isn't it weird that animals in the nature are not gay but

>>735200433
bad bait. go home.

>>735200433
there's recorded cases of a lot of animals engaging in homosexual behavior.

>>735200433
guinea pigs.

>>735200782
>Alot.
No.

There are gay dolphins. And other primates. Just to name a few.

>>735200872
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

here's a whole list

>>735200872
Are you retarded? Same-sex sexual behavior is documented in nearly all warm-blooded animals

>>735200872
over 1500 different species...

>>735200433
They do gay sex also, and they even masturbate all the time

>>735201033
I'm sure this is on there but my favorite gay animals are the penguins who cozy up to a female until the egg is laid. Then they kick her ass to the curb.

>>735200433
There you go anon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior

>>735200433
Animals aren't gay, they are bisexual. They don't care what they fuck, are you retarded?

>>735201033
>here's a whole list

"..b-b-but I only obsess about the human homosexuality. Explain that!"

>>735200433
actually animals in nature are gay as well

File: 1357417268076.jpg (36KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x360px

>>735200433
isn't it weird that animals in the nature are not of the building of skyscrapers but humans are?

like wtf? when did we fuck up that bad?

>fucking foreigners

>>735200433
We're animals in nature anon, we just happened to shape nature around us to fit our needs.
We might be smarter than other animals, but we are also still defined by our instincts.
If homosexuality has some survival aspect to it, you can bet other animals will show similar behavior.

>>735200433
The more advanced an animal species is, the more likely it is to engage in homosexual behavior

Bonobos, the closest living relative to humans, are infamously bisexual

>>735200433
Every species of mammal, several observed avian dinos including most of the birds of prey and tool using intelligent species, and even species of insects.

tryharder faggit

There are a squillion things humans do that animals don't, idiot

>>735200433

isn't it weird that animals in the nature survive okay but OP is this retarded?

like wtf? how did OP's parents fuck up that bad?

>>735202410
They raised him with the notion that he isn't an animal.

>>735200433
if you consider that a fuck up.
personally i enjoy getting railed and orgasming from anal.
I don't like really jerking off anymore or fucking women.
its preference dude. and i like it better where im at right now.

Isn't it weird that animals in nature don't speak, drive cars, design and use complex electronics and machinery, eat fast food, build schools, post shitty bait threads...

>>735200433
There is statistical indication, that the unwillingness to select a partner who you could procreate, is a genetic trait. It is predominately occurring more often, more kids a woman has.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraternal_birth_order_and_male_sexual_orientation

In this regard, this could be nature simply culling the herd. The problem is, that we put our bodies so full with shit, that when the woman gets pregnant, things go awry. And nature didn't expect getting kids from other countries to circumvent the having kids thing.

>>735201079
why did god fuck up so badly? did he make multiple earths? are we the gay earth?

>>735200872
>>735200433
There are many wild non-hooman faggots out there
wtf are you talking about

>>735200433
>false information
Just google homosexuality in animals. It's not hard.

Except they fucking are! Do some slight research, ya know, so you know the fucc you talking about. Gay animals exist, faggot

>>735204225
There is no proof of a creator, all living creatures are how they are, because they managed to survive that way.

>>735204225
maybe, just maybe, there is no god, and gay isn't wrong.

>>735200433
You are the most advised person on this matter, OP.

>>735201010
>>735201131
>>735201297
Race play is the problem with this, not the gay stuff.

Fear is the mind killer and because of the internet, you can spread scary ideas very quickly. I wonder who might be profiting off of this besides the same groups that always stir up distrust among the lower classes?

It's almost as if history repeats itself, but with updated strategies to fit modern technology. Weird.

>>735200433
You know autism can't be weaponized if b/tards are too busy being idiots to even google the basic questions.... one fundamental truth does remain: OP is a fag

>>735204676
>op is a fag
Well, that just goes without saying

>>735200782
No, there is not, theres recorded instances of animals confusing males for females... exclusive homosexuality in animals is not a genetically reproducable trait.

>>735205233
are humans exclusively homosexual? No. Are some humans homosex? Yes.

Why assume the entire species has to be gay for some of them to be gay? That's some gay ass logic, bruh.

>>735201033
Not only that, but inter-SPECIES sex has been observed many times too.

Seals fucking penguins for one. Monkeys fucking birds.

