Atheists believe in atoms without proof. However, they deny God's

>>734515300
I POSTED IT AGAIN XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
SAGE GOES IN ALL FIELDS

File: who the fuck you talkin to.jpg (2MB, 1067x3130px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1067x3130px

>>734515300
the neverending shitpost endures

>>734515300
No.

>>734515355
damn just realized its neverending shitposting

Here goes the bait

>>734515300
Please don't get them started. Everyone is happier when they just sit in the corner and color.

>>734515300
Kys

>>734515300
there's proof of atoms

>>734515300
oh this faggotry again

>>734515505
>>734515496
>>734515460
>>734515429
>>734515416
>>734515403
>>734515381
Let's all just give the shitty bait free bumps xD

Seeing them subatomic microscopes proof enough? This is your worst bait yet. Now if you'd said electrons maybe you'd have a semblance of an argument, but no ones expecting much of you.

I'd love to find out one day this is Dawkins, 'testing the faithful'

>Have nuclear fission technology
"No proof of atoms"
>Have a full Periodic table with detailed information about each element (atom)

Why do I sense that OP is an ameritard?

Also, saged

>>734515300
Atoms without proof?
You do know we have machines that can detect those right?
This straw man is one of the flimsiest you've ever come up with op.
Also you wan't us to disprove god, can you prove god?
If not we're at an impasse.

File: TWERK.300.gif (498KB, 500x234px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 500x234px

>>734515300
Atom smashing

>>734516214
want*

We meet again...Bait.

>>734516320
Different from what?

>>734515300
Believe in atoms without proof?.......wut. just because you convfefe; doesnt mean everyone else does too.

>>734515300
yep
every morning i get out of bed, turn on my comp, and there you are with yet another absurd claim of christian versus atheist beliefs.

so i post a reply (or not) and then leave 4chan.
this is good business for mook?
where are the janitors when you need shit pounded down to the point where the shitposter gives up?
probably jacking it to traps.

oh well. have a great day, my fellow /b/tards, i'm off to work and thoughts of a more concrete nature.

>>734516452
I have a theory about this thread being posted by a mod, who seems to think agnostic is a position and not a qualifier.