how come brooke shields did nudes and all those other stuff when

>>734641121
Different times

It was "art"

>>734641121
the 70s were so different than today
pedophiles were viewed as needing no more than a little therapy
swinging was almost mainstream
people said nigger on tv
on and on, just a very different time
I saw pretty baby on showtime, and it was no big deal...totally naked 12 year old fucking grown men

>>734641121
Monarch

"Art". It caused quite a stir back then. It's still fucked to think they did that.

Fucking sjw's were given positions of power. aka feminism.

File: IMG_1926.jpg (113KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 640x640px

Nudity is not pornography, that's why.

>>734641418
What's so fucked up about nudes?

Google Gary Gross a woman and a child

>>734641121
How come we used to be able to lynch niggers and we wouldn't get arrested for it, but if we did it now we'd get in shit?

see >>734641257

>>734641770
It was a simpler time


A better time

File: early-photoshoot-brooke-shields-10560543-741-829.jpg (89KB, 741x829px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 741x829px

Because cuckservatives and god-believers go apeshit whenever they see skin anywhere. It could still be filmed today, but the film would receive an "A/Adult" rating and no (Jew) studio will take a chance on losing one thin dime. (Her Calvin Klein jeans ad was more controversial than this movie ever was at the time.) Thus the reason we're forever stuck watching nothing but goddamned rehashed comic book and car racing/fast/furious movies.

>>734641121
hardcore cp was legal in many parts of the world and sold on magazine stands

>>734642138
Color Climax.

>>734641121
To add to what everyone else already said, her mother gave written permission I seem to recall.

In other words, her mother whored out her own daughter. I think caught a lot of flak for that.

>>734642138
hardcore of soft?

>>734642292
Color Climax was the first to produce commercial child pornography films.[4] From 1969 to 1979, Color Climax was responsible for the relatively large-scale distribution of child pornography.[6]

Between 1971 and 1979 the company produced 36 or more 10-minute films for its Lolita series.[4][7][8] These films featured young girls, mainly with men, but sometimes with women or other children.[4][7][8] The participating girls were mainly between the ages of 7 and 11 years; however, some were younger.[4][7][8] Titles included Incest Family, Pre-Teen Sex, Sucking Daddy, and Child Love.[7]

>>734642059
liberals are sure retarded

>>734641121
because the united states has become a tragedy of a country, banning and repressing all things based on society's own insecurities

>>734642229
Aye. Those 16mm prints are still out there somewhere in some pervs loft. I know there was some guy who collected porn (not just CP) and there was a big fuss about it because he basically was keeping an archive of every porn film for historical purposes. But he got fucked over because of it or something like that.

>>734641858

Pepperidge farm remembers.

>>734641121
Good bait, FBI.
Have fun on your pedo witch hunt.

Remember everyone, she is literally a naive, innocent little child, practically an infant, until the moment she turns 18. That's when she magically becomes a sexually attractive woman.

>>734642493

shut up loser

you still get occasional young nude stuff in euro movies. baader meinhof complex is one that springs to mind.

the most recent US one i can think of is american beauty from 1999

>>734641121
dont ask stupid shit question like that, just thank the lord for lettting it happen, what are you gay?

>>734642656
Gays cry the loudest about pedos. Fact. I wonder why.

>>734642347

There was a time when that was legal?

goddamn...

>>734642656
>>734642721
you beat me to it. you can tell english is not his first language so i doubt he'll understand what you meant, sadly.

>>734641121
Because it's illegal now.

>>734642917
but its not though. as long as it isn't sexualised, its perfectly legal.
Any studio that made a film with child nudity would probably be committing commercial suicide though, because of over reacting triggered types

Go to qwant. Turn off safe search. Search for pimpandhost. You're welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peF8XTrUOsA

made in 1984

>>734643232
stop cunt.

Be me in 1978. Take girlfriend to a drive in theater to see Pretty Baby.
Girlfriend sucking my dick during the hottest scene of PB.

Came buckets.

>>734642858
You are wrong, english is my first language.

Because it's important to go after 77 year old wheelchair jockeys for the crime of being a 17 year old janitor at a ww2 concentration camp, but not worth the trouble to go after a "celebrity" who ran a mouseketeers casting couch.

>>734643031
Pretty Baby was about a 12 year old in a brothel getting fucked by adult men
Pretty sure that's sexualized.

>>734643231
That is a lot of philosophy to wade through just to masturbate

>>734642347
>produced 36 or more 10-minute films for its Lolita series
>10-minute films

I guess they were so good they didn't need to be any longer to um, serve there purpose?

>>734642493
kek

>>734643938
16mm film needed to be compact and cheap enough to transport

>>734641121
People respected the law back then. And the law once distinguished between nudity and sex and prurient interests.

I saw the Traci Lords Penthouse spread when I was a teenager. I had no idea she was maybe 15 or 16 at the time

>>734643938
Yeah, but 16mm film, so they were pretty shitty quality. There will never be any commercially produced blu ray quality CP.

>>734643938
how long it take you to jerk off man, wtf if you ent buisting a nut in 2-3 mins then you gay

>>734643849
you never see her doing any stuff, the scenes always cut before the event. no close ups on the genitals either. If it was illegal, the movie would be withdrawn from print. its still available on amazon in the UK and US, and still shown on TV occasionally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5H-TQq-ILg

kek

>>734644166
It is illegal in some states.

>>734641121
bcoz its hollywood.

>>734644250
the 16:9 cropped version is legal because it crops out that one "problematic" scene in the bathroom

If you go to liveomg com and look at the amount of preteen girls whoring themselves out on cam it is no wonder there are so many pedos out there.

>>734644250
it has never been banned in any US state.

>>734644098

One of the few VHS cassettes I bought was one of the first Traci films, I think it cost like 60 bucks or so.

>>734642408
idiot

>>734645073
gay

>>734641121
she was not nude!

>>734642347


I'd execute everyone involved, burn their bodies in a bonfire, then fuck the ashes.

Then I'd have a snack.

>>734641362
Lyrics to a Frank Zappa song from the 1970s:

Nasty nasty nasty
Only thirteen, and she knows how to nasty

She's a dirty young mind, corrupted
Corroded
Well she's thirteen today
And I hear she gets loaded

If she were my daughter, I'd...
...
Smother my daughter in chocolate syrup
And strap her on again, oh baby
Smother that girl in chocolate syrup
And strap her on again, oh baby
She's my teen-age baby
She turns me on
I'd like to make her do a nasty
On the White House lawn
Smother my daughter in chocolate syrup
And boogie 'till the cows come home

No one was shocked or horrified. It was the 1970s

It should have been illegal then, too.

>>734646727
probably inspired that dr rockso song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOYVNss_tJI

>>734642919
das CP dude she was 15 then

>>734648239
It's okay, it counts as art

>>734641121
Pretty Baby was directed by a respected French director, Louis Malle. And it was tasteful nudity.