>>735200433
Homosexuality is either a choice or a defect... those are the choices

>>735200433
It's all chemical, mate.
No healthy human being is gay.
Same goes for frogs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atrazine#Amphibians

>>735205342
Exclusive homosexuality pertains to single animals exhibiting exclusive traits you mong fuck.. you obviously have not a scientific bone in your body so please leave the scientific discussions to people better suited for it

>>735205233
Gay isn't a genetic thing, m8. gr9 b9 tho

bc we are fucking retards

>>735205518
I was mistaken. But you are also mistaken in assuming gay is a trait passed onto your offspring. If that were the case gay people wouldn't exist for obvious reasons.

Think harder, bud.

>>735205342
Homosexuality is a genetic defect, plain and simple. Those specimens exhibiting homosexual tendancies are typically repulsed by those of the opposite sex and thus never pass on their genes.

Sorry for the cold hard facts, love who you think you want to, but know that unless you pass on your genes in this world, you are a defect...

That goes for anyone, not just gays, but anyone who is unable to pass gene on to the next generation... your line stops with you. You were defective and nature selected better stronger more adaptable candidates than yourself

>>735200433
why are you so obsessed with gay people? faggot

>>735205736
This.

>have gay uncle
>stays in the closet until 30
>had three children with his now exwife
>all three are in their early twenties and straight

Also tons of other animals are gay. Infamously, plenty of monkey and ape species' are well known for gay sex being a fairly regular thing. Google is your friend.

>>735205736
Again... i stated it was NOT genetically reproducable, thats you 0/2...

>>735200433
STFU op. My dog is gay, otherwise he wouldn't let me fuck him.

>>735200433
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

>>735205589
So then people choose to be persecuted and end their own genetic line, going against the very instincts that drive us to reproduce. You're saying that their every fiber cries out to be heterosexual and society also cries out against them for choosing homosexuality...

Yeah, that doesn't pass Occam's Razor, but thanks for trying

Isn't it weird that OP has never done a second of research in his life and goes around spewing his shit like a faggot?

Homosexual behavior is exhibited by many, many, MANY species of animals.

>>735206078
I may have misinterpreted your wording, but your original point was that animals that are not human can't be gay, correct? Because I have news for you...>>735206242

>>735205945
>Sorry for the cold hard facts

Source? They ain't facts unless you can back them up.

>>735200433
too many peoples.

>the elephant in the room of all the human's and planet's problems no one wants to address.

>>735206390
>genetics=/=opinions
Honey, the eugenicists are at it again!

Lions

>>735206549
Seriously. Gay is a blessing in this sense. Might possibly save our species and it's exceedingly less cruel than killing newborns and enforcing strict rules on procreation.

File: images (36).jpg (8KB, 321x240px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 321x240px

>>735206512
If you think that a source is needed for either of the points made in that post you are a fucking retard.

File: images (66).jpg (23KB, 392x375px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 392x375px

>>735201730
>infamous

>>735205945
>implying reproduction is your reason to live
Maybe when we were throwing spears at each other was reproduction the only thing to live for, but in the modern world we have the choice to appreciate what we choose. There are far too many humans on this earth as is and if something doesn't change soon resources are going to become very scarce and the metaphor that the four horsemen are intended to represent will destroy the world as we know it.

If you exist only to create small versions of yourself, you're kind of an idiot and likely a very uninteresting person. Hope your life goes well though.

>>735207581
>kek

>>735207581
>misunderstanding species wide imperative as a personal lifestyle choice.
How are you this much of a fucking idiot anon? Go kys you antinatalist scum.

File: bleet.gif (377KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 500x280px

>>735208985
>implying a life is as valuable as it is able to reproduce
Einstein had no kids.

Besides that, do you really have nothing more important to you than reproducing? I mean, judge it how you will; your take on life is oyur own responsibility, but don't you think you're setting the bar a little low for yourself?

I mean, if making children is what makes a person's life worth living, those hillbillies doing nothing but drinking moonshine and popping out babies by the dozen should be considered the pinnacle of our species, right? Doesn't really add up for me.

Our species wide imperative is to continue as a species. In the past that meant to procreate and multiply but now that our planet is reaching capacity and now that multiplying further will make it harder for people to continue to survive, don't you think it's time to shift gears? What's the point in having children just so that they can grow up to starve to death or die in a war over grain/farm lands? That's just backwards thinking, anon. If anything, you are the fool for seeing the world through such a narrow lens. If people sharing your world-view had their way we'd end up going through a mass-extinction but you don't mind because life is all about
>BEING ALPHA
and
>GETTING THAT PUSSY CAUSE IF YOU CAN'T GET LAID YOUR BITCH ASS DOESN'T DESERVE LIFE
just like all of the many children that will eventually die of the diseases spread at lightning speed because it's 100 years later and now all human civilizations are essentially what we currently consider to be ghettos, due to overpopulation.

