Am I the only commie on /b/? I feel like they whole MAGA and

>>734523254
wages cucks inc
they must defend their bosses

>>734523254
Everybody who wants Trump to save the jobs of coal miners is a commie. The market has declared those jobs dead and the government is interfering. So to answer your question, OP, all the MAGA-fags are commies. They're just too fucking stupid to know it. They're too fucking stupid to know much at all.

>>734523420
....but they always are screaming about muh free market and how "libtards are dirty commies"

As if any of you ever read the communist manifesto or even understand the basic ideas behind dialectical materialism. You're all bourgeois-individualists and disgrace to every communist.

>>734523254 Both capitalist's and gommie's allow jews to rise they are both shit

fascism for the win

>>734523531
Then they vote for a command economy and make death threats against people who insist that the U.S. economy cannot eternally be like people pretend it was in the 1950s

>>734523254
/pol/ is dead m8. i suggest u find some other chan for political discourse

>>734523994
A spectre is haunting 4chan: the spectre of your faggotry.

>>734523254
https://youtu.be/QiPxPHNrIek

nobody is actually a commie people just like to pretend to be commies because they are contradictory faggots and go against the status quo to self differentiate because their life is otherwise meaningless

>>734523254
Not a ML, but definitely a leftist, unlike the lousy Democrats.

>>734523254
>only communist
No, you aren't alone. There are tons of 12 year olds with little understanding of political/economic realities on /b/.

Face it. You aren't a communist. You're just a reactionary. This is your way of trying to stick it to the man. Nothing more.

Im a communist, many are

4chan is predominantly american and people are heavily uneducated and ignorant. they think liberalism and idpol is left, havent even heard of hegel or dialectics etc. on this aspect, even /leftypol/ is trash

>>734523994
i've read 2 volumes of the capital. unfortunately, im doing a phd in stem atm and its preventing me from reading heavy literature with a clear mind. i do plan on getting a masters on philosophy once i get tenure somewhere though.

>>734525491
>There are tons of 12 year olds with little understanding of political/economic realities on /b/.

anyone who understands economics is either a communist or a bourgeois.

and no anon, bernie sanders and obama aren't communists

>>734525978
>4chan is predominantly american and people are heavily uneducated and ignorant
>they think liberalism and idpol is left
Sadly true. A lot of the working class in this country has sold out to two parties that merely exploit them. Part of the issue is the capitalist media pitting people against each other over perceived differences. It's a disgrace that this has happened to America.

>>734525491
>You're just a reactionary
This could be true. I think the same can be said for Democrats and Republicans, though.

There's nothing stopping you from creating your own communist society under libertarianism.
You cannot create a libertarian society under communism.
For this reason alone libertarianism is better

>>734526487
This is true, actually. Marxism-Leninism failed to realize a Communist society. Left-Libertarianism might succeed, however, as the economy would actually be in the hands of the people.

>>734523254
I'm more of a classical liberal. I hate Trump. There are certain industries capitalism is great and others not so much (e.g. Healthcare, education, disability, climate change, medical research).

File: IMG_5766.png (62KB, 747x526px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 747x526px

>>734523254
Consider suicide.

http://myweb.fsu.edu/jsc07e/Documents/Papers/Connors%20-%20Economic%20Institutions%20and%20Global%20Poverty.pdf

>>734526487
right wing libertarianism implies private property. if the means of production are privately owned, its the polar opposite of communism

>>734526762
what do you even think that picture proves?

>>734526603
Left-Libertarianism cannot exist because you need a strong government to enforce equality of wealth
You cannot be a Libertarian if you support a strong government

>>734526772
There's literally nothing stopping you from relinquishing the ownership of your factory to the workers.

>>734526762
Hence why America has so many in poverty. Our "free market" isn't really free. I'm not a Marxist-Leninist either, just not a supporter of American economics.

>>734526895
>There's literally nothing stopping you from relinquishing the ownership of your factory to the workers

ofc i wont. the workers are the ones that are screwed, not the capitalist

>>734523254
Based on a few political tests, I'm put in the neoliberal category. Pro-military and universal healthcare. Voted for HRC. Wanted her to blow Syria away.

>>734526895
>Left-Libertarianism cannot exist because you need a strong government to enforce equality of wealth

Wrong. If the economy were actually controlled by the people, instead of corporations or the state, we wouldn't see nearly as much greed and unfairness as we see now.

>You cannot be a Libertarian if you support a strong government

I never said I supported a strong government.

>>734526603
The institutions which eventually became the Soviet Union were founded on the principles of anarchism. Marx himself was an anarchist and he openly advised the paris commune to form an authoritarian central government when it looked like it wasn't working out.

The only reason people turn to left-authoritarianism is explicitly because left-libertarianism fails. Ask yourself why anyone would willingly identify as an authoritarian if their ideology didn't necessitate it?

>>734526959
You don't know what "poverty" means. Less than 2,000 people die of malnutrition in the United States annually. There are exponentially more deaths related to obesity each year than to starvation. If you live in the US, you are not poor.

http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/cause-of-death/malnutrition/by-country/

>>734527143
Sorry, I meant that if you support any government in general, you can't really call yourself a libertarian.

What exactly do you mean by having the economy controlled by the people and how would it redistribute wealth equally between everyone while maintaining economic freedom?

>>734523420
What the fuck, doing the biddings of capitalist corporations is NOT communism. Communism is the movement which aims to abolish capitalist wage relations in its entirety

>>734526836
It says what right on the image.

Lmao

I wouldn't admit it to most of the people I know, but I respect real communism as an ideology. I can see why you'd want to strive for it. HOWEVER, I think it's completely and utterly unrealistic. Personally, for the real world I'm natsoc, and for the hypothetical perfect world I'm minarchist.

>>734523254

If it were not for capitalism you would not be using fuckin' internet, fag. Capitalism has formed our world and society, lefty

>>734528444
>im retarded and uneducated: the post

Marxism says mankind's institutions are more valuable than mankind itself.

It's retarded. Anyone that believes in it is brainwashed/retarded.

File: make-it-rain.jpg (1MB, 2500x1407px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2500x1407px

Capitalism works.
Communism doesn't.

History has demonstrated this. Nothing you can possibly say ITT will change that.