try having you're 5yo niece's perenum torn from her vagina to her anus by her horny teen "babysitter" then come advocate to me how you "just don't understand what's wrong" with child sex. Fucking idiot.

>>735610068
physical and emotional abuse does as much or even more harm to kids than sexual abuse. this doesn't excuse pedos

>>735610298
The thing is, that because of following the example of cuckistan, fucking a 17 is still considered fucking a children.

I mean, seriously niggers?

>>735610036
Child is unable to make the decision to have anything. It doesn't mean anything is illegal for child/

>>735610149
if a kid is old enough to masturbate and watch porn that's not that big deal. does op seriously ask about children who didn't even hit puberty?

>>735610454
Are you? It's an established fact in the medical community that being molested i.e. having non consensual contact has a negative effect on mental state. And since a child cannot consent than all sexual activity is non consensual and therefore molestation

>>735610579
Agreed, but then comes the question nobody here seems comfortable asking.

Is giving only oral harmful?

>>735607890
that's why you need to be locked up you raging faggot

>>735610847

Yes.

>>735610263
You doesn't need to proof anything wrong. If it's not proved right then it's wrong.

>>735610644
A child can decide if they are hungry or tired. Not sexual aroused since sex hormones are not produced till puberty hence children are never horny

>>735610569
you have 69 anon, did you weigh the pros and cons of that?

File: 1478791098183-1.jpg (71KB, 786x590px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 786x590px

Nothing wrong with that.
Tis just another way to control humanity. The less you're allowed the easier it is to grab you by the balls.

>>735609307

The Chris Hansen show was stupid tho, because it was always teenagers and not prepubescent children.

>>735610477
well as a society we decided that they cannot give legal consent. That does no mean they cannot actually consent, just that we, as a society, don't acknowledge their consent.

>>735610985

and it has been proven sex with children is wrong.

>>735611008
Pros dick sucked. Cons face smells like pussy.

>>735610644
you didn't deserve those dubs

>>735610303
There is higher chance that meal can be poisoned rather then boy would be pregnant from oral sex in condom .

>>735611065
No science decided that children do not become sexual beings till puberty. Now you want to fuck a 15 year old you are probably sick but at least they are able to be horny

>>735610569
well in that case, every person should be judge individually, there's no limit where the ability to weigh pros and cons magically appears.

>>735610477
They can't consent because you don't allow them. They cannot give it legally, because you don't want to male it legal.

>>735610807
I'm actually a psychiatrist, psychology is a little bitch for us. But you are all closet faggots that will claim bullshit and ask for timestamp which I can't provide.

But anyway, you are refering to the legal implications of consent. Mentally some children are intelligent enough to know when they truly want something and when they feel something's odd.

Off course, am not advocating for penetrative sex for anyone under 14. But the part of consent seems a little retarded, badly explained and with not enough studies made.

Off course it gets more complicated because every study case is about raped children... So I can't really come up with a solution for that.

>>735610847
at what age? teen? dunno. younger? i'll go with yes

>>735611240
sure but why is the legal age in the US 18 then, if science says puberty? and should there be a legal age, or should sex with people who have hit puberty be allowed?

>>735610574
I got it, you just a troll.

>>735611252
Every person is judged individually hence why children and the retarded cannot consent. Which is why fucking an 8 year old and fucking a 16 year old are different crimes. That's what courts are for. To just each case based on the individual

>>735610910
I haven't seen a woman, man, mare or anybody alive that has been harmed by oral sex.

Care to explain?

>>735610577
Do you really believe that she want to be ripped apart? You are so sick!

>>735611403

Then you, are a monster.

Seek help. Don't do to other kids, what was done to you. Seek help.

>>735610579
We don't talk about abuse at all! Stop talking that shit or try to proof your word! We're talking about consensual relationships sickos!

>>735611004
Toddlers masturbate, you know? Sexual arousal is not exclusively related to hormones.

>>735611359
>Am psychiatrist
>Retarded
The word retarded was taken out of the DSM and therefore no doctor uses it. Therefore you are not a psychiatrist

>>735611467
> 0/reading comprehension

That post wasn't about it being a good thing fucktard.

>>735611445

You haven't done your research then.

>>735607890
is putin a pedo?

>>735611399
Legal age of consent varies by state from 15 to 18. Some is based on puritanical beliefs some is to protect immature teenagers from fucking creeps

>>735611424
How do you define child then ? And are you saying a 16 year old cannot consent and is unable to weigh pros and cons? How can a society justify putting someone in jail, when they don't even acknowledge their consent to sex?

>>735610807
It was an established fact in the medical community of Nazi Germany that Jews are non-humans. You cannot trust their opinion if that is only possible and allowed opinion.

>>735611565
Toddlers explore their bodies in a non sexual way. It's not the same as sexual arousal

>>735611684
isn't it 14 in Canada and 13 in Japan?

>>735611723
Prepubescent is a child. Teenagers fuck. They just shouldnt fuck old creeps

>>735611608
I said you to explain it because I don't see the harm licking the living shit outta someone can be harmful.

>>735611747
Welcome to /b/. Jews are subhumans what's your point.

>>735611004
So, we need to proof they can be horny and that's it?

>>735611779
He said in us. Some countries it's as low as 12. That is all based on cultural norms

I had a friend get a statutory rape charge from the girls parents when he was 18 and she was 17. They were heavily catholic.

>>735611779
In Japan national is 13, but most jurisdictions set it higher(16-18)

>>735611866
Imagine that. You are a child who has no idea what sex is
someone puts his dick into your mouth
does it seem wrong yet?