Fucking solid logic, m8. I think you might actually be Einstein in disguise. Can't fool me, ya cheeky bastard.

>>735200782
There's recorded cases of a lot of animals eating their own shit as well, does that mean it's "natural", "normal", or even beneficial in any way? I don't think so.

Having a disease may be natural, but it's definitely something that should be expected or accepted as "normal" just because it happens with animals too.

A disease will always be a disease. Homosexuality is nothing more than a disease.

>>735210372
Can you contract homosexuality by touch, air or water?
Does homosexuality in itself, make people feel ill or in extreme cases kill people?
Also anyone, of any sexuality can catch an STI/STD so that doesn't figure in.

>>735210372

some animals instinctively eat some of their own feces because specific nutrients cant be absorbed into their bodies in one digestive cycle

>>735210900
>Does homosexuality in itself, make people feel ill or in extreme cases kill people?
does AIDS?

seriously, I'm not making the obvious joke here. AIDS doesn't kill anything and it's a disease.

Penguins, some monkeys and giraffs are knowen to be posibilly gay or bisexuell in free nature.
So maybe you are fucked up and a lot beneath the level of many animales on this planet

File: coolstorybro.gif (1MB, 302x201px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 302x201px

>>735200433
>animals in the nature are not gay

>>735211994
It used to and it doesn't discriminate on sexuality.
For something to be a disease, there needs to be a pathology, being gay is just another version of being human.

>>735212231
no but AIDS makes you more susceptible to diseases, JUST LIKE AIDS, which is a disease.

Gay is a disease

>>735210372
Humans are the disease. We destroy this planet and do virtually nothing to maintain it's well being. We kill and demonize each other over personal differences rather than come together to fix the problems we all share because it's easier to sound like you're the most right than to do what is actually right.

But, you know, some people are just so lost in that cancer that they'll never get it.Do you and fuck the world up while you have the chance to. We're all dying eventually, right? Why bother raising the basic living conditions and generally just helping other people if you can instead argue about how gays are diseased. Nothing wrong with that picture.

I wish I had a gold star for you, anon. You look like you need it.

>>735212320
>Aids is just like Aids.
Go figure anon.
Also condoms are a thing
Gay is a version of being.

>>735210900
>Can you contract homosexuality by touch, air or water?
Are all diseases contracted by touch, air, or water?

>Does homosexuality in itself, make people feel ill or in extreme cases kill people?
Do all diseases make people feel ill, or are in extreme cases lethal?

>Also anyone, of any sexuality can catch an STI/STD so that doesn't figure in.
What does that has to do with anything I said?

>>735212231
Nah, I'm on your side, but AIDS doesn't kill. It shuts down the immune system making it so that even the common cold can kill someone with AIDS. Just saying.

This is all strawmanning in order to avoid the actual point, though.

if this discussion were actually about the future of the human species and gay's relevance to that, most of the people saying gays are wrong in some fundamental way would actually be praising them for effectively cutting themselves out of the gene pool. But, it's actually about some bigbois who are too afraid of their own feelings to allow other people to be comfortable with liking the things they like.

Seriously, why do you care if people are gay? If you are genuinely straight, how is that relevant to you? You don't have to be gay too just because someone in your office sucks dick, dude. That being the case, what do you have to gain from stopping other people from being gay besides peace of mind that could be found through other means?

>>735212419
Did you ever consider the fact that those differences that lead people to kill each other is the natural defense of the planet against a parasitic species that dominated the planet and spread out of control?

Did you ever take into account that your crusade against war and death is more detrimental to the planet than your fake compassion for the species that are responsible for its destruction?

Many questions left unanswered for you to be pointing fingers at other people there, mate.

>>735212824
A lot do yes.
Some are genetic and have detrimental effects.
Disease entails being ill or in extreme cases dying.
It was a preempting of "Gays gets aids yo, that makes them a disease".
>>735213001
Hah yeah okay, from a semantics perspective, Aids doesn't kill people, their damaged immune system does.

>>735213184
Homosexuality makes the healthy members of a specie reject the diseased individual and impedes them from reproducing, therefore becoming a hindrance to a healthy distribution of natural resources among the other healthy members of a species, who can reproduce.

If all humans became homosexuals, the species would disappear completely in one generation. If that isn't enough of a treat, I don't know what is.

You're delusional if you think homosexuality is harmless disease.

File: giphy[1].gif (497KB, 500x343px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 500x343px

>>735200433
fish are gay

In my opinion there is a distinct difference between animals and humans. Oh and to clear something up real quick we did not evolve from apes we have common ancestors with apes. Anyways, back to the question at hand. For me, the difference is that humans get feelings in the way. Animals survive and reproduce. For some reasons people have given themselves alterior motives besides just continuation of the species.

It's these feelings that distract us from the true goals of life. Again, in my opinion homosexuals have let feelings get to them more than others. Whatever these feelings are, is still up for interpretation.

That's just my two cents

>>735213723
Do you think you are at any risk of turning gay any time soon?
Everyone turning gay would never happen, what are you smoking man?

>>735213044
I have considered that some people fear other people because they look different. I think it's stupid and avoids the actual problem that stems from. Instead of joining one another in a mutually beneficial relationship, the ones with the better equipment normally dominate and destroy the culture of whoever the loser was.

Are you implying that some race or group of people is a disease? Because I agree, so long as that group of people is the humans. I wrote about it. You can read it in that post you responded to.

Have you considered that your hate and fear is there for a reason other than "I,anon, am the most right in having my opinions because I have them and I can prove that I have them" and that maybe your fear of things different from you might be an outdated self-defense system, at least in regard to the average human?

Have you considered that it's possible for a species to change over time and that some things we once needed no longer hold the same value? OR are you one of those creationists?

If we always valued the same things just because it's the old way, we would still worship the sun. Is there a point in worshipping the sun? I don't see one. But, I mean, if it was ingrained into our brains that must mean it has value. So we should worship the sun. by your logic, I mean.

>crusade against war and death
>implying war and death are not inherently unfortunate concepts but actually something to strive for
>implying you are really, really, ridiculously stupid

>fake compassion
>implying all people are sociopaths because you are a sociopath

And we come back to the anon's believing their feelings should dictate reality, rather than their reality swaying their feelings. Lots of people that got way too much or way too little praise from their parents in this thread.

>>735204225
You have two options faggot.
1) Sky daddy isn't real
2) Sky daddy is a faggot

>>735213872
I'm not at the risk of turning gay, but if whatever it is making people gay spreads to further generations, god knows what could happen?

Especially if people like you keep pushing this notion that homosexuality isn't a disease that could potentially wipe out an entire species from the face of the planet, if at some point all members end up developing it.

File: c12P2nm.jpg (23KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x281px

>>735205518

>>735214148
The amount of people being gay has been pretty constant ever since we started making medical records anon.
It's not really something that is violently spreading.

>>735214148
>but if whatever it is making people gay
You are actually retarded aren't you?
Is this same disease also making those certain species of animals gay?

>>735213723
see >>735210127 and >>735207581

Too many people are on this planet. If our numbers were slimmed, that would actually benefit the species. If you really think that all people will become gay(not that I'm implying you implied that), you are a fool. People will always have differing opinions and feelings about things. That will literally never change as long as humans exist in the way we currently do. Knowing this, we have good reason to believe that while gay people are not reproducing, straight people will be; that is to say that our species will not end, but actually benefit because of homosexuality.

tldr; you and most people in this thread are fucking retarded

>>735214148
1. it's not a disease
2. even if somehow everyone turned gay there are still people who want kids and will just be artificially inseminated or fuck the opposite gender for the sole purpose of procreation. So even if your retarded ideas actually came true, you're still retarded.

>>735213945
>Are you implying that some race or group of people is a disease? Because I agree, so long as that group of people is the humans

If you agree that humans are a disease, then why are you fighting against the natural response of a parasitic species trying to destroy itself in order to restore the balance of the ecosystem in the planet?

You do realize that people wishing to destroy other nations, and especially the inferior members of a group, is a great way to keep the human disease contained, right?

>>735214243
Are you sure? Really? Are you sure there are just as many cases of homosexuality in 2017 as there were 30 years ago? Really?

Homosexuality is an epidemic, and it's spreading FAST. Especially amongst the young. You have to be blind or a homosexuality denier to not see it as a problem that could potentially wipe out the entire species in a few generations.

i used to watch my neighbors male dachshunds run around their yard stuck together dick to ass more times than i'd care to admit.

animals are gay as fuck.

>>735214275
Animals aren't gay. Gay animals are either killed or rejected from their groups by healthy males.

It's the human compassion for the sick what allows diseases like homosexuality to flourish and spread to the newer generations.

>>735214462
Another great way to do it would be to nuke every nation but [insert home nation]. But it almost feels as if that's an immoral way to do things? Like, maybe the value of a life isn't something any individual has the right to decide? Weird stuff, I know.

>itt; god/dog syndrome induced delusions

>>735214688
It could if everyone turned gay and didn't use medical ways of procreating.
You're making a positive claim that it's a disease and spreading, I would like to see empirical evidence for that.

>>735214688
>You have to be blind or a homosexuality denier to not see it as a problem that could potentially wipe out the entire species in a few generations.
You are actually retarded, aren't you? (again)
Homosexuality can be traced back hundreds of years (Greece, Rome for some examples.) and everything is just fine, actually, we have even more people, and getting more by the minute.
Do you really want to protect the next few generations? kill yourself and rid the planet of your future resource usage.

>>735214864
>Gay animals are either killed or rejected from their groups by healthy males.
>Some animals fuck other males as a show of dominance
If you don't understand what you are talking about, kindly fuck off.
Also
>Gay animals are either killed or rejected from their groups by healthy males.
source me.

>>735210372
/Thread

>>735214914
>You're making a positive claim that it's a disease and spreading
Well, the cases are definitely increasing at an alarming rate, and it discourages the patient from reproducing.

What else do you need to know this is clearly a disease, that could potentially wipe out the entire species, in case every individual, or their offspring, ended up contracting/developing it?

>>735214864
>animals aren't gay
>gay animals

Just let that sound logic sink in for a minute.

Ancient rome and greece were famously gay and bi empires. They also rightfully prided themselves on their prowess in battle and ability to produce the strongest of warriors. They were also highly populated places in their primes; the same period in which gays were common and accepted. It's almost as if it doesn't matter that gay people exist when speaking of large populations. Like there being a lot of gay people doesn't change that reproduction still happens. Fucking crazy stuff, maaaaan.

>>735215282
That sounds more like propaganda spread by leftists than actual facts.

There's no such thing as a "gay empire".

>>735215253
>Well, the cases are definitely increasing at an alarming rate, and it discourages the patient from reproducing.
It's not increasing because more people are being poisoned, as you so eloquently put it, it's increasing because more people are coming out that were gay to begin with, now that it's mildly accepted.

>>735215253
It's increasing because there are more of us anon, the percentage of gay people is pretty much the same as it has always been.
Besides there are so many of us breeding already, the amount of people not breeding are actually affording us some more time were resources aren't getting depleted.

>>735215124
>>735215282
are you me?

I'm bouncing out this lost cause of a thread. Some people are just too set in their ways to hear reason. What do I know though? Maybe it'll randomly click for some of these fools one day. Maybe we're all doomed as a species because we're only as strong as our exceptionally dull and weakest of links.

>>735215124
Healthy individuals outnumber the cases of homosexuality still.

That doesn't mean the number of affected individuals isn't growing at an alarming rate in modern times.

Spewing leftist propaganda about "old gay empires" just to further your narrative doesn't make any sense, especially since homosexuality discourages people from reproducing, therefore your claim that homosexuality went rampant on ancient times just doesn't fit reality.

>>735215457
No there hasn't been a gay empire, there have however been empires who accepted gay people.

File: I swar m8.jpg (195KB, 1224x1445px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1224x1445px

>this entire thread

>>735215763
>Healthy individuals outnumber the cases of homosexuality still.
And will continue to do so, like countless many times in antiquity, which is my entire point you daft moron.
>That doesn't mean the number of affected individuals isn't growing at an alarming rate in modern times.
It's "growing" because more people are actually coming to terms with their sexuality, now that they don't get lynched for it.
>Spewing leftist propaganda about "old gay empires" just to further your narrative doesn't make any sense, especially since homosexuality discourages people from reproducing, therefore your claim that homosexuality went rampant on ancient times just doesn't fit reality.
Who the hell it said it went rampant?

If you're gay then I'm afraid you are lowest of the gene pool.

>>735215457
>brain damage, the person
No shit they weren't a "gay empire". They were empires that regularized homosexuality. But you are right that my wording was poorly chosen. Should have been something more like
>ancient rome and greece were famously empires accepting of bi and gay people

And as far as facts go, do you know how to use google? Because it's relatively simple. Just type the words "homosexuality in ancient greece and rome" into a search engine and read one or more of the pages that comes up. That's not too hard is it?

>>735215581
I'm not arguing against their disease or against anyone specific. I'm merely stating that people who develop homosexuality are a hinderance to the species, in a way, and they can't further their genes properly, therefore representing and imminent threat to the continuation of their own species.

Those are simple facts. You do what you want with them, but denying homosexuality is a dangerous disease that could potentially wipe out the entire species, if all members ended up contracting it, is just not something anyone should ever take lightly.

>>735210127
>Einstein had no kids.
https://www.google.nl/search?q=einstein+kids&oq=einstein+kids&aqs=chrome..69i57.1860j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

>>735216117
Looks like we've come full circle again, should of known better than to ram my head against a wall.
But hey, spew out all the kids you want, maybe one will end up gay just to spite you.

>>735216117
You still need to prove that it can actually transfer to straight people you mong.
What bacteria or virus causes it, pinpoint a genetic defect that somehow jumps onto other people without procreation.

>>735216117
I think the variation in human sexuality may have been beneficial to early societies.

>>735216044
>And as far as facts go, do you know how to use google? Because it's relatively simple. Just type the words "homosexuality in ancient greece and rome" into a search engine and read one or more of the pages that comes up. That's not too hard is it?

Well, as I said, it's not hard to come across scholars who spread leftist propaganda to further the gay agenda. That's a widely known fact, especially since the homosexuality disease was pressured out of the DSM by the same lobbyists who push propaganda like the one you just mentioned.

>>735215763
>being this retarded
There were also far less humans alive in those times. Just like how we now have far too many people on this planet. That's called over population and if nothing is done about it(like nature choosing certain people to not reproduce by making them attracted to their own gender) we will almost all die because of starvation(this means people can't eat because there's not enough food), pestilence(this means people are gonna get sick because there aren't enough medical supplies to heal everyone) and war(this is when a lot of people fight another group of people over something like food or medicine. a lot of people are killed during war because they shoot and stab each other).

Is that clear enough for you? Do you want me to wipe your ass too or does my big boi want to wipe it himself today?

>>735216327
>divine irony kek
here's to hoping, anon

>>735216388
>inb4 trap porn tricking heterosexuals on 4chan

>>735216388
Even if it's not something a normal individual can contract, it's something that can infect their offspring. Completely finishing the reproduction cycle held by thousands of years, by all individuals up to that point. If that isn't scary to you, you probably aren't being very honest or you are trying to push an agenda here.

I don't know what part isn't clear about it yet.

>>735216621
I just hope it's not one of those conservative gays, where you wonder if he may or may not be.
I mean a butterfly rainbow that is just one step away from being a tranny.

>>735216446
It's also a widely known fact that anyone can say anything is or isn't true on the internet. Did you know that Obama was a muslim jew and that trump is actually the new head of al qaeda? Also the gmos in your anti-vaccines are made by gay dolphins to turn your babies into ass burgers?
COBSNIRMACY CUPSNEARACY! EVERYONE SAYING THINGS I DONT WANT TO BE TRUE IS A SHILL
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>735216436
I wouldn't be able to confirm or deny what you just said, but unless there's an actual evolutionary purpose for homosexuality, I don't see how it could be beneficial, in any way, to the members of a species who can actually reproduce normally, since they aren't afflicted by homosexuality to begin with.

>>735216798
There actually is some causality in the mount of sons born to one woman and their chance of being gay. It's not a disease though, it seems more like a natural stop, to avoid too much of the same genetics entering the gene pool.
In other words, gay people might be helping us avoid inbreeding.

>>735216446
>Does it fit my narrative?
>No?
>It MUST be leftist propaganda!!!
If you're going to pretend to be retarded, try not to make it so convincing.

>>735216973
amount*

>>735216973
Easy anon, and chose your next words carefully, you are dangerously close to being a lefty shill.

>>735200433
It's only transgender and whatever else that comes after that only pertains to us, cause their fucking mental illnesses that should be cured instead of accepted.

>>735216973
It could be, but it definitely must serve some purpose in stopping a species from reproducing out of control. There's no doubt about it.

Unfortunately those are tough crimes, and no discussion can be held over the subject before someone starts vomiting their agenda all over the place. It's the same thing with pedophilia and other sexual diseases.

>>735217025
Well, if you want to make this discussion reasonable, then stop using leftist gay propaganda to make your point.

I had fag rabbits, so shut this thread down its a lie

>>735200433
Humans are the most complex entities of all. Of course there'd be some fuckups. Only we can conceptualize existence.

>>735217118
Look up fraternal birth order and male sexual orientation. Being a shill entails me getting paid and I'm here for free.
>>735217201
wut?

>>735217118
>if I don't agree with you it's because you're shilling
>I have the perfect perspective and infallibility of a god when it comes to shill-detecting online
>THE ZEFF WING WANTS OUR GUN BOYS
>THIS IS NOT A DRILL
>ANTI-GAY-THOUGHT FOIL HATS ON MEN AND FAST

Same-sex couples have been observed in Emperor penguins. One member of the couple will go with the females to find food, while the other stays with the male. Since no egg is laid, the "male" in the couple will nurse a rock or something similar because it's an instinctual behavior. Once its mate returns with the females, it discards the rock and assists in the group raising of the other chicks.

>>735217463
>Being a shill entails me getting paid and I'm here for free.
>I'm here for free
>for free
Holy shit you guys, he is fucking doing it for free!

>>735217547
What does that has to do with two members of the same sex keeping sexual relationships with one another.

What you just described is a natural behavior where animals take care of their offspring, it has absolutely nothing to do with males having sex with males, or females having sex with females exclusively.

Apples and oranges, mate. Apples and oranges.

>>735217651
I'm not a shill you fucktard.
I'm straight and have no vested interest in promoting some gay conspiracy.
I just tend to believe empirical evidence when I read about it.

>>735217771
he's just b8n you m8

you're right, but leave it alone. if this thread was gonna in any productive direction it would have by this point

No one cares except people who wish they could stop dreaming about sucking dick..

>>735217771
>I just tend to believe empirical evidence when I read about it.
Tell me, does this "empirical" evidence coincide with what you personally believe? Also, do you understand what "empirical" evidence actually means?

>>735218031
It's not really surprising, since homosexuality cases are directly linked with insecurity, depression, and anxiety.

It's no question this is a mental disorder that afflicts the individual's ability to generate offspring naturally.

File: Senor.jpg (7KB, 280x180px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 280x180px

>>735218031
And that's the truth, Ruth

>>735218073
Are you asking me if I've considered the fact that I might have confirmation bias and whether I am aware of how the scientific method works?
Gee anon, I never thought of those things at all.
No I don't just consider the evidence valid because it makes me feel happy on the inside and yes I do in fact know how empirical evidence works.
Be a little more condescending next time, I almost didn't catch it this time.

>>735217981
Meh I'm procrastinating going to bed anyway.

>>735218364
>I do in fact know how empirical evidence works.
No, I really don't think you do.

>>735218511
Well, that sets it then, right? He's wrong.

Fucking idiot.

Human sexuality has evolved beyond traditional means.
Get over yourselves, you lonely, gutless cunts.

>>735218511
You know the asking you to be more condescending part was sarcasm right?
You weren't actually supposed to ramp it up.

File: 1305810517702.jpg (44KB, 604x453px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 604x453px

lame gay animals have existed for a long time

>>735218846
Empirical evidence is based solely on experience, or observations.
Like I said, I really don't think you understand how it works.

>>735205233
Still wrong. Some chimps fuck eachother all day and they know what's up.

File: 1257407686738.jpg (91KB, 675x597px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 675x597px

>>735216973

bullshit, all it takes is one straight sibling and your reasoning flies out the window, And since more gays have older siblings thats just stupid.

>>735216798
this was the correct no. i was replying to

>>735219315
you missed the part where he said "chance"

>>735218949
Not really.

You must be confusing submissive animals completely dominated by stronger males in order to survive, and take advantage of the protection provided by other animals. There are absolutely no cases where animals actively seek sexual intercourse with the same gender for any purpose whatsoever.

Homosexuality provides no evolutionary advantage to animals in any way, shape, or form. WTF are you even talking about?

>>735200433
fuck you

>>735219020
Experience and observations that can be reproduced, and necessarily have to be reproduced several times in order to prove that said evidence is true.
You're calling me unknowledgeable without actually knowing what I know on the subject.
You're being a condescending prick in attempt to cow me, but I won't let you cow me just because you talk down to me.
>>735219315
Look up fraternal birth order and male sexual orientation, there is some correlation to many gay men having several older male siblings and their chances of being gay.
Now I'm not saying correlation is causation, but it's a valid point to think on.

>>735219628
I hope you know it's useless to try and drive any point across a leftist preacher, if it goes against his propaganda.

He'll just shit all over your point, call you a something-o-phobe, and tell you you're anti-science.

>>735219836
Huh, and I thought I was the one being called the leftist preacher for nor considering being gay a disease.

>>735219628
>Experience and observations that can be reproduced, and necessarily have to be reproduced several times in order to prove that said evidence is true.
If it can successfully be reproduced, and can no longer be considered empirical.
You really want me to repeat it a third time?

>>735219990
It doesn't matter.

If you're not into the ENTIRE leftist narrative, you're automatically a white supremacist, science denier. It's how these people function.

>>735220120
Yes yes I know, you're right because reasons and I know nothing john snow.

>>735220155
>this is not a strawman
ok

>>735220220
I know you know nothing, but at least now YOU know, which is what matters.

>>735200433
Isn't it weird that humans act like they know something when in reality they know nothing?

Like wtf? When did we fuck up that bad?

>>735220155
You do see the irony in that, right?

>>735220287
And I'm the one being accused of having confirmation bias.

>>735204225
Yes.
Fuck this gay earth.

>>735220337
You're not doing a good job, proving otherwise. You sound like a fucking preacher spreading the holy word of homosexuality as the salvation of humanity.

>>735220471
No, you are being accused of not knowing what a word means.

>>735220528
when did he say that homosex would somehow save the world? what are you trying to say?

>>735220528
I spread all that with one sentence? Man, I must be better than I though.

>>735220155
I could have sworn it was the other way around.

If you don't like Trump, or not against all forms of socialism, you must be a libcuck.

>>735200433
Most homosexual interactions seen in animals is due to just horniness or mistaken identity. Except in aquatic cases where fish can change their own sex. I have never heard of a homosexual partnering lasting any length of time.

>>735220528
>you're wrong
>DURR HURR GUISE LOOK AT THIS FUCKING FAGGOT PREACHING HOMOSEXUALITY LIKE A LEFTY PUSSY CUCK FAGGOT!!

>>735220654
If you're blindly defending something the way you do, it's a good sign that you probably shouldn't be taken seriously at all. That's my two cents.

>>735220724
>socialism isn't always bad guys
Why am I not surprised to hear that from a gay preacher?

>>735220810
>You do see the irony in that, right
This applies nicely again.

>>735220810
What is he blindly defending?

>>735220614
Okay looked it up, what I meant was that they have done studies in this that goes beyond empirical and follows the scientific method.

>>735220859
There are facts and ideology ITT.

You brought the ideology, and others brought up the facts. I don't know what type of preaching applies to both sides, to be precise.

>>735220848
You must not like driving on paved roads or having police or firemen.

>>735220969
Sure? I don't know, I've never actually cared enough about this topic to want to get on it.
If I'm being honest I've just been wasting time replying.

>>735220979
Godking Trump will end those programs soon enough

File: 1491505944822.jpg (97KB, 866x767px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 866x767px

sexual orientation is a choice, it all just feels good to your brain

>>735221102
>/b/

Not that anon, but this is why I'm here

>>735220979
ever heard of tolls? taxes man that's the way to go

>>735221102
Huh, well at least you helped me procrastinate going to bed.

>>735200433
yes, there are gay animals. The percentage of gay animals in a population has been found to increase when stressors like overpopulation, lowering of resource availibility, etc occur. It's a way of reducing population growth.

>>735221233
Just came here to shitpost. Don't care if I'm arguing with trolls.

File: mr4chan.png (127KB, 345x337px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 345x337px

>>735205945
>better stronger more adaptable candidates than yourself

Like if I were staring at you right now lol

>>735221262
That goes against the leftist narrative, mate. I hope you're ready to have your ass handed to you for stating simple unbiased facts.

>>735221233
>implying the free market wont allow everyone to afford everything

>>735221447
and you guys say socialism is impossible

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-08 at 5.56.10 PM.png (188KB, 437x405px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 437x405px

>>735221441
>That goes against the leftist narrative, mate. I hope you're ready to have your ass handed to you for stating simple unbiased facts.
>mfw half the thread has been people basically saying this over and over again

I LOVE DICKS

>>735221385
He's right though. Even if he actually looks like that.

You do realize you are not invalidating his argument at all, right?

>>735221447
>free market

You realize in a truly free market, there's nothing stopping the rich from completely enslaving the poor.